Summary:
Ref T4398. This adds a settings panel for account activity so users can review activity on their own account. Some goals are:
- Make it easier for us to develop and support auth and credential information, see T4398. This is the primary driver.
- Make it easier for users to understand and review auth and credential information (see T4842 for an example -- this isn't there yet, but builds toward it).
- Improve user confidence in security by making logging more apparent and accessible.
Minor corresponding changes:
- Entering and exiting hisec mode is now logged.
- This, sessions, and OAuth authorizations have moved to a new "Sessions and Logs" area, since "Authentication" was getting huge.
Test Plan:
- Viewed new panel.
- Viewed old UI.
- Entered/exited hisec and got prompted.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8871
Summary:
Ref T4398. Ref T4842. I want to let users review their own account activity, partly as a general security measure and partly to make some of the multi-factor stuff easier to build and debug.
To support this, implement modern policies and application search.
I also removed the "old" and "new" columns from this output, since they had limited utility and revealed email addresses to administrators for some actions. We don't let administrators access email addresses from other UIs, and the value of doing so here seems very small.
Test Plan: Used interface to issue a bunch of queries against user logs, got reasonable/expected results.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: keir, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4842, T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8856
Summary:
Ref T4398. This is roughly a "sudo" mode, like GitHub has for accessing SSH keys, or Facebook has for managing credit cards. GitHub actually calls theirs "sudo" mode, but I think that's too technical for big parts of our audience. I've gone with "high security mode".
This doesn't actually get exposed in the UI yet (and we don't have any meaningful auth factors to prompt the user for) but the workflow works overall. I'll go through it in a comment, since I need to arrange some screenshots.
Test Plan: See guided walkthrough.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8851
Summary: Fixes T4903. At some point maybe-soonish we should maybe go make `"device" => true` the default, and put `"device" => "hella-busted"` on the remaining bad pages.
Test Plan: L@@K @ W/ iOS Simulator
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley, k
Maniphest Tasks: T4903
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8863
Summary: Fixes T4606. Also shortens two unusual type names which are currently inconsistent.
Test Plan: Expanded advanced search.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4606
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8853
Summary:
Ref T4830. A few methods, like `conduit.ping`, are callable without authentication, so this even has some use cases. Also:
- Make some Differential stuff a little more consistent.
- Use slightly more modern rendering.
- Deprecate the status-oriented `user` calls; these will be replaced by Calendar methods.
Test Plan: Browsed console as logged out / logged in users.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4830
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8826
Summary:
When we generate account tokens for CSRF keys and email verification, one of the inputs we use is the user's password hash. Users won't always have a password hash, so this is a weak input to key generation. This also couples CSRF weirdly with auth concerns.
Instead, give users a dedicated secret for use in token generation which is used only for this purpose.
Test Plan:
- Ran upgrade scripts.
- Verified all users got new secrets.
- Created a new user.
- Verified they got a secret.
- Submitted CSRF'd forms, they worked.
- Adjusted the CSRF token and submitted CSRF'd forms, verified they don't work.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8748
Summary:
Ref T4371. Ref T4699. Fixes T3994.
Currently, we're very conservative about sending errors back to users. A concern I had about this was that mistakes could lead to email loops, massive amounts of email spam, etc. Because of this, I was pretty hesitant about replying to email with more email when I wrote this stuff.
However, this was a long time ago. We now have Message-ID deduplication, "X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Mail", generally better mail infrastructure, and rate limiting. Together, these mechanisms should reasonably prevent anything crazy (primarily, infinite email loops) from happening.
Thus:
- When we hit any processing error after receiving a mail, try to send the author a reply with details about what went wrong. These are limited to 6 per hour per address.
- Rewrite most of the errors to be more detailed and informative.
- Rewrite most of the errors in a user-facing voice ("You sent this mail..." instead of "This mail was sent..").
- Remove the redundant, less sophisticated code which does something similar in Differential.
