Summary: Ref T2217. Render feed stories like "alincoln updated T123" instead of "alincoln updated this task.". Fix up some more translations.
Test Plan: Looked at feed, saw something a bit more reasonable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7108
Summary: Ref T2217. Cleans up some of the "attached %d file(s)" stuff.
Test Plan: Generated some of these transactions and verified they render more naturally.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7096
Summary: Simplify rendering of the repository list. For inactive repositories, mark them disabled.
Test Plan: {F57615}
Reviewers: btrahan, rockybean
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6921
Summary: Fixes T3486. I don't love how this looks -- maybe we could try different icons? Like white icons on a brighter red/yellow background?
Test Plan: {F56299}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3486
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6833
Summary:
Releeph branch lists in project views have a bunch of custom UI right now; give them more standard UI and ApplicationSearch.
This drops a small piece of functionality: we now show only a total open request count instead of a detailed enumeration of each request status. I assume this is reasonable (that is, the important piece is "is there something to do on this branch?"), but we can muck with it if the more detailed status is important.
Test Plan: {F54344}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3656
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6764
Summary: Fixes T2654.
Test Plan: attached lots of mocks and tasks to one another from both maniphest and pholio. verified transactions rendered okay in both applications
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2654
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6501
Summary:
Nice title. We add three new transactions - IMAGE_FILE, IMAGE_NAME, and IMAGE_DESCRIPTION. The first is a bit like subscribers as it is a list of file phids. The latter have values of the form ($file_phid => $data), where $data is $name or $description respectively. This is because we need to collate transactions based on $file_phid...
Overall, this uses the _underyling files_ and not the "PholioImage" to determine if things are unique or not. That said, simply mark PholioImages as obsolete so inline comments about no-longer applicable PholioImages don't break.
Does a reasonable job implementing the mock. Note you can't "update" an image at this time, though you can delete and add at will.
Test Plan: played with pholio a ton.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3489
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6441
Summary:
Refs T1048
Adding Differential Hovercard EventListener
Adding People Hovercard EventListener
Adding basic Diffusion hovercard
Adding Conpherence Hovercard EventListener
Test Plan:
Used in a combo with working hovercards. So beautiful.
Also visited test page. Works alright.
awesometown
Reviewers: epriestley, chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1048
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5576
Summary:
adds ye olde people widget. Features include
- handle-based display, so we get status for free. (Note less pretty than M14 would have it!)
- can add a person
- can remove a person
- can see the people already in the conpherence
Test Plan: added and removed people and noted they joined / re-added as appropriate. Tried to add someone already in the conpherence and got a "transaction has no effect" message
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5466
Summary:
Fixes T2639 by grouping related transactions at display time, so all the inlines merge into a nice block.
(Note that this does not do anything about T2709 yet, so there's still no way to figure out where the inlines actually are.)
Test Plan: {F35262}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2639
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5313
Summary:
Also splits blocking and active revisions.
This could display 0 with non-empty tip over it.
It's intentional meaning that 0 objects need your attention but there is still some work to do.
Test Plan: Hovered over number.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5049
Summary:
- Remove some redundant copies of translations after D4985.
- Make some %d more grammatical, "run this command" reads better than "run this 1 command". In context, these numbers are always very small, so counting them even in the >1 variants aren't useful.
- Fix subscriber(s).
Test Plan: Looked at an unsubscribe story, saw translation.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4989
Summary: It's a little bit confusing that you couldn't use %d but kind of expected taken that the number will be formatted so it's not a number anymore.
Test Plan: /paste/
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4764
Summary: it's ugly. but it works. basically. See T2399 for a roughly prioritized list of what still needs to happen.
Test Plan:
- created a conpherence with myself from my profile
- created a conpherence with myself from "new conpherence"
- created a conphernece with another from "new conpherence"
- created a conpherence with several others
- created a conpherence with files in the initial post
- verified files via comment text ("{F232} is awesome!") and via traditional attach
- edited a conpherence image
- verified it showed up in the header and in the conpherence menu on the left
- edited a conpherence title
- verified it showed up in the header and in the conpherence menu on the right
- verified each widget showed up when clicked and displayed the proper data
- calendar being an exception since it sucks so hard right now.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, chad, codeblock, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2301
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4620
Summary: Adds an ALL CAPs language, requires changes from libphutil as well.
Test Plan: Turn on AC, get caps back. Turn it back to English, stuff went away.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4627
Summary: Port the database checks over.
Test Plan: Triggered all the checks via intentional misconfiguration.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2228
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4590
Summary: We now issue only valid setup warnings, so we can let administrators know when we detect problems.
Test Plan:
Banner:
{F29568}
Created a fake issue; saw banner. No banner inside /config/. Resovled the issue, banner went away.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2221
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4493
Summary:
The search indexing API has several problems right now:
- Always runs in-process.
- It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it.
- Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster.
- Instead, make the API phid-oriented.
- No uniform indexing API.
- Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird.
- Instead, provide a uniform API.
- No uniform CLI.
- We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers.
- Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing.
- Not application-oriented.
