Summary:
Ref T2852.
- Broadly, we support "I have a Ref, I need a PHID" well but not "I have a PHID, I need a Ref".
- Add DoorkeeperExternalObjectQuery, and use it to query ExternalObjects.
- Allow external objects to be imported by their internal PHIDs. Basically, if we have an edge pointing at an ExternalObject, we can say "load all the data about this" from just the PHID and have it hit all the same code.
- Allow construction of Refs from ExternalObjects. This makes the "I have a PHID, I need a Ref" easier.
Test Plan:
- Verified Asana links still enrich properly at display time.
- Used in future revision.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6294
Summary:
Ref T2852. I want to model Asana integration as a response to feed events. Currently, we queue one feed event for each HTTP hook.
Instead, always queue one feed event and then have it queue any necessary followup events (now, http hooks; soon, asana).
Add a script to make it easy to reproducibly fire feed event publishing.
Test Plan:
Republished a feed event and verified it hit configured HTTP hooks correctly.
$ ./bin/feed republish 5765774156541908292 --trace
>>> [2] <connect> phabricator2_feed
<<< [2] <connect> 1,660 us
>>> [3] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC
<<< [3] <query> 595 us
>>> [4] <connect> phabricator2_differential
<<< [4] <connect> 760 us
>>> [5] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5')
<<< [5] <query> 478 us
>>> [6] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5')
<<< [6] <query> 449 us
>>> [7] <connect> phabricator2_user
<<< [7] <connect> 1,062 us
>>> [8] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov')
<<< [8] <query> 540 us
>>> [9] <connect> phabricator2_file
<<< [9] <connect> 951 us
>>> [10] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7')
<<< [10] <query> 498 us
>>> [11] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo
<<< [11] <query> 507 us
Republishing story...
>>> [12] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC
<<< [12] <query> 685 us
>>> [13] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5')
<<< [13] <query> 489 us
>>> [14] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5')
<<< [14] <query> 512 us
>>> [15] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov')
<<< [15] <query> 601 us
>>> [16] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7')
<<< [16] <query> 405 us
>>> [17] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo
<<< [17] <query> 551 us
>>> [18] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC
<<< [18] <query> 507 us
>>> [19] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5')
<<< [19] <query> 428 us
>>> [20] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5')
<<< [20] <query> 419 us
>>> [21] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov')
<<< [21] <query> 591 us
>>> [22] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7')
<<< [22] <query> 406 us
>>> [23] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo
<<< [23] <query> 593 us
>>> [24] <http> http://127.0.0.1/derp/
<<< [24] <http> 746,157 us
[2013-06-24 20:23:26] EXCEPTION: (HTTPFutureResponseStatusHTTP) [HTTP/500] Internal Server Error
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6291
Summary: Ref T2852. Provide a script for inspecting/debugging OAuth token refresh.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/auth refresh` with various arguments, saw token refreshes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6276
Summary:
Ref T2852. Primarily, this expands API access to Asana. As a user-visible effect, it links Asana tasks in Remarkup.
When a user enters an Asana URI, we register an onload behavior to make an Ajax call for the lookup. This respects privacy imposed by the API without creating a significant performance impact.
Test Plan: {F47183}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6274
Summary:
- `DoorkeeperObjectRef` is a convenience object to keep track of `<applicationType, applicationDomain, objectType, objectID>` tuples.
- `DoorkeeperBridge` provides pull/push between Phabricator and external systems.
- `DoorkeeperBridgeAsana` is a bridge to Asana.
Test Plan:
Ran this snippet and got a task from Asana:
{P871}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6273
Summary:
Ref T2852. This table holds data about external objects and allows us to write edges to them.
Objects are identified with an `<applicationType, applicationDomain, objectType, objectID>` tuple. For example, Asana tasks will be, e.g., `<asana, asana.com, asana:task, 93829279873>` or similar.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6271
Summary: Ref T2222. I need this to migrate the Differential comment tables, because they are large. We have the similar `LiskMigrationIterator` already, but it won't work here because I intend to destroy the original objects after migrating them.
Test Plan:
Wrote a script to iterate over the `differential_comment` table, got reasonable output:
{P869}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6264
Summary:
Ref T2222. See D6260.
Push all this junk behind a Query so I can move the storage out from underneath it.
