Summary: Will see how this goes in practice. Uses violet where color is used for non responsive peeps.
Test Plan: Create a user without email verification, test hover card, profile, mentions and lists.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17678
Summary:
Ref T12268. Ref T12157. When you mention or interact with a user who is unlikely to be able to respond (for example, because their account is disabled), we try to show a colored dot to provide a hint about this.
Recently, we no longer send any normal mail to unverified addresses. However, the rules for showing a dot haven't been updated yet, so they only care about this if `auth.require-verification` is set. This can be misleading, because if you say `Hey @alice, what do you think about this?` and she hasn't verified her email, you may not get a response.
Update the rule so users with unverified email addresses get a grey dot in all cases. The hint is basically "you shouldn't expect a response from this user".
Make the meaning of this hint more clear on the hovercard and profile.
Also:
- Allow the non-ajax version of the hovercard page (which is basically only useful for testing hovercards) accept `?names=...` so you can just plug usernames, hashtags, etc., in there.
- Fix a bug where the user's join date was based on their profile creation date instead of account creation date on the hovercard. Users may not have a profile creation date (if they never changed any account details), and it may be different from their account creation date.
Test Plan: {F2998517}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12268, T12157
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17374
Summary:
Ref T11809. I missed this when adding a "Busy" status.
Also the other dot is orange? Just make them all orange for consistency.
Test Plan: Viewed `@username` of busy users (orange), away users (red).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11809
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16819
Summary:
Ref T6299. This makes more of the links point to the right places.
Not covered yet:
- Projects and subscribers don't point to the right place (this is a little tricky to fix, I think).
- `[[ #anchor ]]`s won't do the right thing in, uh, email, I guess, since `uri.here` is not set. This is also a little tricky.
Possibly we should just remove subscribers (although also kind of tricky).
Test Plan: On a custom-domain blog, observed that fewer things were broken.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6299
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16007
Summary: No UI changes, just some search and replace for UI consistency.
Test Plan: Test person and object hovercards still work. UIExamples too.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15172
Summary:
Ref T7707. Ref T8183.
- Currently, user status is derived by looking at events they //created//. Instead, look at non-cancelled invites they are attending.
- Prepare for on-user caching.
- Mostly remove "Sporradic" as a status, although I left room for adding more information later.
Test Plan:
- Called user.query.
- Viewed profile.
- Viewed hovercard.
- Used mentions.
- Saw status immediately update when attending/leaving/cancelling a current event.
- Created an event ending at 6 PM and an event from 6:10PM - 7PM, saw "Away until 7PM".
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8183, T7707
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12833
Summary:
Ref T4411
I'm not quite sure if this is the right place for this as it will be difficult to provide proper user feedback of why we removed a particular subscriber.
Is the ApplicationTransactionEditor generally the right place to extract mentioned phids in comments?
On the other hand in some cases we cannot really give user feedback why a user was not subscribed (e.g.: commits & diffs)
Adding a diff to a repo where the user mentioned has no view permissions the subscriber is currently still added. Still would have to find where this is donet...
Any other places?
Unrelated: Is there any way to remove a subscriber from a commit/audit ?
Test Plan:
- Edited tasks with the mentioned user having view permissions to this specific task and without
- Raised concern with a commit and commented on the audit with the user having view permissions to the repo and without
- Added a commit to a repo with and without the mentioned user having permissions
- Mention a user in a task & commit comment with and without permissions
- Mentioning a user in a diff description & comments with and without permissions to the specific diff
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4411
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11049
Summary: Ref T6343, adding HTMLMailMode to remarkup, and most objects should now be processed and appear pretty in emails.
Test Plan: Add a comment to a Maniphest task containing a mention of an object like '{T1}' or 'T1'. Emails should show a styled version of the object similar to how the object looks in the context of the Maniphest task in the UI.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6343, T2617
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10859
