Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: Instead of implementing the `getTypeConstant` method in all subclasses of `PhabricatorPHIDType`, provide a `final` implementation in the base class which uses reflection. See D9837 for a similar implementation.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit`.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9985
Summary:
Fixes T4917. Currently, if a user doesn't have access to, e.g., Phriction, they still get a checkbox in the search results to search for Wiki Documents. Those results will be filtered anyway, so this is confusing at best.
Instead, bind PHID types to applications. This is a relatively tailored fix; some areas for potential future work:
- Go through every PHID type and bind them all to applications. Vaguely nice to have, but doesn't get us anything for now.
- If no searchable application is installed, we don't show you an error state. This isn't currently possible ("People" is always installed) but in the interest of generality we could throw an exception or something at least.
- The elasticserach thing could probably constrain types to visible types, but we don't have a viewer there easily right now.
Test Plan: Uninstalled Phriction, saw the checkbox vanish.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4917
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8904
Summary: Fixes T4606. Also shortens two unusual type names which are currently inconsistent.
Test Plan: Expanded advanced search.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4606
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8853
Summary:
Ref T2222. Make the "EditPro" controller accommodate diff updates, and support the transaction type. This one is pretty straightforward.
Also make `revisionPHID` in the comments table nullable to fix the "Edit" action.
Test Plan:
- Created new revision.
- Updated revision.
- Tried to do some invalid stuff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8376
Summary:
These just got copy/pasted like crazy, the base class has the correct default implementation.
(I'm adding "H" for Herald Rules, which is why I was in this code.)
I also documented the existing prefixes at [[ Object Name Prefixes ]].
Test Plan: Verified base implementation. Typed some object names into the jump nav.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: hach-que, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7785
Summary:
Currently, "Closed" and "Abandoned" are treated as "closed". I want to add a flag which treats "Accepted" as "Closed", too, for Asana and other companies who use an Asana-like workflow.
The background here is that their workflow is a bit weird. They basically do audits, but have a lot of things which Diffusion doesn't do well right now. This one change makes Differential fit their workflow fairly well, even though it's an audit workflow.
To prepare for this, normalize the definition of "closed" better. We have a few callsites which explicitly check for "ABANDONED || CLOSED", and normalizing this is cleaner anyway.
Also delete the very old COMMITTED status, which has been obsolete for over a year.
Test Plan: Browsed around most/all of the affected interfaces.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7653
Summary:
Ref T1049. Ref T2222. `DifferentialDiff` does not currently have a PHID, but we need it for Harbormaster and ApplicationTransactions. See some discussion in D7501.
(I split the SQL into two sections so we can't fail in the middle. At some point, I'd like to do a pass on the migration stuff and get this happening automatically, and also simplify the PatchList.)
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade`.
- Checked for valid PHIDs in the database.
- Used `phid.query` to look up a diff by PHID.
- Created a new diff and verified it got a PHID.
Reviewers: btrahan, hach-que
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T2222, T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7513
Summary:
While we mostly have reasonable effective object accessibility when you lock a user out of an application, it's primarily enforced at the controller level. Users can still, e.g., load the handles of objects they can't actually see. Instead, lock the queries to the applications so that you can, e.g., never load a revision if you don't have access to Differential.
This has several parts:
- For PolicyAware queries, provide an application class name method.
- If the query specifies a class name and the user doesn't have permission to use it, fail the entire query unconditionally.
- For handles, simplify query construction and count all the PHIDs as "restricted" so we get a UI full of "restricted" instead of "unknown" handles.
Test Plan:
- Added a unit test to verify I got all the class names right.
- Browsed around, logged in/out as a normal user with public policies on and off.
- Browsed around, logged in/out as a restricted user with public policies on and off. With restrictions, saw all traces of restricted apps removed or restricted.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7367
Summary: Ref T603. Ref D6941.
Test Plan: Clicked around all over - looked good. I plan to re-test D6941 to make sure the executeOne case works now as intended
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6944
Summary: I copied this over wrong. Ref T2715
Test Plan: Looked at Maniphest with linked commits/revisions, e.g.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6531
