1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-24 15:52:41 +01:00
Commit graph

12 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
f1534e6feb Make password reset emails use one-time tokens
Summary:
Ref T4398. This code hadn't been touched in a while and had a few crufty bits.

**One Time Resets**: Currently, password reset (and similar links) are valid for about 48 hours, but we always use one token to generate them (it's bound to the account). This isn't horrible, but it could be better, and it produces a lot of false positives on HackerOne.

Instead, use TemporaryTokens to make each link one-time only and good for no more than 24 hours.

**Coupling of Email Verification and One-Time Login**: Currently, one-time login links ("password reset links") are tightly bound to an email address, and using a link verifies that email address.

This is convenient for "Welcome" emails, so the user doesn't need to go through two rounds of checking email in order to login, then very their email, then actually get access to Phabricator.

However, for other types of these links (like those generated by `bin/auth recover`) there's no need to do any email verification.

Instead, make the email verification part optional, and use it on welcome links but not other types of links.

**Message Customization**: These links can come out of several workflows: welcome, password reset, username change, or `bin/auth recover`. Add a hint to the URI so the text on the page can be customized a bit to help users through the workflow.

**Reset Emails Going to Main Account Email**: Previously, we would send password reset email to the user's primary account email. However, since we verify email coming from reset links this isn't correct and could allow a user to verify an email without actually controlling it.

Since the user needs a real account in the first place this does not seem useful on its own, but might be a component in some other attack. The user might also no longer have access to their primary account, in which case this wouldn't be wrong, but would not be very useful.

Mitigate this in two ways:

  - First, send to the actual email address the user entered, not the primary account email address.
  - Second, don't let these links verify emails: they're just login links. This primarily makes it more difficult for an attacker to add someone else's email to their account, send them a reset link, get them to login and implicitly verify the email by not reading very carefully, and then figure out something interesting to do (there's currently no followup attack here, but allowing this does seem undesirable).

**Password Reset Without Old Password**: After a user logs in via email, we send them to the password settings panel (if passwords are enabled) with a code that lets them set a new password without knowing the old one.

Previously, this code was static and based on the email address. Instead, issue a one-time code.

**Jump Into Hisec**: Normally, when a user who has multi-factor auth on their account logs in, we prompt them for factors but don't put them in high security. You usually don't want to go do high-security stuff immediately after login, and it would be confusing and annoying if normal logins gave you a "YOU ARE IN HIGH SECURITY" alert bubble.

However, if we're taking you to the password reset screen, we //do// want to put the user in high security, since that screen requires high security. If we don't do this, the user gets two factor prompts in a row.

To accomplish this, we set a cookie when we know we're sending the user into a high security workflow. This cookie makes login finalization upgrade all the way from "partial" to "high security", instead of stopping halfway at "normal". This is safe because the user has just passed a factor check; the only reason we don't normally do this is to reduce annoyance.

**Some UI Cleanup**: Some of this was using really old UI. Modernize it a bit.

Test Plan:
  - **One Time Resets**
    - Used a reset link.
    - Tried to reuse a reset link, got denied.
    - Verified each link is different.
  - **Coupling of Email Verification and One-Time Login**
    - Verified that `bin/auth`, password reset, and username change links do not have an email verifying URI component.
    - Tried to tack one on, got denied.
    - Used the welcome email link to login + verify.
    - Tried to mutate the URI to not verify, or verify something else: got denied.
  - **Message Customization**
    - Viewed messages on the different workflows. They seemed OK.
  - **Reset Emails Going to Main Account Email**
    - Sent password reset email to non-primary email.
    - Received email at specified address.
    - Verified it does not verify the address.
  - **Password Reset Without Old Password**
    - Reset password without knowledge of old one after email reset.
    - Tried to do that without a key, got denied.
    - Tried to reuse a key, got denied.
  - **Jump Into Hisec**
    - Logged in with MFA user, got factor'd, jumped directly into hisec.
    - Logged in with non-MFA user, no factors, normal password reset.
  - **Some UI Cleanup**
    - Viewed new UI.
  - **Misc**
    - Created accounts, logged in with welcome link, got verified.
    - Changed a username, used link to log back in.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T4398

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9252
2014-05-22 10:41:00 -07:00
epriestley
a04e138ae2 Minor cleanup of some session code
Summary: Ref T4398. Add some documentation and use `phutil_units()`.

Test Plan:
  - Established a web session.
  - Established a conduit session.
  - Entered and exited hisec.
  - Used "Sessions" panel to examine results.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T4398

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8924
2014-05-01 10:23:19 -07:00
epriestley
50376aad04 Require multiple auth factors to establish web sessions
Summary:
Ref T4398. This prompts users for multi-factor auth on login.

Roughly, this introduces the idea of "partial" sessions, which we haven't finished constructing yet. In practice, this means the session has made it through primary auth but not through multi-factor auth. Add a workflow for bringing a partial session up to a full one.

Test Plan:
  - Used Conduit.
  - Logged in as multi-factor user.
  - Logged in as no-factor user.
  - Tried to do non-login-things with a partial session.
  - Reviewed account activity logs.

{F149295}

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T4398

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8922
2014-05-01 10:23:02 -07:00
epriestley
23e654ec2b Rate limit multi-factor actions
Summary: Ref T4398. Prevent users from brute forcing multi-factor auth by rate limiting attempts. This slightly refines the rate limiting to allow callers to check for a rate limit without adding points, and gives users credit for successfully completing an auth workflow.

Test Plan: Tried to enter hisec with bad credentials 11 times in a row, got rate limited.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T4398

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8911
2014-04-30 14:30:31 -07:00
epriestley
a017a8e02b Make two-factor auth actually work
Summary:
Ref T4398. Allows auth factors to render and validate when prompted to take a hi-sec action.

