1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2025-02-17 17:28:42 +01:00
Commit graph

12 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
a9d7b4f0ff Support bulk edit of "points" for Maniphest tasks
Summary: Ref T13025. Fixes T10973. Fairly straightforward. The "points" type is just an alias for "text" today.

Test Plan: Bulk edited points.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T10973

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18889
2018-01-22 11:59:52 -08:00
epriestley
d9b6513a21 Respect tokenizer limits in the bulk editor
Summary: Ref T13025. This makes limits (for fields like "Assign To") work in the bulk editor, so you can't type "Assign to: x, y, z" anymore.

Test Plan: Hit limit for "Assign to" and a custom project field. No limit for "Add subscribers".

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18888
2018-01-22 11:55:55 -08:00
epriestley
3038d564a6 Allow bulk edits to be made silently if you have CLI access
Summary:
Fixes T13042. This hooks up the new "silent" mode from D18882 and makes it actually work.

The UI (where we tell you to go run some command and then reload the page) is pretty clumsy, but should solve some problems for now and can be cleaned up eventually. The actual mechanics (timeline aggregation, Herald interaction,  etc.) are on firmer ground.

Test Plan:
  - Made a normal bulk edit, got mail and feed stories.
  - Made a silent bulk edit, no mail and no feed.
  - Saw "Silent Edit" marker in timeline for silent edits:

{F5386245}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13042

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18883
2018-01-19 13:24:54 -08:00
epriestley
7a43181337 Organize bulk edit actions into nice groups
Summary: Ref T13025. We're getting kind of a lot of actions, so put them in nice groups so they're easier to work with.

Test Plan: {F5386038}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18880
2018-01-19 13:22:25 -08:00
epriestley
f8113aecdc Make bulk edit <select /> fields a little more natrual and set options for subtype transactions
Summary:
Ref T13025. This is some minor technical stuff: make the "select" bulk edit type a little more consistent with other types by passing data down instead of having it reach up the stack. This simplifies the implementation of a custom field "select" in a future change.

Also, provide an option list to the "select" edit field for object subtypes. This is only accessible via Conduit so it currently never actually renders anything in the UI, but with the bulk edit stuff we get some initialization order issues if we don't set anything. This will also make any future changes which expose subtypes more broadly more straightforward.

Test Plan:
  - Bulk edited "select" fields, like "Status" and "Priority".
  - No more fatal when trying to `getOptions()` internally on the subtype field.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18878
2018-01-19 13:17:28 -08:00
epriestley
1e51f1d0dc Reuse more transaction construction code in bulk editor
Summary:
Ref T13025. Currently, the bulk editor takes an HTTP request and emits a list of "raw" transactions (simple dictionaries). This goes into the job queue, and the background job builds a real transaction.

However, the logic to turn an HTTP request into a raw transaction is ending up with some duplication, since we generally already have logic to turn an HTTP request into a full object.

Instead: build real objects first, then serialize them to dictionaries. Send those to the job queue, rebuild them into objects again, and we end up in the same spot with a little less code duplication.

Finally, delete the mostly-copied code.

Test Plan: Used bulk editor to add comments, projects, and rename tasks.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18875
2018-01-19 12:49:17 -08:00
epriestley
0cad6021b6 Restore "Tags" and "Subscribers" edit capabilities to Maniphest bulk editor
Summary: Depends on D18867. Ref T13025. Fixes T8740. Rebuilds the tag/subscriber actions (add, remove, set) into the bulk editor.

Test Plan: Added, removed and set these values via bulk edit.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T8740

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18868
2018-01-19 12:47:10 -08:00
epriestley
687fada5af Restore bulk edit support for remarkup fields (description, add comment)
Summary:
Depends on D18866. Ref T13025. Fixes T12415. This makes the old "Add Comment" action work, and adds support for a new "Set description to" action (possibly, I could imagine "append description" being useful some day, maybe).

The implementation is just a `<textarea />`, not a whole fancy remarkup box with `[Bold] [Italic] ...` buttons, preview, typeaheads, etc. It would be nice to enrich this eventually but doing the rendering in pure JS is currently very involved.

This requires a little bit of gymnastics to get the transaction populated properly, and adds some extra validation since we need some code there anyway.

Test Plan:
  - Changed the description of a task via bulk editor.
  - Added a comment to a task via bulk editor.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T12415

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18867
2018-01-19 12:45:34 -08:00
epriestley
bf1ac701c3 Support "select" types in bulk editor (status, priority)
Summary: Depends on D18864. Ref T13025. Adds bulk edit support back for "status" and "priority" using `<select />` controls.

Test Plan:
Used bulk editor to change status and priority for tasks.

{F5374436}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18866
2018-01-19 12:44:48 -08:00
epriestley
09e71a4082 Define bulk edits in terms of EditEngine, not hard-coded ad-hoc definitions
Summary:
Depends on D18862. See PHI173. Ref T13025. Fixes T10005. This redefines bulk edits in terms of EditEngine fields, rather than hard-coding the whole thing.

Only text fields -- and, specifically, only the "Title" field -- are supported after this change. Followup changes will add more bulk edit parameter types and broader field support.

However, the title field now works without any Maniphest-specific code, outside of the small amount of binding code in the `ManiphestBulkEditor` subclass.

Test Plan: Used the bulk edit workflow to change the titles of tasks.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T10005

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18863
2018-01-19 12:43:47 -08:00
epriestley
6ef45d8245 Provide a generic transaction-oriented bulk job worker
Summary:
Depends on D18806. Ref T13025. See PHI173. Currently, Maniphest bulk edits are processed by a Maniphest-specific worker. I want to replace this with a generic worker which can apply transactional edits to any object.

This implements a generic worker, although it has no callers yet. Future changes give it callers, and later remove the Maniphest-specific worker.

Test Plan: See next changes.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18862
2018-01-19 12:41:56 -08:00
epriestley
7f91c8c4ac Rebuild the bulk editor on SearchEngine
Summary:
Depends on D18805. Ref T13025. Fixes T10268.

Instead of using a list of IDs for the bulk editor, power it with SearchEngine queries. This gives us the full power of SearchEngine and lets us use a query key instead of a list of 20,000 IDs to avoid issues with URL lengths.

Also, split it into a base `BulkEngine` and per-application subclasses. This moves us toward T10005 and universal support for bulk operations.

Also:

  - Renames most of "batch" to "bulk": we're curently inconsitent about this, I like "bulk" better since I think it's more clear if you don't regularly interact with `.bat` files, and newer stuff mostly uses "bulk".
  - When objects in the result set can't be edited because you don't have permission, show the status more clearly.

This probably breaks some stuff a bit since I refactored so heavily, but it seems mostly OK from poking around. I'll clean up anything I missed in followups to deal with remaining items on T13025.

Test Plan:
{F5302300}

  - Bulk edited from Maniphest.
  - Bulk edited from a workboard (no more giant `?ids=....` in the URL).
  - Hit most of the error conditions, I think?
  - Clicked the "Cancel" button.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T10268

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18806
2018-01-19 12:40:08 -08:00