Summary:
Ref T9838.
Add a Properties field to Revision, and update a `wasAcceptedBeforeClose` when closing a revision.
Test Plan:
A quick run through the obvious steps (Close with commit/manually, with or w/o accept) and calling `differential.query` shows the `wasAcceptedBeforeClose` property was setup correctly.
Pushing closed + accepted passes the relevant herald, which was my immediate issue; Pushing un-accepted is blocked.
Test the "commit" rule (Different from "pre-commit") by hacking the DB and running the "has accepted revision" rule in a test-console.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T9838
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15085
Summary: We haven't refreshed this in a while.
Test Plan: Saw unit test times drop about 1.5 seconds locally.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16176
Summary: Ref T9897. This moves "Domain" to "DomainFullURI" to allow setting of https or for some reason, a port. I guess.
Test Plan: Try to break by setting a path, or fake protocol. Set to http, or https, see correct redirects. Verify domain still gets written.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16173
Summary:
Ref T11208. See that task for a more detailed description of revprops.
This allows revprop changes in a hosted Subversion repository if the repository has the "allow dangerous changes" flag set.
In the future, we could expand this into real Herald support, but the only use case we have for now is letting `svnsync` work.
Test Plan:
Edited revprops with `svn propset --revprop -r 2 propkey propvalue repositoryuri`:
- Tried before patch, got a "configure a commit hook" error.
- Tried after patch, got a "dangerous change" error.
- Allowed dangerous changes.
- Did a revprop edit.
- Prevented dangerous changes.
- Got an error again.
- Made a normal commit to an SVN repository.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11208
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16174
Summary: Fixes T11209. We want to always break tags when displaying them in a list, but not in general (remarkup).
Test Plan: Fake a tag on a differental revision with a really long name. See wrapping.
Reviewers: avivey, epriestley
Reviewed By: avivey, epriestley
Subscribers: avivey, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11209
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16175
Summary:
Fixes T11203. Subversion handling of `SVN_SSH` commands requires some additional finesse for nonstandard remote SSH ports.
We get `domain.com:port` in the command, so parse it out if it's present.
Test Plan: @enckse confirmed this locally in T11203.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: enckse
Maniphest Tasks: T11203
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16172
Summary: Fixes T11201.
Test Plan:
Created bogus edges like this:
```
INSERT INTO edge (src, type, dst, dateCreated, seq) values ('PHID-TASK-vnddativbialb5p6ymis', 999999, 'quack', UNIX_TIMESTAMP(), 1);
```
Then ran `bin/remove destroy` on the relevant object.
Before the patch, destruction halted after hittin the bad edge.
After the patch, a warning is emitted but destruction continues.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11201
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16171
Summary:
In D16167 I required users to be logged in to be "activated", but this logic doesn't account for that properly when the user is an Almanac device (a cluster host connecting to another cluster host).
Don't do this check for device connections, they can always establish sessions.
Test Plan: Will push.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16170
Summary: Fixes T11164. At least, this fixes it locally for me. I don't know how to code. Copy Pasta!
Test Plan: Change name, don't see extra timeline entry on quality set anymore.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16169
Summary: Fixes T11166. Adds some class, and space to the preview widget.
Test Plan: Test Maniphest, Ponder, etc, without a footer.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11166
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16168
Summary: Fixes T11198. These are confusing or premature if you aren't an activated user: disabled or unapproved accounts won't be able to act on them.
Test Plan: Changed timezone, went through flow to correct it
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11198
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16167
Summary:
Ref T11179. This splits "Edit Blocking Tasks" into two options now that we have more room ("Edit Parent Tasks", "Edit Subtasks").
This also renames "Blocking" tasks to "Subtasks", and "Blocked" tasks to "Parent" tasks. My goals here are:
- Make the relationship direction more clear: it's more clear which way is up with "parent" and "subtask" at a glance than with "blocking" and "blocked" or "dependent" and "dependency".
- Align language with "Create Subtask".
- To some small degree, use more flexible/general-purpose language, although I haven't seen any real confusion here.
