Summary:
Before this change, if you search a file using Locate File,
this was the only accepted syntax for a full-path:
path/to/something.txt
After this change, some relative/absolute Unix-like variants
are also accepted:
./path/to/something.txt
/path/to/something.txt
Similar prefixes can be frequent when you quickly copy-paste things
from shell commands like 'grep' or 'find' etc.
Ref T15508
Test Plan:
Visit a lovely repository like Phorge and use Locate File with these:
1. src/applications/maniphest/editor/ManiphestEditEngine.php
2. /src/applications/maniphest/editor/ManiphestEditEngine.php
3. ./src/applications/maniphest/editor/ManiphestEditEngine.php
After this change, also 2. and 3. return the expected file.
Reviewers: O1 Blessed Committers, avivey
Reviewed By: O1 Blessed Committers, avivey
Subscribers: avivey, speck, tobiaswiese, Matthew, Cigaryno
Maniphest Tasks: T15508
Differential Revision: https://we.phorge.it/D25320
Summary:
The CTRL+click now opens the links in a new tab, like any other
normal link opened with CTRL+click.
Note that the middle-click was already working.
Closes T15157
Test Plan:
- visit a Workboard
- column > menu > mouse on "Create Task"
- CTRL+click: open in new tab (→ now works)
- normal click: open the pop-up (→ still works)
- middle-click: open in new tab (→ still works)
- column > single Task > mouse on "Edit"
- CTRL+click: open in new tab (→ now works)
- normal click: open the pop-up (→ still works)
- middle-click: open in new tab (→ still works)
Reviewers: O1 Blessed Committers, avivey
Reviewed By: O1 Blessed Committers, avivey
Subscribers: speck, tobiaswiese, Matthew, Cigaryno
Maniphest Tasks: T15157
Differential Revision: https://we.phorge.it/D25072
Summary:
Ref T9530. Ref T13658. The "Releeph" application was never useful outside of Facebook and any application providing release support would not resemble it much.
It has some product name literal strings, so now is as good a time as any to get rid of it.
This application never left prototype and I'm not aware of any install in the wild that uses it (or has ever used it).
I did not destroy the database itself. I'll issue upgrade guidance and destroy the database in some future release, just in case.
Test Plan: Grepped for "releeph", found no relevant/removable hits.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13658, T9530
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21792
Summary: Ref T13559. Substantially correct the client logic for "Save" and "Cancel" actions to handle unusual cases.
Test Plan:
Quoting behavior:
- Quoted a comment.
- Cancelled the quoted comment without modifying anything.
- Reloaded page.
- Before changes: quoted comment still exists.
- After changes: quoted comment is deleted.
- Looked at comment count in header, saw consistent behavior (before: weird behavior).
Empty suggestion behavior:
- Created a new comment on a suggestable file.
- Clicked "Suggest Edit" to enable suggestions.
- Without making any text or suggestion changes, clicked "Save".
- Before changes: comment saves, but is empty.
- After changes: comment deletes itself without undo.
General behavior:
- Created and saved an empty comment (deletes itself).
- Created and saved a nonempty comment (saves as draft).
- Created and saved an empty comment with an edit suggestion (saves).
- Created and saved an empty comment with a suggestion to entirely delete lines -- that is, no suggestion text (saves).
- Edited a comment, saved without changes (save).
- Edited a comment, save deleting all text (saves -- note that this is intentionally without undo, since this is a lot of steps to do by accident).
- Cancel editing an unchanged comment (cancels without undo).
- Cancel editing a changed comment (cancels with undo).
- Undo'd, got text back.
- Cancel new comment with no text (deletes without undo).
- Cancel new comment with text (deletes with undo).
- Undo'd, got text back.
- Saved a quoted comment with no changes (saves -- note that this is intentionally not a "delete", since just quoting someone seems fine if you click "Save" -- maybe you want to come back to it later).
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21654
Summary:
Ref T13559. Various client decisions depend on the "initial" or "committed" states of inline comments. Previously, these were informally constructed from "mostly similar" available values, or glossed over in some cases.
