1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-11 17:32:41 +01:00
Commit graph

142 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
a7955e919c Remove all reads of ReleephProject->repositoryID
Summary:
Ref T3655. ReleephProject currently has both `repositoryID` and `repositoryPHID`, which point to the same object and are reudundant. Get rid of all reads of `repositoryID`.

NOTE: This makes project loads depend on repository loads. The eventual rule here will be that you must be able to see a repository in order to see projects for that repository, which seems like a reasonable rule. We might need to tailor it more than this (e.g., if there are branch read permissions down the line) but this seems like a reasonable minimum.

Test Plan: Grepped for `repositoryID` in `releeph/`. Called `releeph.getbranches`.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: LegNeato, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3655

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6633
2013-08-14 08:59:28 -07:00
Edward Speyer
bca9dfa10e Fix for D6260
Summary: Fixes a query in √D6260.

Test Plan: View a Releeph RQ and verify that the "churn" field renders and has the right numbers in it.

Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6702
2013-08-08 16:32:05 +01:00
epriestley
ece246cb72 Modernize Releeph Request create/edit controller
Summary: Ref T3092.

Test Plan: Created a new pick request. Edited an existing pick request.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3092

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6630
2013-07-30 12:38:32 -07:00
epriestley
333e377488 Modernize Releeph project create controller
Summary:
Ref T3092.

  - Check for a duplicate key error;
  - do less single loading and use Query classes;
  - use responsive UI elements;
  - add crumbs.

Test Plan: Created a new project, and hit error cases.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3092

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6629
2013-07-30 12:38:11 -07:00
epriestley
5cc3bbf721 Use application PHIDs for application transactions
Summary: Ref T2715. Ref T3578. Load application transactions through application PHID infrastructure.

Test Plan: Viewed feed, saw successful loads of application transaction objects and rendered feed stories.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2715, T3578

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6617
2013-07-29 12:04:15 -07:00
epriestley
cf9dc5d189 Fix bug when multiple comment forms appear on a single page
Summary:
Ref T3373. The submit listener doesn't properly scope the form it listens to right now, so several forms on the page mean that comments post to one of them more or less at random.

Scope it properly by telling it which object PHID it is associated with.

Test Plan: Made Question comments, saw comments Ajax in on the question itself rather than on an arbitrary answer.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3373

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6611
2013-07-29 12:04:10 -07:00
epriestley
d2e5afb095 Use application PHIDs in Releeph, plus more
Summary:
Ref T2715. Ref T3551. Ref T603. This does a few things, but they're all sort of small:

  - We commonly use a `getX()` / `attachX()` pattern, but have very similar code in the `getX()` method every time. Provide a convenience method to make this pattern easier to write.
  - We use `willFilterPage()` in many queries, but it currently is called with zero or more results. This means we have a lot of "if no results, return nothing" boilerplate. Make it call only for one or more results.
  - Implement `PhabricatorPolicyInterface` on `ReleephBranch`. A branch has the same policy as its project.
  - Implement `ReleephBranchQuery`.
  - Move the branch PHID type to application PHID infrastructure.

Test Plan: Browsed Releeph. Used `phid.query` to query branch PHIDs.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T603, T2715, T3551

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6512
2013-07-22 12:17:32 -07:00
epriestley
220f0ea4d1 Delete various dead/nonuseful PHID code
Summary:
Ref T2715.

  - Remove the "PHID" application. `phid.query` provides a reasonable way for developers to get this data without requiring a top-level application.
  - Remove some dead/uncalled code.

Test Plan: No more PHID application. Grepped for callsites.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2715

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6511
2013-07-22 12:17:31 -07:00
epriestley
f2ed56147d Use application handle infrastructure for Releeph Requests and Releeph Projects
Summary: Ref T2715.

Test Plan: Used `phid.query` to query handles. Browsed Releeph.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2715

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6510
2013-07-22 12:17:30 -07:00
epriestley
215da7728f Use ApplicationSearch in Releeph project list
Summary: Ref T3092. Convert Releeph project list to ApplicationSearch.

Test Plan: {F50333}

Reviewers: btrahan, edward

Reviewed By: edward

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3092

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6474
2013-07-21 08:44:53 -07:00
epriestley
904a24c1df Provide an application-wide controller for Releeph
Summary: Fixes T3548. Concrete Releeph controllers currently extend either from ReleephController or PhabricatorController directly. Instead, make them all extend ReleephController. Introduce ReleephProjectController for controllers which depend on project context. Project context code which lived in ReleephController moves to ReleephProjectController.

