Summary: Ref T8116. Add search-by-name and per-package / per-publisher search to Packages.
Test Plan: Searched publishers, packages, versions by name. Searched packages by publisher. Searched versions by package.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16320
Summary:
Ref T8116. A version has:
- a package (like "Arcanist") which it belongs to;
- a name (like "v3.1.5").
The name is immutable and unique, like the package key and publisher key.
Policy stuff:
- Versions have the exact same policies as their packages.
- You must be able to edit a package to create new versions of it.
This is still entirely uninteresting.
Test Plan: {F1731703}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16316
Summary:
Ref T8116. A package has:
- a publisher (like "Phacility"), from the previous revision;
- a name (like "Arcanist");
- a package key (like "arcanist").
The package key is immutable, like the publisher key.
This gives a package a full key like "phacility/arcanist".
Policy stuff:
- You must be able to view a publisher to view a package (currently, everyone can always see all publishers).
- You must be able to edit a publisher to create a new package inside it.
- Packages have separate view/edit permissions.
This still does nothing interesting.
Test Plan: {F1731663}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16315
Summary:
Ref T8116. Partially scavenged from D14152. This roughs in a new Packages application for Arcanist extensions and third-party applications, and adds a "Publisher" object.
A "Publisher" represents an individual or entity who is publishing a package, like "Phacility". It's explicitly //not// necessarily the original author -- just the primary entity vouching for the safety of the code.
A publisher just has a name and a unique key for now. For example, Phacility might have "Phacility" and "phacility", respectively.
Unique keys are immutable, e.g., the package "phacility/arcanist" will always be exactly the same package by exactly the same publisher.
Test Plan: {F1731621}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16314
Summary:
Ref T11326. This isn't perfect, but should be a little easier to use and less weird/confusing.
Generally, provide a "Query > Month > Day" crumb on day views, and a "Wed, July 3" header.
Generally, provide a "Query > Month" crumb on month views, and a "July 2019" header.
Also try to fix a bit of padding/spacing on the day view.
Test Plan: {F1739128}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16338
Summary:
Ref T11326. When viewing "February", add a class to dates in January and March to let them be styled a little differently as a UI hint.
For now, I've given them a grey background. (Calendar.app changes the date number color instead.)
Test Plan: {F1738990}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16336
Summary:
Ref T11326. This doesn't go quite as far as the mock in T11326#185932, but gets rid of the easy margins.
Also cleans up some of the border rules so they're simpler and more consistent (no weird ragged edges on the far right).
Test Plan: {F1738951}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16335
Summary:
Ref T11326. Currently, we link Calendar days using hidden DOM nodes.
This is nice because it's simple, and right-clicking a day works properly. However, it's a bit ugly/unintuitive, messy, and unclear. It's especially messy because days are really two different rows, one for events and one for day/week numbers.
Instead, use JS to highlight day cells. You can still right-click by clicking the actual day number, which seems like a reasonable compromise.
Test Plan: {F1738941}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16334
Summary: When we have an info view in a column, the css isn't specific enough to override the core info-view css.
Test Plan: Review an importing repository, see info view properly spaced.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16331
Summary: This padding is a little off / custom. Normalizes it to the form on mobile.
Test Plan: Review some settings forms, save form changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16330
Summary: Mobile forms are super tight, this opens them up a little bit.
Test Plan: Review editing a document, task, mobile, tablet.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16329
Summary:
Fix T11339.
Now, old and new are both simple lists of phids, and the rendering should make sense.
Test Plan: Viewed existing transaction with all 3 states.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11339
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16311
Summary: Ref T11326. This just cleans things up a little and removes some of the obvious layout/CSS issues.
Test Plan:
- Viewed day view before/after. Also viewed profile panel.
Before:
{F1725547}
After:
{F1725548}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16308
Summary:
Ref T11326. This just inches things forward a little bit:
- Make it easier to see current day.
- Line-through cancelled events.
- Don't colorize the whole event title, just use an Attending/Invited/Custom icon.
- Slightly subtler treatment for all-day events.
Test Plan: See screenshot in T11326.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16306
Summary:
Ref T11326. Normally, events occur at a specific epoch, independent of the viewer. For example, if we're having a meeting in 35 hours, every user who looks at the event will see that it starts 35 hours from now.
But when an event is "All Day", the start time and end time depend on the //viewer//. A day like "Christmas" does not start at the same time for everyone: it starts sooner if you're in a more-eastern timezone. Baiscally, an event on "July 15th" starts whenever "July 15th" starts for whoever is looking at it.
Previously, we stored these events by using the western-most and eastern-most timezones as the start and end times (the earliest possible start and latest possible end).
This worked OK, but we get into a bunch of trouble with EditEngine, mostly because each field can be updated individually now. We can't easily tell if an event is all-day or not when reading or updating the start time and end time, and making that easier would introduce a huge amount of complexity.