Fixes T6815. I think I narrowed this down to two issues:
- Just throwing a bare exeception (we now return a dialog explicitly).
- Not killing open transactions when the cyclec check fails (we now kill them).
Test Plan:
- Edited parent tasks.
- Edited subtasks.
- Tried to introduce graph cycles, got a nice error dialog.
{F1697087}
{F1697088}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6815, T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16166
Summary:
Ref T11179. Ref T4768. Currently, on `master`, if two users open "Edit Revisions" at the same time, then add revisions A and B, only the last state wins (just "B").
Instead, apply these as "add A" and "add B" so they merge in a natural way.
Test Plan:
- Opened edit dialog in two windows.
- Added "A" in one, "B" in the other.
- Saved both.
- Saw "Added A" and "Added B" transactions, instead of "Added A" and "Removed A, added B".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16164
Summary: Ref T11179. This is basically a "pro" controller to replace the SearchAttach controller. It does basically the same stuff, just in a (mostly) more modern and modular way.
Test Plan:
- Added and removed mocks.
- Added and removed revisions.
- Everything worked just like it did before.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16163
Summary:
Ref T11179. This generates the Maniphest menu items in a modular way. It doesn't change any of the underlying code yet.
Searching for commits doesn't work particularly well so I've just hidden that for now, but the item itself works fine.
Test Plan: {F1696849}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16162
Summary: Fixes T11193. Assume this is the correct place to check for permissions before attaching edges.
Test Plan: Create a task and set edit policy to Admins, log into test account. Try to Edit Subtasks, Merge Duplicates, Attach a Diff, or Attach a Mock, get a Policy Dialog explaing why.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11193
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16161
Summary: Fixes T11190. The div with all the stuff in it was sometimes ending up on top of the "select" button, making it unclickable.
Test Plan: Clicked "select" in several browsers.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11190
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16160
Summary: This makes it more natural to write Herald rules about commits that appear on any or no branches.
Test Plan: Wrote a commit rule for commits on any branch, ran it with `bin/repository reparse --herald <commit>`, saw expected results in web UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16158
Summary: Just removing the animation for now, can't find anything decent, I think that the issue is the animation is applying to all items in the list, and not just as a list as a single block. That is, I'd like to slide down all three at one. Any animation that slides them down when attached to each item makes them overlap at the first frame and it's a little distracting. Not a big deal to leave this out for now. Whatever we come up with should likely be applied to phuix-dropdown as well.
Test Plan: Clicky Clicky.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16159
Summary:
Ref T11179. Alternative to D16152. I think this turned out a bit better than the other one did.
Currently, we render two copies of the menu (one for mobile, one for desktop). A big chunk of this is sharing the nodes instead: when you open the mobile dropdown menu, it steals the nodes from the document. When you close it, it puts them back. Magic! Sneaky!
Test Plan:
{F1695499}
{F1695500}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16157
Summary: Ref T11034. Ref T4788. This allows you to resize the typeahead browse dialog if you want. I plan to let you resize the object selector dialog in the future.
Test Plan: {F1695433}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788, T11034
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16156
Summary:
Ref T11034. This seems a little more promising. Two problems at the moment:
- This doesn't actually provide any useful information at all right now.
- Many object types have no profile images.
Test Plan:
{F1695254}
{F1695255}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11034
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16155
Summary:
Ref T11179. One issue I'm getting with trying to turn actions into dropdowns is that we currently render this menu very late, which can cause us to try to add more metadata after we start resolving metadata. This won't work right now (and making it work seems unreasonably complicated), so stop doing it and fatal if something tries.
(This might make some things fatal but //should// be safe -- anything that fatals should have been broken already.)
Test Plan:
Browsed around looking for fatals, didn't see any.
(This primarily avoids a broken state / fatal in a future diff.)
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16151
Summary: Ref T9897. Adds a Parent Site and Parent Domain field to allow external sites to link back to parent.
Test Plan: Set up ```local.blog.phacility.com```, set parent site to "Phacility" and parent domain to "local.www.phacility.com". Get new crumbs at Blog and Post levels.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16150
Summary:
Fixes T11180. In Git, it's possible to tag a tag (????). When you do, we try to log the tag-object, which automatically resolves to the commit and fails.