On the server, save the initial state when creating a comment. Save the committed state when applying a "save" operation. Send all three states to the client.
On the client, load and track all three states explicitly.
Test Plan: Created inlines, etc. See followups.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21653
Summary:
Ref T13559. Currently, the default text for inline comment side-loads in a bizarre way. Instead, when a user creates an inline comment, load the inline context and set it as part of the initial content state.
This allows the side channel (and the code that puts the text in place at the last second on the client) to be removed.
Test Plan: Created inlines, clicked "Suggest Edit". See followup changes.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21652
Summary:
Ref T13559. To allow the client to make correct decisions about what buttons mean, track an explicit "Committed" content state.
This is the last version of the comment that has been saved on the server, and does not exist if the comment has never been saved.
Test Plan: Created comments, etc. See followups.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21651
Summary:
Ref T13559. When the user clicks the "Cancel" button, we sometimes take it to mean "delete" (when the comment is empty).
Both the client and server make a decision about this, and they may not agree, which causes the client to fall out of sync.
Make the client responsible for deciding whether it wants to interpret a click on the "Cancel" button as a "revert" or a "delete".
Test Plan: Cancelled empty and nonempty comments, etc. See followup changes.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21649
Summary:
Ref T13559. When you click "Save" on an inline comment and it's empty, we may actually delete the comment.
Currently, the client and server both make decisions about whether the comment should be deleted. These decisions may not agree, causing the client state to fall out of sync.
Make the client authoritative about whether it wants to handle the user clicking the "Save" button as an intent to save or an intent to delete.
Test Plan: Saved empty and nonempty inlines. See followup changes.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21648
Summary:
Ref T13559. Instead of directly reading form state, make all callers use the "active" state instead. The state reads the form.
No functional changes, just clarifying responsiblites.
Test Plan: Created inlines, etc. See followup changes.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21647
Summary:
Ref T13559. Rather than reading from the document, make client inlines actively track their current "active" state.
The "active" state is what the user currently sees in the client UI.
Test Plan: Created inlines, etc. See followups.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21646
Summary:
Ref T13559. In an effort to ultimately fix the "quote + cancel" bug, begin formalizing content states on the client.
This creates a "ContentState" client object and moves the authoritative storage for the "hasSuggestion" property to it.
Test Plan: Created inlines, etc. See followups.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21645
Summary:
Ref T13559. D21261 added caching here, but the logic in rebuilding inlines wasn't quite correct, and could lead to us double-appending.
Instead, when rebuilding, unconditionally discard the old list.
Test Plan:
- Added inline comments to a file in Differential.
- Marked some done.
- Scrolled so the inline comment header was visible, saw "X / Y Comments" button in header.
- Clicked "Show 20 more lines" on the changeset with inlines (or toggle "View Unified" / "View Side-by-Side", or other interactions likely work too).
- Before: saw "X / Y" change improperly (because inlines in that file were double-counted).
- After: saw stable count.
- Grepped for "differential-inline-comment-refresh", got no hits, concluded this event has no listeners.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21642
Summary:
Ref T13644. Ref T13638.
- Double-encode the symbol that is used as a path component, similar to Diffusion.
- Fix an outdated reference to ".path", which provided context for symbol lookup.
- Prevent command-clicking headers from looking up the path as a symbol.
Test Plan:
- Command-clicked headers, no longer got a symbol.
- Command-clicked stuff with "/", saw it double-encoded and decoded properly.
- Command-clicked normal symbols, saw "path" populate correctly.
Maniphest Tasks: T13644, T13638
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21641
Summary:
See PHI1900. Recent changes to how commit graphs are drawn made the height automatic in most cases, but it fails in Differential because the element isn't initially visible so the computed height is 0.
Just give them an explicit height so they show up again.
Test Plan: Viewed graphs in Maniphest, Differential, and Diffusion; saw them all render properly.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21481
Summary:
See PHI1898. An install is reporting an execution/initialization order issue where this code is reachable before `_inlines` is initialized.
I can't immediately reproduce it, but using "getInlines()" is preferable anyway and seems likely to fix the problem.