Test Plan: Viewed home page, list view, revision. Made draft, looked at preview, submitted draft, viewed inline, replied to inline.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6262
Summary:
Ref T2222. Ref T1460. Depends on D6260.
This creates the new tables, but doesn't start using them. I added three new fields for {T1460}, to represent fixed/done/replied states.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1460, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6261
Summary:
Ref T2222.
I'm thinking about how I want to approach the Asana sync, and I want to try to do T2222 first so that we can build it cleanly on top of ApplicationTransactions. I think we can at least walk down this road a little bit and if it turns out to be scary we can take another approach.
I was generally very happy with how the auth migration turned out (seemingly, it was almost completely clean), and want to pursue a similar strategy here. Basically:
- Wrap the new objects in the old objects for reads/writes.
- Migrate all the existing data to the new table.
- Everything hard is done; move things over a piece at a time at a leisurely pace in lots of smallish, relatively-easy-to-understand changes.
This deletes or abstracts all reads of the DifferentialComment table. In particular, these things are **deleted**:
- The script `undo_commits.php`, which I haven't pointed anyone at in a very long time.
- The `differential.getrevisionfeedback` Conduit method, which has been marked deprecated for a year or more.
- The `/stats/` interface in Differential, which should be rebuilt on Fact and has never been exposed in the UI. It does a ton of joins and such which are prohibitively difficult to migrate.
This leaves a small number of reading interfaces, which I replaced with a new `DifferentialCommentQuery`. Some future change will make this actually load transactions and wrap them with DifferentialComment interfaces.
Test Plan: Viewed a revision; made revision comments
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: edward, chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6260
Summary: Ref T1536. This is the last major migration. Moves us over to the DB and drops all the config stuff.
Test Plan:
- Ran the migration.
- Saw all my old config brought forward and respected, with accurate settings.
- Ran LDAP import.
- Grepped for all removed config options.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, wez
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6243
Summary:
Ref T1536. Currently, when you install Phabricator you're dumped on the login screen and have to consult the documentation to learn about `bin/accountadmin`.
Instead, detect that an install is running first-time setup:
- It has no configured providers; and
- it has no user accounts.
We can safely deduce that such an install isn't configured yet, and let the user create an admin account from the web UI.
After they login, we raise a setup issue and lead them to configure authentication.
(This could probably use some UI and copy tweaks.)
Test Plan:
{F46738}
{F46739}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6228
Summary: Ref T1536. Make this UI a bit more human-friendly.
Test Plan: {F46873}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6237
Summary:
Ref T1536. This is extremely reachable and changes the login code to the new stuff.
Notes:
- I've hard-disabled password registration since I want installs to explicitly flip it on via config if they want it. New installs will get it by default in the future, but old installs shouldn't have their auth options change.
- Google doesn't let us change the redirect URI, so keep the old one working.
- We need to keep a bit of LDAP around for now for LDAP import.
- **Facebook:** This causes substantive changes in what login code is executed.
Test Plan:
- Logged in / logged out / registered, hit new flows.
- Logged in with google.
- Verified no password registration by default.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: wez, nh, aran, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6222
Summary: Picked a set of standard colors. Based on our current Maniphest color set, but tweaked to the same hue with http://color.hailpixel.com/
Test Plan: Not intended to be end all be all, but a decent first cut. Applied to Maniphest and Tags.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6229
Summary: Ref T1536. This gets the single queries out of the View and builds a propery Query class for ExternalAccount.
Test Plan: Linked/unlinked accounts, logged out, logged in.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6212
Summary: Ref T1536. This script basically exists to restore access if/when users shoot themselves in the foot by disabling all auth providers and can no longer log in.
Test Plan: {F46411}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6205
Summary: Ref T1536. Many rough / broken edges, but adds the rough skeleton of the provider edit workflow.
Test Plan: {F46333}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6200
Summary: Ref T1536. Adds an initial "choose a provider type" screen for adding a new provider. This doesn't go anywhere yet.
Test Plan: {F46316}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6199
Summary:
Ref T1536. Currently, we have about 40 auth-related configuration options. This is already roughly 20% of our config, and we want to add more providers. Additionally, we want to turn some of these auth options into multi-auth options (e.g., allow multiple Phabricator OAuth installs, or, theoretically multiple LDAP servers).