This has a whole lot of rough edges still (see D8875) but does fundamentally work correctly.

Test Plan:
  - Added two different TOTP factors to my account for EXTRA SECURITY.
  - Took hisec actions with no auth factors, and with attached auth factors.
  - Hit all the error/failure states of the hisec entry process.
  - Verified hisec failures appear in activity logs.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T4398

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8886
2014-04-28 10:20:54 -07:00
epriestley
3f5a55fa6e Let users review their own account activity logs
Summary:
Ref T4398. This adds a settings panel for account activity so users can review activity on their own account. Some goals are:

  - Make it easier for us to develop and support auth and credential information, see T4398. This is the primary driver.
  - Make it easier for users to understand and review auth and credential information (see T4842 for an example -- this isn't there yet, but builds toward it).
  - Improve user confidence in security by making logging more apparent and accessible.

Minor corresponding changes:

  - Entering and exiting hisec mode is now logged.
  - This, sessions, and OAuth authorizations have moved to a new "Sessions and Logs" area, since "Authentication" was getting huge.

Test Plan:
  - Viewed new panel.
  - Viewed old UI.
  - Entered/exited hisec and got prompted.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T4398

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8871
2014-04-27 17:32:09 -07:00
epriestley
f42ec84d0c Add "High Security" mode to support multi-factor auth
Summary:
Ref T4398. This is roughly a "sudo" mode, like GitHub has for accessing SSH keys, or Facebook has for managing credit cards. GitHub actually calls theirs "sudo" mode, but I think that's too technical for big parts of our audience. I've gone with "high security mode".

This doesn't actually get exposed in the UI yet (and we don't have any meaningful auth factors to prompt the user for) but the workflow works overall. I'll go through it in a comment, since I need to arrange some screenshots.

Test Plan: See guided walkthrough.

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T4398

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8851
2014-04-27 17:31:11 -07:00
epriestley
69ddb0ced6 Issue "anonymous" sessions for logged-out users
Summary:
Ref T4339. Ref T4310. Currently, sessions look like `"afad85d675fda87a4fadd54"`, and are only issued for logged-in users. To support logged-out CSRF and (eventually) external user sessions, I made two small changes:

  - First, sessions now have a "kind", which is indicated by a prefix, like `"A/ab987asdcas7dca"`. This mostly allows us to issue session queries more efficiently: we don't have to issue a query at all for anonymous sessions, and can join the correct table for user and external sessions and save a query. Generally, this gives us more debugging information and more opportunity to recover from issues in a user-friendly way, as with the "invalid session" error in this diff.
  - Secondly, if you load a page and don't have a session, we give you an anonymous session. This is just a secret with no special significance.

This does not implement CSRF yet, but gives us a client secret we can use to implement it.

Test Plan:
  - Logged in.
  - Logged out.
  - Browsed around.
  - Logged in again.
  - Went through link/register.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T4310, T4339

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8043
2014-01-23 14:03:22 -08:00
epriestley
2ec45d42a6 Remove session limits and sequencing
Summary:
Ref T4310. Fixes T3720. This change:

  - Removes concurrent session limits. Instead, unused sessions are GC'd after a while.
  - Collapses all existing "web-1", "web-2", etc., sessions into "web" sessions.
  - Dramatically simplifies the code for establishing a session (like omg).

Test Plan: Ran migration, checked Sessions panel and database for sanity. Used existing session. Logged out, logged in. Ran Conduit commands.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T4310, T3720

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7978
2014-01-15 17:27:59 -08:00
epriestley
acb141cf52 Expire and garbage collect unused sessions
Summary:
Ref T3720. Ref T4310. Currently, we limit the maximum number of concurrent sessions of each type. This is primarily because sessions predate garbage collection and we had no way to prevent the session table from growing fairly quickly and without bound unless we did this.

Now that we have GC (and it's modular!) we can just expire unused sessions after a while and throw them away:

  - Add a `sessionExpires` column to the table, with a key.
  - Add a GC for old sessions.
  - When we establish a session, set `sessionExpires` to the current time plus the session TTL.
  - When a user uses a session and has used up more than 20% of the time on it, extend the session.

In addition to this, we could also rotate sessions, but I think that provides very little value. If we do want to implement it, we should hold it until after T3720 / T4310.

Test Plan:
  - Ran schema changes.
  - Looked at database.
  - Tested GC:
    - Started GC.
    - Set expires on one row to the past.
    - Restarted GC.
    - Verified GC nuked the session.
  - Logged in.
  - Logged out.
  - Ran Conduit method.
  - Tested refresh:
    - Set threshold to 0.0001% instead of 20%.
    - Loaded page.
    - Saw a session extension ever few page loads.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T4310, T3720

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7976
2014-01-15 13:56:16 -08:00
epriestley
d392a8f157 Replace "web" and "conduit" magic session strings with constants
Summary: Ref T4310. Ref T3720. We use bare strings to refer to session types in several places right now; use constants instead.

Test Plan: grep; logged out; logged in; ran Conduit commands.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T4310, T3720

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7963
2014-01-14 13:22:34 -08:00
epriestley
eef314b701 Separate session management from PhabricatorUser
Summary: Ref T4310. Ref T3720. Session operations are currently part of PhabricatorUser. This is more tightly coupled than needbe, and makes it difficult to establish login sessions for non-users. Move all the session management code to a `SessionEngine`.

Test Plan:
  - Viewed sessions.
  - Regenerated Conduit certificate.
  - Verified Conduit sessions were destroyed.
  - Logged out.
  - Logged in.
  - Ran conduit commands.
  - Viewed sessions again.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T4310, T3720

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7962
2014-01-14 13:22:27 -08:00