Summary:
Instead of allowing all routes based on security.alternate-file-domain, now, when security.alternate-file-domain is set, and the request matches this domain, requests are validated against an explicit list. Allowed routes:
- /res/
- /file/data/
- /file/xform/
- /phame/r/
This will be redone by T5702 to be less of a hack.
Test Plan:
- browse around (incl. Phame live) to make sure there is no regression from this when security.alternate-file-domain is not used.
- check that celerity resources and files (incl. previews) are served with security.alternate-file-domain set.
- check that phame live blog is serving its css correctly with security.alternate-file-domain set.
- check that requests outside of the whitelist generate an exception for security.alternate-file-domain
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10048
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary:
D9153 fixed half of this, but exposed another issue, which is that we don't actually serve ".eot" and ".ttf" through Celerity right now.
Make sure we include them in the routes.
Test Plan:
- Downloaded CSS, JS, TTF, EOT, WOFF, JPG, etc., through Celerity.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9154
Summary:
Ref T4398. Allows auth factors to render and validate when prompted to take a hi-sec action.
This has a whole lot of rough edges still (see D8875) but does fundamentally work correctly.
Test Plan:
- Added two different TOTP factors to my account for EXTRA SECURITY.
- Took hisec actions with no auth factors, and with attached auth factors.
- Hit all the error/failure states of the hisec entry process.
- Verified hisec failures appear in activity logs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8886
Summary:
Ref T4398. This is roughly a "sudo" mode, like GitHub has for accessing SSH keys, or Facebook has for managing credit cards. GitHub actually calls theirs "sudo" mode, but I think that's too technical for big parts of our audience. I've gone with "high security mode".
This doesn't actually get exposed in the UI yet (and we don't have any meaningful auth factors to prompt the user for) but the workflow works overall. I'll go through it in a comment, since I need to arrange some screenshots.
Test Plan: See guided walkthrough.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8851
Summary: A small but appreciable number of users find flavor on buttons confusing. Remove this flavor. This retains flavor in headers, error messages, etc., which doesn't cause confusion.
Test Plan: Looked at a revision, task, paste, macro, etc.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8812
Summary: I accidentally made these exceptionally ugly recently.
Test Plan: {F137411}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8684
Summary:
This adds a system which basically keeps a record of recent actions, who took them, and how many "points" they were worth, like:
epriestley email.add 1 1233989813
epriestley email.add 1 1234298239
epriestley email.add 1 1238293981
We can use this to rate-limit actions by examining how many actions the user has taken in the past hour (i.e., their total score) and comparing that to an allowed limit.
One major thing I want to use this for is to limit the amount of error email we'll send to an email address. A big concern I have with sending more error email is that we'll end up in loops. We have some protections against this in headers already, but hard-limiting the system so it won't send more than a few errors to a particular address per hour should provide a reasonable secondary layer of protection.
This use case (where the "actor" needs to be an email address) is why the table uses strings + hashes instead of PHIDs. For external users, it might be appropriate to rate limit by cookies or IPs, too.
To prove it works, I rate limited adding email addresses. This is a very, very low-risk security thing where a user with an account can enumerate addresses (by checking if they get an error) and sort of spam/annoy people (by adding their address over and over again). Limiting them to 6 actions / hour should satisfy all real users while preventing these behaviors.
Test Plan:
This dialog is uggos but I'll fix that in a sec:
{F137406}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8683
Summary:
This is the other half of D8548. Specifically, the attack here was to set your own editor link to `javascript\n:...` and then you could XSS yourself. This isn't a hugely damaging attack, but we can be more certain by adding a whitelist here.
We already whitelist linkable protocols in remarkup (`uri.allowed-protocols`) in general.
Test Plan:
Tried to set and use valid/invalid editor URIs.
{F130883}
{F130884}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8551
Summary:
Fixes T4610. Open to suggestions, etc., if there's anything I'm missing.