- All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world.
- Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader.
Test Plan:
- `bin/search index`
- Indexed one revision, one task.
- Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types.
- Indexed `--all`.
- Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it.
- Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing.
- Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing.
- Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: 20after4, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
Summary:
D4188 adds a preview of Paste contents to the list, but gets slow for large lists if you have Pygments installed since it has to spend ~200ms/item highlighting them. Instead, cache the highlighted output.
- Adds a Paste highlighting cache. This uses RemarkupCache because it has automatic GC and we don't have a more generalized cache for the moment.
- Uses the Paste cache on paste list and paste detail.
- Adds a little padding to the summary.
- Adds "..." if there's more content.
- Adds line count and language, if available. These are hidden on Mobile.
- Nothing actually uses needRawContent() but I left it there since it doesn't hurt anything and is used internally (I thought the detail view did, but it uses the file content directly, and must for security reasons).
Test Plan:
{F27710}
- Profiled paste list, saw good performance and few service calls.
- Viewed paste.
- Viewed raw paste content.
Reviewers: codeblock, btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4204
Summary:
When a user submits an action with no effect (like an empty comment, an "abandon" on an already-accepted revision, or a "close, resolved" on a closed task) we want to alert them that their action isn't effective. These warnings fall into two general buckets:
- User is submitting two or more actions, and some aren't effective but some are. Prompt them to apply the effective actions only.
- A special case of this is where the only effective action is a comment. We provide tailored text ("Post Comment") in this case.
- User is submitting one action, which isn't effective. Tell them they're out of luck.
- A special case of this is an empty comment. We provide tailored text in this case.
By default, the transaction editor throws when transactions have no effect. The caller can then deal with this, or use `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionNoEffectResponse` to provide a standard dialog that gives the user information as above. For cases where we expect transactions to have no effect (notably, "edit" forms) we just continue on no-effect unconditionally.
Also fix an issue where new, combined or filtered transactions would not be represented properly in the Ajax response (i.e., return final transactions from `applyTransactions()`), and translate some strings.
Test Plan:
- Submitted empty and nonempy comments in Macro and Pholio.
- Submitted comments with new and existing "@mentions".
- Submitted edits in both applications.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T912, T2104
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4160
Test Plan:
/diffusion/ARC/lint/master/src/, clicked on count link.
/diffusion/ARC/browse/master/src/difference/?lint=XHP9, clicked on file name.
/diffusion/ARC/browse/master/src/difference/ArcanistDiffUtils.php?lint=, verified that all messages are displayed.
/diffusion/ARC/browse/master/src/difference/ArcanistDiffUtils.php?lint=XHP9.
/diffusion/ARC/browse/master/src/difference/ArcanistDiffUtils.php?lint=TXT3, verified that 0 messages are displayed.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3929
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary:
- Adds a new "Applications" application.
- Builds an application list via application config instead of via hard-coding, so we can move toward better concepts of installing/uninstalling applications, etc.
- Applications indicate that they need attention with notice counts and brief status messages rathern than 50 giant tables of all sorts of app data.
I want to try replacing the home screen with this screen, pretty much. Not sure if this is totally crazy or not. What does everyone else think?
Test Plan: Will add screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, vrana, alanh
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, davidreuss, champo
Maniphest Tasks: T1569
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3129
Summary:
Some facts are aggregations of other facts. For example, we may compute how many times each macro is used in each object as a "raw fact":
Dnnn uses macro "psyduck" 6 times.
But we want to present this data in aggregate form, e.g. "order macros by popularity". We can do this at runtime and it probably won't be too awful a query, but we can also aggregate it cheaply:
Macro "psyduck" is used 3920 times across all objects.
...and then do a query like "select macros ordered by usage".
"Aggregate" facts support facts like this. The aggregate facts I've implemented are:
- Count of all objects.
- Count of objects of type X.
- Last time facts were updated.
These clearly fit the "aggregate" facts template well. I'm not 100% sure macros do. We can use this table to answer a question like "What are the most popular macros, ordered by use?" We can also use it to answer a question like "What are the most popular macros in the last 6 months?", if we build a specific fact for that. But we can't use it to answer a question like "What are the most popular macros between times X and Y?". Maybe that's important; maybe not.
This seems like a good fit for at least some types of facts.
I'll de-magic the keys a bit in the next diff.
Test Plan: Ran the engines and got some aggregated facts about other facts.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1562
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3089
Summary:
Basic "Fact" application with some storage, part of a daemon, and a control binary.
= Goals =
The general idea is that we have various statistics we'd like to compute, like the frequency of image macros, reviewer responsiveness, task close rates, etc. Computing these on page load is expensive and messy. By building an ETL pipeline and running it in a daemon, we can precompute statistics and just pull them out of "stats" tables.
One way to do this is just to completely hard-code everything, e.g. have a daemon that runs every hour which issues a big-ass query and dumps results into a table per-fact or per fact-group. But this has a bunch of drawbacks: adding new stuff to the pipeline is a pain, various fact aggregators can't share much code, updates are slow and expensive, we can never build generic graphs on top of it, etc.
