Summary:
Minor rebuild / redesign of Conpherence. Most of this is new UX and tossing out things like widgets, device fallbacks. I expect some of the UI to get more polished after next pass, but most everything here is in place.
- Removed "Widgets", now just a single Participants pane
- Added "Topic"
- New header
- Settings, Edit are action icons
- Removed a lot of JS
- Simplified CSS as much as I could
Test Plan:
Desktop, Tablet, Mobile. Adding and removing people. Setting new topics, new rooms.
{F1828662}
{F1828669}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16550
Summary: Fixes T9000, sets a variable.
Test Plan: Try to make a new room without a title, but with a message.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9000
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13754
Summary:
Ref T8488, T8469, T8485.
This is done in regards to T8488 as far as users are concerned. There's still some classes, and etc. that should be re-named probably. T8469 and T8485 are basically moot now though.
Rather than having "Send Message" exposed, just expose "Create Room". Users get the full form. One change is "title" is now required.
This diff removes the concept of "isRoom" entirely.
Test Plan: Verifed a user with no conpherences had sensible data in both column view and full conpherence view. Created rooms with various policies and things worked well.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: chad, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8469, T8485, T8488
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13351
Summary: Remove the `*TransactionType` classes and define the constants in the corresponding `*Transaction` class instead.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13188
Summary: Fixes T8102. This makes public rooms actually work. Also lets users see the search listings page so they can wander into all public rooms without logging in.
Test Plan: As logged out user, visited ZXX and ZYY. ZXX was public, so I could see it and had a little "Login to Participate" button in the bottom. ZYY was not public so I was prompted to login. Back on ZXX I clicked the Conpherence crumb and got a sensible UI where most links prompted me to login. CLicked "search" and saw listings for all public rooms.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8102
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12778
Summary: Ref T7584. In Conpherence main view, this adds a "search" link right in the "Rooms" header. This piece addresses an outstanding item on T7584. This diff also adds a search button in the durable column that takes you to the application search. This kind of a big product bet that rooms are going to be dominating things and its most useful to find another room quickly from this view. That said, I think the application search should get massaged slightly to allow searching threads and this won't be much of a trade off at all.
Test Plan: verified new search links took me to correct place and displayed reasonably.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7584
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12215
Summary: Ref T7584. This hits all the major bullets there. Next step on T7584 is figuring out how it integrates into the full UI and column UI. That said, this is a bit buggy feeling right now since Conpherence as is assumes you are a participant all over the place and rooms make no such assumption. I'll probably this bit up next.
Test Plan:
viewed /conpherence/room/ and saw stuff. viewed the "participant" query as two different users and saw different correct result sets. made a room via the button and it worked. tried to view a room I wasn't a participant in and it failed horribly, which is something to fix in a future diff
created a thread via "send message" on a user profile and it worked
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7584
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12113