Summary: Use `__CLASS__` instead of hard-coding class names. Depends on D12605.
Test Plan: Eyeball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12806
Summary: Ref T4100. Add a function datasource for filtering mailable objects (e.g., subscribers).
Test Plan: Searched for objects with "Current Viewer", "Members: Dog Project", etc., as a subscriber in global search.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12524
Summary: Ref T4100. Let datasources specify a more meaningful title than the class name.
Test Plan: Browsed some sources.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12469
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595.
To support a unified "Projects:" query across all applications, a future diff is going to add a set of "Edge Logic" capabilities to `PolicyAwareQuery` which write the required SELECT, JOIN, WHERE, HAVING and GROUP clauses for you.
With the addition of "Edge Logic", we'll have three systems which may need to build components of query claues: ordering/paging, customfields/applicationsearch, and edge logic.
For most clauses, queries don't currently call into the parent explicitly to get default components. I want to move more query construction logic up the class tree so it can be shared.
For most methods, this isn't a problem, but many subclasses define a `buildWhereClause()`. Make all such definitions protected and consistent.
This causes no behavioral changes.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything`, which does a pretty through job of verifying this statically.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T5595
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12453
Summary:
Ref T5750. These are a pain to modernize and most don't matter, so cheat:
- Mark a bunch nonbrowsable, including some that probably should be browsable but which I don't want to deal with for now.
- For static datasources, add an easy server-side filter (this isn't really cheating, and is appropriate for the status/priority/application datasources).
- Make composite sources browsable if their components are browsable.
Test Plan:
- Tried to browse an unbrowsable source, got a 404.
- Browsed a composite source.
- Browsed static sources (priority/status/applications).
- Browsed normal sources (people/projects).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12438
Summary:
Ref T7803. Some Query subclasses implement getPagingColumn() in a trivial way, usually to provide a table alias.
Formalize the concept of a primary table alias, and remove obsoleted getPagingColumn() implementations.
Test Plan: Issued affected queries.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12356
Summary: Saw this variant in a thread.
Test Plan: Unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12349
Summary:
Fixes T7731. When a user writes a "Send me an email" rule, always try send them an email, even if their notification settings would normally downgrade it to a notification.
In particular, this is stronger than these downgrades:
- Downgrades due to "self actions";
- downgrades due to "mail tags".
Test Plan:
- Wrote various Herald rules with "Send me an email" rules.
- Used `bin/mail list-outbound` / `show-outbound` to vet generated mail.
- Mail reacted properly to a variety of conditions (disabled accounts, settings, "send me an email" rule, forced delivery).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7731
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12300
Summary:
Ref T7731. Looking forward to T5791, I eventually anticipate writing an interface which looks like a webmail UI where users can review mail they've been sent and understand why they recieved (or did not receive) the mail. Roughly like `bin/mail list-outbound` / `bin/mail show-outbound` work today, but policy-aware (so you can only see messages where delivery was attempted to you).
We currently record a list of "reasons" why a mail is undeliverable, but this list is string-based (so it can not be translated once we start persisting it) and has only negative reasons (so it can not be used to fully understand reasons for delivery or nondelivery).
Make it code-based (so it can be translated) and allow both positive and negative reasons to be listed (so positive reasons can be understood).
Test Plan: Used `bin/mail show-outbound` to review mail delivery reasons, including the positive reason we currently have (forced delivery of authentication mail).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7731
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12297
Summary:
Fixes T7712. Currently, files sent via email get default policies, like they were dragged and dropped onto the home page.
User expectation is better aligned with giving files more restrictive policies, like they were draggged and dropped directly onto an object.
Make files sent via email have restricted default visibility. Once we identify the sender, set them as the file author. Later, the file will become visible to other users via attachment to a task, revision, etc.
Test Plan: Sent some files via email; verified they got restrictive policies, correct authorship, and appropriate object attachment.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7712
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12255
Summary:
Fixes T7199. This still isn't a shining example of perfect code, but the raw amount of copy/paste is much lower than it used to be.
- Reduce code duplication between existing receivers.
- Expose receiving objects in help menus where appropriate.
- Connect some "TODO" receivers.
Test Plan:
- Sent mail to every supported object type.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12249
Summary: Ref T7199. This needs some polish and isn't reachable from the UI, but technically has all of the information.
Test Plan:
{F355899}
{F355900}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12241
Summary: Ref T7199. Everyone can have a mail command! You can have a mail command! You can have a mail command! Mail commands for everyone!
Test Plan: Used `bin/mail receive-test` to issue commands against files and pastes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12238
Summary:
Ref T7199. Ref T7712. This improves the file rules for email:
- Embed visible images as thumbnails.