I'm going to move this into a separate "Auth" tool with a minimal CLI (`bin/auth`) interface and a more full web interface. Roughly:
- Administrators will use the app to manage authentication providers.
- The `bin/auth` CLI will provide a safety hatch if you lock yourself out by disabling all usable providers somehow.
- We'll migrate existing configuration into the app and remove it.
General goals:
- Make it much easier to configure authentication by providing an interface for it.
- Make it easier to configure everything else by reducing the total number of available options.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6196
Summary: Ref T1536. These can probably use some design tweaking and there's a bit of a bug with profile images for some providers, but generally seems to be in the right ballpark.
Test Plan:
{F46604}
{F46605}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6210
Summary:
Ref T1536. Currently, we have separate panels for each link/unlink and separate controllers for OAuth vs LDAP.
Instead, provide a single "External Accounts" panel which shows all linked accounts and allows you to link/unlink more easily.
Move link/unlink over to a full externalaccount-based workflow.
Test Plan:
- Linked and unlinked OAuth accounts.
- Linked and unlinked LDAP accounts.
- Registered new accounts.
- Exercised most/all of the error cases.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6189
Summary:
Ref T1536. LDAP is very likely the worst thing in existence.
This has some rough edges (error handling isn't perfect) but is already better than the current LDAP experience! durrr
Test Plan: Registered and logged in using LDAP.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6177
Summary: Ref T1536. Support for GitHub on new flows.
Test Plan: Registered and logged in with GitHub.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6166
Summary: Ref T1536. Adds Disqus as a Provider.
Test Plan: Registered and logged in with Disqus.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6165
Summary:
Ref T1536. Ref T1930. Code is not reachable.
This provides password authentication and registration on the new provider/adapter framework.
I sort of cheated a little bit and don't really route any password logic through the adapter (instead, this provider uses an empty adapter and just sets the type/domain on it). I think the right way to do this //conceptually// is to treat username/passwords as an external black box which the adapter communicates with. However, this creates a lot of practical implementation and UX problems:
- There would basically be two steps -- in the first one, you interact with the "password black box", which behaves like an OAuth provider. This produces some ExternalAccount associated with the username/password pair, then we go into normal registration.
- In normal registration, we'd proceed normally.
This means:
- The registration flow would be split into two parts, one where you select a username/password (interacting with the black box) and one where you actually register (interacting with the generic flow). This is unusual and probably confusing for users.
- We would need to do a lot of re-hashing of passwords, since passwords currently depend on the username and user PHID, which won't exist yet during registration or the "black box" phase. This is a big mess I don't want to deal with.
- We hit a weird condition where two users complete step 1 with the same username but don't complete step 2 yet. The box knows about two different copies of the username, with two different passwords. When we arrive at step 2 the second time we have a lot of bad choices about how to reoslve it, most of which create security problems. The most stragihtforward and "pure" way to resolve the issues is to put password-auth usernames in a separate space, but this would be incredibly confusuing to users (your login name might not be the same as your username, which is bizarre).
- If we change this, we need to update all the other password-related code, which I don't want to bother with (at least for now).
Instead, let registration know about a "default" registration controller (which is always password, if enabled), and let it require a password. This gives us a much simpler (albeit slightly less pure) implementation:
- All the fields are on one form.
- Password adapter is just a shell.
- Password provider does the heavy lifting.
We might make this more pure at some point, but I'm generally pretty satisfied with this.
This doesn't implement the brute-force CAPTCHA protection, that will be coming soon.
Test Plan: Registered with password only and logged in with a password. Hit various error conditions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T1930
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6164
Summary:
Ref T1536. None of this code is reachable.
Implements new-auth login (so you can actually login) and login validation (which checks that cookies were set correctly).
Test Plan: Manually enabled FB auth, went through the auth flow to login/logout. Manually hit most of the validation errors.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6162
Summary:
Ref T1536. Code is intentionally made unreachable (see PhabricatorAuthProviderOAuthFacebook->isEnabled()).
This adds:
- A provider-driven "start" screen (this has the list of ways you can login/register).
- Registration actually works.
- Facebook OAuth works.
