1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-11 09:22:40 +01:00
Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joshua Spence
0a62f13464 Change double quotes to single quotes.
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.

Test Plan: Eyeballed it.

Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
2014-06-09 11:36:50 -07:00
epriestley
c5ba75ee9e Implement a "Reviewers" CustomField
Summary:
Ref T3886:

  - Adds a "Reviewers" field as a modern CustomField.

Ref T418:

  - Allows CustomFields to emit transaction metadata.

Test Plan: {F116254}

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T418, T3886

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8291
2014-02-21 11:54:32 -08:00
epriestley
3d3d3b6d80 Move determination of reviewer authority into DifferentialRevisionQuery
Summary:
Ref T1279. We currently determine reviewers at display time, but this is bad for several reasons:

  - It puts queries very close to the display layer.
  - We have to query for each revision if we want to figure out authority for several.
  - We need to figure it out in several places, so we'll end up with copies of this logic.
  - The logic isn't trivial (exceptions for the viewer, exceptions to that rule for install configuration).
  - We already do this "figure it out when we need it" stuff in Diffusion for audits and it's really bad: we have half-working copies of the logic spread all over the place.

Instead, put it in the Query. Callers query for it and get the data attached to the reviewer objects.

Test Plan:
  - Looked at some revisions, verified the correct lines were highlighted.
    - Looked at a revision I created and verified that projects I was a member of were not highlighted.
      - With self-accept enabled, these //are// highlighted.
    - Looked at a revision I did not create and verified that projects I was a member of were highlighted.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1279

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7241
2013-10-06 17:08:14 -07:00
epriestley
2d733f88a1 Split users apart from projects/packages in reviewer and audit UIs
Summary: Ref T1279. Show separate sections for "Reviewers" and "Project Reviewers" (Differential) and for "Auditors" and "Package/Project Auditors" (Diffusion/Audit).

Test Plan:
  - Looked at a commit. Saw separation.
  - Looked at a revision. Saw separation.

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1279

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7233
2013-10-05 14:10:49 -07:00
epriestley
4d8707df13 Use status list UI to show reviewers in Differential
Summary:
Ref T1279. No logical changes, just updates the reviewer display style.

We currently keep track of only "requested changes".

Test Plan: See screenshot.

Reviewers: btrahan, chad

Reviewed By: chad

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1279

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7228
2013-10-05 14:10:44 -07:00
Juan Pablo Civile
d4c28dcbc2 Methods for reading reviewers from edges in differential
Summary: Add `getReviewerStatus` to get an array of `DifferentialReviewer` objects. The method `needReviewerStatus` in `DifferentialRevisionQuery` loads the edges into the revisions loaded.

Test Plan: Added `->needReviewerStatus(true)` to `DifferentialRevisionSearchEngine` and checked through logging that the data was being loaded correctly.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6450
2013-07-14 19:18:56 -07:00