- Put all other file types in a nice list.
This "fixes" an issue caused by the opposite of the problem described in T7712 -- files being dropped if the default ruleset is too restrictive. T7712 is the real solution here, but use a half-measure for now.
Test Plan:
- Sent mail with two non-images and two images.
- Got a nice list of non-images and embeds of images.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7712, T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12235
Summary:
Ref T7199. These were a bad idea which got copy-pasted a bunch.
- There is zero reason to ever set these to different things.
- Unsurprisingly, I don't know of any install which has them set to different things.
Unless I've completely forgotten about it, this option was not motivated by some obscure business need, it was just a bad decision which didn't catch anyone's attention at the time.
We partially remedied the mistake at some point by introducing `metamta.reply-handler-domain`, which works as a default for all applications, but never cleaned this mess up.
Test Plan: Sent some mail from applications, verified it picked up appropraite reply handler domains.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12231
Summary:
Ref T7199. This prepares for an exciting new world of more powerful "!action" commands. In particular:
- We parse multiple commands per mail.
- We parse command arguments (these are currently not used).
- We parse commands at the beginning or end of mail.
Additionally:
- Do a quick modernization pass on all handlers.
- Break legacy compatibility with really hacky Facebook stuff (see T1992). They've theoretically been on notice for a year and a half, and their setup relies on calling very old reply handler APIs directly.
- Some of these handlers had some copy/paste fluff.
- The Releeph handler is unreachable, but fix it //in theory//.
Test Plan:
- Sent mail to a file; used "!unsubscribe".
- Sent mail to a legalpad document; used "!unsubscribe".
- Sent mail to a task; used various "!close", "!claim", "!assign", etc.
- Sent mail to a paste.
- Sent mail to a revision; used various "!reject", "!claim", etc.
- Tried to send mail to a pull request but it's not actually reachable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12230
Summary:
Ref T7199. Although this is useful for discovery, it's un-useful enough that we already have an option to disable it, and most applications do not provide any meaningful instructions.
Throwing it away makes it easier to move forward and lets us get rid of a config option.
This is becoming a more advanced/power-user feature anyway, and the new syntax will be significantly more complex and hard to explain with a one-liner. I'm currently thinking that I'll maybe make the "help" menu a dropdown and give it some options like:
+---+
| O |
+---+---------------------+
| Maniphest Documentation |
| Maniphest Email Actions |
+-------------------------+
Then you click the "Email Actions" thing and get a runtime-derived list of available options. Not sure if I'll actually build that, but I think we can fairly throw the in-mail instructions away even if we don't go in that specific direction.
Test Plan: Grepped for `replyHandlerInstructions`, got no hits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12229
Summary: Ref T7689. Ref T4100. This advances the goals of removing `loadViewerHandles()` (only 67 callsites remain!) and letting tokenizers some day take token functions like `viewer()` and `members(differential)`.
Test Plan:
- Sent a new message; used "To".
- I simplified the cancel URI construction slightly because it's moot in all normal cases.
- Edited a thread; used "Add Participants".
- Searched rooms; used "Participants".
- Searched countdowns; used "Authors".
- Created a diff; used "Repository".
- Edited a revision; edited "Projects"; edited "Reveiwers"; edited "Subscribers".
- Searched for revisions; edited "responsible users"; "authors"; "reviwers"; "subscribers"; "repositories".
- Added revision comments; edited "Add Reveiwers"; "Add Subscribers".
- Commented on a commit; edited "Add Auditors"; "Add subscribers".
- Edited a commit; edited "Projects".
- Edited a repository; edited "Projects".
- Searched feed, used "include Users"; "include Proejcts".
- Searched files, used "authors".
- Edited initiative; edited "Projects".
- Searched backers; used "Backers".
- Searched initiatives; used "Owners".
- Edited build plans; edited "Run Command".
- Searched Herald; used "Authors".
- Added signature exemption in Legalpad.
- Searhced legalpad; used "creators"; used "contributors".
- Searched signatures; used "documents"; used "signers".
- Created meme.
- Searched macros; used "Authors".
- Used "Projects" in Maniphest reports.
- Used Maniphest comment actions.
- Edited Maniphest tasks; edited "Assigned To"; edited "CC"; edited "projects".
- Used "parent" in Maniphest task creation workflow.
- Searched for projects; used "assigned to"; "in any projec"; "in all projects"; "not in projects"; "in users' projects"; "authors"; "subscribers".
- Edited Maniphest bug filing domains, used "Default Author".
- Searched for OAuth applications, used "Creators".
- Edited Owners pacakge; edited "Primary Owner"; edited "Owners".