Test Plan: Viewed list, project, releases, requests.

Reviewers: btrahan, edward

Reviewed By: edward

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3548

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6472
2013-07-21 08:42:10 -07:00
epriestley
8190b16c60 Fix Releeph application icon
Summary: Fixes T3546. The Application just used an outdated method name. Use the modern method name.

Test Plan: {F50319}

Reviewers: btrahan, edward, chad

Reviewed By: chad

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3546

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6471
2013-07-16 13:48:36 -07:00
epriestley
328aa383e4 Always provide a viewer when executing DifferentialRevisionQuery
Summary: Ref T603. This query isn't policy-aware yet, but prepare for it to be one day.

Test Plan: Looked at: home page; differential home; differential detail; diffusion browse. Made differential.query conduit call.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T603

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6337
2013-07-01 12:38:27 -07:00
epriestley
6a2e27ba8d Put all DifferentialComment loading behind DifferentialCommentQuery
Summary:
Ref T2222.

I'm thinking about how I want to approach the Asana sync, and I want to try to do T2222 first so that we can build it cleanly on top of ApplicationTransactions. I think we can at least walk down this road a little bit and if it turns out to be scary we can take another approach.

I was generally very happy with how the auth migration turned out (seemingly, it was almost completely clean), and want to pursue a similar strategy here. Basically:

  - Wrap the new objects in the old objects for reads/writes.
  - Migrate all the existing data to the new table.
  - Everything hard is done; move things over a piece at a time at a leisurely pace in lots of smallish, relatively-easy-to-understand changes.

This deletes or abstracts all reads of the DifferentialComment table. In particular, these things are **deleted**:

  - The script `undo_commits.php`, which I haven't pointed anyone at in a very long time.
  - The `differential.getrevisionfeedback` Conduit method, which has been marked deprecated for a year or more.
  - The `/stats/` interface in Differential, which should be rebuilt on Fact and has never been exposed in the UI. It does a ton of joins and such which are prohibitively difficult to migrate.

This leaves a small number of reading interfaces, which I replaced with a new `DifferentialCommentQuery`. Some future change will make this actually load transactions and wrap them with DifferentialComment interfaces.

Test Plan: Viewed a revision; made revision comments

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: edward, chad, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6260
2013-06-21 12:51:18 -07:00
Chad Little
f1bf27959f PHUIList, PHUIDocument updates
Summary:
This diff covers a bit of ground.

- PHUIDocumentExample has been added
- PHUIDocument has been extended with new features
- PhabricatorMenuView is now PHUIListView
- PhabricatorMenuItemView is now PHUIItemListView

Overall - I think I've gotten all the edges covered here. There is some derpi-ness that we can talk about, comments in the code. Responsive design is missing from the new features on PHUIDocument, will follow up later.

Test Plan: Tested mobile and desktop menus, old phriction layout, new document views, new lists, and object lists.

Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6130
2013-06-05 08:41:43 -07:00
Edward Speyer
55f8e2a565 Let requestors claim their code is picked
Summary:
In Releeph, `ReleephRequestHeaderView` will render you a "mark-manually-picked" button if (a) you are authoritative (chuckr) or (b) you are the person who created this Releeph request.

However `ReleephRequestActionController`, which handles these button presses, will only do something if you are (a).  This patch honors your button pressing if you are (b) as well.

Test Plan: Push buttons.  There's another bug in the Javascript do-stuff-without-reloading-the-page code that handles these button pushes, but I'd like to fix that separately from handling this hi-pri bug.

Reviewers: epriestley, wez

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6036
2013-05-28 16:21:26 +01:00
epriestley
1430c2c449 Provide a concrete class for one-off remarkup blocks
Summary: I want to use some of these for instructional text in Diffusion. Provide a concrete class to make one-offs cacheable and switch Releeph to use it.

Test Plan: {F44175}

Reviewers: btrahan, chad, edward

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6032
2013-05-24 12:37:53 -07:00
epriestley
6dda35897a Use setContentSourceFromRequest() in more places
Summary: I introduced this helper at some point, clean up all the code duplication around content sources.

Test Plan: Grepped; hit edit interfaces for most/all of these.

Reviewers: btrahan, chad, edward

Reviewed By: chad

CC: aran

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6030
2013-05-24 10:48:34 -07:00
Edward Speyer
4692920751 Releeph: use relative URIs
Summary: I used the `PhabricatorEnv::getProductionURI()` in too many places to build Releeph URIs.  The only places that should need full URIs are the links generated for Releeph emails, and in Conduit responses that link to Releeph objects.

