1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-15 10:00:55 +01:00
Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joshua Spence
36e2d02d6e phtize all the things
Summary: `pht`ize a whole bunch of strings in rP.

Test Plan: Intense eyeballing.

Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12797
2015-05-22 21:16:39 +10:00
vrana
e10fdbe77e Use write connection and transactions in SQL patches
Summary:
Patches often read from slaves (possibly stale data) and use that information to write on master.
It causes problems when applying more patches quickly after each other because data created in previous patch may not be replicated yet.

Test Plan:
  $ bin/storage upgrade

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4483
2013-01-17 12:07:16 -08:00
vrana
ef85f49adc Delete license headers from files
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).

We are removing the headers for these reasons:

- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.

This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).

Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.

Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T2035

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
2012-11-05 11:16:51 -08:00
epriestley
2532cb9613 Add mail keys to Ponder questions
Summary:
We need to go slightly farther to stub reply handler functionality for Ponder in at least some configurations, where we rely on the presence of a unique random key to generate per-object or per-object+user reply addresses.

This should probably be formalized in an interface since it's currently pretty ad-hoc.

Test Plan:
  - Made comments in Ponder under a per-user email configuration.
  - Ran migration, verified mail keys were generated.
  - Ran migration again (with --apply), verified existing questions were skipped.
  - Created a new question, verified mail key generation.

Reviewers: pieter

Reviewed By: pieter

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1873

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3665
2012-10-08 20:14:58 -07:00