Summary:
Fixes T5138. Some of the "revision" properties are really "diff" properties, but we only show the properties for the most recent / current diff.
- Immediately, this makes it hard or impossible to review, e.g., lint/unit results for older diffs.
- Longer-term, these limits will become more problematic with more data on diffs after Harbormaster.
Instead, separate "revision" from "diff" properties.
(In the long term, it might make sense to show more diffs in this panel -- e.g., tabs for the 8 most recent updates or something -- but I went with the simplest approach for now since I don't have a clean way to deal with 100-update revisions offhand.)
Test Plan: {F500480}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: cburroughs, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5138
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13282
Summary:
Ref T5495. We currently show one warning in revision headers, about not having any reviewers.
I want to add a second warning (for missing Legalpad signatures). At least one install would like to add custom warnings (see T5495) which are so specific that we can't reasonably cover them in the upstream.
Generalize these header warnings by moving them to CustomField, so I can implement the Legalpad stuff without making a mess and the install in T5495 can use an extension.
Test Plan:
Hit all three header states, they look exactly like they did before this change:
{F173265}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5495
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9793
Summary: Ref T3718. Move from unbatched / ad-hoc loading to standard stuff for handles.
Test Plan: Looked at some requests and saw no changes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8810
Summary: In the Message parser, we read this field and expect to get an array of PHIDs out of it. Currently, we get a string. Instead, get an array of PHIDs.
Test Plan: Wrote a message like "Fixes Tnnn" with "Reviewed by: duck", and saw no more parse error during message parsing.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8510
Summary: Ref T2222. Makes the "lint/unit errors" warnings work again.
Test Plan: Viewed some revisions with and without these warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8475
Summary: Ref T2222. Ref T3886. Converts parsing and construction of commit messages to be driven by CustomField.
Test Plan:
This is a huge, messy change. I've made an effort to test it exhasutively, but suspect I probably missed a few behaviors. Roughly:
- Enumerted all current fields (fields implementing `shouldAppearOnCommitMessage()`) and tried to test them one by one.
- Used `arc diff --edit` repeatedly to manipulate each field (this workflow hits both the parse and construct steps).
- Used `arc amend --show` to examine construct output (this does not activate the "edit" mode).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8449
Summary:
Ref T2222. This isn't complete and doesn't change runtime behavior yet (the new fields are not glued to the interface), but implements many fields.
(The remaining fields have something weird going on with them, for the most part.)
Test Plan:
With additional changes, rendered most fields sensibly:
{F118834}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8354
Summary:
Ref T3886. I spent a few hours trying to make `DifferentialFieldSpecification` extend `PhabricatorCustomField` so I could be more blunt in my approach here and just swap the whole thing over in one go (more or less like I did with Maniphest) but we have a ton of custom fields and things felt really shaky and the change was enormous and hard to keep track of.
Instead, I'm going to do this more gradually and go field-by-field. This implements a CustomField version of the "Title" field.
(There are no links to this in the UI.)
Test Plan:
{F115353}
{F115354}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8276
