Summary:
Ref T6881.
- Allow users to set a default payment method for a subscription, which we'll try to autobill (not all payment methods are autobillable, so we can't require this in the general case, and a charge might fail anyway).
- If a subscription has an autopay method, try to automatically bill it.
- Otherwise, we'll send them an email like "hey here's a bill, it couldn't autopay for some reasons, go pay it and fix those if you want".
- (That email doesn't exist yet but there's a comment about it.)
- Also some UI cleanup.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/phortune invoice` to autobill myself some fake test money.
{F279416}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11596
Summary:
Ref T6881. This is basically just some UX.
Right now, if we invoice you, you can //technically// pay it but since we don't tell you about it and don't show it in the UI you'd have to guess the ID by manipulating the URI. We should probably be at least a little more aggressive about billing.
In the common case when we generate a cart/order, we don't show it to the user or merchant in Phortune until the user takes a payment action (basically, Phortune doesn't recognize the cart until you actually check out with it). In the current use case in Fund (and other reasonable use cases) an un-acted-upon cart hasn't been ordered yet, and is just a place for the application to store state as it hands off the workflow to Phortune.
Even if we had a real "Shop for physical goods" app, I think the same rule would apply -- the application itself would probably track and show your current cart, but it wouldn't make sense to put it into your order history in Phortune until you actually buy it.
Since invoices from subscriptions are essentially identical to not-yet-ordered-carts, that mean they also did not show up in the UI (although I think this is also desirable).
This change carves out a place for them:
- Add an "invoices" section with unpaid invoices.
- The UI shows that you have unpaid invoices.
- Invoices have a slightly different rendering, inclduing an alluring "Pay Now" button.
Some considerations:
- One thing I'm vaguely thinking about is the possibilty that users may be able to invoice one another directly, eventually. For example, we might invoice a contracting client.
- Considering this, I thought about making these carts have a special status like `STATUS_DUE`, which replaces `STATUS_READY`, or a flag like `isInvoice`.
- However, this approach was pretty involved and made the //billing// logic more complicated, so I backed off. The ultimate approach here puts more of the complexity into the display logic, which feels better to me.
- We might need an `isInvoice` flag eventually, but `subscriptionPHID` is a reasonable stand-in for now.
- The OrderTable serving double duty for rendering subscriptions feels a little muddy, but I think splitting it into two highly-redundant classes would be worse.
Test Plan:
{F279348}
{F279349}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11593
Summary:
Ref T6881. This generates a product, purchase and invoice for users, and there's sort of some UI for them. Stuff it doesn't do yet:
- Try to autobill when we have a CC;
- actually tell the user they should pay it;
- ask the application for anything like "how much should we charge", or tell the application anything like "the user paid".
However, these work:
- You can //technically// pay the invoices.
- You can see the invoices you paid in the past.
Test Plan: Used `bin/phriction invoice` to double-bill myself over and over again. Paid one of the invoices.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11580
Summary:
Ref T6881.
- Add a subscription detail page.
Minor cosmetics:
- Fix glyph, from "X" (old "X marks the spot" icon) to "diamond" (new gem icon).
- Name the initial account "Default Account" instead of "Personal Account", since this seems more general.
Test Plan:
{F278623}
And I got two full days to test that Jan 30/31 -> Feb 28 billing logic!
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11576
Summary:
Ref T6881. This still doesn't "work" in any reasonable sense of the word, but gets us a bit further.
I'll build out the Phortune UI a little bit next, then look at implementing the Worker to do actual billing.
Test Plan:
- Allocated an instance and saw a Subscription generate properly.
- Saw subscription show up in the Phortune UI, albeit in a very limited way.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11575
Summary:
Ref T6881. This roughs in the major objects, support classes, and controllers.
- Show subscriptions on account detail.
- Browse all account subscriptions.
- Link to active subsciptions from merchant detail.
