Summary:
Fixes T430. Fixes T4834. Obsoletes D7641. Currently, we do some things less-well than we could:
- We just let the browser queue and prioritize requests, so if you load a revision with 50 changes and then click "Award Token", the action blocks until the changes load in most/all browsers. It would be better to prioritize this action and queue it immediately.
- Similarly, changes tend to load in order, even if the user has clicked to a specific file. When the user expresses a preference for a specific file, we should prioritize it.
- We show a spinning GIF when waiting on requests. This is appropriate for some types of reuqests, but distracting for others.
To fix this:
- Queue all (or, at least, most) requests into a new queue in JX.Router.
- JX.Router handles prioritizing the requests. Principally:
- You can submit a request with a specific priority (500 = general content loading, 1000 = default, 2000 = explicit user action) and JX.Router will get the higher stuff fired off sooner.
- You can name requests and then adjust their prorities later, if the user expresses an interest in specific results.
- Only use the spinner gif for "workflow" requests, which is bascially when the user clicked something and we're waiting on the server. I think it's useful and not-annoying in this case.
- Don't show any status for draft requests.
- For content requests, show a subtle hipster-style top loading bar.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a diff with 93 changes, and clicked award token.
- Prior to this patch, the action took many many seconds to resolve.
- After this patch, it resolves quickly.
- Viewed a diff with 93 changes and saw a pleasant subtle hipster-style loading bar.
- Viewed a diff with 93 changes and typed some draft text. Previews populated fairly quickly and there was no spinner.
- Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked something with workflow, saw a spinner after a moment.
- Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked a file in the table of contents near the end of the list.
- Prior to this patch, it took a long time to show up.
- After this patch, it loads directly.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T430, T4834
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8979
Summary:
man I sure hate Javascript
I removed the ajax-edit and ajax-remove interactions, becuase they were prohibitively complex to get working given that the entire menu has to change too. Instead, the page just reloads. This works perfectly fine in practice.
If we want to restore these in the future, we should have the server re-render the entire transaction group or something. I think very little is lost here, though.
Test Plan:
- Took all the actions.
- Used existing dropdown menus.
{F150196}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8966
Summary:
See D8966, D8973. Replace PhabricatorDropdownMenu with PHUIXDropdownMenu.
These new menus look weird on mobile because all action lists pick up a bunch of weird styles on mobile and we're now reusing the CSS.
Test Plan:
{F150425}
{F150426}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8974
Summary:
Dropdown menus are entirely dynamic right now and use custom CSS. Begin rebuilding them to use ActionList CSS.
This introduces PHUIX components which are basically JS copy/pastes of the PHP PHUI components, just implemented in JS.
We have two other dropdowns: policy controls and one in Conpherence. I'll convert those, then implement D8966.
Test Plan: {F150418}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8973
Summary:
Ref T4119. This is ugly for now, but technically works.
The comment area and transaction log don't realy know about each other, so for the moment the linking is a bit manual. Differential/Maniphest are special cases anyway.
Test Plan: {F149992}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4119
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8957
Summary:
Fixes T4909. Adds a "remove" link next to the edit link, which permanently hides a comment. Addresses two use cases:
- Allowing administrators to clean up spam.
- Allowing users to try to put the genie back in the bottle if they post passwords or sensitive links, etc.
The user who removed the comment is named in the removal text to enforce some level of administrative accountability.
No data is deleted, but there's currently no method to restore these comments. We'll see if we need one.
This is cheating a little bit by storing "removed" as "2" in the isDeleted field. This doesn't seem tooooo bad for now.
Test Plan:
- Removed some of my comments.
- As an administrator, removed other users' comments.
- Failed to view history of a removed comment.
- Failed to edit a removed comment.
- Failed to remove a removed comment.
- Verified feed doesn't show the old comment after comment removal.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: qgil, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8945
Summary:
Ref T3718. Ref T3644. Ref T3092. Switches from the Releeph UI elements to standard ones. I'll attach some screenshots.
Also fixes CSRF against the request action endpoint.
Test Plan:
- Viewed request details.
- Took actions on a request from detail page.
- Viewed request list.
- Took actions on a request from list page.
- Used keyboard shortcuts to navigate list.
- Used keyboard shortcuts to take actions.
- Simulated errors.
- Viewed on devices.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: grp, FacebookPOC, mattlqx, tala, beng, LegNeato, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3718, T3092, T3644
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8771
Summary: ...use the prefab stuff as it does fancier things than we were doing. Only trick then really is to pass username and the map of handle phids => icons to the client so prefab can work nicely. Fixes T4775.
Test Plan: made a herald rule with projects and users. Saw nice icons. Reloaded page and still saw nice icons.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4775
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8749
Summary: ...the key is to move a layer lower and beam down the updated comment. There is a wee bit of Javascript gymnastics going on here. Fixes T4608.