Test Plan:
- Using `scripts/mail/mail_receiver.php`, artificially received a pile of mail.
- Hit a bunch of different errors.
- Saw reasonable error mail get sent to me.
- Saw other reasonable error mail get rate limited.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3994, T4371, T4699
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8692
Summary: Fixes T3047. Update this document and remove some lies ("menu bar is read in admin interfaces"!!!!).
Test Plan:
- Read text.
- Searched for "System Agent" in the UI and replaced it with "bot" or "bot/script" or similar.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3047
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8675
Summary:
Fixes T4065. This divides user creation into separate "Standard User" and "Script/Bot" workflows which show only relevant fields and provide guidance.
This fixes the verification mess associated with script/bot users by verifying their email addresses automatically.
Test Plan:
- Created a standard user.
- Created a script/bot.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4065
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8674
Summary: Ref T4065. Moves the last of the weird alternate edit UI to profiles. The old "Edit" controller is now for creation only, and the funky pencil icon is gone.
Test Plan: Created accounts; sent welcome email.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4065
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8670
Summary: Ref T4065. Give administrators an "Edit Settings" link from profiles, which allows selective edit of settings panels. Enable Conduit, SSH Keys, and VCS Password.
Test Plan:
- Used these panels for a bot.
- Used these panels on my own account.
- Tried to use these panels for a non-bot account, was denied.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4065
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8668
Summary: Ref T4065. Moves the "disable / enable" and "make / unmake administrator" actions to profiles.
Test Plan: Disabled and enabled users, and made and unmade administrators.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4065
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8666
Summary:
Ref T4065. Currently, we have this super copy/pasted "edit profile picture" UI for system agents.
Instead, give administrators direct access from profiles, so they can use the same code pages do.
Test Plan: Edited my profile picture and profile details. Edited an agent's. Was unable to edit a non-agent user.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4065
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8664
Summary: Ref T4065. Make this work in a more standard way which administrators have a reasonable shot at finding and using. See D8662 for discussion.
Test Plan: Changed a user's username.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4065
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8663
Summary:
Ref T4065. The existence of two separate edit workflows for users is broadly confusing to administrators.
I want to unify user administration and improve administration of system agent accounts. Particularly, I plan to:
- Give administrators limited access to profile editing of system agents (e.g., change profile picture).
- Give administrators limited access to Settings for system agents.
- Broadly, move all the weird old special editing into standard editing.
Test Plan:
- Hit all the errors (delete self, no username, wrong username).
- Deleted a user.
- Visited page as a non-admin, got 403'd.
- Viewed old edit UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4065
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8662
Summary:
Ref T1049. Fixes T4602. Moves all the funky field stuff to CustomField. Uses ApplicationTransactions to apply and record edits.
This makes "artifact" fields a little less nice (but still perfectly usable). With D8599, I think they're reasonable overall. We can improve this in the future.
All other field types are better (e.g., fixes weird bugs with "bool", fixes lots of weird behavior around required fields), and this gives us access to many new field types.
Test Plan:
Made a bunch of step edits. Here's an example:
{F133694}
Note that:
- "Required" fields work correctly.
- the transaction record is shown at the bottom of the page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4602, T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8600
Summary:
Request from @csilvers. When approving users, the primary email address is useful for administrators.
(This queue is only accessible by administrators, so this doesn't expose email information in general.)
Test Plan: {F132912}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: shadowhand, csilvers, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8589
Summary: Fixes T4665. The "attachable" logic was a little off after a recent change.
Test Plan: With and without a profile image, viewed a page.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4665
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8594
Summary: Ref T4400. Same deal as projects. Tweaked the CSS a touch to make it look better in these views.
Test Plan: Viewed /people/.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4400
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8571
Summary:
This is the other half of D8548. Specifically, the attack here was to set your own editor link to `javascript\n:...` and then you could XSS yourself. This isn't a hugely damaging attack, but we can be more certain by adding a whitelist here.