Test Plan: Clicked around in the UI. There's no way to create subscriptions yet, so I basically just kicked the tires on this. I probably missed a few things that I'll clean up in followups.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11482
Summary: Ref T5752, moves mobile action menus to the object box instead of crumbs.
Test Plan: View action menus at tablet, desktop, and mobile break points. Verify clicking buttons works as expected opening menu.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5752
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11340
Summary: Ref T6822.
Test Plan: Visual inspection. These methods are only called from within `PhabricatorController` subclasses.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6822
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11241
Summary:
Ref T4712. Specifically...
- Differential
- needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented
- Audit
- needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented
- Repository
- one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- setShouldTerminate(true)
- Ponder
- BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI
- both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers
- left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually
- Phortune
- BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal
- PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller
- Fund
- Legalpad
- Nuance
- NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...)
- HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...!
- BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit
- ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- Harbormaster
- HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place
Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4712
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
Summary: See <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T906>. This behavior is a bug; we should remove the button if the user can't use the application.
Test Plan:
- With Macro uninstalled, did these things verifying the button vanished:
- Sent a user a message.
- Edited a revision.
- Edited repository basic information.
- Edited an initiative.
- Edited a Harbormaster build step.
- Added task comments.
- Edited profile blurb.
- Edited blog description.
- Commented on Pholio mock.
- Uploaded Pholio image.
- Edited Phortune merchant.
- Edited Phriction document.
- Edited Ponder answer.
- Edited Ponder question.
- Edited Slowvote poll.
- Edited a comment.
- Reinstalled Macro and saw button come back.
- Used button to put silly text on a funny picture.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10900
Summary: Ref T5833. See that task for functional goals and some discussion of design.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10713
Summary:
Ref T5702. This is a forward-looking change which provides some very broad API improvements but does not implement them. In particular:
- Controllers no longer require `$request` to construct. This is mostly for T5702, directly, but simplifies things in general. Instead, we call `setRequest()` before using a controller. Only a small number of sites activate controllers, so this is less code overall, and more consistent with most constructors not having any parameters or effects.
- `$request` now offers `getURIData($key, ...)`. This is an alternate way of accessing `$data` which is currently only available on `willProcessRequest(array $data)`. Almost all controllers which implement this method do so in order to read one or two things out of the URI data. Instead, let them just read this data directly when processing the request.
- Introduce `handleRequest(AphrontRequest $request)` and deprecate (very softly) `processRequest()`. The majority of `processRequest()` calls begin `$request = $this->getRequest()`, which is avoided with the more practical signature.
- Provide `getViewer()` on `$request`, and a convenience `getViewer()` on `$controller`. This fixes `$viewer = $request->getUser();` into `$viewer = $request->getViewer();`, and converts the `$request + $viewer` two-liner into a single `$this->getViewer()`.
Test Plan:
- Browsed around in general.
- Hit special controllers (redirect, 404).
- Hit AuditList controller (uses new style).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5702
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10698
Summary: These were missing. Sorry, need to fix this interface someday.
Test Plan: pay for stuff on mobile
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10708
Summary: Ref T2787. I mostly just want these in place so I can glue emails to them, but they're also useful on their own.
Test Plan: {F216515}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10688
Summary: Ref T2787. Currently, we show all orders/charges, which won't scale well. Show the 10 most recent and link to full order/charge history.
Test Plan: {F216325}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10685
Summary: Ref T2787. This stuff is now irrelevant and/or has no callsites.
Test Plan: `grep`, poked around
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad, btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10684
Summary:
Ref T2787. Make this a little more concrete with explicit membership instead of a general edit policy. In particular, we need to know who to email when orders happen, and can't reasonably do that with an edit policy.
I imagine this might eventually get more nuanced (e.g., users who can only approve orders vs users who can manage the merchant itself) but that's a long ways away.
Test Plan: {F216284}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10681
Summary:
Ref T2787.
- Account members can add and remove other members (major use case is corporate accounts).
- Use a modern edge constant setup.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10678
Summary: Ref T5835. Show backing amounts in transactions. Account for and show refunds.
