Summary: Moves PhabricatorActionHeaderView to PHUIActionHeaderView, adds Red, Green, and Violet colors and extend ObjectBox to take colors and action headers.
Test Plan:
Tested new Welcome layout as well as UIExamples, Workboards, and Hovercards
{F169669}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9707
Summary:
Ref T2222. This introduces two small new concepts:
- `expandTransactions()`: allows a transaction to expand into several transactions. For example, "resign" adds a "remove reviewers" transaction.
- We have some other cases which could use this, but currently hard-code things outside of the `Editor`.
- One example is that in Maniphest, closing a task implies claiming it if it is unowned.
- `setIgnoreOnNoEffect()`: The whole Editor can be set to continue or stop if any transactions have no effect, but this allows the behavior to be refined at the individual transaction level. This is primarily to make the UX less confusing, so the user gets only a single relevant error instead of one for each expanded transaction.
Otherwise, this is pretty straightforward.
Test Plan:
Rigged comment form to use SavePro controller, enabled resign action, then tried to resign from a bunch of stuff.
{F117743}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8328
Summary:
Small step forward which improves existing stuff or lays groudwork for future stuff:
- Currently, to check for email verification, we have to single-query the email address on every page. Instead, denoramlize it into the user object.
- Migrate all the existing users.
- When the user verifies an email, mark them as `isEmailVerified` if the email is their primary email.
- Just make the checks look at the `isEmailVerified` field.
- Add a new check, `isUserActivated()`, to cover email-verified plus disabled. Currently, a non-verified-but-not-disabled user could theoretically use Conduit over SSH, if anyone deployed it. Tighten that up.
- Add an `isApproved` flag, which is always true for now. In a future diff, I want to add a default-on admin approval queue for new accounts, to prevent configuration mistakes. The way it will work is:
- When the queue is enabled, registering users are created with `isApproved = false`.
- Admins are sent an email, "[Phabricator] New User Approval (alincoln)", telling them that a new user is waiting for approval.
- They go to the web UI and approve the user.
- Manually-created accounts are auto-approved.
- The email will have instructions for disabling the queue.
I think this queue will be helpful for new installs and give them peace of mind, and when you go to disable it we have a better opportunity to warn you about exactly what that means.
Generally, I want to improve the default safety of registration, since if you just blindly coast through the path of least resistance right now your install ends up pretty open, and realistically few installs are on VPNs.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration, verified `isEmailVerified` populated correctly.
- Created a new user, checked DB for verified (not verified).
- Verified, checked DB (now verified).
- Used Conduit, People, Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7572
Summary:
Ref T603. I want to let applications define new capabilities (like "can manage global rules" in Herald) and get full support for them, including reasonable error strings in the UI.
Currently, this is difficult for a couple of reasons. Partly this is just a code organization issue, which is easy to fix. The bigger thing is that we have a bunch of strings which depend on both the policy and capability, like: "You must be an administrator to view this object." "Administrator" is the policy, and "view" is the capability.
That means every new capability has to add a string for each policy, and every new policy (should we introduce any) needs to add a string for each capability. And we can't do any piecemeal "You must be a {$role} to {$action} this object" becuase it's impossible to translate.
Instead, make all the strings depend on //only// the policy, //only// the capability, or //only// the object type. This makes the dialogs read a little more strangely, but I think it's still pretty easy to understand, and it makes adding new stuff way way easier.
Also provide more context, and more useful exception messages.
Test Plan:
- See screenshots.
- Also triggered a policy exception and verified it was dramatically more useful than it used to be.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7260
Summary:
Ref T603. Adds clarifying text which expands on policies and explains exceptions and rules. The goal is to provide an easy way for users to learn about special policy rules, like "task owners can always see a task".
This presentation might be a little aggressive. That's probably OK as we introduce policies, but something a little more tempered might be better down the road.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7150
Summary: Another pass at consolidating colors
Test Plan: Test various pages and UI elements
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6905
Summary: More grey tweaks, breaking these up so I can test and tweak each as needed.
Test Plan: Review pages.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6866
Summary: This adds standard 'blues' and start integration of standard colors for text, backgrounds, and borders.
Test Plan: sb
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6857
Summary: Split some of these up for safe regexes.
Test Plan: reload celerity
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6858
Summary:
This attempts some consistency in form layouts. Notably, they all now contain headers and are 16px off the sides and tops of pages. Also updated dialogs to the same look and feel. I think I got 98% of forms with this pass, but it's likely I missed some buried somewhere.
TODO: will take another pass as consolidating these colors and new gradients in another diff.
Test Plan: Played in my sandbox all week. Please play with it too and let me know how they feel.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6806
Summary: Touches a lot of little spacing things here and there, stuck to 4px grid when possible, checked mobile views.
Test Plan: Mobile, Logging In, Multiple Providers.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6220
Summary: Ref T1536. Error state is a bit gross but we need to sort that out in general.
