Summary: Ref T9134. It looks like this functionality was removed in D13848.
Test Plan: Submitted a diff successfully.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9134
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13869
Summary: Fixes T9267. Removes preceeding r.
Test Plan: Ran Sample, did not get error.
Reviewers: epriestley, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: epriestley, joshuaspence
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9267
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14000
Summary:
Email is so exciting I can't wait 30 days for initial results.
ref T9161
Test Plan:
* `./bin/mail volume --days 60` took longer and gave plausibly larger
results.
* `./bin/mail volume --days 0` quickly told me no mail had been sent.
* `./bin/mail volume` Said it was still looking 30 days back.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T9161
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13901
Summary: Fix T8710. I had hopes of doing something cleaver with `highlighted` (Like trying to understand `foo.bar` when clicking `bar`, but I obviously didn't do it.
Test Plan: ctrl-click.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley, gena2x, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8710
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13550
Summary:
Fixes T8501.
When losing focus while holding ctrl, we never get a key-up event; ctrl-f/d/tab make the browser tab lose focus.
So treat 'blur' (unfocus) as if the user released ctrl.
Test Plan: ctrl-f/ctrl-d/ctrl-tab, ctrl-click-outside-of-window, and move mouse over the content - see no help suggestions.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8501
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13260
Summary:
We currently detect tab panels embedding themselves, but do not detect text panels embedding themselves with `{Wxx}`.
Detect these self-embedding panels.
I had to add a bit of a hack to pass the parent panel PHIDs to the rule. Generally, I got the Markup API kind of wrong and want to update it, I'll file a followup with details about how I'd like to move forward.
Test Plan:
Created a text panel embedding itself, a tab panel embedding a text panel embedding itself, a tab panel embedding a text panel embedding the tab panel, etc.
Rendered all panels standalone and as `{Wxx}` from a different context.
{F761158}
{F761159}
{F761160}
{F761161}
{F761162}
Reviewers: chad, jbeta
Reviewed By: chad, jbeta
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13999
Summary:
Fixes T9268. Currently, we try to match any string like "a2f313f1" as a commit/revision, so short hashes will get picked up.
However, we don't require a word boundary or terminal after the match, so for input like "aaa...aaaaz" the engine can get stuck trying to split the string into sub-matches.
That is, in the original case, the input "aaaz" had valid matches against `[rA-Z0-9a-f]+` up to "z" of:
aaa
aa a
a aa
a a a
All of these will fail once it hits "z", but it has to try them all. This complexity is explosive with longer strings.
Instead, require a word boundary or EOL after the match, so this is the only valid match:
aaa
Then the engine sees the "z", says "nope, no match" and doesn't have to backtrack across all possible combinations.
Test Plan: Added a failing unit test, applied patch, clean test.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9268
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13997
Summary:
Fixes T9251. Old mail could get saved with bad parameters for two reasons that I can come up with:
- Nothing ever set a parameter on it -- not sure this could ever actually happen; or
- some field contained non-UTF8 data prior to D13939 and we silently failed to encode it.
My guess is that the second case is probably the culprit here.
In any case, recover from this so `20150622.metamta.5.actor-phid-mig.php` can proceed.
Test Plan: Same effective patch as user patch in T9251; looked at some mail to make sure it was still pulling parameters properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9251
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13990
Summary:
Ref T8783. Sort out some relationships and fields:
- Make Items 1:1 with Queues: each item is always in exactly one queue. Minor discussion on T8783. I think this is easier to understand and reason about (and implement!) and can't come up with any real cases where it isn't powerful enough.
- Remove "QueueItem", which allowed items to be in multiple queues at once.
- Remove "dateNuanced", which is equivalent to "dateCreated" in all cases.
Then add really basic routing:
- Add "Default Queue" for Sources. New items from the source route into that queue.
- (Some day there will be routing rules, but for now the rule is "always route into the default queue".)
- Show queue on items.
- Show more / more useful edit history and transactions in several UIs.
Test Plan:
{F749445}
{F749446}
{F749447}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13988
Summary: Ref T2015. This fixes issues where the Drydock queries wouldn't filter (or throw an exception) when passed empty arrays for their `with` methods. In addition, this also adds `array_unique` to the resource and lease subqueries so that we don't pull in a bunch of stuff if logs or leases have the same related objects.
Test Plan: Tested it by using DarkConsole on the log controller.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: joshuaspence, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2015
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10879
Summary: Ref T2015. This allows searching based on blueprints, resources or leases when viewing the logs, which helps when searching for events that occured to a particular blueprint / resource / lease. Unlike the logs shown on the resource / lease pages, the search engine supports paging properly, which means it can be used to find entries in the past.
