Summary:
- Add edges for this relationship.
- Use edges to store this data.
- Migrate old data.
- Fix some warnings with generating feed stories about Aux and Edge transactions.
- Fix a task-task edge issue with "Create Subtask".
Test Plan:
- Migrated data, verified reivsions showed up.
- Attached and detached tasks to revisions and vice versa.
- Created a new revision with attached tasks.
- Created a subtask.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3018
Summary:
blogs are collections of posts. a blog also has metadata like a name, description and "bloggers" that can edit the metadata of the blog and contribute posts.
changes include the post edit flow where bloggers can now select which blogs to publish to. also made various small tweaks throughout the UI to make things sensical and clean as the concept of blogs is introduced.
there's edges powering this stuff. bloggers <=> blogs and posts <=> blogs in particular.
Test Plan:
made blogs, deleted blogs, tried to make blogs with no bloggers. all went well.
verified ui to publish only showed up for public posts, published posts to blogs, un-published posts to blogs, re-published posts to blogs, deleted posts and verified they disappeared from blogs.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3003
Summary: See D3006. Move this data to the edge store.
Test Plan:
- Created dependencies, migrated, verified dependencies were preserved.
- Added new dependencies, they worked.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1162
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3007
Summary:
- Use edges to store "X depends on Y" information in Maniphest.
- Show both "Depends On" and "Dependent Tasks".
- Migrate all the old edges.
Test Plan:
- Added some relationships, migrated, verified they were preserved.
- Added some new valid relationships, verified tasks got updated with sensible transactions and sent reasonable emails.
- Tried to add a cycle, got an ugly but effective error.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1162
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3006
Summary: See D3006, D3007. Make it easier to do migrations like that without holding all results in memory.
Test Plan:
Ran this code with an artificially small page size (2):
foreach (new LiskMigrationIterator(new DifferentialRevision()) as $rev) {
echo "Revision ".$rev->getID()."\n";
}
Verified each revision as loaded and processed.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1162
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3008
Summary:
Lisk currently behaves in two different ways if you call it like `load("cow")` (throws) versus `load(99999999)` (returns null), where neither ID exists.
This was intended to catch programming errors as distinct from missing data, but in practice the former is very rare and you have to handle the latter in most cases anyway. The case where you pass "0" is particularly confusing. See D2971 for an example.
On the balance, I think this ends up being far more confusing than helpful. Instead, just return NULL if we're sure there's no such object.
Test Plan: Reasoned about program behavior.
Reviewers: alanh, btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2977
Summary:
- See D2945.
- Drop `cache` field from ManiphestTransaction.
- Render task descriptions and transactions through PhabricatorMarkupEngine.
- Also pull the list of macros more lazily.
Test Plan:
- Verified transactions and transaction preview work correctly and interact with cache correctly.
- Verified tasks descriptions and task preview work correctly.
- Verified we don't hit the imagemacro table when we're rendering everything from cache anymore.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2946
Summary:
The immediate issue this addresses is T1366, adding a rendering cache to Phriction. For wiki pages with code blocks especially, rerendering them each time is expensive.
The broader issue is that out markup caches aren't very good right now. They have three major problems:
**Problem 1: the data is stored in the wrong place.** We currently store remarkup caches on objects. This means we're always loading it and passing it around even when we don't need it, can't genericize cache management code (e.g., have one simple script to drop/GC caches), need to update authoritative rows to clear caches, and can't genericize rendering code since each object is different.
To solve this, I created a dedicated cache database that I plan to move all markup caches to use.
**Problem 2: time-variant rules break when cached.** Some rules like `**bold**` are time-invariant and always produce the same output, but some rules like `{Tnnn}` and `@username` are variant and may render differently (because a task was closed or a user is on vacation). Currently, we cache the raw output, so these time-variant rules get locked at whatever values they had when they were first rendered. This is the main reason Phriction doesn't have a cache right now -- I wanted `{Tnnn}` rules to reflect open/closed tasks.
To solve this, I split markup into a "preprocessing" phase (which does all the parsing and evaluates all time-invariant rules) and a "postprocessing" phase (which evaluates time-variant rules only). The preprocessing phase is most of the expense (and, notably, includes syntax highlighting) so this is nearly as good as caching the final output. I did most of the work here in D737 / D738, but we never moved to use it in Phabricator -- we currently just do the two operations serially in all cases.
This diff splits them apart and caches the output of preprocessing only, so we benefit from caching but also get accurate time-variant rendering.
**Problem 3: cache access isn't batched/pipelined optimally.** When we're rendering a list of markup blocks, we should be able to batch datafetching better than we do. D738 helped with this (fetching is batched within a single hunk of markup) and this improves batching on cache access. We could still do better here, but this is at least a step forward.
Also fixes a bug with generating a link in the Phriction history interface ($uri gets clobbered).
I'm using PHP serialization instead of JSON serialization because Remarkup does some stuff with non-ascii characters that might not survive JSON.
Test Plan:
- Created a Phriction document and verified that previews don't go to cache (no rows appear in the cache table).
- Verified that published documents come out of cache.
- Verified that caches generate/regenerate correctly, time-variant rules render properly and old documents hit the right caches.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1366
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2945
Summary:
In unit tests which use fixtures, we open transactions on every connection we establish. However, since we don't track connections that are established with "$force_new" (currently, only GlobalLock connections) we never close these transactions normally.
Instead of not tracking these connections, track them using unique keys so we'll never get a cache hit on them.
Test Plan: Built unit tests on top of this, had them stop dying from unclosed transactions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1162
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2938
Summary:
A later diff adds unit tests against edges, but we need real objects to connect with edges. Add some trivial objects to the Harbormaster database to compliment the similar HarbormasterScratchTable.
On its own, this does nothing interesting.
Test Plan: Built unit tests on this in a followup.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1162
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2937
Summary:
See discussion here:
https://secure.phabricator.com/chatlog/channel/%23phabricator/?at=21186
Basically, MySQL usually raises a good error if we exceed "max_allowed_packet":
EXCEPTION: (AphrontQueryException) #1153: Got a packet bigger than 'max_allowed_packet' bytes
But sometimes it gives us a #2006 instead. This is documented, at least:
>"With some clients, you may also get a Lost connection to MySQL server during query error if the communication packet is too large."
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman//5.5/en/packet-too-large.html
Try to improve the error message to point at this as a possible explanation.
Test Plan: Faked an error, had it throw, read exception message. See also chatlog.
Reviewers: btrahan, skrul
Reviewed By: skrul
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2923
