Summary: Cleans up EditEngine, adds new layout to EditEngine and descendents
Test Plan: Test creating a new form, reordering, marking and unmarking defaults. View new forms.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15531
Summary:
Ref T10537. For Nuance, I want to introduce new sources (like "GitHub" or "GitHub via Nuance" or something) but this needs to modularize eventually.
Split ContentSource apart so applications can add new content sources.
Test Plan:
This change has huge surface area, so I'll hold it until post-release. I think it's fairly safe (and if it does break anything, the breaks should be fatals, not anything subtle or difficult to fix), there's just no reason not to hold it for a few hours.
- Viewed new module page.
- Grepped for all removed functions/constants.
- Viewed some transactions.
- Hovered over timestamps to get content source details.
- Added a comment via Conduit.
- Added a comment via web.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade --namespace XXXXX --no-quickstart -f` to re-run all historic migrations.
- Generated some objects with `bin/lipsum`.
- Ran a bulk job on some tasks.
- Ran unit tests.
{F1190182}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15521
Summary:
Ref T10537. These are objects which are bound to some external object, like a Maniphest task which is a representation of a GitHub issue.
This doesn't do much yet and may change, but my thinking is:
- I'm putting these on-object instead of on edges because I think we want to actively change the UI for them (e.g., clearly call out that the object is bridged) but don't want every page to need to do extra queries in the common case where zero bridged objects exist anywhere in the system.
- I'm making these one-to-one, more or less: an issue can't be bridged to a bunch of tasks, nor can a bunch of tasks be bridged to a single issue. Pretty sure this makes sense? I can't come up with any reasonable, realistic cases where you want a single GitHub issue to publish to multiple different tasks in Maniphest.
- Technically, one type of each bridgable object could be bridged, but I expect this to never actually occur. Hopefully.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade, loaded some pages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15502
Summary: Fixes T10234. This usage is unusual, out of date, and has some bad interactions with engines and custom rules.
Test Plan:
- Added `CustomInlineCodeRule` from P1129 as an extension rule.
- Put a custom `<code> ... </code>` block in a Maniphest task description.
- Saw fatal as described in task; applied change; saw rule work properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10234
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15501
Summary:
Ref T10493.
- Call this action "Unassigned" instead of "Up For Grabs", since the latter implies that it's OK for anyone to grab it, which is a social/context thing that we probably shouldn't assume.
- Show who a task was previously assigned to in the transaction.
The text is a little clunky, yell if you've got a better wording? Or maybe I'll come up with something.
Test Plan: {F1166299}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cburroughs
Maniphest Tasks: T10493
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15454
Summary: Adds a date with the author name on the Authored By panel in Maniphest. A basic treatment, will see how it feels.
Test Plan: Look at a few tasks
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15456
Summary: See D15432. There, we can use this test to check if the user //could// reassign the task by using "Edit Form" or the stacked actions, so any dedicated "claim" element is consistent with the other permissions.
Test Plan:
- Added a `var_dump($can_reassign)` after the call.
- Saw `true`.
- Edited the edit form, locked and disabled "Assigned To".
- Saw `false`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15433
Summary: Moves Maniphest over, and allows application to provide ad-hoc panels more easily.
Test Plan: {F1160591}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15417
Summary:
Every caller returns `true`. This was added a long time ago for Projects, but projects are no longer subscribable.
I don't anticipate needing this in the future.
Test Plan: Grepped for this method.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15409
Summary: Reworks Maniphest into a two column view. Moves priority and color to header, assignee to sidebar. quest points to header, and author to gutter. may be some confusion since priority only displays on open tickets.
Test Plan: with and without description, custom fields, points, tablet, mobile and desktop.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15396
Summary:
Fixes T10426. When the owner of a task changes, we try to add the old owner to CC so they're kept in the loop.
Currently, we do this unconditionally. This can add the owner as a subscriber when someone didn't change anything, which is confusing.
Instead, only do this if the owner actually changed.
Test Plan:
- With "A" as owner, edited task and saved.
- Before patch, A was added as subscriber.
- After patch, A not added.
- With "A" as owner, changed owner to "B" and saved.
- Both before and after patch, "A" is added as a subscriber.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10426
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15333
Summary:
Ref T10349. At HEAD, if you create a task //on a board//, it floats to the top correctly.
If you create a task elsewhere and tag it with the board, you were subject to the whims of the layout engine and it would generally end up on the bottom.
Instead, make the rules consistent so that "virtual" positions (of tasks which haven't been committed to a particular position yet) still float to the top.
Test Plan:
- Created tasks from a board.
- Created tasks from Maniphest, then looked at them on a board.
- Moved tasks around.
- In all cases, newly created tasks floated to the top.
- Sorted by natural and priority.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10349
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15276
Summary:
This commit adds the `transactionID` field to manphest.gettransactions, to
satisfy the request in T10327
Test Plan: Call the `maniphest.gettransactions` endpoint, verify `transactionID` is present
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15250
Summary:
Fixes T10343. All solutions here seem basically fine. I think adding this small bit of complexity is OK, and sorrrrt of like this behavior sometimes.
