Summary:
Ref T8424. When users are rejected because they can't see the space an object is in, this isn't really a capability rejection. Don't require a capability when rejecting objects.
This mostly simplifies upcoming changes.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a capability exception dialog, it looked the same as always.
- (After additional changes, viewed a space exception dialog.)
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8424
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13155
Summary: Fixes T7064. We need to pass the quicksand magic request variable around and then instrument the javascript to handle quicksand page loads.
Test Plan:
Enabled two factor auth on my account and then
- visited password page
- filled out 2 factor auth request
- saw high security bubble
- clicked about still seeing high security bubble
- refreshed page and still saw security bubble
- dismissed bubble by following through workflow after clicking bubble
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7064
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12536
Summary: Since this element isn't strictly about errors, re-label as info view instead.
Test Plan: Grepped for all callsites, tested UIExamples and a few other random pages.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11867
Summary: Clean up the error view styling.
Test Plan:
Tested as many as I could find, built additional tests in UIExamples
{F280452}
{F280453}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11605
Summary:
Ref T2086. Ref T7014. With the persistent column, there is significant value in retaining chrome state through navigation events, because the user may have a lot of state in the chat window (scroll position, text selection, room juggling, partially entered text, etc). We can do this by capturing navigation events and faking them with Javascript.
(This can also improve performance, albeit slightly, and I believe there are better approaches to tackle performance any problems which exist with the chrome in many cases).
At Facebook, this system was "Photostream" in photos and then "Quickling" in general, and the technical cost of the system was //staggering//. I am loathe to pursue it again. However:
- Browsers are less junky now, and we target a smaller set of browsers. A large part of the technical cost of Quickling was the high complexity of emulating nagivation events in IE, where we needed to navigate a hidden iframe to make history entries. All desktop browsers which we might want to use this system on support the History API (although this prototype does not yet implement it).
- Javelin and Phabricator's architecture are much cleaner than Facebook's was. A large part of the technical cost of Quickling was inconsistency, inlined `onclick` handlers, and general lack of coordination and abstraction. We will have //some// of this, but "correctly written" behaviors are mostly immune to it by design, and many of Javelin's architectural decisions were influenced by desire to avoid issues we encountered building this stuff for Facebook.
- Some of the primitives which Quickling required (like loading resources over Ajax) have existed in a stable state in our codebase for a year or more, and adoption of these primitives was trivial and uneventful (vs a huge production at Facebook).
- My hubris is bolstered by recent success with WebSockets and JX.Scrollbar, both of which I would have assessed as infeasibly complex to develop in this project a few years ago.
To these points, the developer cost to prototype Photostream was several weeks; the developer cost to prototype this was a bit less than an hour. It is plausible to me that implementing and maintaining this system really will be hundreds of times less complex than it was at Facebook.
Test Plan:
My plan for this and D11497 is:
- Get them in master.
- Some secret key / relatively-hidden preference activates the column.
- Quicksand activates //only// when the column is open.
- We can use column + quicksand for a long period of time (i.e., over the course of Conpherence v2 development) and hammer out the long tail of issues.
- When it derps up, you just hide the column and you're good to go.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2086, T7014
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11507
Summary:
Ref T5702. This is a forward-looking change which provides some very broad API improvements but does not implement them. In particular:
- Controllers no longer require `$request` to construct. This is mostly for T5702, directly, but simplifies things in general. Instead, we call `setRequest()` before using a controller. Only a small number of sites activate controllers, so this is less code overall, and more consistent with most constructors not having any parameters or effects.
- `$request` now offers `getURIData($key, ...)`. This is an alternate way of accessing `$data` which is currently only available on `willProcessRequest(array $data)`. Almost all controllers which implement this method do so in order to read one or two things out of the URI data. Instead, let them just read this data directly when processing the request.
- Introduce `handleRequest(AphrontRequest $request)` and deprecate (very softly) `processRequest()`. The majority of `processRequest()` calls begin `$request = $this->getRequest()`, which is avoided with the more practical signature.
- Provide `getViewer()` on `$request`, and a convenience `getViewer()` on `$controller`. This fixes `$viewer = $request->getUser();` into `$viewer = $request->getViewer();`, and converts the `$request + $viewer` two-liner into a single `$this->getViewer()`.
Test Plan:
- Browsed around in general.
- Hit special controllers (redirect, 404).
