Summary:
Ref T5245. These were a bad idea.
We no longer need actors for edge edits either, so remove those. Generally, edges have fit into the policy model as pure/low-level infrastructure, and they do not have any policy or capability information in and of themselves.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9840
Summary:
Ref T5245. See some discussion in D9838.
When we attach object A to object B, we'd like to write transactions on both sides but only write the actual edges once.
To do this, allow edge types to `shouldWriteInverseTransactions()`. When an edge type opts into this, have editors apply the inverse transactions before writing the edge. These inverse transactions don't actually apply effects, they just show up in the transaction log.
Test Plan: Attached and detached revisions from tasks, saw transactions appear on both sides of the operation.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: btrahan, joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9839
Summary:
Ref T5245. I want to add a new capability to edge types, which is a good opportunity to move away from `PhabricatorEdgeConfig`, which isn't modular.
This is basically the same as the modularization of PHID types, which has worked well. Add `PhabricatorEdgeType` and provide an adaption layer for the existing code.
This has no runtime changes, except the fixed edge constant.
Test Plan: Ran `var_dump(PhabricatorEdgeType::getAllTypes())` and got reasonable looking output.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9837
Summary:
Ref T3116. Add a Herald action "Require legal signatures" which requires revision authors to accept legal agreements before their revisions can be accepted.
- Herald will check which documents the author has signed, and trigger a "you have to sign X, Y, Z" for other documents.
- If the author has already signed everything, we don't spam the revision -- basically, this only triggers when signatures are missing.
- The UI will show which documents must be signed and warn that the revision can't be accepted until they're completed.
- Users aren't allowed to "Accept" the revision until documents are cleared.
Fixes T1157. The original install making the request (Hive) no longer uses Phabricator, and this satisfies our requirements.
Test Plan:
- Added a Herald rule.
- Created a revision, saw the rule trigger.
- Viewed as author and non-author, saw field UI (generic for non-author, specific for author), transaction UI, and accept-warning UI.
- Tried to accept revision.
- Signed document, saw UI update. Note that signatures don't currently //push// an update to the revision, but could eventually (like blocking tasks work).
- Accepted revision.
- Created another revision, saw rules not add the document (since it's already signed, this is the "no spam" case).
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: asherkin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1157, T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9771
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary: Fixes T5021, UI labels for the fields, "Edit Dependencies" in the action list, transaction strings ("added dependent tasks", etc), UI strings in the dependencies dialog (title/submit/etc)
Test Plan: Open task, edit blocks, dialog should have new term, task history should show "blocks" instead of "dependencies"
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5021
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9270
Summary:
Ref T4967. Adds a "Watch" relationship to projects, which is stronger than member/subscribed.
Specifically, when a task is tagged with a project, we'll include all project watchers in the email/notifications. Normally we don't include projects unless they're explicitly CC'd, or have some other active role in the object (like being a reviewer or auditor).
This allows you to closely follow a project without needing to write a Herald rule for every project you care about.
Test Plan:
- Watched/unwatched a project.
- Tested the watch/subscribe/member relationships:
- Watching implies subscribe.
- Joining implies subscribe.
- Leaving implies unsubscribe + unwatch.
- You can't unsubscribe until you unwatch (slightly better would be unsubscribe implies unwatch, but this is a bit tricky).
- Watched a project, then recevied email about a tagged task without otherwise being involved.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9185
Summary:
Ref T3583. Adds edges, query relationships, etc. Lots of debugging/temporary UI.
My general intent here is to use edges to track where panels appear, and then put additional data on the dashboard itself to control layout, positioning, etc.
Dashboards don't actually render yet so this is still pretty boring.
Test Plan:
{F149175}
{F149176}
{F149177}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3583
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8916
Summary:
There are quite a few tests in Arcanist, libphutil and Phabricator that do something similar to `$this->assertEqual(false, ...)` or `$this->assertEqual(true, ...)`.
This is unnecessarily verbose and it would be cleaner if we had `assertFalse` and `assertTrue` methods.
Test Plan: I contemplated adding a unit test for the `getCallerInfo` method but wasn't sure if it was required / where it should live.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8460
Summary: Ref T1344. Write edges and read them when reloading the board.