Test Plan:
- Grep for `getProductionURI()` in Releeph, and make sure only sensible, non-DOM building places use it.
- Inspect the Releeph DOM to make sure hrefs etc. are relative.

Reviewers: wez, epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5999
2013-05-22 15:42:30 +01:00
epriestley
5cd13c3c65 Remove the last hardcoding from PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail
Summary:
Moves all remaining mail handling into ReplyHandlers.

Farewell, `getPhabricatorToInformation()`! You were a bad method and no one liked you.

Ref T1205.

Test Plan:
  - Used test console to send mail to Revisions, Tasks, Conpherences and Commits (these all actually work).
  - Used test console to send mail to Requests, Macros, Questions and Mocks (these accept the mail but don't do anything with it, but didn't do anything before either).

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1205

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5953
2013-05-17 10:00:49 -07:00
epriestley
bb0a39a48c Add loadObject() methods to PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver subclasses
Summary: This doesn't do anything, but touches a bunch of files so I split it out to reduce the size of the next diff. Basically, make `MailReceiver` classes responsible for loading their application objects. Ref T1205.

Test Plan: Inspection / next diff / code is not reached.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1205

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5941
2013-05-17 03:47:46 -07:00
Bob Trahan
016b62a7ef Diffusion - move some DiffusionRequest queries to occur over Conduit
Summary: Ref T2784. This one was a wee bit complicated. Had to add PhabricatorUser and concept of initFromConduit (or not) to DiffusionRequest.

Test Plan: foreach repo, visited CALLSIGN and clicked a commit and verified they laoded correctly. Hacked code to hit NOT via Conduit and repeated tests to great success.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: chad, aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T2784

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5928
2013-05-14 15:32:19 -07:00
epriestley
341079c3cf Move some received mail responsibility to applications
Summary:
Ref T1205. Continuation of D5915.

Currently, `PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail` has //all// the logic for routing mail. In particular:

  - New mail receivers in applications must edit it.
  - Mail receivers don't drop out when applications are uninstalled.

Applications have some logic in subclasses of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler`, but this class is a bit of a mess. It is also heavily based on the assumption that mail receivers are objects (like revisions), but this is not true in at least two cases today (creating new tasks with `bugs@`, creating a new Conpherence thread) and likely other cases in the future (e.g., revision-by-mail).

Move this logic into a new `PhabricatorMailReceiver` classtree. This is similar to `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` but a bit cleaner and more general. I plan to heavily reduce the responsibilities of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` or possibly eliminate it entirely.

For now, the new classtree doesn't do much of interest. The only behavioral change this diff causes is that Phabricator will now reject mail to an application when that application is uninstalled.

I also moved all the `ReplyHandler` classes into `mail/` directories in their respective applications.

Test Plan: Unit tests, used receive test to route mail to various objects.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: Afaque_Hussain, edward, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1205

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5922
2013-05-14 10:57:41 -07:00
elenaperezrioja
af220fddc1 Add get Releeph Requests conduit method
Summary: Added "getrequests" conduit method

Test Plan: Open /conduit/method/differential.getrequests/ and try different inputs.

Reviewers: edward, epriestley

Reviewed By: edward

CC: aran, epriestley, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T3057

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5788
2013-05-14 09:50:23 -07:00
Edward Speyer
da92d79d8d ReleephRequestStatus
Summary: This is just a bit of gardening in order to make the responsive-UI diff easier; I'll be putting `getColorFor($status)` type things in this class, following the pattern in `ManiphestTaskStatus`.

Test Plan: Poke around Releeph.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5893
2013-05-11 15:20:16 +01:00
Edward Speyer
fcb7286533 ReleephRequest xactions
Summary:
Migrate to `PhabricatorApplicationTransactions` (`ReleephRequestTransactions` applied by `ReleephRequestTransactionalEditor`, instead of `ReleephRequestEvents` created by `ReleephRequestEditor`) and migrate all the old events into transactions.  Email is supported in the standard way (no more `ReleephRequestMail`) as well.

This also collapses the Releeph request create and edit controllers into one class, as well as breaking everyone's subject-based mail rules by standardising them (but which should be more easily filtered by looking at headers.)