- Hit AuditList controller (uses new style).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5702
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10698
Summary: Ref T5702. This primarily gets URI routing out of Aphront and into an Application, for consistency.
Test Plan: Loaded some pages, got static resources.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5702
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10696
Summary: Ref T5702. Primarily, this gets the custom DarkConsole URI routes out of the Aphront core and into an Application, like almost all other routes.
Test Plan: Used DarkConsole.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5702
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10695
Summary:
Resolves T5937. HTTPS redirects caused by `security.require-https` use a full scheme, domain and port in the URI. Consequently, this causes invocation of the new external redirect logic and prevents redirection from occurring properly when accessing the HTTP version of Phabricator that has `security.require-https` turned on.
I've also fixed the automatic slash redirection logic to add the external flag where appropriate.
Test Plan: Configured SSL on my local machine and turned on `security.require-https`. Observed the "Refusing to redirect" exception on master, while the redirect completed successfully with this patch.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5937
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10318
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary:
D9153 fixed half of this, but exposed another issue, which is that we don't actually serve ".eot" and ".ttf" through Celerity right now.
Make sure we include them in the routes.
Test Plan:
- Downloaded CSS, JS, TTF, EOT, WOFF, JPG, etc., through Celerity.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9154
Summary:
Ref T4398. Allows auth factors to render and validate when prompted to take a hi-sec action.
This has a whole lot of rough edges still (see D8875) but does fundamentally work correctly.
Test Plan:
- Added two different TOTP factors to my account for EXTRA SECURITY.
- Took hisec actions with no auth factors, and with attached auth factors.
- Hit all the error/failure states of the hisec entry process.
- Verified hisec failures appear in activity logs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8886
Summary:
Ref T4398. This is roughly a "sudo" mode, like GitHub has for accessing SSH keys, or Facebook has for managing credit cards. GitHub actually calls theirs "sudo" mode, but I think that's too technical for big parts of our audience. I've gone with "high security mode".
This doesn't actually get exposed in the UI yet (and we don't have any meaningful auth factors to prompt the user for) but the workflow works overall. I'll go through it in a comment, since I need to arrange some screenshots.
Test Plan: See guided walkthrough.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8851
Summary: A small but appreciable number of users find flavor on buttons confusing. Remove this flavor. This retains flavor in headers, error messages, etc., which doesn't cause confusion.
Test Plan: Looked at a revision, task, paste, macro, etc.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8812
Summary: I accidentally made these exceptionally ugly recently.
Test Plan: {F137411}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8684
Summary:
This adds a system which basically keeps a record of recent actions, who took them, and how many "points" they were worth, like:
epriestley email.add 1 1233989813
epriestley email.add 1 1234298239
epriestley email.add 1 1238293981
We can use this to rate-limit actions by examining how many actions the user has taken in the past hour (i.e., their total score) and comparing that to an allowed limit.
One major thing I want to use this for is to limit the amount of error email we'll send to an email address. A big concern I have with sending more error email is that we'll end up in loops. We have some protections against this in headers already, but hard-limiting the system so it won't send more than a few errors to a particular address per hour should provide a reasonable secondary layer of protection.
This use case (where the "actor" needs to be an email address) is why the table uses strings + hashes instead of PHIDs. For external users, it might be appropriate to rate limit by cookies or IPs, too.
To prove it works, I rate limited adding email addresses. This is a very, very low-risk security thing where a user with an account can enumerate addresses (by checking if they get an error) and sort of spam/annoy people (by adding their address over and over again). Limiting them to 6 actions / hour should satisfy all real users while preventing these behaviors.
Test Plan:
This dialog is uggos but I'll fix that in a sec:
{F137406}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8683
Summary:
This is the other half of D8548. Specifically, the attack here was to set your own editor link to `javascript\n:...` and then you could XSS yourself. This isn't a hugely damaging attack, but we can be more certain by adding a whitelist here.
We already whitelist linkable protocols in remarkup (`uri.allowed-protocols`) in general.
Test Plan:
Tried to set and use valid/invalid editor URIs.
{F130883}
{F130884}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8551
Summary:
Fixes T4610. Open to suggestions, etc., if there's anything I'm missing.
Also:
- Moves these "system" endpoints into a real application.
- Makes `isUnlisted()` work a little more consistently.