Test Plan: {F215869}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5835
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10676
Summary: Ref T2787. Allow merchants to flag orders for review. For now, all orders are flagged for review. Eventually, I could imagine Herald rules for coarse things (e.g., require review of all orders over $1,000, or require review of all orders by users not on a whitelist) and maybe examining fraud data for the providers which support it.
Test Plan: {F215848}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10675
Summary: Ref T2787. Support multiple payment accounts so you can have personal vs company payment accounts.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10673
Summary:
Ref T2787. Currently, we dump the user back into the application. Instead, give them a confirmation screen and then let them continue.
Also fix a couple of unit tests I adjusted the underlying behavior of somewhat-recently in libphutil.
Test Plan: {F215498}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10672
Summary: Ref T2787. These don't necessarily do a ton yet, but we can get PayPal out of hold, at least.
Test Plan: Updated charges from all providers. Cleared a PayPal hold.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10670
Summary:
Ref T2787. When Paypal comes back to us with funds on hold, dead-end the transaction but handle it properly.
Generally, smooth out the user interaction on weird states.
Implement refudnds/cancels for Paypal.
Test Plan: {F215230}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10667
Summary:
Ref T2787. Currently, we kill a cart and dead-end the workflow on a charge failure.
Instead, fail the charge and reset the cart so the user can try using a valid payment instrument like a normal checkout workflow would.
Some shakiness/smoothing on WePay for the moment; PayPal is still made up since we don't have a "Hold" state yet.
Test Plan: {F215214}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10666
Summary:
Ref T2787. This has some rough edges but basically works.
- Users can cancel orders that are in incomplete states (or in complete states, if the application allows them to -- for example, some future application might allow cancellation of billed-but-not-shipped orders).
- Merchant controllers can partially or fully refund orders from any state after payment.
Test Plan: This is still rough around the edges, but issued Stripe and WePay refunds.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10664
Summary:
Ref T2787.
- Allow merchants to disable payment providers.
- Show more useful information about providers on the payments page.
- Make test vs live more clear.
- Show merchant status.
- Add a description to merchants to flesh them out a bit -- the merchant areas of responsibilities seem to be fitting well with accounts, etc.
Test Plan: {F215109}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10662
Summary: Ref T2787. Uses the real icons. Straightens out the add payment flow a tiny bit.
Test Plan: {F214922}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10654
Summary:
Ref T2787. Builds on D10649 by rebining existing objects (carts, charges, etc) to merchantPHIDs and providerPHIDs instead of an implicit global merchant and weird global artifacts (providerType / providerKey).
Basically:
- When you create something that users can pay for, you specify a merchant to control where the payment goes.
- Accounts are install-wide, but payment methods are bound to merchants. This seems to do a reasonable job of balancing usability and technical concerns.
- Replace a bunch of weird links between objects with standard PHIDs.
- Improve "add payment method" flow.
Test Plan: Went through the Fund flow with Stripe and WePay, funding an initiative.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10652
Summary:
Ref T2787. Instead of making providers global configuration, make them a thing on merchants with web configuration.
Payment methods and some of the pyament workflow needs to be retooled a bit after this, but this seemed like a reasonable cutoff point for this diff.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10649
Summary:
Ref T2787. Currently, you add payment providers (Stripe, Paypal, etc) in global configuration.
Generally, this approach is cumbersome, limiting, and often hard for users to figure out. It also doesn't provide a natural way to segment payment receivers or provide web access to administrative payment functions like issuing refunds, canceling orders, etc. I think that stuff definitely needs to be in the web UI, and the rule for access to it can't reasonably just be "all administrators" in a lot of reasonable cases.
The only real advantage is that it prevents an attacker from adjusting settings and pointing something at an account they control. But this attack can be mitigated through notifications, some sort of CLI-only merchant lock, payment accounts being relatively identifiable, etc.