Also:
- Moves these "system" endpoints into a real application.
- Makes `isUnlisted()` work a little more consistently.
Test Plan: Accessed `/robots.txt`, `/status/` and `/debug/`.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4610
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8532
Summary:
Ref T4593. Via HackerOne. An attacker can use the anchor reattachment, combined with the Facebook token workflow, combined with redirection on OAuth errors to capture access tokens. The attack works roughly like this:
- Create an OAuth application on Phabricator.
- Set the domain to `evil.com`.
- Grab the OAuth URI for it (something like `https://phabricator.com/oauthserver/auth/?redirect_uri=http://evil.com&...`).
- Add an invalid `scope` parameter (`scope=xyz`).
- Use //that// URI to build a Facebook OAuth URI (something like `https://facebook.com/oauth/?redirect_uri=http://phabricator.com/...&response_type=token`).
- After the user authorizes the application on Facebook (or instantly if they've already authorized it), they're redirected to the OAuth server, which processes the request. Since this is the 'token' workflow, it has auth information in the URL anchor/fragment.
- The OAuth server notices the `scope` error and 302's to the attacker's domain, preserving the anchor in most browsers through anchor reattachment.
- The attacker reads the anchor in JS and can do client workflow stuff.
To fix this, I've made several general changes/modernizations:
- Add a new application and make it beta. This is mostly cleanup, but also turns the server off for typical installs (it's not generally useful quite yet).
- Add a "Console" page to make it easier to navigate.
- Modernize some of the UI, since I was touching most of it anyways.
Then I've made specific security-focused changes:
- In the web-based OAuth workflow, send back a human-readable page when errors occur. I //think// this is universally correct. Previously, humans would get a blob of JSON if they entered an invalid URI, etc. This type of response is correct for the companion endpoint ("ServerTokenController") since it's called by programs, but I believe not correct for this endpoint ("AuthController") since it's used by humans. Most of this is general cleanup (give humans human-readable errors instead of JSON blobs).
- Never 302 off this endpoint automatically. Previously, a small set of errors (notably, bad `scope`) would cause a 302 with 'error'. This exposes us to anchor reattachment, and isn't generally helpful to anyone, since the requesting application did something wrong and even if it's prepared to handle the error, it can't really do anything better than we can.
- The only time we'll 'error' back now from this workflow is if a user explicitly cancels the workflow. This isn't a 302, but a normal link (the cancel button), so the anchor is lost.
- Even if the application is already approved, don't blindly 302. Instead, show the user a confirmation dialog with a 'continue' link. This is perhaps slightly less user-friendly than the straight redirect, but I think it's pretty reasonable in general, and it gives us a lot of protection against these classes of attack. This redirect is then through a link, not a 302, so the anchor is again detached.
-
Test Plan: I attempted to hit everything I touched. See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4593
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8517
Summary:
- Allow Celerity to map and serve WOFF files.
- Add Source Sans Pro, Source Sans Pro Bold, and the corresponding LICENSE.
- Add a `font-source-sans-pro` resource for the font.
Test Plan:
- Changed body `font-face` to `'Source Sans Pro'`.
- Added `require_celerity_resource('font-source-sans-pro')` in StandardPageView.
Works in Firefox/Chrome/Safari, at least:
{F123296}
{F123297}
{F123298}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8430
Summary:
Currently, the linter raises `XHP29` warnings for these files because they are not abstract or final.
I guess there are two possibly solutions, either making the classes final or marking them as `@concrete-extensible`. Given that there are no subclasses of these classes in the `phabricator`, `arcanist` and `libphutil` repositories... I opted to declare the classes as final.
Test Plan:
The following linter warnings are gone:
```
>>> Lint for src/aphront/configuration/AphrontDefaultApplicationConfiguration.php:
Warning (XHP29) Class Not abstract Or final
This class is neither 'final' nor 'abstract', and does not have a
docblock marking it '@concrete-extensible'.