Test Plan: Viewed revisions with inlines, added/removed/edited/replied to inlines, didn't find anything broken.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21475
Summary: Ref T13552. In the new combined "table/list" graph view, tidy up the graph rendering.
Test Plan: {F7633504}
Maniphest Tasks: T13552
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21411
Summary: See PHI1753. This condition got rewritten for suggested edits and accidentally inverted.
Test Plan:
- Create a comment, type text, save draft, edit comment, cancel.
- Before: comment hides itself.
- After: comment properly cancels into pre-edit draft state.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21286
Summary: Ref T13513. When a revision has inlines with edit suggestions, pressing "j" and "k" can incorrectly select the blocks inside the diffs inside the inlines.
Test Plan: Used "j" to cycle through changes in a revision with inline comments with edit suggestions, didn't get jumped into the suggestion diffs.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21283
Summary:
Ref PHI1749. Instead of opening files to the last unchanged line on either side of the change, open files to the "simple" line number of the selected block.
For inlines, this is the inline line number.
For blocks, this is the first new-file line number, or the first old-file line number if no new-file line number exists in the block.
This may not always be what the user is hoping for (we can't know what the state of their working copy is) but should produce more obvious behavior.
Test Plan:
- In Diffusion, used "Open in Editor" with and without line selections. Saw same behavior as before.
- Used "n" and "r" to leave an inline with the keyboard, saw same behavior as before.
- Used "\" and "Open in Editor" menu item to open a file with:
- Nothing selected or changeset selected (line: 1).
- An inline selected (line: inline line).
- A block selected (line: first line in block, per above).
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21282
Summary: Ref T13513. For now, I'm not supporting inline edit suggestions in Diffusion, although it's likely not difficult to do so in the future. Clean up some of the code so that plain ol' inlines work the same way they did before.
Test Plan:
- Created, edited, reloaded, submitted inlines in Diffusion: familiar old behavior.
- Created, edited, reloaded, submitted inlines with suggestions in Differential: familiar new behavior.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21278
Summary:
Ref T13513. This still has quite a few rough edges and some significant performance isssues, but appears to mostly work.
Allow reviewers to "Suggest Edit" on an inline comment and provide replacement text for the highlighted source.
Test Plan: Created, edited, reloaded, and submitted inline comments in various states with and without suggestion text.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21276
Summary: Ref T13513. Introduce a formal server-side content state object so the whole state can be saved and restored to the drafts table, read from the request, etc.
Test Plan: Created and edited inlines. Reloaded drafts with edits. Submitted normal and editing comments. Grepped for affected symbols.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21275
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, all the inline code passes around strings to describe content. I plan to add background music, animation effects, etc., soon. To prepare for this change, make content a state object.
This does not change any user-visible behavior, it just prepares for content to become more complicated than a single string.
Test Plan: Created, edited, submitted, cancelled, etc., comments.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21273
Summary: Ref T13513. The code which added "r" and "R" to the inline menu accidentally discarded the difference between the keystrokes.
Test Plan:
- Clicked an inline, pressed "r", got new empty inline (previously: inline with quote).
- Clicked an inline, pressed "R", got a new quoted inline.
- Repeated steps with the menu items, got the expected behaviors.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21268
Summary: Ref T13513. On `secure`, I caught an issue where inlines may be accessed directly before they're constructed. Instead, access them through the relevant accessor.
Test Plan: Will deploy.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21263
Summary:
Ref T13513. The on-hover-inline reticle has switched over to have cell-based behavior. Switch the on-hover-line-number reticle to use the same behavior.
Also, clean up the dirty/redraw loop slightly: we no longer need to dirty on resize, and we don't need to redraw if the range isn't actually dirty.
Test Plan: Highlighted lines and line ranges. Hovered over inlines.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21262
Summary:
Ref T13513. See PHI1734, which raises a concern about the performance of large revisions near the 100-change threshold.
Currently, `getInlines()` is called whenever the scroll position transitions between two changesets, and it performs a relatively complicated DOM scan to lift inlines out of the document.