Instead, when we update the start or end time, we write //two// times:
- The epoch timestamp of the time the user entered, which is the start time we will use if the event is a normal event.
- The epoch timestamp of 12:00 AM in UTC on the same date as the //local// date the user entered. This is pretty much like just storing the date the user actually typed. This is what w'ell use if the event is an all-day event.
Then, no matter whether the event is later made all-day or not, we have all the information we need to display it correctly.
Test Plan:
- Created and edited all-day events.
- Migrated existing all-day events, which appeared to survive without problems. (Note that events all-day which were created or edited in the last couple of days `master` won't survive this mutation correctly and will need to be fixed.)
- Created and edited normal, recurring, and recurring all-day events.
- Swapped back to `stable`, created an event, specifically migrated it forward, made sure it survived with times intact.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16305
Summary: Ref T10909. Ref T9224. We label this field "Host" in the UI; make the storage format consistent.
Test Plan:
- Viewed month view, day view, detail view of an event.
- Created a new event, saw myself as the host.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9224, T10909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16291
Summary: Fixes T9202.
Test Plan:
- Viewed day in 12-hour, saw "8:00 PM".
- Viewed day in 24-hour, saw "16:00".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9202, T10932
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16290
Summary:
Ref T9275. When you create a recurring event which recurs forever, we want to avoid writing an infinite number of rows to the database.
Currently, we write a row to the database right before you edit the event. Until then, we refer to it as `E123/999` or whatever ("instance 999 of event 123").
This creates a big mess with trying to make recurring events work with EditEngine, Subscriptions, Projects, Flags, Tokens, etc -- all of this stuff assumes that whatever you're working with has a PHID.
I poked at letting this stuff work without a PHID a little bit, but that looked like a gigantic mess.
Instead, generate an event "stub" a little sooner (when you look at the event detail page). This is basically just an ID/PHID to refer to the instance.
Then, when you edit the stub, "materialize" it into a real event.
This still has some issues, but I think it's more promising than the other approach was.
Also:
- Removes dead user profile calendar controller.
- Replaces comments with EditEngine comments.
Test Plan:
- Commented on a recurring event.
- Awarded tokens to a recurring event.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16248
Summary:
Fixes T11307. Fixes T8124. Currently, builtin files are tracked by using a special transform with an invalid source ID.
Just use a dedicated column instead. The transform thing is too clever/weird/hacky and exposes us to issues with the "file" and "transform" tables getting out of sync (possibly the issue in T11307?) and with race conditions.
Test Plan:
- Loaded profile "edit picture" page, saw builtins.
- Deleted all builtin files, put 3 second sleep in the storage engine write, loaded profile page in two windows.
- Before patch: one of them failed with a race.
- After patch: both of them loaded.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8124, T11307
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16271
Summary: Fixes T11305, Ref T7754. Makes this menu dropdown act like actions and collapse to a fa-bars menu.
Test Plan:
View on mobile, desktop, browser. Click an action, spawn new page.
{F1717953}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T7754, T11305
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16265
Summary: fix T11290.
Test Plan: Paste language type, view in web and in emails (It uses quotes in HTML emails, which I think is something else).
Reviewers: epriestley, chad, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: chad, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11290
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16252
Summary: Ref T10252. This is similar to D16259, but makes KeyboardShortcutManager more relaxed about `altKey` when typing obscure characters.
Test Plan: Pressed Option + Shift + 7 on a German keyboard layout, saw Conphernece sidebar toggle.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10252
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16260
Summary:
Ref T10252. On the German keyboard layout, you must type "Alt" + "L" to generate an "@" character.
We currently ignore this event, assuming it's a keyboard command. However, I think we can safely continue so that autocomplete works on German layouts.
Test Plan:
- Switched keyboard layout to German.
- Typed Alt + L to generate an "@".
- Typed some username text.
- Got autocompleter.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10252
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16259
Summary: Ref T9360. These weren't getting set properly, also make them nullable since they're optional.
Test Plan: run upgrade, make a new blog with and without a parent domain. Edit a current blog.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9360
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16242
Summary:
Ref T9360. Moves PhamePost to CommentEditEngine.
[x] HTTP Parameters dropdown on New Post goes to 404
[x] Implement EditEngine Comments
Test Plan: Make Post, Make Comment, Laugh.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9360
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16222
Summary: Ref T11244. 8 more tokens. Probably need better math on the selector?
Test Plan: Award Dat Boi.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: putnam, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11244
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16228
Summary: Ref T4788. It's not easy to tell at a glance which objects are open vs closed. Try to make that a bit more clear. This could probably use some more tweaking.
Test Plan: {F1708330}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16219
Summary:
Ref T4788. This fixes all the bugs I was immediately able to catch:
- "Directory-Like" graph shapes could draw too many vertical lines.
- "Reverse-Directory-Like" graph shapes could draw too few vertical lines.
