Summary:
Ref T2222. Five very small improvements:
- I hit this exception and it took a bit to understand which transaction was causing problems. Add an `Exception` subclass which does a better job of making the message debuggable.
- The `oldValue` of a transaction may be `null`, legitimately (for example, changing the `repositoryPHID` for a revision from `null` to some valid PHID). Do a check to see if `setOldValue()` has been called, instead of a check for a `null` value.
- Add an additional check for the other case (shouldn't have a value, but does).
- When we're not generating a value, don't bother calling the code to generate it. The best case scenario is that it has no effect; any effect it might have (changing the value) is always wrong.
- Maniphest didn't fall back to the parent correctly when computing this flag, so it got the wrong result for `CustomField` transactions.
Test Plan: Resolved the issue I was hitting more easily, made updates to a `null`-valued custom field, and applied other normal sorts of transactions successfully.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4557, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8401
Summary: Ref T2222. Adds a mostly-functional "Pro" comment controller. This does the core stuff, but does not yet do actions (accept, reject, etc.) or inline comments.
Test Plan: Changed the `if (false)` to an `if (true)`, then made some comments, etc. This is normally unreachable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8304
Summary:
Ref T418. This is fairly messy, but basically:
- Add a validation phase to TransactionEditor.
- Add a validation phase to CustomField.
- Bring it to StandardField.
- Add validation logic for the int field.
- Provide support in related classes.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T418
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7028
Summary:
When a user submits an action with no effect (like an empty comment, an "abandon" on an already-accepted revision, or a "close, resolved" on a closed task) we want to alert them that their action isn't effective. These warnings fall into two general buckets:
- User is submitting two or more actions, and some aren't effective but some are. Prompt them to apply the effective actions only.
- A special case of this is where the only effective action is a comment. We provide tailored text ("Post Comment") in this case.
- User is submitting one action, which isn't effective. Tell them they're out of luck.
- A special case of this is an empty comment. We provide tailored text in this case.
By default, the transaction editor throws when transactions have no effect. The caller can then deal with this, or use `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionNoEffectResponse` to provide a standard dialog that gives the user information as above. For cases where we expect transactions to have no effect (notably, "edit" forms) we just continue on no-effect unconditionally.
Also fix an issue where new, combined or filtered transactions would not be represented properly in the Ajax response (i.e., return final transactions from `applyTransactions()`), and translate some strings.
Test Plan:
- Submitted empty and nonempy comments in Macro and Pholio.
- Submitted comments with new and existing "@mentions".
- Submitted edits in both applications.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T912, T2104
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4160