So introduce "merchants", which are basically payable entities. An individual merchant will have attached Paypal, Stripe, etc., accounts, and access rules. When you buy something in an application, the merchant to pay is also specified. They also provide an umbrella for dealing with permissions down the line.
This may get a //little// cumbersome because if there are several merchants your saved card information is not shared across them. I think that will be fine in the normal case (most installs will have only one merchant). Even if it isn't and we leave providers global, I think introducing this is the right call from a web UI / permissions point of view. I'll play around with it in the next couple of diffs and figure out exactly where the line goes.
Test Plan: Listed, created, edited, viewed merchants.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10648
Summary:
Ref T2787. For test charges, Paypal is putting the charge in a "payment review" state. Dealing with this state requires way more infrastructure than other providers: we're supposed to pause delivery, then poll Paypal every 6 hours to see if the review has resolved.
Since I can't seem to generate normal test charges, I can't test Paypal for now. Disable it until we have more infrastructure.
(This diff gets us further along, up to the point where I hit this issue.)
Test Plan: Read documentation, rolled eyes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10644
Summary:
Ref T2787. This doesn't get all the edge cases quite correct, but is generally a safe, complete payment workflow:
- Shares the actual charging state logic.
- Makes it appropriately stateful with locking and transactions.
- Gets the main flow correct.
- Detects failure cases, just tends to blow up rather than help the user resolve them.
Test Plan:
- Charged with WePay.
- Charged with Infinite Free Money.
- Resumed an abandoned cart.
- Hit all failure states where we just dead-end the cart. Not ideal, but (seemingly) complete/safe/correct.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10639
Summary: Ref T2787. Similar to D10634, give applications more control over the cart workflow. For now this just means they get to pick exit URIs, but in the future they can manage more details of cart behavior.
Test Plan: Funded an initiative and got returned to the initiative instead of dead-ending in Phortune.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10638
Summary:
Ref T2787. When a user purchases a product in Phortune, transition the cart through a purchased state and invoke product callbacks so applications can respond to the workflow.
Also shore up some stuff like preventing negative amounts of funding.
Test Plan: Backed an initiative and saw it show up on the initiative after completing the purcahsing workflow.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10635
Summary: Ref T2787. `Product` is currently a fairly heavy object, but as Phortune develops it makes a lot of sense to make it a lighter object and put more product logic in applications. Convert it into a fairly lightweight reference to applications. The idea is that Phortune is mostly providing a cart flow, and applications manage the details of products.
Test Plan: Funded an initiative for $1.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10634
Summary:
Ref T2787. Phortune currently stores a bunch of stuff as `...inUSDCents`. This ends up being pretty cumbersome and I worry it will create a huge headache down the road (and possibly not that far off if we do Coinbase/Bitcoin soon). Even now, it's more of a pain than I figured it would be.
Instead:
- Provide an application-level serialization mechanism.
- Provide currency serialization.
- Store currency in an abstract way (currently, as "1.23 USD") that can handle currencies in the future.
- Change all `...inUSDCents` to `..asCurrency`.
- This generally simplifies all the application code.
- Also remove some columns which don't make sense or don't make sense anymore. Notably, `Product` is going to get more abstract and mostly be provided by applications.
Test Plan:
- Created a new product.
- Purchased a product.
- Backed an initiative.
- Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10633
Summary: Ref T2787. This provides a purchase detail screen (which has nothing useful on it yet) and converts a bunch of PHIDs into slightly more useful links.
Test Plan: Browsed around my account.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10284
Summary: Ref T2787. This is very basic and just helps me know that the data is inserting correctly.
Test Plan: {F187765}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10205
Summary: Ref T2787. There were some mega-uggo buttons and such; reduce the uggo-ness by a hair.
Test Plan: {F179686}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10006
Summary:
Ref T2787. Carts need a status so we can tell if they've been purchased. Also kind of get WePay working as a one-time provider, and let charges not have a methodPHID (they won't for one-time providers).