Test Plan: After reload, stuff stays mostly where I put it. In-column order isn't always persisted correctly yet.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7944
Summary: Ref T4264. Ref T2628. Ref T3102. Allows you to associate repositories with projects. In the future, you'll be able to write Herald object rules against projects, use Herald fields like "Repository's projects", and search by project.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3102, T4264, T2628
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7881
Summary: Ref T4122. Add an edge to keep track of where a credential is used, and show it in the UI.
Test Plan:
See "Used By":
{F84099}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4122
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7628
Summary:
Ref T1279. No actual logical changes, but:
- You can now add projects as reviewers from the revision view typeahead ("Add Reviewers" action).
- You can now add projects as reviewers from the revision detail typeahead.
- You can now add projects as reviewers from the CLI (`#yoloswag`).
- Generated commit messages now list project reviewers (`Reviewers: #yoloswag`).
I'll separate projects from users in the "Reviewers" tables in the next revision.
Test Plan:
- Added projects as reviewers using the web UI and CLI.
- Used `arc amend --show --revision Dnnn` to generate commit messages.
- Viewed revision with project reviewers in web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7230
Summary: Ref T2217. Route transaction rendering through modern code. This just affects the detail page. Some rough edges but nothing significant.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7070
Summary:
Fixes T3821. Maybe. The existing code seemed to have a bug and actually return the //commit phid//. Judging by the function name this is not intended.
Also, sorry to step on toes here -- I thought no one was assigned and was curious about loadRelativeEdges and here we are...
Test Plan: lots of logic here as I have no idea how to use Releeph.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3821
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6967
Summary: Ref T603. Killing this class is cool because the classes that replace it are policy-aware. Tried to keep my wits about me as I did this and fixed a few random things along the way. (Ones I remember right now are pulling a query outside of a foreach loop in Releeph and fixing the text in UIExample to note that the ace of hearts if "a powerful" card and not the "most powerful" card (Q of spades gets that honor IMO))
Test Plan: tested the first few changes (execute, executeOne X handle, object) then got real mechanical / careful with the other changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran, FacebookPOC
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6941
Summary:
Ref T3687. This adds a field which allows you to link Differential Revisions to JIRA issues.
This is just about as basic as it can get, but gets the job done. The field enables itself if you have a JIRA auth provide. You enter JIRA issues in a comma-delimited format and it generates appropriate edges.
Nothing is pushed to the issues yet.
The only real rough part here is that if you commandeer a revision which is linked to issues you can't see, editing it is difficult via the CLI. This seems pretty much like a non-issue, but at some point we can let the field throw some kind of "RecoverableInvalidFieldException" which just warns the user. The "no reviewers, continue anyway?" prompt could then use that too.
Test Plan:
- Edited via web UI, tried valid/invalid edits, checked that edges showed up in the database, added/removed issues, clicked issue links.
- Edited via CLI, tried valid/invalid edits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3687
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6879
Summary: Ref T2715. Had to start loading status information in the query class. Debated trying to clean up some of the attach / load stuff but decided to just add status under the new paradigm for now.
Test Plan: phid.query also made a status and checked that out. also played in conpherence.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6585
Summary: Ref T2715.
Test Plan: loaded conpherence, loaded a different thread, made a conpherence. also phid.query
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6577
Summary: ref T2715 - apologies btw as I didn't catch the "start from the bottom" ask until recently... :/
Test Plan: phid.query for some legalpad documents... booya. also loaded legalpad.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6576
Summary: Ref T2715. Switch Ponder to the new IDs.
Test Plan: Ran `phid.lookup`; `phid.query`. Grepped for old constant
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6554
Summary: Ref T2715. Move Projects to the new stuff.
Test Plan: Used `phid.query` to load projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6526
Summary: Ref T2715. Move files to the new stuff.
Test Plan: Used `phid.query`; `phid.lookup` to find files.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6523
Summary: Ref T2715. Switch mocks to the new stuff.
Test Plan: Used `phid.query` and `phid.lookup` to find mocks.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6517
Summary: Ref T2715. Switch Maniphest to the new stuff.