Just skip these. If "A" points at "B" which points at "C", it's fine to ignore "A" and "B" since we'll get the same stuff when we process "C".
Test Plan:
- Tagged a tag.
- Pushed it.
- Discovered it.
- Before patch: got exception similar to the one in T11180.
- After patch: got tag-tag skipped. Also got slightly better error messages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11180
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16149
Summary: Reading the code, this seems correct, but I don't have a local test. Ref T9897
Test Plan: read carefully
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16148
Summary: Makes the crumbs background and border disappear in the live view of Phame.
Test Plan: Go live, see no crumb bg. Test blog, post, mobile, desktop.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16146
Summary: Adds a new header layout for Phame Blog. Subtitles now also.
Test Plan:
With Image, With Subtitle, Without Image, Without Subtitle. Mobile, Tablet, Desktop.
{F1691506}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16147
Summary:
Ref T11153. If you have a build plan like this:
- Lease machine A.
- Lease machine B.
- Run client-tests on machine A.
- Run server-tests on machine B.
...and we get machine A quickly, then finish the tests, we currently do not release machine A until the whole plan finishes.
In the best case, this wastes resources (something else could be using that machine for a while).
In a worse case, this wastes a lot of resources (if machine B is slow to acquire, or the server tests are much slower than the client tests, machine A will get tied up for a really long time).
In the absolute worst case, this might deadlock things.
Instead, release artifacts as soon as no waiting/running steps take them as inputs. In this case, we'd release machine A as soon as we finished running the client tests.
In the case where machines A and B are resources of the same type, this should prevent deadlocks. In all cases, this should improve build throughput at least somewhat.
Test Plan:
I wrote this build plan which runs a "fast" step (10 seconds) and a "slow" step (120 seconds):
{F1691190}
Before the patch, running this build plan held the lease on the "fast" machine for the full 120 seconds, then released both leases at the same time at the very end.
After this patch, I ran this plan and observed the "fast" lease get released after 10 seconds, while the "slow" lease was held for the full 120.
(Also added some `var_dump()` into things to sanity check the logic; it appeared correct.)
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11153
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16145
Summary: This should get locked to 100% of viewport.
Test Plan: Really wide image on a mobile screen.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16144
Summary: Adds a view live and view internal link to the blog and crumbs manage page.
Test Plan: Click on new links.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16142
Summary: Fixes T10901. Allows blogs to have headers. I've built this in a basic way, any file, max-height is 240. Should bleed into top crumbs, so any spacing you want you should add to the file itself. Might have to see how users break this.
Test Plan: Set a blog header, see blog header, remove blog header, see no blog header. Check mobile, tablet, desktop break points.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10901
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16141
Summary: This is the backend half of uploading an image as a header for Phame Blogs. Allows you to upload image, or delete it. Ref T10901
Test Plan:
Go to Manage Blog, visit Edit Header Image, Upload snarky file. See snarky file on Manage page. Edit Header Image, click delete, save, see file goes away.
{F1690966}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10901
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16140
Summary:
This test has been failing occasionally in a way that does not reproduce, and only when no one is looking at it.
Try to add some extra assertions to maybe get more information.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16137
Summary: Ref T9028. When selecting refs, pretend refs in "refs/remotes/" that we don't otherwise recognize don't exist, since it looks like these are probably remotes //of the remote// we're observing, and who knows what state they're in.
Test Plan: Used `bin/repository discover --verbose` to verify that these named refs no longer appear in the list.
Reviewers: chad, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16136
Summary:
Ref T9028. Mostly, this gives them a strikethru style.
(I think this is probably the right definition of "closed" for commits. Another definition might be "audited", but I don't think completing audits really "closes" a commit.)
Test Plan: {F1689662}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16135
Summary: Ref T9028. Ref T6878. This rule should probably be refined in the long term, but for now just ignore "phabricator/diff/12424" and similar staging area tags.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/repository discover --verbose` on a repository with staging area refs, saw Phabricator ignore those refs as untracked.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6878, T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16134
Summary:
Ref T9028. This allows us to detect when commits are unreachable:
- When a ref (tag, branch, etc) is moved or deleted, store the old thing it pointed at in a list.