All the status stuff is still super crazy rough and you can do things like start a checkout, add a bunch of stuff to your cart, complete the checkout, and have Phabricator think you paid for all the stuff you added. But this is fine for now since you can't actually edit carts, and also none of this is at all usable anyway. I'll refine some of the workflows in future diffs, for now I'm just getting things hooked up and technically working.
Test Plan:
- Purcahsed a cart and got a sort of status/done screen instead of a "your money is gone" exception.
- Went through the WePay flow and got a successful test checkout.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10003
Summary: Ref T2787. Makes charges a real object, allows providers to apply them. We are now (just barely) capable of stealing users' money.
Test Plan: {F179584}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10002
Summary:
Ref T2787. Make carts and purchases real objects, with storage, that kind-of work.
Roughly, the idea here is that applications create "purchases" (like "1 large t-shirt") and add them to "carts" (a user can have a lot of different carts at the same time), then hand things off to Phortune to deal with actualy charging a card. Roughly this works like Paypal or other similar systems do, except Phortune is the thing the user gets handed off to.
This doesn't do anything interesting/useful yet.
Also fix some bugs and update some UI.
Test Plan: Added a product to a cart, saw it in cart screen.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10001
Summary:
Ref T2787. Update some of the UI elements used by Phortune. Mostly gets rid of the old blue headers.
Also adds some sweet art.
Test Plan: Poked aroudn Phortune.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9915
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary: The removes the sprite sheet 'icons' and replaces it with FontAwesome fonts.
Test Plan:
- Grep for SPRITE_ICONS and replace
- Grep for sprite-icons and replace
- Grep for PhabricatorActionList and choose all new icons
- Grep for Crumbs and fix icons
- Test/Replace PHUIList Icon support
- Test/Replace ObjectList Icon support (foot, epoch, etc)
- Browse as many pages as I could get to
- Remove sprite-icons and move remarkup to own sheet
- Review this diff in Differential
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9052
Summary: We currently have a lot of calls to `addCrumb(id(new PhabricatorCrumbView())->...)` which can be expressed much more simply with a convenience method. Nearly all crumbs are only textual.
Test Plan:
- This was mostly automated, then I cleaned up a few unusual sites manually.
- Bunch of grep / randomly clicking around.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: hach-que, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7787
Summary: This builds out and implements PHUIPropertyListView (container) and PHUIPropertyListItemView (section) as well as adding tabs.
Test Plan: Tested each page I edited with the exception of Releeph and Phortune, though those changes look ok to me diff wise. Updated examples page with tabs.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7283
Summary:
Three changes here.
- Add `setActionList()`, and use that to set the action list.
- Add `setPropertyList()`, and use that to set the property list.
These will let us add some apropriate CSS so we can fix the border issue, and get rid of a bunch of goofy `.x + .y` selectors.
- Replace `addContent()` with `appendChild()`.
This is just a consistency thing; `AphrontView` already provides `appendChild()`, and `addContent()` did the same thing.
Test Plan:
- Viewed "All Config".
- Viewed a countdown.
- Viewed a revision (add comment, change list, table of contents, comment, local commits, open revisions affecting these files, update history).
- Viewed Diffusion (browse, change, history, repository, lint).
- Viewed Drydock (resource, lease).
- Viewed Files.
- Viewed Herald.
- Viewed Legalpad.
- Viewed macro (edit, edit audio, view).
- Viewed Maniphest.
- Viewed Applications.
- Viewed Paste.
- Viewed People.
- Viewed Phulux.
- Viewed Pholio.
- Viewed Phame (blog, post).
- Viewed Phortune (account, product).
- Viewed Ponder (questions, answers, comments).
- Viewed Releeph.
- Viewed Projects.
- Viewed Slowvote.
NOTE: Images in Files aren't on a black background anymore -- I assume that's on purpose?
NOTE: Some jankiness in Phortune, I'll clean that up when I get back to it. Not related to this diff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7174
Summary: This adds the 'PHUIObjectBox' to nearly every place that should get it. I need to comb through Diffusion a little more. I've left Differential mostly alone, but may decide to do it anyways this weekend. I'm sure I missed something else, but these are easy enough to update.