3 /**
4 * @group aphront
5 */
>>> 6 class AphrontDefaultApplicationConfiguration
7 extends AphrontApplicationConfiguration {
8
9 public function __construct() {
>>> Lint for src/applications/differential/mail/DifferentialReplyHandler.php:
Warning (XHP29) Class Not abstract Or final
This class is neither 'final' nor 'abstract', and does not have a
docblock marking it '@concrete-extensible'.
1 <?php
2
>>> 3 class DifferentialReplyHandler extends PhabricatorMailReplyHandler {
4
5 private $receivedMail;
6
```
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8347
Summary:
Ref T4324. Add a real `Application` class. Use modern UI elements.
@chad, we could use an icon :3
Test Plan: {F114477}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8254
Summary:
Ref T4420. This sets up the basics for modular typeahead sources. Basically, the huge `switch()` is just replaced with class-based runtime dispatch.
The only clever bit I'm doing here is with `CompositeDatasource`, which pretty much just combines the results from several other datasources. We can use this to implement some of the weird cases where we need multiple types of results, although I think I can entirely eliminate many of them entirely. It also makes top-level implementation simpler, since more logic can go inside the sources.
Sources are also application-aware, will be responsible for placeholder text, and have a slightly nicer debug view.
Test Plan: {F112859}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8228
Summary: Ref T3979. Currently, the home page lives in an old application called "directory" and is informally defined. Make it a real application called "Home", with a formal definition. It isn't launchable and can't be uninstalled.
Test Plan: Loaded home, saw exact same stuff.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3979
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8074
Summary: Cookie-prefix should fix phabricator instances where x.com and x.y.com have conflicting cookie names
Test Plan: Pushed branch to dev.phab.example.com, logged into phab.example.com and into dev.phab.example.com.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7979
Summary: Ref T4222. Adds the map name to Celerity resource URIs, so we can serve out of any map.
Test Plan: Poked around, verified URIs have "/phabricator/" in them now.
Reviewers: btrahan, hach-que
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7877
Summary:
Ref T4222.
- Removes the old map and changes the CelerityResourceMap API to be entirely driven by the new map.
- The new map is about 50% smaller and organized more sensibly.
- This removes the `/pkg/` URI component. All resources are now required to have unique names, so we can tell if a resource is a package or not by looking at the name.
- Removes some junky old APIs.
- Cleans up some other APIs.
- Added some feedback for `bin/celerity map`.
- `CelerityResourceMap` is still a singleton which is inextricably bound to the Phabricator map; this will change in the future.
Test Plan:
- Reloaded pages.
- Verified packaging works by looking at generated includes.
- Forced minification on and verified it worked.
- Forced no-timestamps on and verified it worked.
- Rebuilt map.
- Ran old script and verified error message.
- Checked logs.
Reviewers: btrahan, hach-que
Reviewed By: hach-que
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7872
Summary: Ref T4140. Provide more debugging information so we can figure out what's going on with redirect loops.
Test Plan: {F83868}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7620
Summary:
I just want to make sure that this is the style we want.
It seems less readable to me in some cases.
Test Plan: Looked at DarkConsole with errors.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7533
Summary: Ref T4064. The response code here isn't normally relevant, but we can hit these via `git clone http://../`, etc., and it's clearly more correct to use HTTP 500.
Test Plan: Added a fake `throw new Exception()` and verified I got an HTTP 500 response.
Reviewers: jamesr, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4064
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7507
Summary:
Ref T603. Currently, if you're logged out and try to view some object which requires you to be logged in, the login screen is missing the application breadcrumb and just says "Login".
Add the application in context so we get the keys icon.
Test Plan: {F69255}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, asherkin
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7303
Summary:
Ref T603. I want to let applications define new capabilities (like "can manage global rules" in Herald) and get full support for them, including reasonable error strings in the UI.
