Summary:
I typed up like 30 pages here and then got my soul crushed by T895, but here's
the summary:
I looked at several charting libraries. There aren't very many that seem to be
any good and have an open-source license.
I also want the charts to be scriptable in JS so we can add good interactivity
where appropriate.
Raphael is an SVG drawing library which seems very solid. gRaphael is a charting
library on top of Raphael that is a lot less solid, but seems kind of OK.
Overall, I think this selection gives us a lot of flexibility, although we'll
have to pay some costs up front. I'd rather do that then get limited later,
though.
That said, I'm open to other suggestions here if anyone has experience or wants
to take a different stab at researching things.
This is largely for @vii and D1643.
Test Plan: Created a basic, fairly OK chart (see next revision).
Reviewers: btrahan, vii
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1654
Summary:
When a user hits 'cancel' on a 'new', 'edit', or 'reply' operation, add a little
"Changes discarded. __Undo__" insert so they can get their change back. No undo
for delete since there's an explicit prompt. Once this lands we can make
'escape' work again to close dialogs.
This change started feeling really good when I was merging all the duplicate
code and making things more consistent, but by the time I started writing client
rendering it felt gross. I'm not really thrilled with it but I guess it's a step
forward? The feature seems pretty OK in practice. Let me know how much barfing
this causes and I can try to remedy the most acute concerns.
This also fixes a bug where replies always (?) appear on the 'new' side of the
diff (I think?).
Test Plan:
Applied 'new', 'edit', 'delete' and 'reply' operations, pressed 'cancel' and
'okay' in each case, with and without changing text where relevant. All
behaviors seem to conform with expectations, except that canceling out of 'edit'
without changing the text gives you an option to undo when it shouldn't really.
There's no super easy way to get at the original text right now.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: simpkins, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 406
Summary:
Currently, the Javelin linter fails completley if this binary is missing.
However, it's hard to build and not critical so just issue a warning.
Eventually we can document this better and make the build easier, but the
current behavior is pretty unfriendly so make it smoother until the state of the
world can be improved.
Test Plan:
Removed the binary and ran "arc lint --lintall" against multiple Javelin paths.
Received one warning. Restored the binary and ran with "--trace", got no
warnings and verified that the binary was running.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran, tomo
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 265
Summary:
Javelin is currently embedded in Phabricator via copy-and-paste of prebuilt
packages. This is not so great.
Pull it in as a submodule instead and make all the Phabriator resources declare
proper dependency trees. Add Javelin linting.
Test Plan:
I tried to run through pretty much all the JS functionality on the site. This is
still a high-risk change, but I did a pretty thorough test
Differential: inline comments, revealing diffs, list tokenizers, comment
preview, editing/deleting comments, add review action.
Maniphest: list tokenizer, comment actions
Herald: rule editing, tokenizers, add/remove rows
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: aran, tomo, mroch, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, tomo, epriestley
Differential Revision: 223