- After discovery, go through the list and check if all the stuff on it is still reachable.
- If something isn't, try to follow its ancestors back until we find something that is reachable.
- Then, mark everything we found as unreachable.
- Finally, rebuild the repository summary table to correct the commit count.
Test Plan:
- Deleted a ref, ran `pull` + `refs`, saw oldref in database.
- Ran `discover`, saw it process the oldref, mark the unreachable commit, and update the summary table.
- Visited commit page, saw it properly marked.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16133
Summary:
Ref T9028. This corrects the reachability of existing commits in a repository.
In particular, it can be used to mark deleted commits as unreachable.
Test Plan:
- Ran it on a bad repository, with bad args, etc.
- Ran it on a clean repo, got no changes.
- Marked a reachable commit as unreachable, ran script, got it marked reachable.
- Started deleting tags and branches from the local working copy while running the script, saw greater parts of the repository get marked unreachable.
- Pulled repository again, everything automatically revived.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16132
Summary:
Ref T9028. This improves the daemon behavior for unreachable commits. There is still no way for commits to become marked unreachable on their own.
- When a daemon encounters an unreachable commit, fail permanently.
- When we revive a commit, queue new daemons to process it (since some of the daemons might have failed permanently the first time around).
- Before doing a step on a commit, check if the step has already been done and skip it if it has. This can't happen normally, but will soon be possible if a commit is repeatedly deleted and revived very quickly.
- Steps queued with `bin/repository reparse ...` still execute normally.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/repository reparse` to run every step, verified they all mark the commit with the proper flag.
- Faked the `reparse` exception in the "skip step" code, used `repository reparse` to skip every step.
- Marked a commit as unreachable, ran `discover`, saw daemons queue for it.
- Ran daemons with `bin/worker execute --id ...`, saw them all skip + queue the next step.
- Marked a commit as unreachable, ran `bin/repository reparse` on it, got permanent failures immediately for each step.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16131
Summary:
Ref T9028. This is the easy part of dealing with deleted commits:
- Add a flag for unreachable commits (nothing sets this flag yet).
- Ignore unreachable commits when querying for known commits during discovery, so we pretend they do not exist.
- When recording a commit, try just reviving an existing unreachable commit first. If that works, bail out.
Test Plan:
- Artificially marked a commit as unreachable with raw SQL.
- Verified it said "deleted: unreachable" in the UI.
- Ran `repository discover --trace --verbose`.
- Saw the discovery process ignore the commit when filling the cache.
- Saw the discovery process revive the commit instead of trying to record it again.
- Web UI now shows the commit as normal.
- Running `repository discover` again doesn't make any further changes.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16130
Summary:
Ref T9028. Fixes T6878. Currently, we only fetch and discover branches. This is fine 99% of the time but sometimes commits are pushed to just a tag, e.g.:
```
git checkout <some hash>
nano file.c
git commit -am '...'
git tag wild-wild-west
git push origin wild-wild-west
```
Through a similar process, commits can also be pushed to some arbitrary named ref (we do this for staging areas).
With the current rules, we don't fetch tag refs and won't discover these commits.
Change the rules so:
- we fetch all refs; and
- we discover ancestors of all refs.
Autoclose rules for tags and arbitrary refs are just hard-coded for now. We might make these more flexible in the future, or we might do forks instead, or maybe we'll have to do both.
Test Plan:
Pushed a commit to a tag ONLY (`vegetable1`).
<cf508b8de6>
On `master`, prior to the change:
- Used `update` + `refs` + `discover`.
- Verified tag was not fetched with `git for-each-ref` in local working copy and the web UI.
- Verified commit was not discovered using the web UI.
With this patch applied:
- Used `update`, saw a `refs/*` fetch instead of a `refs/heads/*` fetch.
- Used `git for-each-ref` to verify that tag fetched.
- Used `repository refs`.