Test Plan:
* Make requests, then pick them.
* Pick and revert the same request so that discovery happens way after `arc` has told Releeph about what's been happening.
* Try to pick something that fails to pick in a project with pick instructions (and see the instructions are in the email.)
* Load all of FB's Releeph data into my DB and run the `storage upgrade` script.
* Request a commit via the "action" in a Differential revision.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: epriestley, aran, Korvin, wez

Maniphest Tasks: T3092, T2720

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5868
2013-05-11 15:20:09 +01:00
Edward Speyer
00cc6b1ba5 Double escape %N (%%N) for pht in Releeph project editor
Summary: Oops, `pht()` interpolates percent escape sequences, but this is a literal "%N".

Test Plan: Edit a Releeph project; notice no errors.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5897
2013-05-11 14:00:18 +01:00
Edward Speyer
48b7539d7d Cache the Releeph project edit page's help remarkup
Summary: I wrote some of the Releeph-project edit-page's help in remarkup.  This renders the remarkup using the `PhabricatorMarkupEngine` pipeline.

Test Plan:
* Edit a Releeph project.
* Feel the cool base of a laptop whose CPU is no longer being thrashed by onerous remarkup rendering duties.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T3098

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5898
2013-05-10 22:39:36 +01:00
Edward Speyer
961c2c0108 Releeph s/isPusher/isAuthoritative/
Summary: Instead of being able to ask if someone was a pusher or not, ask if they are "authoritative" enough to make decisions about Releeph requests.  A person is authoritative if a project has pushers, and they are a pusher, or in the case of pusher-less projects, everyone is authoritative.

Test Plan: Make a request in a project with no pushers (it is immediately ready to be picked) and a project with pushers (where it requires approval.)

Reviewers: wez, epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: epriestley, aran

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5877
2013-05-09 17:55:40 +01:00
Edward Speyer
be358bddae Dead code in Releeph
Summary: Two lines of dead code gone.  ##impact!##

Test Plan: View a Releeph request.

Reviewers: foldLeft, epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, epriestley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5876
2013-05-09 17:55:30 +01:00
Edward Speyer
58f0f37873 Add mail keys to ReleephRequests
Summary: Adding mail-keys; required for `PhabricatorApplicationTransaction` support.

Test Plan: Upgrade an old database with this patch, observe the matrix: {F42620}

Reviewers: wez, epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2720

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5852
2013-05-08 10:38:07 +01:00
Edward Speyer
5b2fc6a184 Simplify ReleephRequest schema
Summary:
Removing a bunch of cache-style columns from `ReleephRequest`, where it's actually much easier to just load the information at runtime.

This makes sense for migrating to `PhabricatorApplicationTransactions`, where each xaction changes one aspect of a `ReleephRequest` at a time (rather than multiple columns at once.)

Test Plan: Request something, run `arc releeph` and watch the picks, pass on some RQs, run `arc releeph` and watch the reverts.

Reviewers: wez, epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2720

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5851
2013-05-08 10:27:20 +01:00
Edward Speyer
55c3c6cb12 Some ReleephRequests don't have diffs
Summary: Not every commit requested in Releeph has to have come from a Differential revision.  If you have a Releeph request for a commit without a Differential revision, you currently get this lovely error in the logs: {P824}.  This diff silences the howling.

Test Plan: Load a Releeph branch page; observe log silence.

Reviewers: wez, epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: epriestley, aran, SEJeff, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5823
2013-05-07 11:13:22 +01:00
Edward Speyer
380f011fa1 Use the markup pipeline in Releeph
Summary: Use a single `PhabricatorMarkupEngine` to render any markup in Releeph's fields, rather than rendering everything from scratch every time.

Test Plan: Check out the "Services" tab in the dark console when rendering a page on a branch page with 500x RQs!

Reviewers: wez, epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3098

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5822
2013-05-07 11:08:41 +01:00
Edward Speyer
5c4a9ac9e5 Use LiskDAOSet's loadRelativeEdges with ReleephRequest
Summary:
`ReleephRequest`s contain the PHID for a `PhabricatorRepositoryCommit`, and commits have an edge to a `DifferentialRevision`.

Commits are loaded with the `loadOneRelative()` method that loads the commits for every `ReleephRequest` in a `LiskDAOSet`, but the edges are loaded indivdually.  A page with N RQs on it makes one DB query for the commits, but N queries for the `TYPE_COMMIT_HAS_DREV` edges.

This diff uses `loadRelativeEdges` instead to load the edges all in one query.