Currently, this is difficult for a couple of reasons. Partly this is just a code organization issue, which is easy to fix. The bigger thing is that we have a bunch of strings which depend on both the policy and capability, like: "You must be an administrator to view this object." "Administrator" is the policy, and "view" is the capability.
That means every new capability has to add a string for each policy, and every new policy (should we introduce any) needs to add a string for each capability. And we can't do any piecemeal "You must be a {$role} to {$action} this object" becuase it's impossible to translate.
Instead, make all the strings depend on //only// the policy, //only// the capability, or //only// the object type. This makes the dialogs read a little more strangely, but I think it's still pretty easy to understand, and it makes adding new stuff way way easier.
Also provide more context, and more useful exception messages.
Test Plan:
- See screenshots.
- Also triggered a policy exception and verified it was dramatically more useful than it used to be.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7260
Summary:
Ref T603. This could probably use a little more polish, but improve the quality of policy error messages.
- Provide as much detail as possible.
- Fix all the strings for i18n.
- Explain special rules to the user.
- Allow indirect policy filters to raise policy exceptions instead of 404s.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7151
Summary: Fixes T3673. Supposedly we won't get any data in this case, but it seems we sometimes do. See discussion in task.
Test Plan: Used `var_dump()`, etc., to verify we short circuit out of "multipart/form-data" posts regardless of the presence of input data.
Reviewers: nmalcolm, btrahan
Reviewed By: nmalcolm
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3673
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6670
Summary: Mostly straightforward. Also fixed a couple of error/darkconsole things.
Test Plan:
- Created poll;
- viewed poll;
- voted in poll;
- used `V6` and `{V6}` markup styles in poll.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6458
Summary:
D6278 kind of got closed and commited, this is the actual direction.
Ref T3432
Depends on D6277
Test Plan: Keep using the site
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T3432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6283
Summary:
If D6277 is the way to go, then this will be it's implementation.
Depends on D6277
Test Plan: Keep using the site
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6278
Summary:
Ref T1536. This is extremely reachable and changes the login code to the new stuff.
Notes:
- I've hard-disabled password registration since I want installs to explicitly flip it on via config if they want it. New installs will get it by default in the future, but old installs shouldn't have their auth options change.
- Google doesn't let us change the redirect URI, so keep the old one working.
- We need to keep a bit of LDAP around for now for LDAP import.
- **Facebook:** This causes substantive changes in what login code is executed.
Test Plan:
- Logged in / logged out / registered, hit new flows.
- Logged in with google.
- Verified no password registration by default.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: wez, nh, aran, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6222
Summary: Ref T1536. We can safely replace the old login validation controller with this new one, and reduce code dplication while we're at it.
Test Plan: Logged in with LDAP, logged in with OAuth, logged in with username/password, did a password reset.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6178
Summary:
Kind of a quick look at an idea for T2184
Ref T2184
Test Plan: Make sure the site still loads
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T2184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6045
Summary:
Ref T2785
Looks for hosts in `conduit.servers` config and if any exist route any conduit calls through any one of the hosts.
Test Plan:
Make some curl calls to public methods (`conduit.ping`), watch the access log for two requests. Make some calls from the UI that require authentication, watch the access log a bit more.
Also ran the unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2785
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5970
Summary:
Refs T1048; Depends on D5542, D5543, D5544 - It currently just renders multiple hovercards nicely for test purposes. More is on the way.
Mode `test`: Human test chamber.
Mode `retrieve`: For JS. Added so it would not clash with search key routing.
badassery
Test Plan:
`/search/hovercard/test/?phids[hover-T4]=PHID-TASK-g5pduvwrrwvkq5gkx736&phids[hover-T2]=PHID-TASK-gta6lzaaagziavkktima`
Verified the appearance of two tasks with correct rendering and correct ids
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1048
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5545
Summary:
Ref T2870. This resolves a few issues:
- No proper Application. Define one.
