Summary:
After D857, we try to attach local commit information to revisions. If this
information is available, display it on the revision.
Design on this is a little rough, I might try to combine this into the revision
update view or something like that since we're starting to take up a lot of real
estate for metadata.
Test Plan: Local diffed this and got some commit info.
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 872
don't show "Undo"
Summary: When a user hits "Reply" on an inline comment, doesn't type anything,
and then hits "Cancel", we incorrectly store the text of the comment the user is
replying to as the "original" text, and then detect that they've changed it when
they immediately cancel. Instead, store empty string as the original text.
Test Plan:
- Hit "Reply" and then "Cancel" on an inline comment. No undo now.
- Hit "Reply", typed some text, and then hit "Cancel". Got an undo which
restored my text.
Reviewers: tomo, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran, tomo
Differential Revision: 879
Summary:
When an object is updated, record the content source for the update. This mostly
isn't terribly useful but one concrete thing I want to do with it is let admins
audit via-email replies more easily since there are a bunch of options which let
you do hyjinx if you intentionally configure them insecurely. I think having a
little more auditability around this feature is generally good. At some point
I'm going to turn this into a link admins can click to see details.
It also allows us to see how frequently different mechanisms are used, and lets
you see if someone is at their desk or on a mobile or whatever, at least
indirectly.
The "tablet" and "mobile" sources are currently unused but I figured I'd throw
them in anyway. SMS support should definitely happen at some point.
Not 100% sure about the design for this, I might change it to plain text at some
point.
Test Plan: Updated objects and saw update sources rendered.
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 844
Summary: cpiro reported a cache inconsistency issue from a push a while ago
which this should fix (see #?????), and we haven't sync'd in a while anyway.
Test Plan: Poked some interfaces very gently.
Reviewers: cpiro, cpojer, tomo, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: tomo
CC: aran, epriestley, tomo, cpiro
Differential Revision: 859
Summary:
We don't currently validate CSRF tokens on this workflow. This allows an
attacker to upload arbitrary files on the user's behalf. Although I believe the
tight list of servable mime-types means that's more or less the end of the
attack, this is still a vulnerability.
In the long term, the right solution is probably to pass CSRF tokens on all Ajax
requests in an HTTP header (or just a GET param) or something like that.
However, this endpoint is unique and this is the quickest and most direct way to
close the hole.
Test Plan:
- Drop-uploaded files to Files, Maniphest, Phriction and Differential.
- Modified CSRF vaidator to use __csrf__.'x' and verified uploads and form
submissions don't work.
Reviewers: andrewjcg, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, erling
Commenters: andrewjcg, pedram
CC: aran, epriestley, andrewjcg, pedram
Differential Revision: 758
Summary:
This is a very small step toward building a Status and possibly an Oncall tool.
Build a calendar view which renders months.
Much of my hesitance to bang these tools out is that dealing with
dates/calendaring is basically horrible, so I'm trying to ease into it.
This calendar is locale-aware and all that jazz.
Test Plan:
- See:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/view/PHID-FILE-c07a9c663a7d040d2529/
- Verified that months have the right number of days, today is the right day
of the week, months begin on the day after previous months end on, etc.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Commenters: cwbeck, jungejason
CC: blair, aran, epriestley, cwbeck, jungejason
Differential Revision: 791
Summary:
We use ObjectHandles as proxy objects which can refer to any other object in the
system. Add the concept of the underlying object's "status" (e.g., open, closed
or busy).
This allows us to render completed tasks and revisions with strikethrough. In
the future, if we implement OOO or something, we could render users with a
"busy" status if they're on vacation, etc.
Test Plan: Viewed a task with closed revisions and dependencies:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/view/PHID-FILE-6183e81286fa3288d33d/
Reviewed By: codeblock
Reviewers: codeblock, hunterbridges, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, codeblock
Differential Revision: 772
Summary:
Not totally sure I'm in love with this but I think it's somewhat non-terrible,
despite the lack of lens flare.
