Summary:
Depends on D20416. Ref T13269. See D20329.
If you try to save an "Assign to" rule with no assignee, we currently replace the control with an "InvalidRule" control that isn't editable. We'd prefer to give you an empty field back and let you pick a different value.
Differentiate between "bad record format" (i.e., we can't really do anything with this) and "bad record value" (i.e., everything is structurally fine, you just typed the wrong thing). In the latter case, we still build a properly typed rule for the UI, we just refuse to update storage until you fix the problem.
Test Plan:
First, hit the original issue and got a nicer UI with a more consistent control width (note full-width error):
{F6374205}
Then, applied the rest of the patch and got a normal "fix the issue" form state instead of a dead-end:
{F6374211}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13269
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20417
Summary:
Ref T13269. Workboard triggers can now reassign tasks on column drop. Also sprinkles some `setViewer()` calls in places that needed them.
This mostly works, but a few issues:
* To set the owner to unassigned, you must explicitly put the "No Owner" token in the typeahead. Maybe this should just figure out you've put nothing in that field and set it for you?
* I'm pretty sure this was already broken, but if you change the rule type from a tokenizer to a different type, the default for the field doesn't populate correctly: {F6312227}
Also adds a new hook for trigger rules: `getValueForField($value)` which allows you to transform a value stored in the DB into a form suitable for setting on a form control.
Test Plan: Dragged tasks between columns and observed new owners as expected. Didn't try to get fancy to assign tasks to deleted users, users that the viewer can't see, bot users, etc etc. I'm relying on the underlying transaction to hopefully do the right thing.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T13269
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20329
Summary:
Ref T5474. In 99% of cases, a separate "archived/active" status for triggers probably doesn't make much sense: there's not much reason to ever disable/archive a trigger explcitly, and the archival rule is really just "is this trigger used by anything?".
(The one reason I can think of to disable a trigger manually is because you want to put something in a column and skip trigger rules, but you can already do this from the task detail page anyway, and disabling the trigger globally is a bad way to accomplish this if it's in use by other columns.)
Instead of adding a separate "status", just track how many columns a trigger is used by and consider it "inactive" if it is not used by any active columns.
Test Plan: This is slightly hard to test exhaustively since you can't share a trigger across multiple columns right now, but: rebuild indexes, poked around the trigger list and trigger details, added/removed triggers.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T5474
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20308
Summary:
Depends on D20286. Ref T5474. Attaches triggers to columns and makes "Remove Trigger" work.
(There's no "pick an existing named trigger from a list" UI yet, but I plan to add that at some point.)
Test Plan: Attached and removed triggers, saw column UI update appropriately.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T5474
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20287
Summary: Depends on D20279. Ref T5474. Modernize these transactions before I add a new "TriggerTransaction" for setting triggers.
Test Plan: Created a column. Edited a column name and point limit. Hid and un-hid a column. Grepped for removed symbols.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T5474
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20286
Summary:
Depends on D20278. Ref T5474. This change creates some new empty objects that do nothing, and some new views for looking at those objects. There's no actual useful behavior yet.
The "Edit" controller is custom instead of being driven by "EditEngine" because I expect it to be a Herald-style "add new rules" UI, and EditEngine isn't a clean match for those today (although maybe I'll try to move it over).
The general idea here is:
- Triggers are "real" objects with a real PHID.
- Each trigger has a name and a collection of rules, like "Change status to: X" or "Play sound: Y".
- Each column may be bound to a trigger.
- Multiple columns may share the same trigger.
- Later UI refinements will make the cases around "copy trigger" vs "reference the same trigger" vs "create a new ad-hoc trigger" more clear.
- Triggers have their own edit policy.
- Triggers are always world-visible, like Herald rules.
Test Plan: Poked around, created some empty trigger objects, and nothing exploded. This doesn't actually do anything useful yet since triggers can't have any rule behavior and columns can't actually be bound to triggers.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T5474
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20279
Summary: Depends on D19584. Ref T13164. This check is an //extra// check: you need EDIT //and// this capability. Thus, we can do it in validation without issues.
Test Plan:
- This code isn't reachable today: all methods of applying this transaction do a separate check for "Can Lock" upfront.
- Commented out the "Can Lock" check in the LockController, tried to lock as a user without permission. Was rejected with a policy exception.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19585
Test Plan: Unit tests pass, manually changed the default sort and filter on a workboard and observed expected transactions in the DB.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18013
Summary: This was interesting, because there were a mix of callsites using transactions and others that just set the property on the `Project` object. I made everything consistent in using transactions to change this property. I also found an implementation of `getTitle()` that I don't think is ever being invoked since `shouldHide()` is returning `true`, but I migrated it anyway.
Test Plan: Unit tests pass + enabling/disabling workboards (and importing).
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18004
Test Plan: Unit tests pass. Went through the UI for creating new subprojects and milestones, but didn't setup some API calls to check that all the validation errors were still caught.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17999
Summary: See T12673
Test Plan: Unit tests pass. Locked and unlocked a project and saw timeline changes.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17986
Summary: Ref T12732. Use `renderValue()` to build `renderValueList()` so we get nice fancy text for these.
Test Plan: {F4967410}
Reviewers: chad, amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12732
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17966
Summary: I'm not sure you can actually remove a project's image (maybe via the API?), but I kept the code for rendering the relevant title/feed anyway.
Test Plan: Unit tests + adding/changing project pictures.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17954
Test Plan: Unit tests all pass. Added/removed/altered some project hashtags and observed expected transactions in timeline.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17952
Summary: Also changes access modifiers on `PhabricatorProjectTransactionEditor` and sets up `storage` for `applyExternalEffects`.
Test Plan: Created new projects, attempted to create without name, with too long of a name, and with a name that conflicts with other projects and observed expected errors.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T12673
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17947