Test Plan: Accessed `/robots.txt`, `/status/` and `/debug/`.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4610
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8532
Summary:
Ref T4593. Via HackerOne. An attacker can use the anchor reattachment, combined with the Facebook token workflow, combined with redirection on OAuth errors to capture access tokens. The attack works roughly like this:
- Create an OAuth application on Phabricator.
- Set the domain to `evil.com`.
- Grab the OAuth URI for it (something like `https://phabricator.com/oauthserver/auth/?redirect_uri=http://evil.com&...`).
- Add an invalid `scope` parameter (`scope=xyz`).
- Use //that// URI to build a Facebook OAuth URI (something like `https://facebook.com/oauth/?redirect_uri=http://phabricator.com/...&response_type=token`).
- After the user authorizes the application on Facebook (or instantly if they've already authorized it), they're redirected to the OAuth server, which processes the request. Since this is the 'token' workflow, it has auth information in the URL anchor/fragment.
- The OAuth server notices the `scope` error and 302's to the attacker's domain, preserving the anchor in most browsers through anchor reattachment.
- The attacker reads the anchor in JS and can do client workflow stuff.
To fix this, I've made several general changes/modernizations:
- Add a new application and make it beta. This is mostly cleanup, but also turns the server off for typical installs (it's not generally useful quite yet).
- Add a "Console" page to make it easier to navigate.
- Modernize some of the UI, since I was touching most of it anyways.
Then I've made specific security-focused changes:
- In the web-based OAuth workflow, send back a human-readable page when errors occur. I //think// this is universally correct. Previously, humans would get a blob of JSON if they entered an invalid URI, etc. This type of response is correct for the companion endpoint ("ServerTokenController") since it's called by programs, but I believe not correct for this endpoint ("AuthController") since it's used by humans. Most of this is general cleanup (give humans human-readable errors instead of JSON blobs).
- Never 302 off this endpoint automatically. Previously, a small set of errors (notably, bad `scope`) would cause a 302 with 'error'. This exposes us to anchor reattachment, and isn't generally helpful to anyone, since the requesting application did something wrong and even if it's prepared to handle the error, it can't really do anything better than we can.
- The only time we'll 'error' back now from this workflow is if a user explicitly cancels the workflow. This isn't a 302, but a normal link (the cancel button), so the anchor is lost.
- Even if the application is already approved, don't blindly 302. Instead, show the user a confirmation dialog with a 'continue' link. This is perhaps slightly less user-friendly than the straight redirect, but I think it's pretty reasonable in general, and it gives us a lot of protection against these classes of attack. This redirect is then through a link, not a 302, so the anchor is again detached.
-
Test Plan: I attempted to hit everything I touched. See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4593
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8517
Summary:
- Allow Celerity to map and serve WOFF files.
- Add Source Sans Pro, Source Sans Pro Bold, and the corresponding LICENSE.
- Add a `font-source-sans-pro` resource for the font.
Test Plan:
- Changed body `font-face` to `'Source Sans Pro'`.
- Added `require_celerity_resource('font-source-sans-pro')` in StandardPageView.
Works in Firefox/Chrome/Safari, at least:
{F123296}
{F123297}
{F123298}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8430
Summary:
Currently, the linter raises `XHP29` warnings for these files because they are not abstract or final.
I guess there are two possibly solutions, either making the classes final or marking them as `@concrete-extensible`. Given that there are no subclasses of these classes in the `phabricator`, `arcanist` and `libphutil` repositories... I opted to declare the classes as final.
Test Plan:
The following linter warnings are gone:
```
>>> Lint for src/aphront/configuration/AphrontDefaultApplicationConfiguration.php:
Warning (XHP29) Class Not abstract Or final
This class is neither 'final' nor 'abstract', and does not have a
docblock marking it '@concrete-extensible'.
3 /**
4 * @group aphront
5 */
>>> 6 class AphrontDefaultApplicationConfiguration
7 extends AphrontApplicationConfiguration {
8
9 public function __construct() {
>>> Lint for src/applications/differential/mail/DifferentialReplyHandler.php:
Warning (XHP29) Class Not abstract Or final
This class is neither 'final' nor 'abstract', and does not have a
docblock marking it '@concrete-extensible'.
1 <?php
2
>>> 3 class DifferentialReplyHandler extends PhabricatorMailReplyHandler {
4
5 private $receivedMail;
6
```
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8347
Summary:
Ref T4324. Add a real `Application` class. Use modern UI elements.