- Terminated, branched graph shapes drew the very last line to the wrong place.
This covers the behavior with tests, so we should be able to fix more stuff later without breaking anything.
Test Plan:
- Added failing tests and made them pass.
{F1708158}
{F1708159}
{F1708160}
{F1708161}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16216
Summary: New tokens, slightly larger (18x18 vs 16x16). I think these all feel decent, I might tweak the thumbs icons a little more color-wise.
Test Plan:
Use Tokens.
{F1707411}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11244
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16211
Summary: Ref T10628. Cleans up remaining weird, unused tab behaviors in ObjectBoxView to simplify ObjectBox.
Test Plan: Toggled tabs in Files.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10628
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16208
Summary:
Ref T4788. When closing a task as a duplicate of another task, you can only select one task, since it doesn't really make sense to merge one task into several other tasks (this operation is //possible//, but probably not what anyone ever wants to do, I think?).
Make the UI understand this: after you select a task, disable all of the "select" buttons in the UI to make this clear.
Test Plan:
- Used "Close as Duplicate", only allowed to select 1 task.
- Used other editors like "Merge Duplicates In", allowed to select lots of tasks.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16203
Summary: Fixes T11236, breaks long words and inlines the spans.
Test Plan:
Use a diff with super long text like SSH keys, set Font to 24/48 Impact
{F1705910}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11236
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16198
Summary:
Fixes T11225. The primary issue here is that this rule is bleeding down too far. It appears that it's only intended to put space around the inline as a whole.
Spacing still isn't //perfect// since a few other rules are bleeding, but it feels reasonable now instead of being clearly broken.
Test Plan:
- Added "background: red;" to figure out what was being affected.
- Before:
{F1704081}
- After:
{F1704084}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11225
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16184
Summary:
Ref T9838.
Add a Properties field to Revision, and update a `wasAcceptedBeforeClose` when closing a revision.
Test Plan:
A quick run through the obvious steps (Close with commit/manually, with or w/o accept) and calling `differential.query` shows the `wasAcceptedBeforeClose` property was setup correctly.
Pushing closed + accepted passes the relevant herald, which was my immediate issue; Pushing un-accepted is blocked.
Test the "commit" rule (Different from "pre-commit") by hacking the DB and running the "has accepted revision" rule in a test-console.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T9838
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15085
Summary: We haven't refreshed this in a while.
Test Plan: Saw unit test times drop about 1.5 seconds locally.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16176
Summary: Ref T9897. This moves "Domain" to "DomainFullURI" to allow setting of https or for some reason, a port. I guess.
Test Plan: Try to break by setting a path, or fake protocol. Set to http, or https, see correct redirects. Verify domain still gets written.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16173
Summary: Fixes T11209. We want to always break tags when displaying them in a list, but not in general (remarkup).
Test Plan: Fake a tag on a differental revision with a really long name. See wrapping.
Reviewers: avivey, epriestley
Reviewed By: avivey, epriestley
Subscribers: avivey, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11209
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16175
Summary: Fixes T11166. Adds some class, and space to the preview widget.
Test Plan: Test Maniphest, Ponder, etc, without a footer.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11166
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16168
Summary:
Ref T11179. Ref T4768. Currently, on `master`, if two users open "Edit Revisions" at the same time, then add revisions A and B, only the last state wins (just "B").
Instead, apply these as "add A" and "add B" so they merge in a natural way.
Test Plan:
- Opened edit dialog in two windows.
- Added "A" in one, "B" in the other.
- Saved both.
- Saw "Added A" and "Added B" transactions, instead of "Added A" and "Removed A, added B".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16164
Summary: Just removing the animation for now, can't find anything decent, I think that the issue is the animation is applying to all items in the list, and not just as a list as a single block. That is, I'd like to slide down all three at one. Any animation that slides them down when attached to each item makes them overlap at the first frame and it's a little distracting. Not a big deal to leave this out for now. Whatever we come up with should likely be applied to phuix-dropdown as well.
Test Plan: Clicky Clicky.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16159
Summary:
Ref T11179. Alternative to D16152. I think this turned out a bit better than the other one did.
Currently, we render two copies of the menu (one for mobile, one for desktop). A big chunk of this is sharing the nodes instead: when you open the mobile dropdown menu, it steals the nodes from the document. When you close it, it puts them back. Magic! Sneaky!
Test Plan:
{F1695499}
{F1695500}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16157
Summary: Ref T11034. Ref T4788. This allows you to resize the typeahead browse dialog if you want. I plan to let you resize the object selector dialog in the future.
Test Plan: {F1695433}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788, T11034
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16156
Summary:
Ref T11034. This seems a little more promising. Two problems at the moment:
- This doesn't actually provide any useful information at all right now.
- Many object types have no profile images.
Test Plan:
{F1695254}
{F1695255}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11034
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16155