Test Plan: Used `phid.query`; `phid.lookup` to load objects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6516
Summary: Ref T2716. Ref T2715. Move CMIT to use Application PHIDs. Nothing too special here, but I consolidated some code into DiffusionCommitQuery. Depends on D6514.
Test Plan: Browsed Diffusion. Browsed Differential/Maniphest with linked commits. Used jump nav; used `phid.lookup` and `phid.query`. Used remarkup for Git and SVN repos. Grepped for PHID_TYPE_CMIT.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2715, T2716
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6515
Summary:
See discussion in T2715. Currently, PHIDs are all hard coded in the PHID application. In the long run, we need to move them out into actual applications.
A specific immediate issue is Releeph, which uses a very very old and very broken mechanism to inject PHIDs in a way that only sort of works.
Moving forward, every PHID type will be provided by a `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclass, which will manage loading it, etc.
This also moves toward cleaning up the "load objects by name" (where "name" means something like `D12`) code, which is an //enormous// mess and spread across at least 4-5 callsites.
Test Plan: Used `phid.lookup` and `phid.query` to load Slowvotes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6502
Summary: Fixes T2654.
Test Plan: attached lots of mocks and tasks to one another from both maniphest and pholio. verified transactions rendered okay in both applications
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2654
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6501
Summary: Subscribing doesn't do anything yet, but you can subscribe!
Test Plan: {F50169}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6456
Summary:
Keep track of the state of a reviewer in an edge between reviewer and revision.
The edge stores the state of the review, added or rejected. And if the revision was
accepted by that reviewer the id of the diff accepted.
Test Plan:
Create diffs and clowncopterize reviewer list changes. This includes:
* Adding new reviewers
* Resigning
* Commandering a revision
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6372
Conflicts:
src/applications/differential/editor/DifferentialCommentEditor.php
Summary:
got some basics here --
- can create document
- creates document object and document body object and cross-reference
- can update document
- creates document body object and updates reference from document object
- contributors stored correctly
- a contributor is anyone who has created or updated a legal document
- can subscribe to documents
- can flag documents
- can comment on documents
- can query for documents based on creator and create range
- uses basically modern stuff
Missing stuff --
- T3488
- T3483
- T3482
- T3481
- T3480
- T3479
Test Plan: TRUNCATED the database. From scratch made 3 legal docs. Verified versions and version were correct in document and document body database entries respectively. Left comments and verified versions and version did not update. Left updates and verified those updated versions and version. Flagged document and verified it showed up on homepage. Subscribed and verified transaction showed up.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6351
Summary:
Ref T2852. This is highly incomplete but seems structurally sound. Some additional context is available in the Google doc.
- Add a workspace ID configuration. Without it, nothing else activates.
- Add a worker which reacts to feed stories.
- Feed stories about things which aren't Differential objects are ignored.
- We load the revision, or fail permanently if we can't.
- We get all the related user PHIDs (author, reviewers, CCs).
- We check if any of them have linked Asana accounts, or fail permanently if they don't.
- We check for an "ASANATASK" edge from the revision.
- If we do not find one, we create a new task.
- If we do find one, we load the task.
- If we succeed, we check the chronological key of the most recent synchronized feed story ("cursor").
- If this story is the same or newer, we update the task to synchronize it to the current state of the revision.
- If we fail to load the task, we fail permanently ("asana task has been deleted").
- We then publish the actual story text to the task.
Not in yet:
- Updating followers requires separate API calls which we don't do yet.
- No subtasks yet.
- No sync of open/closed state.
Test Plan: {F47546}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6302
Summary:
Ref T2852. When we pull edge data and an edge has none, we currently populate `null` in the results. This is inconvenient and makes `idx()`'ing it clumsy. Instead, populate `array()` for empty.
(We've barely used edge data anywhere so far, which is why this hasn't come up before, but I have some use cases for it now.)
Test Plan:
- Trivial / used in future diff.
- Verified existing edge data callsites don't care about this API change (there are only 3).
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6293
Summary: Migration doesn't delete differential.revisionPHID but maybe it should?
Test Plan: Reparsed commit, ran the migration, deleted differential.revisionPHID, looked at task with attached commit with attached revision.
