1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-30 18:52:42 +01:00
Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
bc5617954a Make control + enter submit forms if a textarea is focused
Summary:
This is straightforward, except that `form.submit()` does not call onsubmit handlers. Create a `didSyntheticSubmit` event and have everything which listens for form submits listen for it too.

Fixes T704.

Test Plan: Hit control + enter in inline comments, main commetns, Pholio, conpherence. Verified it triggered appropriate JS (workflow / special behaviors).

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T704

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4704
2013-01-28 14:11:32 -08:00
Alan Huang
8e5189b439 Add a Delete link to Differential inline comment previews
Summary:
This lets you delete inlines from the preview at the bottom of
the page, instead of hunting for them through the diffs.

There is not yet a keyboard shortcut.

The mechanism for updating the inlines in the diffs is kind of a hack
and I'm sure I'm special-casing way too much, but at least it works.

Test Plan:
Load revision with many diffs. Create inlines all over the
place. Delete them all. Mwahaha.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T1433, T1431

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3131
2012-08-02 12:24:23 -07:00
vrana
4a4752d8c2 Don't provide Undo for empty text in Differential inline comment
Test Plan:
Edit inline comment.
Clear its text.
Hit Cancel.
Try to find Undo link on the usual place with no success.
Repeat for same text.
Repeat for different text, this time with success.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, epriestley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1739
2012-02-29 23:44:42 -08:00
epriestley
21f0aba701 Use an inline dialog element for inline comments in Differential
Summary:
The current approach of using a modal overlay dialog to create/edit inline
comments is pretty silly. Use an inline textarea instead.

This element isn't perfect and we have some mild modalness issues, but I think
it's better than the silly thing we've got going on right now. We can keep
poking it as people break it.

Test Plan:
  - Created comments; submitted and undid them in empty and nonempty states.
Used undo for nonempty states + cancel.
  - Edited comments; saved and canceled them. Used undo for changed state.
  - Replied to comments; yada yada as above.
  - Deleted comments.
  - Did various modal trickery where I clicked "Reply" on something else with a
dialog already up, this very mildly glitches but I think it's not a big issue.

Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, Makinde, nh

Reviewed By: vrana

CC: aran, epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T431

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1716
2012-02-29 14:28:48 -08:00
epriestley
209179a74a Remove tests for JX.$.NotFound from Phabricator
Summary: See D939. Regardless of what we do there, these will break, and they're
pretty silly anyway (see the giant caveat comments in the second one).

Test Plan: Clicked a direct-jump comment link, did save/cancel for inline
comments.

Reviewers: phil, cpojer, tomo, mroch

Reviewed By: phil

CC: aran, phil

Differential Revision: 940
2011-09-16 00:49:10 -07:00
epriestley
d52cf835a9 Fix problem with adding Differential inline comments to the last line of a file
Summary:
We use a 'null' row to indicate the element should be appended to the end of the
table (otherwise, it is prepended to the row in question), but also derive the
table from the row. This needs more cleanup in general but fix the immediate
issue at least.

Test Plan:
Added an inline comment to the last line of a file.

Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 425
2011-06-11 16:00:37 -07:00
epriestley
94d0adb140 Add "Undo" for editing Differential inline comments
Summary:
When a user hits 'cancel' on a 'new', 'edit', or 'reply' operation, add a little
"Changes discarded. __Undo__" insert so they can get their change back. No undo
for delete since there's an explicit prompt. Once this lands we can make
'escape' work again to close dialogs.

This change started feeling really good when I was merging all the duplicate
code and making things more consistent, but by the time I started writing client
rendering it felt gross. I'm not really thrilled with it but I guess it's a step
forward? The feature seems pretty OK in practice. Let me know how much barfing
this causes and I can try to remedy the most acute concerns.

This also fixes a bug where replies always (?) appear on the 'new' side of the
diff (I think?).

Test Plan:
Applied 'new', 'edit', 'delete' and 'reply' operations, pressed 'cancel' and
'okay' in each case, with and without changing text where relevant. All
behaviors seem to conform with expectations, except that canceling out of 'edit'
without changing the text gives you an option to undo when it shouldn't really.
There's no super easy way to get at the original text right now.

Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: simpkins, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 406
2011-06-08 10:44:01 -07:00