This shows up as taking a small but nontrivial amount of time in Firefox profiles and should be safely memoizable.
Test Plan:
- Under Firefox profiling, scrolled through a large revision.
- Before change: `getInlines()` appeared as the highest-cost thing we're explicitly doing on profiles.
- After change: `getInlines()` was no longer meaningfully represented on profiles.
- Created inlines, edited inlines, etc. Didn't identify any broken behavior.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21261
Summary:
Ref T13513. The way I'm highlighting lines won't work for Jupyter notebooks or other complex content blocks, and I don't see an obvious way to make it work that's reasonably robust.
However, we can just ignore the range behavior for complex content and treat the entire block as selected. This isn't quite as fancy as the source behavior, but pretty good.
Also, adjust unified diff behavior to work correctly with highlighting and range selection.
Test Plan:
- Used range selection in a Jupyter notebook, got reasonable behavior (range is treated as "entire block").
- Used range selection in a unified diff, got equivalent behavior to 2-up diffs.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21257
Summary:
Ref T13513. Give selected inlines a selection state and visual cues which are similar to the changeset selection state.
Also fix a couple of minor issues with select interactions and offset comments.
Test Plan: Selected inlines, saw obvious visual cues.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21256
Summary: Ref T13513. Currently, clicking inline or changeset headers eats the click events. This doesn't serve any clear purpose, and means these clicks do not clear text selections from the document, which is unusual.
Test Plan:
- Selected some text in a diff.
- Clicked a changeset header to select it.
- Before patch: text selection and context menu were retained.
- After patch: text selection was cleared and context menu was dismissed.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21255
Summary: Ref T13513. This fixes a bug where clicking a line number, then clicking "Cancel" causes the paths panel to briefly update with an extra inline comment counted on the file.
Test Plan:
- Clicked a line number.
- Typed some text.
- Clicked "Cancel".
- Before patch: paths panel flashes "1".
- After patch: paths panel stays stable.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21253
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, when creating an inline by selecting a line range, slightly careless handling leads to an inline with "0" offsets (by passing "undefined" to the server). This causes the block to highlight every line except the last one as fully bright, which is incorrect.
An inline with "0" offsets and an inline with no offsets are different. Be more careful about passing offsets around and rendering them.
Test Plan:
- Used the line numbers to add an inline to lines 4-8 of a change.
- Hovered the inline.
- Saw all four lines marked as "dull"-highlighted (previously: three bright lines, one dull line).
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21252
Summary:
Ref T13513. When a user selects a text range and uses "New Inline Comment" to create a comment directly from a range, store the offset information alongside the comment.
When hovering the comment, highlight the original range.
Test Plan: {F7480926, size=full}
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21250
Summary:
Ref T13513.
- Firefox represents multiple selected rows as a discontinuous range. Accommodate this.
- Unified diffs don't have a "copy" marker. Do something sort-of-reasonable for them.
Test Plan:
- Selected multiple lines of content in Firefox, got an option to add a comment.
- Selected content in unified mode, got an option to add a comment.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21249
Summary: Ref T13513. Support direct text selection for inlines. This is currently just an alternate way to get to the same place as using line numbers, but can preserve offset/range information in the future.
Test Plan:
- Selected some text, hit "c", clicked "New Inline Comment", got sensible comments on both sides of a diff in Safari, Chrome, and (with limitations) Firefox.
- Caveats: no unified support, doesn't work across lines in Firefox.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21248
Summary: Ref T11401. Ref T13513. This paves the way for more comment actions, particularly an edit-after-submit action.
Test Plan: Took all actions from menus, via mouse and via keyboard (where applicable).
Maniphest Tasks: T13513, T11401
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21244
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, "View as Document Type..." lists every available engine.
This is hard to get completely right because we can't always rebuild the document ref accurately in the endpoint, but try harder to fake something reasonable.
Test Plan: Used "View as Document Type..." on Jupyter notebooks, was given "Jupyter" and "Source" as options.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21241
Summary:
Ref T13513. As part of inline metadata, save the document engine the change is being rendered with.
