Summary: Ref T13513. All queries now go through a reasonably minimal set of pathways and should have consistent behavior.
Test Plan:
- Loaded a revision with inlines.
- Created a new empty inline, reloaded page, saw it vanish.
- Created a new empty inline, typed draft text, did not save, reloaded page, saw draft present.
- Created a new empty inline, typed draft text. Submitted feedback, got prompt, answered "Y", saw draft text submit.
- Created a new empty inline, typed draft text, scrolled down to bottom of page, typed non-draft text, saw preview include draft text.
- Marked and submitted "Done".
- Used hide/show on inlines, verified state persisted.
- Did much of the same stuff in Diffusion, where it all works the same way (except: there's no prompt when submitting draft is-editing inlines).
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21234
Summary:
See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/cannot-audit-a-git-commit/2848>. In D20581, I made some audit behavior dependent upon identities, but the actual edit flow doesn't load them. This can cause us to raise an "attach identities first" exception in the bowels of the edit workflow and trigger unexpected behavior at top level.
Load identities when editing a commit so that the transaction flows have access to identity information and can use it to figure out if a user is an author, etc.
Test Plan:
- As an auditor, applied an "Accept Commit" action to an open audit after D20581.
- Before patch: accept no-ops internally since the preconditions throw.
- After patch: accept works properly.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20612
Summary:
Depends on D20465. Ref T13277. Currently, when a commit is unpublished, we put a single line about it on the "Edit Commit" page. This is pretty much impossible to find.
Move it to the main page. This treatment is more big/bold than I'd probably like to end up, but we should probably overshoot on the explanatory text until users get used to this behavior.
Also, allow searching for only published / unpublished commits.
Test Plan: {F6395705}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13277
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20466
Summary:
Depends on D20464. Ref T13277. Broadly:
- Move all the "should publish X" and "why aren't we publishing X" stuff to a separate class (`PhabricatorRepositoryPublisher`).
- Rename things to be more consistent with modern terminology ("Publish", "Permanent Refs").
Test Plan:
This could use some trial-by-fire on `secure`, but:
- Grepped for all symbols.
- Viewed various commits.
- Reparsed commits.
- Here's a commit with an explanation:
{F6394569}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13277
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20465
Summary: Depends on D20463. Ref T13277. This flag was added some time before 2015 and I don't think I've ever used it. Just get rid of it.
Test Plan: Grepped for `force-autoclose`, `forceAutoclose`, `AUTOCLOSE_FORCED`.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13277
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20464
Summary:
Depends on D20433. Ref T13277. Since "Autoclose" no longer exists, update the documentation.
Currently, this documentation focuses a lot on troubleshooting because users historically had a lot of trouble with figuring out why things were or were not autoclosing. I haven't seen any real confusion about this in years, so I suspect we may have improved the import pipeline and/or UI to make this less of a problem.
It's also possible that this document "fixed" the problem, but usually I expect a documentation fix to not affect the frequency of reports, just make them easier to resolve, so I doubt it.
If unclear things remain //and// documentation really did fix it, maybe we can fix the issues. Or we can just put the troubleshooting documentation back.
Test Plan: Read documentation.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13277
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20434
Summary:
Depends on D20423. Ref T13277. Repositories currently have separate toggles for "Autoclose" and "Publishing".
Merge the "Autoclose" toggle into the "Publishing" toggle. I'm unaware of any valid use case for enabling one but not the other.
(This doesn't fix all the documentation, yet.)
Test Plan: Edited a repository, saw only one publishing option.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13277
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20424
Summary:
Ref T13222. See PHI995. Before making a change to inline rendering, consolidate this code for generating the "alice added inlines comments." and "alice marked X inlines as done." transactions.
Both Differential and Diffusion have four very similar chunks of code. Merge them into shared methods and reduce code duplication across the methods.
(In the next change, I plan to hide the "done" story when the mark affects your own inline, since users marking their own inlines as "done" is generally not very interesting or useful.)
Test Plan: As author and reviewer/auditor, added inlines in Differential and Diffusion. As author, marked own and others inlines as done and undone. Got sensible transaction rendering and persistence of "Done".
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19858
Summary:
See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/cannot-accept-commits-in-audit/2166/>.
In D19842, I changed `PhabricatorEditField->shouldGenerateTransactionsFromComment()`.
- Previously, it bailed on `getIsConduitOnly()`.
- After the patch, it bails on a missing `getCommentActionLabel()`.
The old code was actually wrong, and it was previously possible to apply possibly-invalid actions in some cases (or, at least, sneak them through this layer: they would only actually apply if not validated properly).
In practice, it let a different bug through: we sometimes loaded commits without loading their audit authority, so testing whether the viewer could "Accept" the commit or not (or take some other actions like "Raise Concern") would always fail and throw an exception: "Trying to access data not attached to this object..."
Fixing the insufficiently-strict transaction generation code exposed the "authority not attached" bug, which caused some actions to fail to generate transactions.
This appeared in the UI as either an unhelpful error ("You can't post an empty comment") or an action with no effect. The unhelpful error was because we show that error if you aren't taking any //other// actions, and we wouldn't generate an "Accept" action because of the interaction of these bugs, so the code thought you were just posting an empty comment.
Test Plan: Without leaving comments, accepted and rejected commits. No more error messages, and actions took effect.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: stephan.senkbeil, hskiba
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19845
Summary:
Ref T10978. This prepares for swapping the comment UI to stacked actions.
These are only accessible via the API.
Test Plan: Used the API to accept, raise concern with, and reject commits.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17182
Summary: Ref T10978. Ref T7676. Make auditors work more like reviewers, so they can be freely added or removed.
Test Plan:
- Interacted with auditors via "Edit Commit" and API.
- Comment area is still oldschool and doesn't work yet.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978, T7676
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17181
Summary: Ref T10978. This currently does almost nothing, but gets it in place so I can add stuff to it.
Test Plan: Made a comment on a commit using the API.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17178
Summary: Ref T10978. The current "Edit" flow has some autoclose info. This isn't necessarily the best place to put it in the long run, but preseve it for now since the documentation refers to it.
Test Plan: {F2340658}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17176
Summary:
Ref T10978. After T11114, we have some features (like the old code for the haunted comment panel) which are only used by Diffusion. I want to modernize it so I can nuke them. T10978 also describes many bugs which are only fixable after modernizing.
This adds very basic EditEngine support for commits/audit. You can't create new commits with this workflow, just tag/update existing ones.
Test Plan: {F2340347}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17175