Test Plan: made a comment + resolve. clicked edit and made changes. noted transaction updated correctly and "history" link worked. edited again to a deletion and noted the "this is deleted" looked right and history link still worked
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4608
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8702
Summary: Fixes T4641.
Test Plan: Dragged a "normal" task between "high" and "low" tasks and it stayed as "normal". Generally seems correct when playing around.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: mbishopim3, Beltran-rubo, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4641
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8622
Summary: Ref T1812. Moves most specialized status handling into `ManiphestTaskStatus`. The only real missing case is reports.
Test Plan:
Browsed most of the affected interfaces. Changed task status:
{F132697}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8579
Summary: Useful in cases where there is an Arcanist Project but not a repository tracked by Phabricator for a particular revision.
Test Plan: Created a new rule to flag Differential revisions with a particular Arcanist project, verified that it applied as expected via the test console to revisions with the project specified and with a different project specified.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: aran, epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8463
Summary: Ref T2222. Makes the "lint/unit errors" warnings work again.
Test Plan: Viewed some revisions with and without these warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8475
Summary: Fixes T4553, T4407.
Test Plan: created tasks and they showed up in the proper column. edited task priority and they moved about sensically.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4553, T4407
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8420
Summary:
Fixes T4550 by changing supportsFeed to shouldPublishFeedStory, so things can be more granular like that are with mail. Attempts to fix things generally too, filtering out xactions that have no business in feed, etc.
Also return an updated Task HTML representation on drag and drop moves, etc. This is important so if the priority changes you can see it reflected in the UI.
Test Plan: dragged tasks around. observed no feed stories on subpriority drags. observed feed stories and updated color bars on stories that changed priority
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4550
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8399
Summary: This wasn't working. Create a little JS handler and server-side support for returning the Task in the "project card" format.
Test Plan: Edited tasks from the board - they worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8392
Summary:
adds ManiphestTransaction::TYPE_PROJECT_COLUMN and makes it work. Had to clean up the Javascript ever so slightly as it was sending up the string "null" when it should just omit the data in these cases. Ref T4422.
NOTE: this is overall a bit buggy - e.g. move a task Foo from column A to top of column B; refresh; task Foo is at bottom of column B and should be at top of column B - but I plan on additional diff or three to clean this up.
Test Plan: dragged tasks around columns. clicked on those tasks and saw some nice transactions.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4422
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8366
Summary:
A few minor fixes:
- When we build a tag with `"meta" => null`, strip the attribute like we do for all other attributes. Previously, we would actually set the metadata to `null`. This happened with the Conpherence form.
- Just respond to the draft request with an empty (but valid) response, instead of building a dialog.
- `PhabricatorShapedRequest` is confusingly named and I should have caught this in review, but the basic shape of it is:
- You make one object.
- You call `trigger()` when stuff changes (e.g., a keystroke).
- It manages making a small number of requests (e.g., one request after the user stops typing for a moment).
- The way it was being used previously would incorrectly send a request for every keystroke.
I think I'm going to simplify `ShapedRequest` and merge it into some larger queue for T430.
Test Plan: Typed some text, no longer saw a flurry of requests. Reloaded page, still saw draft text.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8380
Summary:
Ref T3886. Ref T418. For fields like "Summary" and "Test Plan" where changes can't be summarized in one line, allow CustomField to provide a "(Show Details)" link and render a diff.
Also consolidate some of the existing copy/paste, and simplify this featuer slightly now that we've move to dialogs.
Test Plan:
{F115918}
- Viewed "description"-style field changes in phlux, pholio, legalpad, maniphest, differential, ponder (questions), ponder (answers), and repositories.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886, T418
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8284
Summary: Fixes T3497.
Test Plan: on conpherence 1, typed some stuff. clicked conpherence 2 - observed some stuff gone. clicked conpherence 1 - stuff came back! submitted conpherence 1 and reloaded - stuff did not come back. (Generally played around a bunch like this)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3497
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8266
Summary:
Ref T2222. This restores the "N older comments are hidden." shield to all ApplicationTransactions applications. Roughly the rule this uses is that transactions older than your most recent comment are hidden, under the assumption that you've already read and dealt with them, since you replied afterward. Then we show your last comment to remind/contextualize you, and anything afterward. We also don't hide transactions if we'd only be hiding a handfull, and we never hide the few most recent transactions.
This might need some #design help.
Test Plan:
The tricky part here is the anchor rule, which deals with the case where you follow a link to `T123#4`, but that would normally be hidden. We simulate a click on "show all" if you hit an anchor which is hidden. Here's what it looks like in Maniphest:
{F112891}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8229
Summary: form.reset() resets a form to whatever values were present when the form was loaded into the DOM. Instead, grab all the pertinent form bits and set there values to "clear". I don't think there's too much utility in putting this somewhere more general, but it could be something like DOM.clearForm(form) or something. Fixes T3629.