This will allow other parts of the UI to detect that an inline was created on a Jupyter notebook but is being rendered on raw source, or whatever else.
The immediate goal is to fix nonsensical inline snippet rendering in email on Jupyter notebooks.
Test Plan:
- Created inlines and replies on normal soure code, saw no document engine annotated in the database.
- Created inlines and replies on a Jupyter notebook rendered in Jupyter mode, saw "jupyter" annotations in the database.
- Swapped document engines between Jupyter and Source, etc.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21240
Summary: Ref T13513. Currently, if you're editing a comment, "delete" doesn't put the comment into the correct state. This action is normally only reachable from comment previews, since an editing inline has no "delete" button.
Test Plan:
- Started editing an inline, clicked "Delete", got a deletion.
- Created an inline, typed text,
- Deleted a normal comment via preview.
- Deleted a normal comment via the on-inline action.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21238
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, clicking "View" from the inline comment preview (below the "add comment" area at the bottom of the page) only works if the inline isn't being edited.
Update this behavior so it works on inlines in either "Viewing" or "Editing" states.
Test Plan:
- Clicked "View" on a normal inline, got jumped/selected.
- Clicked "View" on an editing inline, got jumped/selected.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21237
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently:
- If you click the "Show Changeset" button, your state change doesn't actually get saved on the server.
- It's hard to select a changeset path name for copy/paste because the "highlight the header" code tends to eat the event.
Instead: persist the former event; make the actual path text not be part of the highlight hitbox.
Test Plan:
- Clicked "Show Changeset", reloaded, saw changeset visibility persisted.
- Selected changeset path text without issues.
- Clicked non-text header area to select/deselect changesets.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21236
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, inline storage objects ("TransactionComment") can't directly generate a runtime object ("InlineComment").
Allow this transformation to be performed in a genric way so clunky code which does it per-object-type can be removed, lifted, or simplified.
Simplify an especially gross callsite in preview code.
Test Plan: Previewed inline comments.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21226
Summary:
Ref T13513. Overloading "original text" to get "edit-on-load" comments into the right state has some undesirable side effects.
Instead, provide the text when the editor opens. This fixes a cancel interaction.
Test Plan:
- Create an inline, type text, don't save.
- Reload page.
- Cancel.
- Before: cancelled into empty state.
- After: cancelled into deleted+undo state.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21219
Summary:
Ref T13513. This is a bit clumsy, but the cleanest way to implement "isEditing" inlines today is to send them down as normal inlines and then simulate clicking "edit" on them.
When we do, don't focus the resulting editor: focusing it makes the page scroll around and highlight things in essentially random order as the editors load in.
Test Plan: Reloaded a page with some open editors, wasn't scrolled to them.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21217
Summary:
Ref T13513. As users type text into inline comments, save the comment state as a draft on the server.
This has some rough edges, particularly around previews, but mostly works. See T13513 for notes.
Test Plan: Started an inline, typed some text, waited a second, reloaded the page, saw an editing inline with the saved text.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21216
Summary: Ref T13513. Refine some inline behaviors, see test plan.
Test Plan:
- Edit a comment ("A"), type text ("AB"), cancel, edit.
- Old behavior: edit and undo states (wrong, and undo does not function).
- New behavior: edit state only.
- Edit a comment ("A"), type text ("AB"), cancel. Undo ("AB"), cancel. Edit.
- Old behavior: "AB" (wrong: you never submitted this text).
- New behavior: "A".
- Create a comment, type text, cancel.
- Old behavior: counter appears in filetree (wrong, comment is undo-able but should not be counted).
- New behavior: no counter.
- Cancel editing an empty comment with no text.
- Old behavior: Something buggy -- undo, I think?
- New behavior: it just vanishes (correct behavior).
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21212
Summary:
Ref T13513. Now that the "currently being edited" state of inlines is saved on the server side, clear the flag when the user clicks "Cancel" to leave the "editing" state on the client.
This also serves to delete empty comments.
Test Plan:
- Clicked a line number to create a new comment. Then:
- Clicked "Cancel". Reloaded page, saw no more comment.