- Allow disabling this behavior per-status.
- Disable it by default for "Invalid" and "Duplicate" (I left "wontfix", since that's a resolution?).
Beyond being more flexible, I think this is slightly better?
Test Plan:
- Closed a task as invalid: no claim.
- Closed a task as resolved: claim.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15257
Summary: Ref T4427. Seems fine / not egregiously broken.
Test Plan: Edited points configuration. Tried to set a bad value. Set a good value. Persued examples and help text.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15256
Summary:
Fixes T8197. Currently, if you priority-sort a workboard and drag a card to the top or bottom, we change the priority even if we do not need to.
For example, if the lowest priority in a column is "Low", and you drag a "Wishlist" task underneath it, we incorrectly increase the priority of the task to "Low", when we do not actually need to touch it. This is bad/confusing.
A similar thing happens when dragging a "High" priority task to the top of a column where the highest priority is currently "Normal".
Test Plan:
- Create a column with a "Normal" task.
- Sort workboard by Priority.
- Drag a "High" task above it. After patch: task still "High".
- Drag a "Wishlist" task below it. After patch: task still "Wishlist".
Also dragged a ton of tasks into the middle of other tasks.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8197
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15240
Summary: Ref T4427.
Test Plan:
- Dragged a 17 XP task from "Hunting" to "Slain".
- Saw 17 XP move.
- Level up!
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15237
Summary:
Ref T4900. Briefly:
- Much more layout and rendering is now done in Javascript.
- This should otherwise be identical to the behavior at HEAD, except that:
- editing a task and removing the current board from it no longer removes the task; and
- points still don't work.
However, this can now plausibly support realtime workboard updates and other complex state-based behaviors like points calculations in a future change.
Test Plan:
- Changed card covers.
- Moved cards.
- Sorted board by priority and natural.
- Added new cards.
- Edited cards in place.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15234
Summary:
Ref T4427.
- When points are configured, show them on the task detail page (just a simple property, at least for now).
- Typecast points better to avoid "joe changed points from 12 to 12." beacuse we compare the stored value (as a string) to the new value (as a double).
Test Plan:
- Saw points on detail view.
- Created task with points, then edited it without touching points. No more spurious "changed from 12 to 12" transaction.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15223
Summary:
Ref T4427.
- New config option for labels, enabling, etc., but no UI/niceness yet.
- When enabled, add a field.
- Allow nonnegative values, including fractional values.
- EditEngine is nice and Conduit / actions basically just work with a tiny bit of extra support code.
Test Plan:
- Edited points via "Edit".
- Edited points via Conduit.
- Edited points via stacked actions.
- Tried to set "zebra" points.
- Tried to set -1 points.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15220
Summary:
Currently never read or written.
Supports fractions.
There's no such thing as an unsigned double so this also supports negative values, technically, although I'll eventually prevent this in the UI.
Test Plan: `bin/storage upgrade`, then created and edited a task. Nothing was different.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15218
Summary:
Before edges, we stored some of this stuff directly on tasks.
- `attached` was migrated to edges in Jan 2013.
- `projectPHIDs` was never used, as far as I can tell?
- `ccPHIDs` was migrated away and dropped more than a year ago.
None of these columns are used in modern code (instead, modern code uses edges).
Test Plan: `grep`, browsed around, `bin/storage upgrade`, unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15216
Summary: This was slightly more complex than I believed, but not too terrible.
Test Plan:
{F1096126}
- Also used some normal file uploaders to make sure I didn't break that.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15202
Summary:
No way to set photos yet, but if you magic them in they work.
Primarily, this consolidates rendering logic so the move + edit + view controllers all run the same code to do tags / cover photos.
Test Plan: {F1095870}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15201
Summary: Ref T10010. This gets rid of, e.g., the "Iteration I" tag in the column for that milestone, as it is redundant with the column itself.
Test Plan: {F1090427}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15181
Summary:
Ref T10010. These aren't perfect but I think (?) they aren't horribly broken.
- When a project is a parent project, destroy (as far as the user can tell) any custom columns.
- When a project has milestones, automatically generate columns on the project's workboard (if it has a workboard).
- When you move tasks between milestones, add the proper milestone tag.
- When you move tasks out of milestones back into the backlog, add the proper parent project tag.
- (Plenty of UI / design stuff to adjust.)
Test Plan:
- Dragged stuff between milestone columns.
- Used a normal workboard.
- Wasn't able to find any egregiously bad cases that did anything terrible.
{F1088224}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15171
Summary: Ref T10010. This retires the old way of doing things inside ColumnPositionQuery. It is now obsolete and lives in BoardLayoutEngine instead.
Test Plan:
- Moved cards, created cards, swapped filters, orders, etc.
- Some degree of unit testing coming in the next diff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15177
Summary:
Ref T10010. See D15174. This gets rid of the "actually apply the change" callsite and moves it to layout engine.
Next up is to make the board view use the layout engine, then throw away all the whack code in ColumnPositionQuery, then move forward with D15171.