- Searched for Owners packages; used "Owner".
- OMG this UI is OLD
- Edited a paste; edited "Projects".
- Searched for paste; used "Authors".
- Searched user activity log; used "Actors"; used "Users".
- Edited a mock; edited "Projects"; edited "CC".
- Searched for mocks; used "Authors".
- Edited Phortune account; edited "Members".
- Edited Phortune merchant account; edited "Members".
- Searched Phrequent; used "Users".
- Edited Ponder question; sued "projects".
- Searched Ponder; used "Authors"; used "Answered By".
- Added project members.
- Searched for projects; used "Members".
- Edited a Releeph product; edited "Pushers".
- Searched pull requests; searched "Requestors".
- Edited an arcanist project; used "Uses Symbols From".
- Searhced push logs; used "Repositories"; used "Pushers".
- Searched repositories; used "In nay project".
- Used global search; used Authors/owners/Subscribers/In Any Project.
- Edited a slowvote; used "Projects".
- Searched slovotes; used "Authors".
- Created a custom "Users" field; edited and searched for it.
- Made a whole lot of typos in this list. ^^^^^^
Did not test:
- Lint is nontrivial to test locally, I'll test it in production.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T7689
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12224
Summary: Fixes T7377. We don't expand projects into members when sending notifications right now. Instead, expand them.
Test Plan:
- Added a project as a reviewer to a revision, made a comment, saw project members receive a read notification + email (with appropriate preferences).
- There's meaningful test coverage on the core mail stuff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7377
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12142
Summary:
Ref T7522. This is mostly useful in the cluster, but could be useful for external installs too.
If you want to import an instance into a test/dry-run state (in the cluster, to test an import; in the general case, to do something like test new hardware or configuration), you currently risk spamming users with a lot of duplicate notifications. In particular, if Phabricator tracks remotes, both instances will continue importing commits and sending email about them. Both instances will try to publish to mirrors, too, which could be bad news, and both instances will try to update linked services.
Instead, provide a flag to let an instance run in "silent mode", which disables all outbound messaging and data.
We need to remember to support this flag on any new outbound channels, but we add about one of those per year so I think that's reasonable.
Test Plan:
- Flipped config.
- Saw it void email, feed and mirroring.
- Didn't test SMS since it's not really in use yet and not convenient to test.
- (Can you think of any publishing I missed?)
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7522
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12109
Summary:
Ref T7607. Ref T7522.
- For the import tools, I want to send from "Phacility Support <support@phacility.com>".
- In the general case, I want to send billing mail from merchants (T7607) later on.
Test Plan: Sent an email and saw the desired "From" address.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7607, T7522
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12100
Summary:
Ref T7149. This is a few steps away, but:
- Generally, I'd like to reduce the amount of "Config" configuration we have.
- One good way to do this is to move it into UIs in Application configuration. We did this with email recently.
- I think this was a great change and I'd like to keep moving in this direction.
- T7149 touches configuration related to file storage engines. Although I'm not planning to fully move configuration into applications yet, it would be easier to debug and test if I could drop a read-only panel there to show engines.
- So, modularize the config stuff so I can add a new panel without hard-coding it.
Test Plan:
- Added, edited, and deleted application emails.
- Viewed non-email application detail pages.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7149
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12051
Summary: Fixes T7088. Mainly this updates the documentation but I also snuck in tweaking how the domain reply handler is built. This does two main things -- makes the behavior consistent as some applications who didn't override this behavior would send out emails with reply tos AND makes it easier for us to deprecate the custom domain thing on a per application basis, which is just silly. On that note, the main documentation doesn't get into how this can be overridden, though I left in that mini blurb on the config setting itself. We could deprecate this harder and LOCK things if you want as well.
Test Plan: read docs, looked good. reasoned through re-factor
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7088
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11725
Summary: Ref T7094. This one is really straight-forward since $this->actor is always populated and the right thing to do here.
Test Plan: used the ole thinking noodle since testing email w/ attachments is really hard
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11589
Summary: Fixes T3404 (post D11565), fixes T5952. This infrastructure has been getting deployed against Maniphest and its time to get these other two applications going on it.
Test Plan: created an email address for paste and used `./bin/mail receive-test` ; a paste was successfully created
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5952, T3404
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11570
Summary: Ref T3404. The only mildly sketchy bit is these codepaths all load the application email directly, by-passing privacy. I think this is necessary because not getting to see an application doesn't mean you should be able to break the application by registering a colliding email address.
Test Plan:
Tried to add a registered application email to a user account via the web ui and got a pretty error.
Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3404
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11565
Summary:
Fixes T5039. The trick / possibly lame part here is we only match 1 application email and its undefined which one. e.g. if a user emails us at address x, y, and z only one of those will pick up the mail. Ergo, don't let users define non-sensical herald conditions like "matches all". Also document what I think was non-intuitive about the code with an inline comment; we have to return an array with just a phid from an object and out of context it feels very "what the...???"
Note this needs to be deployed to other applications still, but I think its okay to close T5039 aggressively here since its done from a user story perspective.
Test Plan: set up a herald rule to flag tasks created as blue via app email x. sent an email to x via `bin/mail receive-test` and verified the task had the blue flag
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11564
Summary: Ref T5039. This will be necessary for Herald integration so users can make rules like "if app email is one of x, y, or z add projects foo, bar, and metallica." I think its best to do an actual typeahead here -- users select full email addresses -- rather than support prefix, suffix, etc stuff on the email address. I think the latter approach would yield lots of confusion, as well as prevent us from (more) easily providing diagnostic tools about what happened when and why.
Test Plan: hacked a maniphest tokenizer to use this new datasource and it worked
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11546
Summary: Ref T5952. This adds support for a "default author" and deploys it on Maniphest.
Test Plan: used augmented (by this diff) bin/mail receive-test to test creation via an application email with a default author configured and no author specified. a task was created with the author as the default author i configured.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11446
Summary: Select a similar or better FontAwesome icon to represent each application
Test Plan: Visual inspection
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11489
Summary: Ref T5952, T3404. This lays the basic plumbing for how this will work, all the way to deploying on Maniphest. Aside from what is mentioned on T5952, I think page(s) on editing application emails could use a little more helpful text about what's going on, similar to how the config page that's getting deprecated works.
Test Plan: ran migration and noted my create email address migrated successfully. used bin/mail to make a task. added another email and used bin/mail to make a task. deleted an email. edited an email. invoked various error states and they all looked good.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3404, T5952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11418
Summary: Ref T6822. This method is only called from within the `PhabricatorWorker::executeTask()` and `PhabricatorWorker::scheduleTask()` methods.
Test Plan: `grep`ped for `->doWork`.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6822
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11406
Summary: Ref T5402. This more or less "fixes" it but there's probably some polish to do?
Test Plan:
stopped and started daemons. error logs look good.
ran bin/storage upgrade. noted that `adjust` added the appropriate indices for active and archive task.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5402
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11044
Summary: Ref T1217, Add link to email preferences to email template
Test Plan: Add comment to object like Maniphest task, check that email has a footer with a link to email preferences.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10883
Summary: Ref T6343, adding HTMLMailMode to remarkup, and most objects should now be processed and appear pretty in emails.
Test Plan: Add a comment to a Maniphest task containing a mention of an object like '{T1}' or 'T1'. Emails should show a styled version of the object similar to how the object looks in the context of the Maniphest task in the UI.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6343, T2617
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10859
Summary: Ref T6576. This avoids generating almost-empty HTML mail bodies for mail which incorrectly has no HTML body.
Test Plan: Generated some mail locally; the specific hook case is a pain for me to hit right now. Will push and dig in if that doesn't fix it.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6576
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10863
Summary: Fixes T6525, adds cc and tos to html emails
Test Plan: send html and plain emails, see new stuff
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6525
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10857
Summary: Fixes T6343. Grepped for all callsites and added addLinkSection where needed.
Test Plan: Tested Differential, Maniphest, Conpherence, Ponder and Macro. Inspect HTML mail for anchor tags. Inspect text mails for non-disruption.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: talshiri, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10762
Summary: Fixes T6372. Apparently ye olde error logs get some crazy spam action as is... Looking around at call sites, we do not specify $config (which could specify the supportage of message id header) so it seems correct to default this to something. I went with "true" as the spot we use this seems like pretty easy stuff that will always work.
Test Plan: lots of thinking
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6372
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10749
Summary:
Ref T2787. When a user purchases a product in Phortune, transition the cart through a purchased state and invoke product callbacks so applications can respond to the workflow.
Also shore up some stuff like preventing negative amounts of funding.
Test Plan: Backed an initiative and saw it show up on the initiative after completing the purcahsing workflow.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10635
Summary: thanks mailbox
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10629
Summary:
Ref T1191. Now that the whole database is covered, we don't need to do as much work to build expected schemata. Doing them database-by-database was helpful in converting, but is just reudndant work now.
Instead of requiring every application to build its Lisk objects, just build all Lisk objects.
I removed `harbormaster.lisk_counter` because it is unused.
It would be nice to autogenerate edge schemata, too, but that's a little trickier.
Test Plan: Database setup issues are all green.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10620