We already whitelist linkable protocols in remarkup (`uri.allowed-protocols`) in general.
Test Plan:
Tried to set and use valid/invalid editor URIs.
{F130883}
{F130884}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8551
Summary:
Via HackerOne. In regular expressions, "$" matches "end of input, or before terminating newline". This means that the expression `/^A$/` matches two strings: `"A"`, and `"A\n"`.
When we care about this, use `\z` instead, which matches "end of input" only.
This allowed registration of `"username\n"` and similar.
Test Plan:
- Grepped codebase for all calls to `preg_match()` / `preg_match_all()`.
- Fixed the ones where this seemed like it could have an impact.
- Added and executed unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8516
Summary:
The People application shows users awaiting approval, but incorrectly counts disabled users (i.e., users who were not approved).
Instead, count only non-disabled, non-approved users.
Test Plan: My homepage count dropped from 4 to 1, corresponding to the actual number of accounts.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, spicyj
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8486
Summary:
There are quite a few tests in Arcanist, libphutil and Phabricator that do something similar to `$this->assertEqual(false, ...)` or `$this->assertEqual(true, ...)`.
This is unnecessarily verbose and it would be cleaner if we had `assertFalse` and `assertTrue` methods.
Test Plan: I contemplated adding a unit test for the `getCallerInfo` method but wasn't sure if it was required / where it should live.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8460
Summary:
Ref T2222. Currently, Differential has a fairly hairy piece of logic to parse object lists, like `Reviewers: alincoln, htaft`. Extract, generalize, and cover this.
- Some of the logic can be simplified with modern ObjectQuery stuff.
- Make `@username` the formal monogram for users.
- Make `list@domain.com` the formal monogram for mailing lists.
- Add test coverage.
Test Plan:
- Ran unit tests.
- Called `differential.parsecommitmessage` with a bunch of real-world inputs and got sensible results.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8445
Summary: Ref T4570. Add trivial assertions to tests which fail-by-exploding so we can fail tests with no assertions.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything` with Arcanist patched to fail with no assertions.
Reviewers: leebyron, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4570
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8436
Summary:
Ref T2222. This isn't complete and doesn't change runtime behavior yet (the new fields are not glued to the interface), but implements many fields.
(The remaining fields have something weird going on with them, for the most part.)
Test Plan:
With additional changes, rendered most fields sensibly:
{F118834}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8354
Summary:
Ref T2222. Ref T3886. Ref T418. A few changes:
- CustomField can now index into global search.
- Use CustomField fields instead of older custom fields for Differential global search. (This slightly breaks any custom fields which exist, but they are presumably very rare, and probably do not exist; this break is also very mild.)
- Automatically perform CustomField and Subscribable indexing on applicable object types.
Test Plan: Used `bin/search index` to reindex a bunch of stuff, then searched for it. Debug-dumped abstract documents to inspect them.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T418, T3886, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8346
Summary: D8341 was a good start. However, I was looping through all the statuses each time, when I should only deal with a given status once. Instead, unset() a status from the list of statuses once we handled it. Also, delete the last old $key thing, which interfered with my chosen strategy.
Test Plan: made a two day event and verified it showed up in just those two days. (will push and test again just in case but this should be it)
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8342
Summary:
...maybe anyway because I can't reproduce it live. This diff does two things that should help with bugginess though - uses $viewer rather than $user (...$user is who we are looking at...) *AND* upgrades a Conpherence util class to Calendar, and said util class has unit tests and came about from fixing a similar bug in Conpherence back in the day.
Wrote some comments in the util class because I think it has a tendency to trip people up. These comments are not partciularly good however.