Test Plan:
- Dragged tasks within a column.
- Dragged tasks between columns.
- Dragged tasks to empty columns.
- Created a task in a column.
- Swapped board to priority sort, dragged a bunch of stuff all over.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15175
Summary: No UI changes, just some search and replace for UI consistency.
Test Plan: Test person and object hovercards still work. UIExamples too.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15172
Summary:
Ref T5240.
- Add proper class when dropping cards.
- Add proper class when creating new cards.
- Make X-drag explicit so that it works if there's only one column.
- Stop tootips when dragging, resume them after dropping.
- Move CSS rule for consistency.
- Allow user to hit "Escape" to cancel an in-progress drag.
Test Plan:
- Dropped cards.
- Created new cards.
- X-dragged on a workboard with one column and a dashboard.
- Dragged over a tooltip (no tip), dropped, moused over tooltip (tip).
- Hit escape during a drag.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cspeckmim
Maniphest Tasks: T5240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15163
Summary:
Mostly, this has just been sitting in my sandbox for a long time. I may also touch some charting stuff with subprojects/milestones, but don't have particular plans to do that.
D3 seems a bit more flexible, and it's easier to push more of the style logic into CSS so you can fix my design atrocities. gRaphael also hasn't been updated in ~3+ years.
Test Plan:
{F1085433}
{F1085434}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cburroughs, yelirekim
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15155
Summary: Mostly for consistency, we're not using other forms of icons and this makes all classes that use an icon call it in the same way.
Test Plan: tested uiexamples, lots of other random pages.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15125
Summary:
Ref T10144. This isn't comprehensive, but we can give it a try and see how it feels?
- EditEngine forms now say "Tags" instead of "Projects".
- Modern SearchEngine forms now say "Tags" instead of "Projects".
- For clarity, replaced as much "in project" language as I could find with "tagged with project" language.
Test Plan: reading / grepping + used "not tagged with any project" token
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10144
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15108
Summary:
Ref T6183. Ref T10054. Historically, only members could watch projects because there were some weird special cases with policies. These policy issues have been resolved and Herald is generally powerful enough to do equivalent watches on most objects anyway.
Also puts a "Watch Project" button on the feed panel to make the behavior and meaning more obvious.
Test Plan:
- Watched a project I was not a member of.
- Clicked the feed watch/unwatch button.
{F1064909}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6183, T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15063
Summary:
See IRC. We're supposed to repair configuration, but if custom validators throw a generic `Exception` or use `PhutilTypeSpec` to do a check, we may explode way harder than we intend to.
Instead, soften these exceptions into validation exceptions so we repair configuration, raise a setup issue, and continue.
Test Plan: {F1059609}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14998
Summary:
Fixes T10117.
- I accidentally broke setting `null` to unassign tasks at some point when I added richer validation.
- Raise a better error if the user passes junk.
Test Plan:
- Unassigned a task via API and web UI.
- Reassigned a task via API and web UI.
- Tried to do an invalid assign via API, got a sensible error.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10117
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14992
Summary: Ref T10004. This primarily supports moving Phame to EditEngine.
Test Plan: {F1045166}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14887
Summary: Ref T8980. This calculation was not quite right and you could sneak one off screen if you tried carefully.
Test Plan: Couldn't sneak one off screen anymore.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8980
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14880
Summary:
Ref T8980. Move away from events to EngineExtensions.
This also simplifies hovercards a bit:
- Removes tasks from revision cards.
- Removes blockers/blocked from task cards.
- Removes "Send Message" from user cards.
These mostly felt cluttery to me. Open to arguments to retain them. I think we can make better use of the space, though (e.g., flags, projects + board columns).
Test Plan:
- Viewed people, task, revision, commit and project hovercards.
{F1043256}
{F1043257}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8980
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14878
Summary:
Ref T8980. This isn't 100% coverage but should be pretty much all of the common ones.
These feel a touch iffy to me at first glance so I didn't go crazy trying to hunt all of them down. I have some other plans for them so maybe they'll feel better by the end of it.
Test Plan: Hovered over author, reviewers, blocked tasks, projects, etc.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8980
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14877
Summary: Ref T9156. This makes the UX a little more modern/standard/safe.
Test Plan:
```
epriestley@orbital ~/dev/phabricator $ ./bin/lipsum generate
Choose which type or types of test data you want to generate, or select "all".
- Differential Revisions
- Files
- Maniphest Tasks
- Pastes
- Pholio Mocks
- Projects
- User Accounts
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9156
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14873
Summary:
Ref T6884. Ref T10004. For various reasons we previously didn't publish these transactions, but now do. This is probably a better behavior overall, but we didn't have reasonable strings for them.
Parent tasks now show "alice created blocking task Txxx.".
Feed now shows nothing, since "alice created task Txxx." is right next to any story we would show and showing them both seems silly.
Test Plan:
- Created subtasks.
- Viewed parent tasks.
- Viewed feed.
- Saw pretty reasonable strings/stories.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6884, T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14849