Also made "Cancel" take you back to the task if you got to "Create" from "Create
Another Task".
Test Plan:
- Style:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/view/PHID-FILE-ad37d3c1f3b2c7a7a7d1/
- Hit "Cancel" from "Create Another", got sent back to task.
- Hit "Cancel" from normal create, got sent back to list.
- Tried to save an invalid task after making changes to CC/Projects, changes
were preserved.
Reviewed By: codeblock
Reviewers: hunterbridges, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran, codeblock
CC: aran, epriestley, codeblock
Differential Revision: 736
Summary:
This allows you to edit dependencies. It is a better patch than it used to be.
It depends on D725.
- If you create a cycle, it just throws an exception and aborts the workflow.
It should not do this.
- Tasks which depend on the current task aren't shown in the UI. Need to add a
new table for this.
- Transaction text says "attached Task" but should probably say "added a
dependency on task".
Test Plan: Created valid and invalid dependencies between tasks. Created valid
and invalid dependencies between revisions.
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: davidreuss, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Commenters: codeblock
CC: aran, codeblock, tuomaspelkonen, epriestley
Differential Revision: 595
Summary:
This gets all the major pieces working. Allows you to drag-and-drop files in
Differential and Phriction, and embed files in remarkup with {Fxxx} references.
See also task.
I'm explicitly not documenting this yet since it's still pretty rough.
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped stuff into Differential and Phriction.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran, tomo
Commenters: tomo
CC: aran, tomo, jungejason
Differential Revision: 674
Summary:
- There's no way you can figure out the ID of a file right now. Expose that
more prominently.
- Put the drag-and-drop uploader on the main page so you don't have to click
through.
- Restore the basic uploader so IE users can theoretically use the suite I
guess? Added author info to basic uploader.
- Show author information in the table.
- Show date information in the table.
- Link file names.
- Rename table for filter views.
- When you upload one file, just jump to it. When you upload multiple files,
jump to your uploads and highlight them.
- Add an "arc download" hint.
Test Plan: Uploaded single files, groups of files, and files via simple
uploader.
Reviewers: codeblock, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Commenters: codeblock
CC: aran, codeblock, epriestley
Differential Revision: 746
Summary:
Currently, you can only edit your own affiliation to projects. Enable users to
be managed in a more reasonable batched way.
I'll lock this down to admins/owners and add a transaction log at some point.
Test Plan: Edited project affiliations. Verified Herald still works.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 677
Summary:
This is really rough and needs work (particularly, there's some diff code I
really need to refactor since I sort-of-copy-pasted it) but basically
functional.
Show text changes between diffs and allow users to revert to earlier versions.
Differential's line-oriented diff style isn't ideal for large blocks of text but
I'm betting this is probably good enough in most cases. We can see how bad it is
in practice and then fix it if needbe.
I added a bunch of support for "description" but didn't add the feature in this
diff, I'll either follow up or task it out since it should be a pretty
straightforward change.
Test Plan: Looked at history for several Phriction documents, clicked "previous
change" / "next change", clicked revert buttons.
Reviewed By: hsb
Reviewers: hsb, codeblock, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, hsb, epriestley
Differential Revision: 687
Summary: When a JX.Request fails, there's no default error handling. Rather than
write some kind of custom stuff, just use JX.Workflow so we get exception
dialogs. We have plans to enhance these anyway (see T302).
Test Plan: Changed the changeset view controller to throw exceptions. Verified I
got un-mysterious exception dialogs when a changeset failed because of an
exception in either initial rendering or after hitting "see more".
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran, tomo
CC: aran, epriestley, tomo
Differential Revision: 679
Summary: Preview Phriction documents as they are edited, similar to how
Differential/Maniphest work.
Test Plan: Mashed my keyboard while editing a Phriction document.
Reviewed By: hsb
Reviewers: hsb, codeblock, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, hsb
Differential Revision: 684
Summary:
We currently cycle CSRF tokens every hour and check for the last two valid ones.
This means that a form could go stale in as little as an hour, and is certainly
stale after two.