Test Plan:
repro'd original issue
- open legalpad doc (or your favorite application transaction powered app)
- type in a comment but do not submit (you are creating a draft) e.g. "foo"
- reload page and note comment appears e.g. "foo"
- change comment e.g. "foobar"
- submit comment
- BUG - after submission, the comment reverts to the comment at initial page load e.g. "foo"
then after this patch, I can't repro it anymore with these steps - the comment is correctly blank
NOTE: this will need to be tested with more complicated forms.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3629
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8220
Summary: adds a new FIELD and a new VALUE to support this. Slightly dodgy because priorities do not have phids so we have to special case how we handle this in a few spots. Ref T4294.
Test Plan: made a new rule to get cc'd on unbreak now and wishlist tasks. verified got cc'd correctly and not cc'd correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4294
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8156
Summary:
Ref T3623. I'm sure I didn't get the margins / drop shadow quite right, but this looks and works reasonably well:
{F105637}
Test Plan: Clicked stuff to quick create.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3623
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8089
Summary:
Added yformat to ManiphestReportController. Removed [yy] from the js.
Will pull config.yformat or send []. The old way with [yy] never seemed to worked having config.yformat, also would crash if yformat was in with value
Test Plan: Loadup burn up report, hover over a given date. Number of tasks opened should be an int
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8080
Summary: Ref T1344. Makes requests to the server, which are received and ignored. Performs appropriate locking/unlocking/enabling/disabling on the client.
Test Plan: Dragged stuff around, saw it enable/disable/send correctly.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7943
Summary:
Ref T1344. Makes the UI/UX a little nicer; still no actual backend stuff. This changes:
- When you drop an item onto a different column, the item actually moves.
- Empty columns render with a special CSS class now, but no nodes in the list. This cleans up some JS jankiness. I made the "empty" columns have a light blue background for now. We could put some sort of subtle background image in them instead, or some kind of call to action if it's not redundant with other UI.
Test Plan: {F101208}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7942
Summary:
Ref T1344. Allows you to drag tasks within a column and between columns, and handles all the multi-column state / targeting / ghosting stuff.
This is a UI-only change; you can't actually do anything meaningful with these yet.
Roughly, I added the idea of a DraggableList existing within a "group" of draggable lists. Normally, that group only has one item, but on boards it has all of the columns. Then I made all of the relevant operations just apply to the whole group of lists.
Test Plan:
- Verified existing funtionality in Maniphest and ApplicationSearch is unaffected, by dragging around tasks to reprioritize them and dragging around search items.
- Dragged tasks between columns on a board view.
{F101196}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7941
Summary: This implements support for explicitly marking the sequence of build steps. Users can now drag and re-order build steps in plans, and artifact dependencies are re-calculated so that if you move "Run Command" before "Lease Host", the "Run Command" step has it's artifact setting cleared and thus the step becomes invalid.
Test Plan: Re-ordered build steps and observed dependencies being correctly recalculated.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7715
Summary:
Ref T4122.
- For Diffusion, we need "allow null" (permits selection of "No Credential") for anonymous HTTP repositories.
- For Diffusion, we can make things a little easier to configure by prefilling the username.
Test Plan: Used UIExample form. These featuers are used in a future revision.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4122
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7624
Summary: Fixes T4006.
Test Plan: clicked "select all" and dragged around tasks. Noted the task remained selected as I re-ordered, thus keeping hte count accurate. Verified when I hit "batch edit" the right tasks showed up.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4006
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7566
Summary:
Depends on D7500.
This seemed like a pretty good idea once I thought of it. Instead of having some custom triggering logic instead Harbormaster, I figured it best to leverage all of Herald's power so that users can create rules to apply builds to commits and differential revisions. This gives the added advantage that they can trigger off builds for particular types of revisions and commits, which seems like it could be really useful (e.g. run extra tests against revisions that touch sensitive areas of the code).
Test Plan: Ran the usual daemons + the Harbormaster daemon. Pushed a commit to the repository and saw both the buildable and build get created when the commit worked picked it up. Submitted a diff and saw both the buildable and build get created when the Herald rules were evaluated for the diff.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, hwinkel
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7501
Summary: Makes it easy to choose distinctive icons for projects.
Test Plan:
{F71018}
{F71020}
{F71019}
{F71021}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7333
Summary: Ref T603. When a user selects "Custom", we pop open the rules dialog and let them create a new rule or edit the existing rule.
Test Plan: Set some objects to have custom policies.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7300
Summary: Ref T3958. Adds a provider for Mozilla's Persona auth.