@chad, do you have any design ideas on the start screen? I think we poked at it before, but the big issue was that there were a limitless number of providers. Today, we have:
- Password
- LDAP
- Facebook
- GitHub
- Phabricator
- Disqus
- Google
We plan to add:
- Asana
- An arbitrary number of additional instances of Phabricator
Users want to add:
- OpenID
- Custom providers
And I'd like to have these at some point:
- Stripe
- WePay
- Amazon
- Bitbucket
So basically any UI for this has to accommodate 300 zillion auth options. I don't think we need to solve any UX problems here (realistically, installs enable 1-2 auth options and users don't actually face an overwhelming number of choices) but making the login forms less ugly would be nice. No combination of prebuilt elements seems to look very good for this use case.
Test Plan: Registered a new acount with Facebook.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6161
Summary:
Ref T1536. None of this code is reachable.
`PhabricatorAuthLoginController` provides a completely generic login/link flow, similar to how D6155 provides a generic registration flow.
`PhabricatorAuthProvider` wraps a `PhutilAuthAdapter` and glues the generic top-level flow to a concrete authentication provider.
Test Plan: Static only, code isn't meaningfully reachable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6159
Summary:
Currently, registration and authentication are pretty messy. Two concrete problems:
- The `PhabricatorLDAPRegistrationController` and `PhabricatorOAuthDefaultRegistrationController` controllers are giant copy/pastes of one another. This is really bad.
- We can't practically implement OpenID because we can't reissue the authentication request.
Additionally, the OAuth registration controller can be replaced wholesale by config, which is a huge API surface area and a giant mess.
Broadly, the problem right now is that registration does too much: we hand it some set of indirect credentials (like OAuth tokens) and expect it to take those the entire way to a registered user. Instead, break registration into smaller steps:
- User authenticates with remote service.
- Phabricator pulls information (remote account ID, username, email, real name, profile picture, etc) from the remote service and saves it as `PhabricatorUserCredentials`.
- Phabricator hands the `PhabricatorUserCredentials` to the registration form, which is agnostic about where they originate from: it can process LDAP credentials, OAuth credentials, plain old email credentials, HTTP basic auth credentials, etc.
This doesn't do anything yet -- there is no way to create credentials objects (and no storage patch), but I wanted to get any initial feedback, especially about the event call for T2394. In particular, I think the implementation would look something like this:
$profile = $event->getValue('profile')
$username = $profile->getDefaultUsername();
$is_employee = is_this_a_facebook_employee($username);
if (!$is_employee) {
throw new Exception("You are not employed at Facebook.");
}
$fbid = get_fbid_for_facebook_username($username);
$profile->setDefaultEmail($fbid);
$profile->setCanEditUsername(false);
$profile->setCanEditEmail(false);
$profile->setCanEditRealName(false);
$profile->setShouldVerifyEmail(true);
Seem reasonable?
Test Plan: N/A yet, probably fatals.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, codeblock, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, asherkin, nh, wez
Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T2394
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4647
Summary: Ref T1536. This is similar to D6172 but much simpler: we don't need to retain external interfaces here and can do a straight migration.
Test Plan: TBA
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6173
Summary: Ref T1536. Migrates the OAuthInfo table to ExternalAccount, and makes `PhabricatorUserOAuthInfo` a wrapper for an ExternalAccount.
Test Plan: Logged in with OAuth, registered with OAuth, linked/unlinked OAuth accounts, checked OAuth status screen, deleted an account with related OAuth.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6172
Summary: Rough pass at a PHUIButtonView Class. Keeps phutil_tag intact and adds some image features if you use the class.
Test Plan: UIExamples
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6192
Summary:
Ref T1703. This sets the stage for (but does not yet implement) custom UI types for config. In particular, a draggable list for custom fields.
I might make all the builtin types go through this at some point too, but don't really want to bother for the moment. It would be very slightly cleaner but woudn't get us much of anything.
Test Plan:
UI now renders via custom code, although that code does nothing (produces an unadorned text field):
{F45693}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6154
Summary:
Ref T1703.
- Adds "Title".
- Adds "Blurb".
- Adds `user.fields` config for selecting and reordering. This will get UI in the next patch.
Test Plan:
{F45689}
{F45690}
Edited the fields, too.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6153
Summary:
Adds a profile edit controller (with just one field and on links to it) that uses ApplicationTransactions and CustomField.
{F45617}
My plan is to move the other profile fields to this interface and get rid of Settings -> Profile. Basically, these will be "settings":
- Sex
- Language
- Timezone
These will be "profile":
- Real Name
- Title
- Blurb
- Profile Image (but I'm going to put this on a separate UI)
- Other custom fields
Test Plan: Edited my realname using the new interface.