Test Plan:
{F46549}
{F46550}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6208
Summary: We were clipping this to 300px, which is arbitrary to iPhone.
Test Plan: test on Nexus, iPhone
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6089
Summary:
Fixes T3252. Other enhancements:
- Header in widget panel was 2px too short.
- Typeahead in add people only allowed one person
- Typeahead in add people was cutoff by overflow:hidden
- X in remove has been changed to unicode (multiply)
- Add people dialog form fields are full width
- Some other CSS tweaks.
Test Plan: Add, Remove people.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3252
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6076
Summary: We're baking some useful things into ActionHeader, would like to consolidate it's use around the site for consistency.
Test Plan: Tested log out dialog, attach dependencies, delete document in phriction.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5635
Summary: Updated the dialog styles for exceptions.
Test Plan: Broke my sandbox, fixed the colors and spacing.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4597
Summary: This updates dialogs to look more inline with other headers.
Test Plan: Tested what dialogs I could find.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4594
Summary: We have enough z-index rules that they're fairly hard to visualize with "git grep". Consolidate them. Then fix T2253 (missing z-index on left menu background).
Test Plan: Made a Differential window really narrow, then scrolled it horizontally.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, ender
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2253
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4302
Summary:
Allows you to edit or delete comments in appplications which support ApplicationTransactions.
UI/UX stuff:
- The dialogs are rough but I want to do a dialog design pass more generally, @chad has some mocks.
- When you add new mentions via edit, they don't currently count as mentions. I'm not sure what I want to do about this.
- When you edit or delete a comment, we do not publish any notifications about it. I think this is reasonable.
- I didn't separate "delete" out versus "edit"; I assume it will be reasonably intuitive that deleting all the text deletes effectively deletes the comment. I also want to discourage deletion somewhat (we still show the transaction, just show that the comment has been deleted).
Test Plan:
Transaction view, note "Edit" and "Edited" links:
{F26914}
Edit view, has some design issues but I want to do a pass on dialogs in general:
{F26915}
History view:
{F26913}
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1082
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4149
Summary: See D3795 / D3797. Also made the mask darker.
Test Plan: Mask now sizes properly on window resize in all browsers / mask uses.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3798
Summary:
Provides a basic start for access policies. Objects expose various capabilities, like CAN_VIEW, CAN_EDIT, etc., and set a policy for each capability. We currently implement three policies, PUBLIC (anyone, including logged-out), USERS (any logged-in) and NOONE (nobody). There's also a way to provide automatic capability grants (e.g., the owner of an object can always see it, even if some capability is set to "NOONE"), but I'm not sure how great the implementation feels and it might change.
Most of the code here is providing a primitive for efficient policy-aware list queries. The problem with doing queries naively is that you have to do crazy amounts of filtering, e.g. to show the user page 6, you need to filter at least 600 objects (and likely more) before you can figure out which ones are 500-600 for them. You can't just do "LIMIT 500, 100" because that might have only 50 results, or no results. Instead, the query looks like "WHERE id > last_visible_id", and then we fetch additional pages as necessary to satisfy the request.
The general idea is that we move all data access to Query classes and have them do object filtering. The ID paging primitive allows efficient paging in most cases, and the executeOne() method provides a concise way to do policy checks for edit/view screens.
We'll probably end up with mostly broader policy UIs or configuration-based policies, but there are at least a few cases for per-object privacy (e.g., marking tasks as "Security", and restricting things to the members of projects) so I figured we'd start with a flexible primitive and the simplify it in the UI where we can.
Test Plan: Unit tests, played around in the UI with various policy settings.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2210
Summary: See T1021. Raise configuration or implementation exceptions immediately. When all engines fail, raise an aggregate exception with details.
Test Plan: Forced all engines to fail, received an aggregate exception. Forced an engine to fail with a config exception, recevied it immediately.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1021
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2157
Summary:
Make the unhandled exception dialogs slightly more useful:
- Make them easier to read.
- Link to files from Phabricator libraries.
- Don't show traces by default.
- Show traces in development mode.
- Rename button from "Cancel" to "Close" and only show it for Ajax.
Test Plan: Rigged DirectoryHomeController to throw, loaded home page. Changed
stack trace setting in config. Clicked some files in the trace.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, codeblock
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 823
Summary:
Provide a quick workflow for adding a new project. This ended up being sort of
complicated because we don't currently put forms in dialogs. I separated the
actual <form /> tag out of the display/layout of AphrontFormView to enable this
(the dialog is itself a form).
Limitations: if you create a new project and then remove it, it won't appear in
the tokenizer until you reload the page. We need to add the ability for the
datasource to drop its cache to enable this, which is super complicated.
Test Plan:
Used "Create new project" to add a new project when creating a task.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 422
Summary:
The transparent mask around the dialogs was too dark. Code was hard to
read. Now opacity has a value of 37, which makes the code easy to read,
but still clearly indicates that the dialog is present.
Test Plan:
I was able to read the code easily through the mask.
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: epriestley, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 139
