1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-09-22 02:08:47 +02:00
Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
vrana
ef85f49adc Delete license headers from files
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).

We are removing the headers for these reasons:

- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.

This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).

Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.

Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T2035

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
2012-11-05 11:16:51 -08:00
vrana
1fc2dfd54b Load reviewer stats
Summary:
This allows getting stats for any arbitrary period, e.g.

- everything
- last week
- week before last week

Test Plan: Ran the script for last week.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3064
2012-07-25 11:40:16 -07:00
vrana
1970ceefe3 Compute reviewer stats
Summary:
The final goal is to display reviewers response time on homepage.
This is a building block for it.

The algorithm is quite strict - it doesn't count simple comment as response because reviewers would be able to cheat with comments like "I'm overwhelmed right now and will review next week".
We are more liberate in Phabricator where reviewers response with comments without changing the status quite often but I'm not trying to improve response times in Phabricator so this is irrelevant.
Reviewers in Facebook changes status more often (to clean their queue) so I follow this approach.

There is currently no way to track reviewers silently added and removed in Edit Revision but it's not a big deal.
The algorithm doesn't track commandeered revision, there's a TODO for it.

Response times are put in two buckets: `$reviewed` and `$not_reviewed`.
`$reviewed` contains reviewers who took action, `$not_reviewed` contains reviewers who didn't respond on time.
I will probably compute average time from `$reviewed` and raise it for those `$not_reviewed` that are higher than this average.
The idea is to not favor reviewers who were only lucky for being in a group with someone fast.

Test Plan: Passed test.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3062
2012-07-24 23:37:58 -07:00