When a stale form is submitted, you basically get a terrible heisen-state where
some of your data might persist if you're lucky but more likely it all just
vanishes. The .js file below outlines some more details.
This is a pretty terrible UX and we don't need to be as conservative about CSRF
validation as we're being. Remedy this problem by:
- Accepting the last 6 CSRF tokens instead of the last 1 (i.e., pages are
valid for at least 6 hours, and for as long as 7).
- Using JS to refresh the CSRF token every 55 minutes (i.e., pages connected
to the internet are valid indefinitely).
- Showing the user an explicit message about what went wrong when CSRF
validation fails so the experience is less bewildering.
They should now only be able to submit with a bad CSRF token if:
- They load a page, disconnect from the internet for 7 hours, reconnect, and
submit the form within 55 minutes; or
- They are actually the victim of a CSRF attack.
We could eventually fix the first one by tracking reconnects, which might be
"free" once the notification server gets built. It will probably never be an
issue in practice.
Test Plan:
- Reduced CSRF cycle frequency to 2 seconds, submitted a form after 15
seconds, got the CSRF exception.
- Reduced csrf-refresh cycle frequency to 3 seconds, submitted a form after 15
seconds, got a clean form post.
- Added debugging code the the csrf refresh to make sure it was doing sensible
things (pulling different tokens, finding all the inputs).
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 660
Summary:
A few minor things:
- Add Phriction to the homepage.
- Link to remarkup reference on the edit screen.
- Add a help tab with a super basic help document.
Test Plan: Cursory inspection.
Reviewed By: codeblock
Reviewers: hsb, codeblock, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, codeblock
Differential Revision: 655
Summary: Provide a (mostly useless, currently) table of document edits.
Test Plan: Looked at document history for several of my high-quality sandbox
wiki pages.
Reviewed By: hsb
Reviewers: hsb, codeblock, jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, hsb
Differential Revision: 644
Summary:
This is another chunk of D636, I just simplified it a bit and added slugs.
When you go to a page like /w/pokemon/, it allows you to create or edit the
page.
Title vs slug stuff is a little funky but I think mostly-reasonable.
Test Plan: Created and edited /w/, /w/pokemon/, etc.
Reviewed By: hsb
Reviewers: hsb, codeblock, jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, hsb
Differential Revision: 643
Summary:
- Services: Show summary panel of total service call costs and relative page weight.
- Services: Add "Analyze Query Plans" button, which issues EXPLAIN for each query and flags problems.
- XHPRof: iframe the profile.
Test Plan: Used the new query plan analysis to find missing keys causing table scans, see D627.
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC:
Differential Revision: 628
Summary: Basic hookup for Differential -> Feed. Also introduces "one-line"
stories for less-important stuff.
Test Plan: Interacted with some revisions, got feed stories out of it.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen, codeblock
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 632
Summary:
We don't currently add CCs, but should (similar to how Differential works).
This also fixes some problems where you can get no-op CC transactions, and makes
mentions a little less aggressively colored.
Test Plan: Applied a bunch of CC/mention transactions to tasks and observed the
behavior.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran, codeblock
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 634
Summary: Make this more usable. Also fix a bug where $choices got overriden by a
loop variable.
Test Plan: Looked at a vote with multiple respondents.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran, codeblock
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 629
Summary: Port slowvote. This has some style/layout roughness but gets us most of
the way there. I'll followup to fix some of the markup issues.
Test Plan: Created and voted in several different kinds of poll.
Reviewed By: codeblock
Reviewers: codeblock, tomo, jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen
Commenters: aran, jungejason
CC: aran, codeblock, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 613
Summary:
Make it prettier, paginate, add user pictures, show document types, clean some
stuff up a little. Plenty of room for improvement but this should make it a lot
more useful.
Test Plan:
Here's what the new one looks like:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/view/PHID-FILE-edce2b83c2e3a121c2b7/
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: tomo, jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen, mroch
Commenters: tomo
CC: aran, tomo, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 545
Summary:
We currently have only an "Add reviewers" action, add "Add CCs". This can also
be accomplished less-discoverably with mentions.
