1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-14 10:52:41 +01:00
Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
0a069cb55a Require a viewer to load handles
Summary:
Unmuck almost all of the we-sort-of-have-viewers-some-of-the-time mess.

There are a few notable cases here:

  - I used Omnipotent users when indexing objects for search. I think this is correct; we do policy filtering when showing results.
  - I cheated in a bad way in the Remarkup object rule, but fixing this requires fixing all the PhabricatorRemarkupEngine callsites (there are 85). I'll do that in the next diff.
  - I cheated in a few random places, like when sending mail about package edits. These aren't a big deal.

Test Plan:
  - Grepped for all PhabricatorObjectHandleData references.
  - Gave them viewers.

Reviewers: vrana

Reviewed By: vrana

CC: aran, edward

Maniphest Tasks: T603

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5151
2013-02-28 17:15:09 -08:00
vrana
9f549ba75e Fix whitespace around else 2013-01-16 12:16:37 -08:00
vrana
ef85f49adc Delete license headers from files
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).

We are removing the headers for these reasons:

- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.

This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).

Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.

Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T2035

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
2012-11-05 11:16:51 -08:00
epriestley
2532cb9613 Add mail keys to Ponder questions
Summary:
We need to go slightly farther to stub reply handler functionality for Ponder in at least some configurations, where we rely on the presence of a unique random key to generate per-object or per-object+user reply addresses.

This should probably be formalized in an interface since it's currently pretty ad-hoc.

Test Plan:
  - Made comments in Ponder under a per-user email configuration.
  - Ran migration, verified mail keys were generated.
  - Ran migration again (with --apply), verified existing questions were skipped.
  - Created a new question, verified mail key generation.

Reviewers: pieter

Reviewed By: pieter

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1873

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3665
2012-10-08 20:14:58 -07:00
Pieter Hooimeijer
3440839c99 Hook Ponder to Subscriptions
Summary: Adding email aggro email aggro

Test Plan: Added some content; annoyed some coworkers.

Reviewers: epriestley, nh, vrana

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T1808

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3643
2012-10-08 14:47:21 -07:00