Test Plan: Used the Drydock log search page.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: joshuaspence, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2015
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10874
Summary: Show the time in addition to the date in the Drydock logs.
Test Plan: Brought forward from D10479.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: joshuaspence, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10909
Summary: Ref T1049. This ensures the Harbormaster build target is associated with leases, so in the future we can query things and find out whether builds are still running with associated leases.
Test Plan: Leased a host, checked the DB and saw the field populated.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: joshuaspence, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10870
Summary:
Ref T8783.
The "View" UI is where a user would check their request for feedback or a resolution, if it's something that makes sense for them to interact with from the web UI.
The "Edit" UI is the manage/admin UI where you'd respond to a request. It's similar to the view UI but will have actions and eventually some queue UI, etc.
(I don't think items need a normal "Edit" UI -- it doesn't make sense to "Edit" a tweet or inbound email -- but maybe this will shuffle around a little eventually.)
Test Plan:
View
{F747218}
Edit
{F747219}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13980
Summary:
Fixes T9245. These picked up some possibly-confusing metadata, like in the screenshot on T9245 where "Subscribers" appears in the middle of the page for no obvious reason.
- Make these pages a little cleaner by removing elements which aren't important for signing agreements.
- Use the last time the actual document text was updated as the modification time, not the last time the "Document" object was modified. The latter will change for trivial things like altering the view/edit policy, but that could be confusing if you see that a TOS was "last updated yesterday" but can't figure out what actually changed (since nothing changed).
Test Plan: Viewed signature page for a document.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13982
Summary:
Ref T8783. If you have a source (like a "report bug" form), let it put a link (like "View Form") on the source detail page.
This also straightens out getting definitions from sources, which had a bug with the modern way we do `PhutilClassMapQuery`.
Specifically, if you called the old mechanism on two different sources, they'd return the same definition object, but they need to return different definitions.
Test Plan:
{F747093}
{F747092}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13966
Summary: Ref T8783. There's nothing at `/nuance/` right now, put something basic there.
Test Plan: {F747078}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13965
Summary:
Ref T8672. Ref T9187. Root issue in at least one case is:
- User makes a commit including a file with some non-UTF8 text (say, a Japanese file full of Shift-JIS).
- We pass the file to the TransactionEditor so it can inline or attach the patch if the server is configured for these things.
- When inlining patches, we convert them to UTF8 before inlining. We must do this since the rest of the mail is UTF8.
- When attaching patches, we send them in the original encoding (as file attachments). This is correct, and means we need to give the worker the raw patch in whatever encoding it was originally in: we can't just convert it to utf8 earlier, or we'd attach the wrong patch in some cases.
- TransactionEditor does its thing (e.g., creates the commit), then gets ready to send mail about whatever it did.
- The publishing work now happens in the daemon queue, so we prepare to queue a PublishWorker and pass it the patch (with some other data).
- When we queue workers, we serialize the state data with JSON.
So far, so good. But this is where things go wrong:
- JSON can't encode binary data, and can't encode Shift-JIS. The encoding silently fails and we ignore it.
Then we get to the worker, and things go wrong-er:
- Since the data is bad, we fatal. This isn't a permanent failure, so we continue retrying the task indefinitely.
This applies several fixes:
# When queueing tasks, fail loudly when JSON encoding fails.
# In the worker, fail permanently when data can't be decoded.
# Allow Editors to specify that some of their data is binary and needs special handling.
This is fairly messy, but some simpler alternatives don't seem like good ways forward:
- We can't convert to UTF8 earlier, because we need the original raw patch when adding it as an attachment.
- We could encode //only// this field, but I suspect some other fields will also need attention, so that adding a mechanism will be worthwhile. In particular, I suspect filenames //may// be causing a similar problem in some cases.
- We could convert task data to always use a serialize()-based binary safe encoding, but this is a larger change and I think it's correct that things are UTF8 by default, even if it makes a bit of a mess. I'd rather have an explicit mess like this than a lot of binary data floating around.
The change to make `LiskDAO` will almost certainly catch some other problems too, so I'm going to hold this until after `stable` is cut. These problems were existing problems (i.e., the code was previously breaking or destroying data) so it's definitely correct to catch them, but this will make the problems much more obvious/urgent than they previously were.
Test Plan:
- Created a commit with a bunch of Shift-JIS stuff in a file.
- Tried to import it.
Prior to patch:
- Broken PublishWorker with distant, irrelevant error message.
With patch partially applied (only new error checking):
- Explicit, local error message about bad key in serialized data.
With patch fully applied:
- Import went fine and mail generated.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: devurandom, nevogd
Maniphest Tasks: T8672, T9187
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13939
Summary: Fixes T9241. Users have a tendancy to assume Ponder is a "forum", make replying to your own question take an additional click.