Test Plan: viewed user profile - looked good. viewed conpherence - looked good. ran unit tests - they passed. (note I would also like to push this live and verify Chad's profile is fixed on secure.phabricator.com)
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8341
Summary:
Does a handful of things to make Calendar significantly more useful
- Enabled overlapping events
- Profile has a 'week view' of the user
- Profile has a 'month view' of the users
- Multiple users on a calendar are color coded
- Browse view slightly more useful
This stops short of implementing the new 'home' view on Calendar, mostly this is a big step though to make that happen next.
Test Plan: Make lots of events on diffent users.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2897, T4375
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8317
Summary: Put a very rough filter on what we'll accept as an email address. We can expand this if anyone is actually using local delivery or other weird things. This is mostly to avoid a theoretical case where some input is parsed differently by `PhutilAddressParser` and the actual mail adapter, in some subtle hypothetical way. This should give us only "reasonable" email addresses which parsers would be hard-pressed to trip up on.
Test Plan: Added and executed unit tests. Tried to add silly emails. Added valid emails.
Reviewers: btrahan, arice
Reviewed By: arice
CC: arice, chad, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8320
Summary:
Via HackerOne. An attacker can bypass `auth.email-domains` by registering with an email like:
aaaaa...aaaaa@evil.com@company.com
We'll validate the full string, then insert it into the database where it will be truncated, removing the `@company.com` part. Then we'll send an email to `@evil.com`.
Instead, reject email addresses which won't fit in the table.
`STRICT_ALL_TABLES` stops this attack, I'm going to add a setup warning encouraging it.
Test Plan:
- Set `auth.email-domains` to `@company.com`.
- Registered with `aaa...aaa@evil.com@company.com`. Previously this worked, now it is rejected.
- Did a valid registration.
- Tried to add `aaa...aaaa@evil.com@company.com` as an email address. Previously this worked, now it is rejected.
- Did a valid email add.
- Added and executed unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, arice
Reviewed By: arice
CC: aran, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8308
Summary:
Ref T3886. Broadly, fields break down into two types right now: fields which store data on the object (like `DifferentialTitleField`) and fields which store data in custom field storage.
The former type generally reads data from the object into local storage prior to editing, then writes it back afterward. Currently, this happens in `didSetObject()`.
However, now that we load and set objects from ApplicationTransactionQuery, we'll do this extra read-field-values on view interfaces too. There, it's unnecessary and sometimes throws data-attached exceptions.
Instead, separate these concepts, and do all the read-from-object / read-from-storage in one logical chunk, separate from `didSetObject()`.
Test Plan:
- Edited Differential revision.
- Edited Maniphest task.
- Edited Project.
- Edited user profile.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8299
Summary:
Ref T4443. Make hashing algorithms pluggable and extensible so we can deal with the attendant complexities more easily.
This moves "Iterated MD5" to a modular implementation, and adds a tiny bit of hack-glue so we don't need to migrate the DB in this patch. I'll migrate in the next patch, then add bcrypt.
Test Plan:
- Verified that the same stuff gets stored in the DB (i.e., no functional changes):
- Logged into an old password account.
- Changed password.
- Registered a new account.
- Changed password.
- Switched back to master.
- Logged in / out, changed password.
- Switched back, logged in.
- Ran unit tests (they aren't super extensive, but cover some of the basics).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, kofalt
Maniphest Tasks: T4443
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8268
Summary:
Ref T1279. The new dual-mode user/project tokenizers are a bit disorienting. Provide content type hints.
Very open to any suggestions here, most of this patch is just getting the right data in the right places. We can change things up pretty easily.
- I like the little icons in the tokens themselves, I think they look good and are useful.
- I'm less sold on the '(Project)' thing I did in the dropdown. We can easily make this richer if you have thoughts on it -- we could put icons in the left column maybe? Or right-justify the types?
- I made it always sort users above projects.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran, carl
Maniphest Tasks: T4420, T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7250
Summary:
Ref T4379. Fixes T4359. Currently, `bin/search index` does not rebuild CustomField indexes. This is because they aren't really part of the main search index. However, from a user's point of view this is by far the most logical place to look for index rebuilds, and it's straightforward for us to write into this secondary store.