Test Plan: tested each new layout.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7162
Summary: The adds the ability to set 'properties' such as state, privacy, due date to the header of objects.
Test Plan: Implemented in Paste, Pholio. Tested various states.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7016
Summary: the attachX upgrade means we need to blank this out formally when creating a new object. Fixes https://github.com/facebook/phabricator/issues/383
Test Plan: loaded phortune for the first time - no fatal and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6939
Summary: Adds plain support for object lists that just look like lists
Test Plan: review UIexamples and a number of other applications
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6922
Summary:
This attempts some consistency in form layouts. Notably, they all now contain headers and are 16px off the sides and tops of pages. Also updated dialogs to the same look and feel. I think I got 98% of forms with this pass, but it's likely I missed some buried somewhere.
TODO: will take another pass as consolidating these colors and new gradients in another diff.
Test Plan: Played in my sandbox all week. Please play with it too and let me know how they feel.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6806
Summary:
^\s+(['"])dust\1\s*=>\s*true,?\s*$\n
Test Plan: Looked through the diff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6769
Summary:
Ref T3373. The submit listener doesn't properly scope the form it listens to right now, so several forms on the page mean that comments post to one of them more or less at random.
Scope it properly by telling it which object PHID it is associated with.
Test Plan: Made Question comments, saw comments Ajax in on the question itself rather than on an arbitrary answer.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6611
Summary:
Fixes T2691. Now, all PhabricatorActionListViews in the codebase setObjectHref to $request->getRequestURI. This value is passed over to PhabricatorActionItems right before they are rendered. If a PhabricatorActionItem is a workflow and there is no user OR the user is logged out, we used this objectURI to construct a log in URI.
Potentially added some undesirable behavior to aggressively setUser (and later setObjectURI) from within the List on Actions... This should be okay-ish unless there was a vision of actions having different user objects associated with them. I think this is a safe assumption.
Test Plan: played around with a mock all logged out (Ref T2652) and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2691
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6416
Summary:
This diff covers a bit of ground.
- PHUIDocumentExample has been added
- PHUIDocument has been extended with new features
- PhabricatorMenuView is now PHUIListView
- PhabricatorMenuItemView is now PHUIItemListView
Overall - I think I've gotten all the edges covered here. There is some derpi-ness that we can talk about, comments in the code. Responsive design is missing from the new features on PHUIDocument, will follow up later.
Test Plan: Tested mobile and desktop menus, old phriction layout, new document views, new lists, and object lists.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6130
Summary: I introduced this helper at some point, clean up all the code duplication around content sources.
Test Plan: Grepped; hit edit interfaces for most/all of these.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, edward
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6030
Summary:
Ref T2787. See discussion in D5834.
- Replace `PhortuneUtil` with `PhortuneCurrency`, which feels a little better and more flexible / future-proof.
- Add unit tests.
- Display prices explicitly as "$... USD".
Test Plan: Hit product list, cart, purchase flow, verified displays.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5841
Summary:
Paypal doesn't let us capture cards in a PCI-free way like Stripe and Balanced do, but we can provide a "pay with paypal" option at checkout. (For subscriptions, we'll have to invoice monthly to retain control over billing, but this doesn't seem wildly unreasonable.) The bitcoin provider MtGox works in a similar way, as do some other providers we might some day want to implement.
This adds:
- Hooks to providers so they can offer "pay once at checkout" workflows.
- Hooks so providers can have controllers, for redirect-based third-party workflows.
- Basic Paypal integration using the "Express Checkout Merchant API", which seems like the best fit for our use case. This only goes as far as shoving the user through the payment flow; we don't actually capture payments yet (paypal has around 35 different APIs, but this one seems to be the only PCI-free one which wouldn't give users an awful experience).
This diff is fairly checkpointey, but Phortune doesn't really bill anything yet anyway. Ref T2787.