Reviewers: chad, seporaitis
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6152
Summary:
None of this code is reachable yet. See discussion in D6147. Ref T1703.
Provide tighter integration between ApplicationTransactions and CustomField. Basically, I'm just trying to get all the shared stuff into the base implementation.
Test Plan: Code not reachable.
Reviewers: chad, seporaitis
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6149
Summary:
Ref T1703. We have currently have two custom field implementations (Maniphest, Differential) and are about to add a third (User, see D6122). I'd like to generalize custom fields before doing a third implementation, so we don't back ourselves into the ApplicationTransactions corner we have with Maniphest/Differential/Audit.
For the most part, the existing custom fields work well and can be directly generalized. There are three specific things I want to improve, though:
- Integration with ApplicationSearch: Custom fields aren't indexable. ApplicationSearch is now online and seems stable and good. D5278 provides a template for a backend which can integrate with ApplicationSearch, and ApplicationSearch solves many of the other UI problems implied by exposing custom fields into search (principally, giant pages full of query fields). Generally, I want to provide stronger builtin integration between custom fields and ApplicationSearch.
- Integration with ApplicationTransactions: Likewise, custom fields should support more native integrations with ApplicationTransactions, which are also online and seem stable and well designed.
- Selection and sorting: Selecting and sorting custom fields is a huge mess right now. I want to move this into config now that we have the UI to support it, and move away from requiring users to subclass a ton of stuff just to add a field.
For ApplicationSearch, I've adopted and generalized D5278.
For ApplicationTransactions, I haven't made any specific affordances yet.
For selection and sorting, I've partially implemented config-based selection and sorting. It will work like this:
- We add a new configuration value, like `differential.fields`. In the UI, this is a draggable list of supported fields. Fields can be reordered, and most fields can be disabled.
- We load every avialable field to populate this list. New fields will appear at the bottom.
- There are two downsides to this approach:
- If we add fields in the upstream at a later date, they will appear at the end of the list if an install has customized list order or disabled fields, even if we insert them elsewhere in the upstream.
- If we reorder fields in the upstream, the reordering will not be reflected in install which have customized the order/availability.
- I think these are both acceptable costs. We only incur them if an admin edits this config, which implies they'll know how to fix it if they want to.
- We can fix both of these problems with a straightforward configuration migration if we want to bother.
- There are numerous upsides to this approach:
- We can delete a bunch of code and replace it with simple configuration.
- In general, we don't need the "selector" classes anymore.
- Users can enable available-but-disabled fields with one click.
- Users can add fields by putting their implementations in `src/extensions/` with zero subclassing or libphutil stuff.
- Generally, it's super easy for users to understand.
This doesn't actually do anything yet and will probably see some adjustments before anything starts running it.
Test Plan: Static checks only, this code isn't reachable yet.
Reviewers: chad, seporaitis
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6147
Summary:
Also you have to drop them. So drag, and then drop.
This needs some cleanup and reconciliation/generalization with the Maniphest implementation. In particular, you can't drag things to the very top right now, and they should share more CSS and more behaviors.
Test Plan:
Look I alphabetized them:
{F45286}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6136
Summary: This adds examples and abstracts out CSS for common nav re-use.
Test Plan: Tested DocumentExample and ListExample
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6138
Summary:
This diff covers a bit of ground.
- PHUIDocumentExample has been added
- PHUIDocument has been extended with new features
- PhabricatorMenuView is now PHUIListView
- PhabricatorMenuItemView is now PHUIItemListView
Overall - I think I've gotten all the edges covered here. There is some derpi-ness that we can talk about, comments in the code. Responsive design is missing from the new features on PHUIDocument, will follow up later.
Test Plan: Tested mobile and desktop menus, old phriction layout, new document views, new lists, and object lists.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6130
Summary: Ref T988. Mostly backend changes, with a very rough frontend on top of them. See Conpherence discussion.
Test Plan: {F45010}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T988
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6113
Summary: D6114 fixed some bugs but on production it shows up as a new bug where Saturday is the first day? stop messing with the DateTime object so much and do some old school epoch manipulation. This works correctly on my laptop and my still fail in production, but it will rule out DateTime suckage.
Test Plan: still works on laptop
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6115