Test Plan:
Added reviewers and CCs to revisions. Toggled display between reviewers and CCs.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: tomo, mroch, jsp, jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 521
Summary:
Maniphest is missing some keys and some query strategy which will make it
cumbersome to manage more than a few tens of thousands of tasks.
Test Plan:
Handily manipulated 100k-scale task groups. Maniphest takes about 250ms to
select and render pages of 1,000 tasks and has no problem paging and filtering
them, etc. We should be good to scale to multiple millions of tasks with these
changes.
Reviewed By: gc3
Reviewers: fratrik, jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen, gc3
Commenters: jungejason
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley, gc3, jungejason
Differential Revision: 534
Summary:
Replace some more date() calls with locale-aware calls.
Also, at least on my system, the DateTimeZone / DateTime stuff didn't actually
work and always rendered in UTC. Fixed that.
Test Plan:
Viewed daemon console, differential revisions, files, and maniphest timestamps
in multiple timezones.
Reviewed By: toulouse
Reviewers: toulouse, fratrik, jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, toulouse
Differential Revision: 530
Summary:
Provides basic Remarkup support for @mentions. No application integration yet so
these aren't terribly useful until that happens.
Test Plan:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/view/PHID-FILE-83d68e7af6085ae928df/
Reviewers: tomo, mroch, jsp
Commenters: tomo
CC: aran, tomo, epriestley
Differential Revision: 517
Summary:
If you "chmod +x" a file and then generate a diff and click "show 20 lines" on
that diff, you get another janky copy of the property table. Render the property
table only for top-level rendering requests.
This started happening after D409, which fixed the far-more-obvious bug of these
things never showing up. We must have changed the logic at some point since this
side effect was surprising to me. :P
Test Plan:
Created a diff with changes and +x, clicked "show 20 lines".
- Original diff had file property header table thing, showing the +x.
- New context brought in by "show 20 lines" didn't have it anymore.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 482
Summary:
This ended up being pretty hard to see, make it a bit easier.
Test Plan:
Focused things using the keyboard reticle.
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: tomo, moskov, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, tomo
Differential Revision: 483
Summary: Added some change on the project's list view, to show information about
active tasks, population, etc. Also modified the "profile view", and added a class "PhabricatorProfileView" to render the profile, both on projects and users.
Test Plan: play around the project directory :)
Reviewers: epriestley ericfrenkiel
CC:
Differential Revision: 477
Summary:
Permit "j" and "k" to cycle through individual changeblocks, similar to how this
feature works in ReviewBoard. This still needs a bunch of refinement but it's
getting closer to being useful.
Also moved reticle underneath the table so you can click links through it (derp
derp).
Test Plan:
Used "j" and "k" to cycle through individual changes.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: moskov, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 426
Summary:
Allow duplicate tasks to be selected and merged in Maniphest.
I didn't create a separate transaction type for this because that implies a
bunch of really complicated rules which I don't want to sort out right now
(e.g., do we need to do cycle detection for merges? If so, what do we do when we
detect a cycle?) since I think it's unnecessary to get right for the initial
implementation (my Tasks merge implementation was similar to this and worked
quite well) and if/when we eventually need the metadata to be available in a
computer-readable form that need should inform the implementation.
Plenty of room for improvement here, of course.
Test Plan:
Merged duplicate tasks, tried to perform invalid merge operations (e.g., merge a
task into itself).
Tested existing attach workflows (task -> revision, revision -> task).
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: anjali, aran
Differential Revision: 459
Summary:
See attached tasks. See D459 for the ability to merge tasks.
Test Plan:
Looked at posted and unposted inline comments.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: edward, viyer, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 461
Summary:
Some day, maybe close the existing dialog too but there's no public method on
JX.Workflow for that right now.
Test Plan:
Hit "??????", then "esc", got back to the page instead of just popping a deep
stack.
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: tomo
CC: aran, tomo
Differential Revision: 450