Test Plan: Ran through Paypal sandbox workflow; "paid" for stuff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5834
Summary:
This has no real behavioral changes (except better error handling), it just factors things out to be a bit cleaner. In particular:
- Move more shared form behaviors into the common JS form component.
- Move more error handling into shared pathways.
- Make the specialized Stripe / Balanced methods do less work.
This needs some more polish for nontrival errors (especially on the Balanced side) but none of the error behavior is worse than it was and a lot of it is much better.
Ref T2787.
Test Plan: Hit all invalid form errors, added valid payment methods with Stripe and Balacned.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5771
Summary:
Ref T2787. For payment methods that allow you to add a billable method (i.e., a credit card), move all the logic into the provider. In particular:
- Providers may (Stripe, Balanced) or may not (Paypal, MtGox) allow you to add rebillable payment methods. Providers which don't allow rebillable methods will appear at checkout instead and we'll just invoice you every month if you don't use a rebillable method.
- Providers which permit creation of rebillable methods handle their own data entry, since this will be per-provider.
- "Add Payment Method" now prompts you to choose a provider. This is super ugly and barely-usable for the moment. When there's only one choice, we'll auto-select it in the future.
Test Plan: Added new Stripe payment methods; hit all the Stripe errors.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5756
Summary: Abstract out the Stripiness of payment providers so we can add a Test provider (and maybe MtGox / Balanced / Paypal / etc). Ref T2787.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5752
Summary: Although I imagine we aren't really going to have an "add to cart" type storefront, putting this in place makes a lot of other workflows simpler. No storage yet, just allows reasonable construction of a "buy stuff" page.
Test Plan: {F41342}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5745
Summary: Fixes T2962. That task discusses this issue.
Test Plan: Read php-curl documentation to verify this change makes sense. Sent an email with SES.
Reviewers: btrahan, garoevans
Reviewed By: garoevans
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2962
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5669
Summary: Adds in the ActionList into Crumbs for mobile on many applications.
Test Plan: Tested each application except probably drydock since not sure how to test that. Also cleaned up Ponder a little.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5648
Summary:
Ref T2787. A product is the abstract representation of something you can buy or rent/subscribe to. Although the interface isn't locked down yet, this would ultimately be internal/administrative.
Products likely have some user-facing skin on top of them: plans would have a purchasing/comparison flow, physical goods would have a storefront, etc., so products don't have any information like descriptions or images, just the data that Phortune needs to correctly bill accounts.
Generally, this is very basic for the moment.
Test Plan:
{F37594}
{F37595}
{F37596}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5441
Summary:
Hook @btrahan's Stripe form to the rest of Phortune.
- Users can add payment methods.
- They are saved to Stripe and associated with PhortunePaymentMethods on our side.
- Payment methods appear on account overview.
Test Plan:
{F37548}
{F37549}
{F37550}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5438
Summary:
Ref T2787. This does very little so far, but makes inroads on accounts and billing. This is mostly just modeled on what Stripe looks like. The objects are:
- **Account**: Has one or more authorized users, who can make manage the account. An example might be "Phacility", and the three of us would be able to manage it. A user may be associated with more than one account (e.g., a corporate account and a personal account) but the UI tries to simplify the common case of a single account.
- **Payment Method**: Something we can get sweet sweet money from; for now, a credit card registered with Stripe. Payment methods are associated with an account.
- **Product**: A good (one time charge) or service (recurring charge). This might be "t-shirt" or "enterprise plan" or "hourly support" or whatever else.
- **Purchase**: Represents a user purchasing a Product for an Account, using a Payment Method. e.g., you bought a shirt, or started a plan, or purchased support.
- **Charge**: Actual charges against payment methods. A Purchase can create more than one charge if it's a plan, or if the first charge fails and we re-bill.
This doesn't fully account for stuff like coupons/discounts yet but they should fit into the model without any issues.
This only implements `Account`, and that only partially.
Test Plan: {F37531}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5435