Test Plan: {F42290}

Reviewers: wez, epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: epriestley, vrana, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2714

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5820
2013-05-07 11:05:18 +01:00
Chad Little
8eb85683f0 pht for Releeph
Summary: Went and pht'd most everything I could find, except exceptions. Fixes T3091

Test Plan: Bopped around the application, didn't seem to break anything but didn't test all flows. Should be safe.

Reviewers: epriestley, edward

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T3091

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5825
2013-05-03 18:33:49 -07:00
Jakub Vrana
e31e998f3b Convert differential.revisionPHID commit detail to edge
Summary: Migration doesn't delete differential.revisionPHID but maybe it should?

Test Plan: Reparsed commit, ran the migration, deleted differential.revisionPHID, looked at task with attached commit with attached revision.

Reviewers: epriestley, edward

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5634
2013-04-12 22:48:16 -07:00
epriestley
ae1f0e3b1b Introduce ReleephProjectQuery
Summary:
Adds a policy-aware query class for selecting Releeph projects. This doesn't really change anything.

  - Make `ReleephProject` implment `PhabricatorPolicyInterface`, beginning the long journey to make it policy-aware.
  - Implement `ReleephProjectQuery`, for querying projects using cursor-based, policy-aware paging.
  - Use it on the list view, so we load only ~100 projects instead of all of them.
  - Tweaked some of the URI routing stuff to make it a little more consistent with common practices.

Ref T2714.

Test Plan:
{F36434}
{F36435}

Reviewers: edward

Reviewed By: edward

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2714

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5390
2013-03-22 06:29:37 -07:00
Anh Nhan Nguyen
04869c6fcc Made declaration of ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController::willProcessRequest() consistent with AphrontController::willProcessRequest(array $uri_data)
Summary:
When submitting a diff I noticed that the unit test `testEverythingImplemented` threw an error that did not fail a test.

```
[2013-03-18 16:35:16] ERROR 2048: Declaration of ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController::willProcessRequest() should be compatible with AphrontController::willProcessRequest(array $uri_data) at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/phabricator/src/applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController.php:99]
  #0 PhutilBootloader::executeInclude called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/libphutil/src/__phutil_library_init__.php:203]
  #1 PhutilBootloader::executeInclude(/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/phabricator/src/applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController.php) called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/libphutil/src/__phutil_library_init__.php:193]
  #2 PhutilBootloader::loadLibrarySource(phabricator, applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController.php) called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/libphutil/src/symbols/PhutilSymbolLoader.php:341]
  #3 PhutilSymbolLoader::loadSymbol(Array of size 4 starting with: { type => class }) called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/libphutil/src/symbols/PhutilSymbolLoader.php:246]
  #4 PhutilSymbolLoader::selectAndLoadSymbols() called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/phabricator/src/infrastructure/__tests__/PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase.php:15]
  #5 PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase::testEverythingImplemented()
  #6 call_user_func_array(Array of size 2 starting with: { 0 => Object PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase }, Array ) called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/arcanist/src/unit/engine/phutil/ArcanistPhutilTestCase.php:441]
  #7 ArcanistPhutilTestCase::run() called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/arcanist/src/unit/engine/PhutilUnitTestEngine.php:60]
  #8 PhutilUnitTestEngine::run() called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/arcanist/src/workflow/ArcanistUnitWorkflow.php:160]
  #9 ArcanistUnitWorkflow::run() called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/arcanist/scripts/arcanist.php:271]
```

Test Plan:
`arc unit --everything` before this change gave error.

applied this change. Re-ran `arc unit --everything`, no error.

Reviewers: edward

Reviewed By: edward

CC: aran, epriestley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5373
2013-03-19 06:04:43 -07:00
Edward Speyer
66b414188c Remove deprecated call to renderSingleView
Summary: Return an array of renderables instead of rendering things ourselves (which we used to do with `AphrontView->renderSingleView()`.)

Test Plan: View a Releeph branch; gloriously notice no deprecated warnings.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5363
2013-03-18 11:17:02 +00:00
Edward Speyer
c55b866d3c Underp ReleephDefaultFieldSelector
Summary: Oops.  Functions only return stuff when you call the `return()` function on the `lvalue`.

Test Plan: Use `ReleephDefaultFieldSelector` is the field selector in a test Releeph project.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5362
2013-03-18 11:16:23 +00:00
Edward Speyer
2497e5b5ed Releeph (Phabricator part)
Summary: A copy of the Releeph release tool.

Test Plan: Generally, click everything at least once.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan

Maniphest Tasks: T2094

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4932
2013-03-15 11:28:43 +00:00