@chad, we could use an icon :3
Test Plan: {F114477}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8254
Summary:
Ref T4420. This sets up the basics for modular typeahead sources. Basically, the huge `switch()` is just replaced with class-based runtime dispatch.
The only clever bit I'm doing here is with `CompositeDatasource`, which pretty much just combines the results from several other datasources. We can use this to implement some of the weird cases where we need multiple types of results, although I think I can entirely eliminate many of them entirely. It also makes top-level implementation simpler, since more logic can go inside the sources.
Sources are also application-aware, will be responsible for placeholder text, and have a slightly nicer debug view.
Test Plan: {F112859}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8228
Summary: Ref T3979. Currently, the home page lives in an old application called "directory" and is informally defined. Make it a real application called "Home", with a formal definition. It isn't launchable and can't be uninstalled.
Test Plan: Loaded home, saw exact same stuff.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3979
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8074
Summary: Cookie-prefix should fix phabricator instances where x.com and x.y.com have conflicting cookie names
Test Plan: Pushed branch to dev.phab.example.com, logged into phab.example.com and into dev.phab.example.com.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7979
Summary: Ref T4222. Adds the map name to Celerity resource URIs, so we can serve out of any map.
Test Plan: Poked around, verified URIs have "/phabricator/" in them now.
Reviewers: btrahan, hach-que
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7877
Summary:
Ref T4222.
- Removes the old map and changes the CelerityResourceMap API to be entirely driven by the new map.
- The new map is about 50% smaller and organized more sensibly.
- This removes the `/pkg/` URI component. All resources are now required to have unique names, so we can tell if a resource is a package or not by looking at the name.
- Removes some junky old APIs.
- Cleans up some other APIs.
- Added some feedback for `bin/celerity map`.
- `CelerityResourceMap` is still a singleton which is inextricably bound to the Phabricator map; this will change in the future.
Test Plan:
- Reloaded pages.
- Verified packaging works by looking at generated includes.
- Forced minification on and verified it worked.
- Forced no-timestamps on and verified it worked.
- Rebuilt map.
- Ran old script and verified error message.
- Checked logs.
Reviewers: btrahan, hach-que
Reviewed By: hach-que
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7872
Summary: Ref T4140. Provide more debugging information so we can figure out what's going on with redirect loops.
Test Plan: {F83868}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7620
Summary:
I just want to make sure that this is the style we want.
It seems less readable to me in some cases.
Test Plan: Looked at DarkConsole with errors.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7533
Summary: Ref T4064. The response code here isn't normally relevant, but we can hit these via `git clone http://../`, etc., and it's clearly more correct to use HTTP 500.
Test Plan: Added a fake `throw new Exception()` and verified I got an HTTP 500 response.
Reviewers: jamesr, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4064
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7507
Summary:
Ref T603. Currently, if you're logged out and try to view some object which requires you to be logged in, the login screen is missing the application breadcrumb and just says "Login".
Add the application in context so we get the keys icon.
Test Plan: {F69255}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, asherkin
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7303
Summary:
Ref T603. I want to let applications define new capabilities (like "can manage global rules" in Herald) and get full support for them, including reasonable error strings in the UI.
Currently, this is difficult for a couple of reasons. Partly this is just a code organization issue, which is easy to fix. The bigger thing is that we have a bunch of strings which depend on both the policy and capability, like: "You must be an administrator to view this object." "Administrator" is the policy, and "view" is the capability.
That means every new capability has to add a string for each policy, and every new policy (should we introduce any) needs to add a string for each capability. And we can't do any piecemeal "You must be a {$role} to {$action} this object" becuase it's impossible to translate.
Instead, make all the strings depend on //only// the policy, //only// the capability, or //only// the object type. This makes the dialogs read a little more strangely, but I think it's still pretty easy to understand, and it makes adding new stuff way way easier.
Also provide more context, and more useful exception messages.
Test Plan:
- See screenshots.
- Also triggered a policy exception and verified it was dramatically more useful than it used to be.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7260
Summary:
Ref T603. This could probably use a little more polish, but improve the quality of policy error messages.
- Provide as much detail as possible.
- Fix all the strings for i18n.
- Explain special rules to the user.
- Allow indirect policy filters to raise policy exceptions instead of 404s.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7151
Summary: Fixes T3673. Supposedly we won't get any data in this case, but it seems we sometimes do. See discussion in task.
Test Plan: Used `var_dump()`, etc., to verify we short circuit out of "multipart/form-data" posts regardless of the presence of input data.