I'm hoping to build an ETL pipeline which is generic enough that we can use it for most things we're interested in without needing schema changes, and so that installs can use it also without needing schema changes, while still being specific enough that it's fast and we can build useful stuff on top of it. I'm not sure if this will actually work, but it would be cool if it does so I'm starting pretty generally and we'll see how far I get. I haven't built this exact sort of thing before so I might be way off.
I'm basing the whole thing on analyzing entire objects, not analyzing changes to objects. So each part of the pipeline is handed an object and told "analyze this", not handed a change. It pretty much deletes all the old data about that thing and then writes new data. I think this is simpler to implement and understand, and it protects us from all sorts of weird issues where we end up with some kind of garbage in the DB and have to wipe the whole thing.
= Facts =
The general idea is that we extract "facts" out of objects, and then the various view interfaces just report those facts. This change has on type of fact, a "raw fact", which is directly derived from an object. These facts are concerete and relate specifically to the object they are derived from. Some examples of such facts might be:
D123 has 9 comments.
D123 uses macro "psyduck" 15 times.
D123 adds 35 lines.
D123 has 5 files.
D123 has 1 object.
D123 has 1 object of type "DREV".
D123 was created at epoch timestamp 89812351235.
D123 was accepted by @alincoln at epoch timestamp 8397981839.
The fact storage looks like this:
<factType, objectPHID, objectA, valueX, valueY, epoch>
Currently, we supprot one optional secondary key (like a user PHID or macro PHID), two optional integer values, and an optional timestamp. We might add more later. Each fact type can use these fields if it wants. Some facts use them, others don't. For instance, this diff adds a "N:*" fact, which is just the count of total objects in the system. These facts just look like:
<"N:*", "PHID-xxxx-yyyy", ...>
...where all other fields are ignored. But some of the more complex facts might look like:
<"DREV:accept", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", ..., ..., nnnn> # User 'yyyy' accepted at epoch 'nnnn'.
<"FILE:macro", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-MACR-yyyy", 17, ..., ...> # Object 'xxxx' uses macro 'yyyy' 17 times.
Facts have no uniqueness constraints. For @vrana's reviewer responsiveness stuff, we can insert multiple rows for each reviewer, e.g.
<"DREV:reviewed", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", nnnn, ..., mmmm> # User 'yyyy' reviewed revision 'xxxx' after 'nnnn' seconds at 'mmmm'.
The second value (valueY) is mostly because we need it if we sample anything (valueX = observed value, valueY = sample rate) but there might be other uses. We might need to add "objectB" at some point too -- currently we can't represent a fact like "User X used macro Y on revision Z", so it would be impossible to compute macro use rates //for a specific user// based on this schema. I think we can start here though and see how far we get.
= Aggregated Facts =
These aren't implemented yet, but the idea is that we can then take the "raw facts" and compute derived/aggregated/rollup facts based on the raw fact table. For example, the "count" fact can be aggregated to arrive at a count of all objects in the system. This stuff will live in a separate table which does have uniqueness constraints, and come in the next diff.
We might need some kind of time series facts too, not sure about that. I think most of our use cases today are covered by raw facts + aggregated facts.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact` commands and verified they seemed to do reasonable things.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, majak
Maniphest Tasks: T1562
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3078
Summary:
- Add edges for this relationship.
- Use edges to store this data.
- Migrate old data.
- Fix some warnings with generating feed stories about Aux and Edge transactions.
- Fix a task-task edge issue with "Create Subtask".
Test Plan:
- Migrated data, verified reivsions showed up.
- Attached and detached tasks to revisions and vice versa.
- Created a new revision with attached tasks.
- Created a subtask.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3018
Summary: Theses are sort of silly anyway since they should all have the actor in them rather than being sentence fragments, but make them work OK for English at least. See D3013.
Test Plan:
Ran:
echo pht('added %d dependencie(s): %s', 1, 'derp')."\n";
echo pht('added %d dependencie(s): %s', 2, 'derp, derp')."\n";
Got:
added dependency: derp
added dependencies: derp, derp
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3015
Summary:
- Use edges to store "X depends on Y" information in Maniphest.
- Show both "Depends On" and "Dependent Tasks".
- Migrate all the old edges.
Test Plan:
- Added some relationships, migrated, verified they were preserved.
- Added some new valid relationships, verified tasks got updated with sensible transactions and sent reasonable emails.
- Tried to add a cycle, got an ugly but effective error.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1162
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3006
Summary: See D2906. This just adds text so they render pretty.
Test Plan:
Got pretty emails and rendered transactions.
{F13706}
Reviewers: btrahan, davidreuss
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2907
Summary:
This is the first step in Phabricator internationalization.
It adds a translation selector and calls it at startup.
Installations can add custom selectors to override some texts.
We can add official translations in future.
Next step is to allow user to choose his translation which will override the global one.
This is currently used only for English plurals.
Test Plan: Displayed a diff with unit test error, verified that it says 'Detail' or 'Details' and not 'Detail(s)'.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1139
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2753