Test Plan:
View my own question, see notice, click open answer box, reply. Visit not my question, see box as normal.
{F743412}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: cspeckmim, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9241
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13957
Summary: Ref T8588. It looks like something slow is happening //before// we start DarkConsole. Add some crude reporting to try to narrow it down.
Test Plan: {F743050}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8588
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13956
Summary:
Fixes T9237. A while ago, the old (more-pink) indigo got split into "pink" (more pink) and "indigo" (more purple), but we didn't change this color config in Maniphest.
This generally made the color more purple, and it's now pretty simliar to the "needs triage" color (violet).
Make it "pink" instead.
Test Plan: {F742617}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9237
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13954
Summary: Should fix all email reply issues, but no solid means of testing at home (how do you local reply test?)
Test Plan: Check for answer mail in /mail/ and see proper headers. Make sure question mail works too.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3846
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13951
Summary: Fixes T9234. The joins method was still the old method and the builtin was calling the wrong key.
Test Plan: Test authored builtin, custom search
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9234
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13953
Summary: There is still some general buginess with answer comments, trying to work them out. This replaces timeline rendering into one offs (less performant) but resolves many bugs. Or if there is a more performant way, let me know? Also when leaving an answer comment, you currently get redirected back to the page, but both the comment form is still populated and you dont see your answer without a reload. I feel like I'm missing some magical parameter to pass, so just redirecting back to the question itself.
Test Plan: Leave lots of answer comments.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13946
Summary: If we have lots ot `text in monospace` everywhere, the padding bleeds. Reduce 1px.
Test Plan: eyeball it
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13947
Summary: Fixes T9226, shows the update time, not the creation time.
Test Plan: Update an answer, see new date.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9226
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13945
Summary:
Ref T9218. See discussion there for rationale; I think this is the right behavior to pursue.
The screenshot below is pretty ugly. I think it's a lot worse than most real-world cases will be, since you have to sort of opt-in to having crazy levels of overlapping packages, and it's perfectly normal/reasonable for files owned by one package. Owners is powerful enough to let you specify sub-packages with exclusive ownership.
That said, this may be more typical than I hope. I don't think we can reduce the complexity here much for free, but it would might be reasonable to add some view options (e.g.: group by package?, show only packages I own?, show packages as icons with a tooltip?) if it's an issue.
Test Plan: {F734956}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9218
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13940
Summary: Fixes T8428. Adds status to packages, allows setting and application search. I presume though these need checked elsewhere?
Test Plan: New package, edit package, archive package, run search queries.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8428
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13925
Summary: This algorithm isn't quite right with respect to ordering more-specific packages correctly.
Test Plan: {F729864}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13929
Summary: Pending other diffs, this actually removes Ponder as a prototype. Fixes T3578
Test Plan: No longer listed as a prototype
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3578
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13920
Summary: Ref T9205. This is a likely fix.
Test Plan: This isn't straightforward to test in the upstream unless you have custom code on top of it.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13928
Summary: Fixes T9207. I think this is correct? Sorts based on vote count and reverses the order of the array so higher is first.
Test Plan: Test vote ordering on a number of sample tasks.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9207
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13924
Summary: Ref T9068, Ref T3846. Maybe fixes both, but I'm having issues testing email replies in a sandbox. Moves answer feed/mail generation to the AnswerEditor, hides it in QuestionEditor.
Test Plan: Write an answer, see feed story, check /mail/ for mail generation.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3846, T9068
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13905
Summary:
Fixes T8004.
- For paths which are part of a package, show the package.
- Highlight paths which are part of a package you (the viewer) have authority over.
Test Plan:
{F725418}
- Viewed owned and unowned chagnes in Diffusion and Differential.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13923
Summary: These were a little silly, simplify them
Test Plan: New countdown, edit preferences, etc.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13888
Summary:
Ref T8320. This field doesn't have any special effects and has no reason to exist. Primary owners are always already owners.
This makes one minor implicit change to Owners: it is now possible to create a package with no owners. That seems fine; it is reasonable to create a package purely as an organizational tool and use it in, e.g., Herald.
Test Plan: Created and edited packages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8320
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13921
Summary:
Ref T9201. At the root of a repository the current path is `null`, but the OwnersQuery wants strings.
This could be resolved a couple different ways, but just cast the arguments to strings since that seems reasonable enough.
Test Plan: Browsed root of a repository.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9201
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13919
Summary: Fixes T9180, removes the background color and wraps the text.
Test Plan: View on a shrunked Chrome.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9180
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13915
Summary: When using the active query in Macro, all Macros are returned. Properly set the status query.
Test Plan: Review active macros, don't see archived macros.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13912
Summary: Fixes T9154, tables have special needs with widths and pres
Test Plan: Test a long piece of code in a Ponder question
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9154
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13904