- Routes are in the default controller. Move them to the application.
- UI doesn't work on mobile.
- Overescaping in the link column.
Test Plan:
Old page:
{F38444}
New page:
{F38445}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, AnhNhan, edward
Maniphest Tasks: T2870
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5531
Summary: Modern conduit responses should never have a JSON shield. We disable it for normal responses, but uncaught exceptions hit this higher-level handler block which fails to disable the shield. Disable the shield.
Test Plan: Inspection.
Reviewers: btrahan, andrewjcg
Reviewed By: andrewjcg
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5483
Summary:
Ref T2787. This does very little so far, but makes inroads on accounts and billing. This is mostly just modeled on what Stripe looks like. The objects are:
- **Account**: Has one or more authorized users, who can make manage the account. An example might be "Phacility", and the three of us would be able to manage it. A user may be associated with more than one account (e.g., a corporate account and a personal account) but the UI tries to simplify the common case of a single account.
- **Payment Method**: Something we can get sweet sweet money from; for now, a credit card registered with Stripe. Payment methods are associated with an account.
- **Product**: A good (one time charge) or service (recurring charge). This might be "t-shirt" or "enterprise plan" or "hourly support" or whatever else.
- **Purchase**: Represents a user purchasing a Product for an Account, using a Payment Method. e.g., you bought a shirt, or started a plan, or purchased support.
- **Charge**: Actual charges against payment methods. A Purchase can create more than one charge if it's a plan, or if the first charge fails and we re-bill.
This doesn't fully account for stuff like coupons/discounts yet but they should fit into the model without any issues.
This only implements `Account`, and that only partially.
Test Plan: {F37531}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5435
Summary:
Currently, there's no easy way for me to tell a user "run this code from the webserver and tell me what it says". Sometimes installs can add new .php files to, e.g., `webroot/rsrc/`, but this is setup-dependent and not universal. Generally I resort to saying "put this into index.php", but that's error prone and not acceptable on active installs.
Add a "debug" controller so I can instead say "put this into support/debug.php, then visit /debug/".
Test Plan: Visited /debug/ with and without support/debug.php files. Visited /staus/.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5212
Summary: Deleted code which used channel. Created PhabricatorChatLogChannelQuery.php
Test Plan: By manually checking in the chatlog application.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5010
Summary:
- In stack traces, a `,` should clearly be a `.`.
- In Calendar, a 'td' got swapped with a 'p' somewhere.
- In old-style transaction views, strlen() is no longer a sufficient test.
Test Plan:
- Verified stack traces render correctly.
- Verified calendar renders correctly.
- Verified Maniphest transactions with no comment no longer have a little empty div a few pixels high.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4971
Summary:
When a developer changes CSS, it is normally sufficient to reload the page to get changes to show up, because browsers revalidate resources on reload.
However, if you reload the page and then an Ajax request adds new CSS to the page, this CSS does not trigger revalidation. The developer must currently clear their cache or re-run `scripts/celerity_mapper.php webroot`, to get this request to skip cache. We rarely use CSS over Ajax right now, so this hasn't cropped up much, but Conpherence does use this and clearing the resource is a big pain.
This seems to work fine normally, but I'm worried it might break some of the extra-celerity-resources stuff Facebook is doing.
Test Plan: In development mode, changed `conpherence/message-pane.css` and saw changes reflected on reload. Verified normal page loads do not cause additional HTTP requests. This change has no effect in production mode.
Reviewers: edward, vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2428
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4902
Summary:
Lots of killed `phutil_escape_html()`.
Done by searching for `AphrontTableView` and then `$rows` (usually) backwards.
Test Plan:
Looked at homepage.
echo id(new AphrontTableView(array(array('<'))))->render();
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4884
Summary:
Done by searching for `AphrontDialogView` and then `appendChild()`.
Also added some `pht()`.
Test Plan: None.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4882