- Saw new tag appear in the tags list in the web UI.
- Saw new refcursor appear in refcursor table.
- Used `repository discover --verbose` and examine refs for sanity.
- Saw commit row appear in database.
- Saw commit skeleton appear in web UI.
- Ran `bin/phd debug task`.
- Saw commit fully parse.
{F1689319}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: avivey
Maniphest Tasks: T6878, T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16129
Summary:
Ref T11140. This makes encryption actually work:
- Provide a new configuation option, `keyring`, for specifying encryption keys.
- One key may be marked as `default`. This activates AES256 encryption for Files.
- Add `bin/files generate-key`. This is helps when generating valid encryption keys.
- Add `bin/files encode`. This changes the storage encoding of a file, and helps test encodings and migrate existing data.
- Add `bin/files cycle`. This re-encodes the block key with a new master key, if your master key leaks or you're just paraonid.
- Document all these options and behaviors.
Test Plan:
- Configured a bad `keyring`, hit a bunch of different errors.
- Used `bin/files generate-key` to try to generate bad keys, got appropriate errors ("raw doesn't support keys", etc).
- Used `bin/files generate-key` to generate an AES256 key.
- Put the new AES256 key into the `keyring`, without `default`.
- Uploaded a new file, verified it still uploaded as raw data (no `default` key yet).
- Used `bin/files encode` to change a file to ROT13 and back to raw. Verified old data got deleted and new data got stored properly.
- Used `bin/files encode --key ...` to explicitly convert a file to AES256 with my non-default key.
- Forced a re-encode of an AES256 file, verified the old data was deleted and a new key and IV were generated.
- Used `bin/files cycle` to try to cycle raw/rot13 files, got errors.
- Used `bin/files cycle` to cycle AES256 files. Verified metadata changed but file data did not. Verified file data was still decryptable with metadata.
- Ran `bin/files cycle --all`.
- Ran `encode` and `cycle` on chunked files, saw commands fail properly. These commands operate on the underlying data blocks, not the chunk metadata.
- Set key to `default`, uploaded a file, saw it stored as AES256.
- Read documentation.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16127
Summary:
Ref T11140. This doesn't do anything yet since there's no way to enable it and no way to store master keys.
Those are slightly tougher problems and I'm not totally satisfied that I have an approach I really like for either problem, so I may wait for a bit before tackling them. Once they're solved, this does the mechanical encrypt/decrypt stuff, though.
This design is substantially similar to the AWS S3 server-side encryption design, and intended as an analog for it. The decisions AWS has made in design generally seem reasonable to me.
Each block of file data is encrypted with a unique key and a unique IV, and then that key and IV are encrypted with the master key (and a distinct, unique IV). This is better than just encrypting with the master key directly because:
- You can rotate the master key later and only need to re-encrypt a small amount of key data (about 48 bytes per file chunk), instead of re-encrypting all of the actual file data (up to 4MB per file chunk).
- Instead of putting the master key on every server, you can put it on some dedicated keyserver which accepts encrypted keys, decrypts them, and returns plaintext keys, and can send it 32-byte keys for decryption instead of 4MB blocks of file data.
- You have to compromise the master key, the database, AND the file store to get the file data. This is probably not much of a barrier realistically, but it does make attacks very slightly harder.
The "KeyRing" thing may change once I figure out how I want users to store master keys, but it was the simplest approach to get the unit tests working.
Test Plan:
- Ran unit tests.
- Dumped raw data, saw encrypted blob.
- No way to actually use this in the real application yet so it can't be tested too extensively.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16124
Summary: Fixes T11156. These were never correct, but also never actually used until I made timelines load object handles unconditionally in D16111.
Test Plan: Viewed an auth provider with transactions, no more fatal.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11156
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16128
Summary: Uses PHUITwoColumnView in Blog Manage and Blog Picture. Ref T9897
Test Plan: Use each page.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16126
Summary: Adds some ordering options to PhamePost queries. Works on search, PhameHome, BlogHome
Test Plan: Try searching with Order By set to Date Published in application search, get correct order. Check a blog home page, check PhameHome.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16125