Reviewers: nmalcolm, btrahan
Reviewed By: nmalcolm
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3673
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6670
Summary: Mostly straightforward. Also fixed a couple of error/darkconsole things.
Test Plan:
- Created poll;
- viewed poll;
- voted in poll;
- used `V6` and `{V6}` markup styles in poll.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6458
Summary:
D6278 kind of got closed and commited, this is the actual direction.
Ref T3432
Depends on D6277
Test Plan: Keep using the site
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T3432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6283
Summary:
If D6277 is the way to go, then this will be it's implementation.
Depends on D6277
Test Plan: Keep using the site
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6278
Summary:
Ref T1536. This is extremely reachable and changes the login code to the new stuff.
Notes:
- I've hard-disabled password registration since I want installs to explicitly flip it on via config if they want it. New installs will get it by default in the future, but old installs shouldn't have their auth options change.
- Google doesn't let us change the redirect URI, so keep the old one working.
- We need to keep a bit of LDAP around for now for LDAP import.
- **Facebook:** This causes substantive changes in what login code is executed.
Test Plan:
- Logged in / logged out / registered, hit new flows.
- Logged in with google.
- Verified no password registration by default.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: wez, nh, aran, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6222
Summary: Ref T1536. We can safely replace the old login validation controller with this new one, and reduce code dplication while we're at it.
Test Plan: Logged in with LDAP, logged in with OAuth, logged in with username/password, did a password reset.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6178
Summary:
Refs T1048; Depends on D5542, D5543, D5544 - It currently just renders multiple hovercards nicely for test purposes. More is on the way.
Mode `test`: Human test chamber.
Mode `retrieve`: For JS. Added so it would not clash with search key routing.
badassery
Test Plan:
`/search/hovercard/test/?phids[hover-T4]=PHID-TASK-g5pduvwrrwvkq5gkx736&phids[hover-T2]=PHID-TASK-gta6lzaaagziavkktima`
Verified the appearance of two tasks with correct rendering and correct ids
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1048
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5545
Summary:
Ref T2870. This resolves a few issues:
- No proper Application. Define one.
- Routes are in the default controller. Move them to the application.
- UI doesn't work on mobile.
- Overescaping in the link column.
Test Plan:
Old page:
{F38444}
New page:
{F38445}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, AnhNhan, edward
Maniphest Tasks: T2870
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5531
Summary: Modern conduit responses should never have a JSON shield. We disable it for normal responses, but uncaught exceptions hit this higher-level handler block which fails to disable the shield. Disable the shield.
Test Plan: Inspection.
Reviewers: btrahan, andrewjcg
Reviewed By: andrewjcg
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5483
Summary:
Ref T2787. This does very little so far, but makes inroads on accounts and billing. This is mostly just modeled on what Stripe looks like. The objects are:
- **Account**: Has one or more authorized users, who can make manage the account. An example might be "Phacility", and the three of us would be able to manage it. A user may be associated with more than one account (e.g., a corporate account and a personal account) but the UI tries to simplify the common case of a single account.
- **Payment Method**: Something we can get sweet sweet money from; for now, a credit card registered with Stripe. Payment methods are associated with an account.
- **Product**: A good (one time charge) or service (recurring charge). This might be "t-shirt" or "enterprise plan" or "hourly support" or whatever else.
- **Purchase**: Represents a user purchasing a Product for an Account, using a Payment Method. e.g., you bought a shirt, or started a plan, or purchased support.
- **Charge**: Actual charges against payment methods. A Purchase can create more than one charge if it's a plan, or if the first charge fails and we re-bill.
This doesn't fully account for stuff like coupons/discounts yet but they should fit into the model without any issues.
This only implements `Account`, and that only partially.
Test Plan: {F37531}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5435
Summary:
Currently, there's no easy way for me to tell a user "run this code from the webserver and tell me what it says". Sometimes installs can add new .php files to, e.g., `webroot/rsrc/`, but this is setup-dependent and not universal. Generally I resort to saying "put this into index.php", but that's error prone and not acceptable on active installs.
Add a "debug" controller so I can instead say "put this into support/debug.php, then visit /debug/".
Test Plan: Visited /debug/ with and without support/debug.php files. Visited /staus/.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5212
Summary: Deleted code which used channel. Created PhabricatorChatLogChannelQuery.php
Test Plan: By manually checking in the chatlog application.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5010