- Typed text, saved. Reloaded page, saw non-editing draft. Clicked "Edit", reloaded page, saw editing draft. Clicked "Cancel", reloaded page, saw non-editing draft.
- Typed text, saved. Clicked "Edit", deleted text, saved. Reloaded page, saw no more comment.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21187
Summary:
Ref T13513. This is mostly an infrastructure cleanup change.
In a perfect world, this would be a series of several changes, but they're tightly interconnected and don't have an obvious clean, nontrivial partition (or, at least, I don't see one). Followup changes will exercise this code repeatedly and all of these individual mutations are "obviously good", so I'm not too worried about the breadth of this change.
---
Inline comments are stored as transaction comments in the `PhabricatorAuditTransactionComment` and `DifferentialTransactionComment` classes.
On top of these two storage classes sit `PhabricatorAuditInlineComment` and `DifferentialInlineComment`. Historically, these were an indirection layer over significantly different storage classes, but nowadays both storage classes look pretty similar and most of the logic is actually the same. Prior to this change, these two classes were about 80% copy/pastes of one another.
Part of the reason they're so copy/pastey is that they implement a parent `Interface`. They are the only classes which implement this interface, and the interface does not provide any correctness guarantees (the storage objects are not actually constrained by it).
To simplify this:
- Make `PhabricatorInlineCommentInterface` an abstract base class instead.
- Lift as much code out of the `Audit` and `Differential` subclasses as possible.
- Delete methods which no longer have callers, or have only trivial callers.
---
Inline comments have two `View` rendering classes, `DetailView` and `EditView`. They share very little code.
Partly, this is because `EditView` does not take an `$inline` object. Historically, it needed to be able to operate on inlines that did not have an ID yet, and even further back in history this was probably just an outgrowth of a simple `<form />`.
These classes can be significantly simplified by passing an `$inline` to the `EditView`, instead of individually setting all the properties on the `View` itself. This allows the `DetailView` and `EditView` classes to share a lot of code.
The `EditView` can not fully render its content. Move the content rendering code into the view.
---
Prior to this change, some operations need to work on inlines that don't have an inline ID yet (we assign an ID the first time you "Save" a comment). Since "editing" comments will now be saved, we can instead create a row immediately.
This means that all the inline code can always rely on having a valid ID to work with, even if that ID corresponds to an empty, draft, "isEditing" comment. This simplifies more code in `EditView` and allows the "create" and "reply" code to be merged in `PhabricatorInlineCommentController`.
---
Client-side inline events are currently handled through a mixture of `ChangesetList` listeners (good) and ad-hoc row-level listeners (less good). In particular, the "save", "cancel", and "undo" events are row-level. All other events are list-level.
Move all events to list-level. This is supported by all inlines now having an ID at all stages of their lifecycle.
This allows some of the client behavior to be simplified. It currently depends on binding complex ad-hoc dictionaries into event handlers in `_drawRows()`, but it seems like almost all of this code can be removed. In fact, no more than one row ever seems to be drawn, so this code can probably be simplified further.
---
Finally, save an "isEditing" state. When we rebuild a revision on the client, click the "edit" button if it's in this state. This is a little hacky, but simpler to get into a stable state, since the row layout of an inline depends on a "view row" followed by an "edit row".
Test Plan:
- Created comments on either side of a diff.
- Edited a comment, reloaded, saw edit stick.
- Saved comments, reloaded, saw save stick.
- Edited a comment, typed text, cancelled, "unedited" to get state back.
- Created a comment, typed text, cancelled, "unedited" to get state back.
- Deleted a comment, "undeleted" to get state back.
Weirdness / known issues:
- Drafts don't autosave yet.
- Fixed in D21187:
- When you create an empty comment then reload, you get an empty editor. This is a bit silly.
- "Cancel" does not save state, but should, once drafts autosave.
- Mostly fixed in D21188:
- "Editing" comments aren't handled specially by the overall submission flow.
- "Editing" comments submitted in that state try to edit themselves again on load, which doesn't work.
Subscribers: jmeador
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21186