Test Plan:
- Created a Persona provider.
- Registered a new account with Persona.
- Logged in with Persona.
- Linked an account with Persona.
- Dissolved an account link with Persona.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3958
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7313
Summary: Currently, when a dialog is submitted the Workflow itself emits an event but no DOM event is emitted. The workflow event is fine for handlers which only use JS, but there's currently no way for a handler to act more like a normal form handler. This event gives normal form handlers a way to capture Workflow submits and muck around with form contents, etc.
Test Plan: In a future diff, edited policies via a Workflow dialog.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7295
Summary: Ref T603. Make this a little easier to use by highlighting the current value.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7289
Summary: Ref T603. After thinking about this for a bit I can't really come up with anything better than what Facebook does, so I'm going to implement something similar for choosing custom policies. To start with, swap this over to a JS-driven dropdown.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7285
Summary:
Ref T603. This isn't remotely usable yet, but I wanted to get any feedback before I build it out anymore.
I think this is a reasonable interface for defining custom policies? It's basically similar to Herald, although it's a bit simpler.
I imagine users will rarely interact with this, but this will service the high end of policy complexity (and allow the definition of things like "is member of LDAP group" or whatever).
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, asherkin
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7217
Summary:
Ref T1279. Although I think this is a bad idea in general (we once supported it, removed it, and seemed better off for it) users expect it to exist and want it to be available. Give them enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot.
I will probably write some lengthy treatise on how you shouldn't use this rule later.
Implementation is straightforward because Differential previously supported this rule.
This rule can also be used to add project reviewers.
Test Plan: Made some "add reviewers" rules, created revisions, saw reviewers trigger.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7235
Summary:
- Use the box view in the test console.
- Let the test console load tasks and mocks. We should move this to the adapters (`canAdaptObject($object)` or something).
- Fix a minor issue with "Always": hiding the whole cell could make the table layout weird in Safari, at least. Just hide the select instead.
Test Plan:
- Used test console on task.
- Used test console on mock.
- Created (silly) rule with "Always" and also some other conditions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7220
Summary:
Fixes T1461.
Adds
- FIELD_ALWAYS - now you could add this to a content type to always get notified
- FIELD_REPOSITORY_AUTOCLOSE_BRANCH - solves T1461
- CONDITION_UNCONDITIONALLY - used by these two fields to not show any value for the user to select
Test Plan: made a herald rule where diffs on autoclose branches would get flagged blue. made a diff on an autoclose branch and committed it. commit was flagged!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1461
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7210
Summary: ...and deploy on Maniphest. Ref T1638.
Test Plan: created a herald rule to be cc'd for tasks created via web. made a task via web and another via email and was cc'd appropriately. edited the herald to be cc'd for tasks created via not web. made 2 tasks again and got cc'd appropriately
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1638
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7145
Summary:
Currently, draggable lists (in Config and ApplicationSearch, for example) don't let you drag an item into the first position.
This is because the behavior is correct in Maniphest: the first position is above an initial header, like "High Prioirty", and shouldn't be targetable.
Permit the behavior in general; forbid it in Maniphest.
Test Plan:
- Dragged elements into the first position in ApplicationSearch.
- Failed to drag elements into the first position in Maniphest.
Reviewers: garoevans, btrahan
Reviewed By: garoevans
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7128
Summary:
Fixes T3814. Broadly, remarkup tables in inline comments did not work properly. I ran into several messes here and cleaned up some of them:
- Some of this code is doing `JX.$N('div', {}, JX.$H(response.markup))`, to turn an HTML response into a node, passing that around, and then doing junk with it. This is super old and gross.
- The slightly more modern pattern is `JX.$H(response.markup).getFragment().firstChild`, but this is kind of yuck too and not as safe as it could be.
- Introduce `JX.$H(response.markup).getNode()`, which actually expresses intent here. We have a bunch of `getFragment().firstChild` callsites which should switch to this, but I didn't clean those up yet because I don't want to test them all.
- Switch the `JX.$N('div', {}, JX.$H(response.markup))`-style callsites to `JX.$H(response.markup).getNode()`.
- `copyRows()` is too aggressive in finding `<tr />` tags. This actually causes the bug in T3814. We only want to find these tags at top level, not all tags. Don't copy `<tr />` tags which belong to some deeper table.
- Once this is fixed, there's another bug with mousing over the cells in tables in inline comments. We select the nearest `<td />`, but that's the cell in the remarkup table. Instead, select the correct `<td />`.
- At this point, these last two callsites were looking ugly. I provided `findAbove()` to clean them up.
Test Plan: Created, edited, deleted, moused over, and reloaded a revision with inline comments including remarkup tables. Used "Show more context" links.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3814
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6924