Reviewers: epriestley, edward
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5634
Summary: Fixes T2962. That task discusses this issue.
Test Plan: Read php-curl documentation to verify this change makes sense. Sent an email with SES.
Reviewers: btrahan, garoevans
Reviewed By: garoevans
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2962
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5669
Summary: MySQL is not able to use indexes with searching for tuples.
Test Plan:
Explained the query before and after, saw `key_len` 16 instead of 8.
Also saw time 0.0 s instead of 2.9 s (but that was probably caused by warming up).
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5580
Summary:
Ref T2787. This does very little so far, but makes inroads on accounts and billing. This is mostly just modeled on what Stripe looks like. The objects are:
- **Account**: Has one or more authorized users, who can make manage the account. An example might be "Phacility", and the three of us would be able to manage it. A user may be associated with more than one account (e.g., a corporate account and a personal account) but the UI tries to simplify the common case of a single account.
- **Payment Method**: Something we can get sweet sweet money from; for now, a credit card registered with Stripe. Payment methods are associated with an account.
- **Product**: A good (one time charge) or service (recurring charge). This might be "t-shirt" or "enterprise plan" or "hourly support" or whatever else.
- **Purchase**: Represents a user purchasing a Product for an Account, using a Payment Method. e.g., you bought a shirt, or started a plan, or purchased support.
- **Charge**: Actual charges against payment methods. A Purchase can create more than one charge if it's a plan, or if the first charge fails and we re-bill.
This doesn't fully account for stuff like coupons/discounts yet but they should fit into the model without any issues.
This only implements `Account`, and that only partially.
Test Plan: {F37531}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5435
Summary: Add the ``PhabricatorEdgeDataEditor`` that allows you to edit the data attached to an edge and its inverse.
Test Plan: Create several edges and update the data attached. Once duplicating the data on both the edge and its inverse, and once setting different value for both.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5447
Summary:
Fixes T2694
added edge infrastructure for Phriction
added mail subject prefix option for Phriction
added messy mail support for subscribers
adds edges to the phriction db, along with the subscriber interface
which gives us subscriptions for free.
simple display of subscribers, adequate to the current design and
sufficient fallbacks for exceptional cases. @chad may
be mailed about that one more UI element may be added to his redesign
mail support is messy. not generic at all. only sends to subscribed non-authors.
Test Plan:
tried out all kinds of stuff. applied patch, subscribed, unsubscribed with multiple
accs. verified proper
edited documents, verified that mail was sent in MetaMTA. Verified
contents, tos and stuff by looking into the db, comparing PHIDs etc.
functional testing per serious MTA (that is, AWS SES) worked wonderfully.
Here's how the subscription list looks like:
{F36320, layout=link}
Reviewers: epriestley, chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: hfcorriez, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2686, T2694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5372
Conflicts:
src/infrastructure/storage/patch/PhabricatorBuiltinPatchList.php
Summary:
Unmuck almost all of the we-sort-of-have-viewers-some-of-the-time mess.
There are a few notable cases here:
- I used Omnipotent users when indexing objects for search. I think this is correct; we do policy filtering when showing results.
- I cheated in a bad way in the Remarkup object rule, but fixing this requires fixing all the PhabricatorRemarkupEngine callsites (there are 85). I'll do that in the next diff.
- I cheated in a few random places, like when sending mail about package edits. These aren't a big deal.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for all PhabricatorObjectHandleData references.
- Gave them viewers.
Reviewers: vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, edward
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5151
Summary: it's ugly. but it works. basically. See T2399 for a roughly prioritized list of what still needs to happen.
Test Plan:
- created a conpherence with myself from my profile
- created a conpherence with myself from "new conpherence"
- created a conphernece with another from "new conpherence"
- created a conpherence with several others
- created a conpherence with files in the initial post
- verified files via comment text ("{F232} is awesome!") and via traditional attach
- edited a conpherence image
- verified it showed up in the header and in the conpherence menu on the left
- edited a conpherence title
- verified it showed up in the header and in the conpherence menu on the right
- verified each widget showed up when clicked and displayed the proper data
- calendar being an exception since it sucks so hard right now.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, chad, codeblock, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2301
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4620
