1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-20 12:30:56 +01:00
Commit graph

10 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chad Little
a53d387ea6 Move Phriction Title transaction to Modular Transactions
Summary: Ref T12625. Moves TYPE_TITLE to modular transaction.

Test Plan: New Document, Edit Document, test validation, verify feed stories.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T12625

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17912
2017-05-16 11:08:38 -07:00
epriestley
7d3d022407 Restore "[Action]" mail subject lines to Differential/Diffusion
Summary: Ref T11114. Ref T10978. These hadn't made it over to EditEngine yet.

Test Plan:
  - Took various actions on revisions and commits.
  - Used `bin/mail show-outbound --id ...` to examine the "Vary Subject", saw it properly generate "[Accepted]", "[Resigned]", etc.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11114, T10978

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17191
2017-01-12 11:44:24 -08:00
epriestley
9e4c16c4c3 Remove Differential "Title" custom field
Summary: Ref T11114. Obsoleted by Modular Transactions + EditEngine + CommitMessageField + we just "hard code" the title of revisions into the page because we're craaazy.

Test Plan:
  - Made an edit on `stable`.
  - Viewed the edit on this change, it still had the proper UI strings.
  - Edited/created/updated revisions.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11114

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17083
2016-12-16 10:23:26 -08:00
epriestley
0906bf547b Begin adding "pro" modular transaction fields to Differential
Summary:
Ref T11114. Currently, all of Differential is extremely custom CustomFields. I want to back away from that somewhat and leverage more EditEngine / ModularTransactions infrastructure.

This allows EditEngine, ModularTransactions, and CustomFields to coexist in an uneasy peace. The "EditPro" controller applies a //different edit// than the CustomFields do, but everything works out in the end. I think.

Hopefully the horrible mess I am creating here will be short-lived.

Test Plan:
  - Edited a revision with the normal editor.
  - Edited a revision with the pro editor.
  - Created a revision with `arc diff`.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11114

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17044
2016-12-13 14:50:31 -08:00
epriestley
e4c6ae5345 Smooth out various transaction/editing behaviors for Calendar
Summary:
Ref T11809.

  - Allow users to remove the "Until" date from recurring events.
  - When removing "Until", show a sensible string ("...set this event to repeat forever.")
  - When users go through the "Make Recurring" workflow, don't require them to explicitly select "Recurring: Recurring" from the dropdown. This intent is clear from clicking "Make Recurring".
  - When editing "All Future Events", don't literally apply date changes to them, since that doesn't make sense. We update the template, then reschedule any events which haven't been edited already. I think this is what users probably mean if they make this edit.
  - When creating an event with a non-default icon, don't show "alice changed the icon from Default to Party.".
  - Hide the "recurring mode" transaction, which had no string ("alice edited this Event.") and was redundant anyway.
  - Also, add a little piece of developer text to make hunting these things down easier.

Test Plan: Edited various events, parents, children, made events recur, set until, unset until, viewed transactions, rescheduled parents, rescheduled children.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11809

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16796
2016-11-03 11:03:20 -07:00
epriestley
27cfd8d19e Support object mentions in Calendar Event descriptions
Summary:
Ref T7924. This:

  - Adds support for remarkup block changes to Modular Transactions.
  - Exposes remarkup changes from the Calendar event "Description" transaction.

This makes stuff like mentions and file embeds work properly.

Test Plan:
Mentioned a task in an event description, saw a mention appear on the task.

Uploaded a file to an event description, saw the file become "Attached" to the event.

(Neither of these worked properly before.)

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T7924

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16481
2016-08-31 15:33:45 -07:00
Aviv Eyal
b656c87e37 horribly fix plain-text email for modular transactions
Summary:
This is the quickest and dirtiest fix I could come up with.

`PhabricatorApplicationTransaction::getTitleForMail()` is using `clone $this`, which doesn't actually effect `implementation`.
Ref T9789.

Test Plan: update paste comment, get plaintext mail.

Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T9789

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16251
2016-07-08 00:17:16 +00:00
Aviv Eyal
0569938880 expose renderHandle in PhabricatorModularTransactionType
Test Plan: Tested with a transactionType from an extension.

Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T9789

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16236
2016-07-06 01:54:51 +00:00
epriestley
e44d92babc Have modular transactions fall back correctly when selecting feed titles
Summary: Ref T9789. Falling back to `parent::` is better, and fixes older-style feed stories for Pastes, like "added a comment".

Test Plan: Viewed a comment feed story about a paste.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T9789

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16114
2016-06-14 11:07:42 -07:00
epriestley
33ec855449 Modularize application transactions in Paste, mostly
Summary:
Ref T9789. `Transaction` and `Editor` classes are the last major pieces of infrastructure that haven't been fully modularized.

Some of the specific issues are:

  - `Editor` classes rely on a bunch of `instanceof` stuff in the base class to pick up transaction types like "subscribe", "projects", etc. Instead, applications should be adding these, and third-party applications should be able to add them.
  - Code is spread across `Transaction` and `Editor` classes somewhat oddly. For example, generating old/new values would probably make more sense at the `Transaction` level, but it currently exists at the `Editor` level.
  - Both types of classes have a lot of functions based on `switch()` statements, which require a ton of boilerplate and are just generally kind of hard to work with.

This creates classes for each type of transaction, and moves almost all of the logic to them. These classes are simpler and more focused than the old stuff was, and can organize related code better.

This starts inching toward defining `CoreTransactions` for features shared across applications. It only defines the "Create" transaction so far, but at some point I plan to move all the other shared transactions to Core and let them control which objects they're available for.

Test Plan:
  - Created pastes with web UI and API.
  - Edited all paste properites.
  - Archived/activated.
  - Verified files got reasonable names.
  - Reviewed timeline and feed.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T9789

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16111
2016-06-14 06:13:28 -07:00