At some point, it might be nice to let you specify fields as "fulltext" too, although no one has asked for that yet. We could then dump the text of those fields into the fulltext index. Ref T418.
Test Plan: Used `bin/search index --type proj --trace`, etc., and examination of the database to verify that indexes rebuilt. Reindexed users, tasks, projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4359, T418, T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8185
Summary: Ref T4375. We never join this table, so this is a pretty straight find/replace.
Test Plan: Browsed around Calendar, verified that nothing seemed broken. Saw my red dot in other apps.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4375
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8145
Summary: Ref T4365. Two diffs from now, I'm changing the UI a bit to let you search for closed and unowned documents more explcitly. To support this in ElasticSearch and more easily in MySQL search, make these explicit, positive relationships.
Test Plan: `bin/search index --all`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4365
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8122
Summary:
Fixes T4368. This is the last "obvious" table we have which we should be GC'ing but do not. It's about 1/12th of the data on `secure.phabricator.com`.
This table stores logins, account creation, password resets, login attempts, etc, and is primarily useful if something sketchy happens so you can go back and review login activity. This data is not useful indefinitely, and there's no reason to retain it forever. Because you don't always know when something sketchy happened I've given this table a fairly long TTL (180 days), but we don't need limitless amounts of this data.
Test Plan: Ran `phd debug garbage` and saw a reasonable amount of data get GC'd. This table already has an appropriate key.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4368
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8128
Summary: This uses the slightly smaller icons. Not sure about the logout icon, will play with it more in the morning.
Test Plan: tested new nav on desktop and mobile.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8119
Summary:
Fixes T4358. User request from IRC, but I think this is generally reasonable.
Although we can not prevent users from determining that other user accounts exist in the general case, it does seem reasonable to restrict browsing the user directory to a subset of users.
In our case, I'll probably do this on `secure.phabricator.com`, since it seems a little odd to let Google index the user directory, for example.
Test Plan: Set the policy to "no one" and tried to browse users.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4358
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8112
Summary:
Ref T3623. This is like a pre-v0, in that it doesn't have a dropdown yet.
Clicking the button takes you to a page which can serve as a right click / mobile / edit target in the long run, but is obviously not great for desktop use. I'll add the dropdown in the next iteration.
Test Plan: {F105631}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3623
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8088
Summary: Super old method which is completely obsoleted by `user.query`
Test Plan: Poked around web UI, ran method.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8071
Summary: Fixes T4339. If you're anonymous, we use a digest of your session key to generate a CSRF token. Otherwise, everything works normally.
Test Plan: Logged out, logged in, tweaked CSRF in forms -- I'll add some inlines.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4339
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8046
Summary:
Ref T4339. Ref T4310. Currently, sessions look like `"afad85d675fda87a4fadd54"`, and are only issued for logged-in users. To support logged-out CSRF and (eventually) external user sessions, I made two small changes:
- First, sessions now have a "kind", which is indicated by a prefix, like `"A/ab987asdcas7dca"`. This mostly allows us to issue session queries more efficiently: we don't have to issue a query at all for anonymous sessions, and can join the correct table for user and external sessions and save a query. Generally, this gives us more debugging information and more opportunity to recover from issues in a user-friendly way, as with the "invalid session" error in this diff.
- Secondly, if you load a page and don't have a session, we give you an anonymous session. This is just a secret with no special significance.
This does not implement CSRF yet, but gives us a client secret we can use to implement it.
Test Plan:
- Logged in.
- Logged out.
- Browsed around.
- Logged in again.
- Went through link/register.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4310, T4339
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8043
Summary: Ref T4339. We have more magical cookie names than we should, move them all to a central location.
Test Plan: Registered, logged in, linked account, logged out. See inlines.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4339
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8041
