1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-02 11:42:42 +01:00
Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
1656a2ff08 Allow inline comment storage objects to generate their own runtime objects
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, inline storage objects ("TransactionComment") can't directly generate a runtime object ("InlineComment").

Allow this transformation to be performed in a genric way so clunky code which does it per-object-type can be removed, lifted, or simplified.

Simplify an especially gross callsite in preview code.

Test Plan: Previewed inline comments.

Maniphest Tasks: T13513

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21226
2020-05-07 15:57:49 -07:00
epriestley
11cf8f05b1 Remove "getApplicationTransactionObject()" from ApplicationTransactionInterface
Summary:
Depends on D19919. Ref T11351. This method appeared in D8802 (note that "get...Object" was renamed to "get...Transaction" there, so this method was actually "new" even though a method of the same name had existed before).

The goal at the time was to let Harbormaster post build results to Diffs and have them end up on Revisions, but this eventually got a better implementation (see below) where the Harbormaster-specific code can just specify a "publishable object" where build results should go.

The new `get...Object` semantics ultimately broke some stuff, and the actual implementation in Differential was removed in D10911, so this method hasn't really served a purpose since December 2014. I think that broke the Harbormaster thing by accident and we just lived with it for a bit, then Harbormaster got some more work and D17139 introduced "publishable" objects which was a better approach. This was later refined by D19281.

So: the original problem (sending build results to the right place) has a good solution now, this method hasn't done anything for 4 years, and it was probably a bad idea in the first place since it's pretty weird/surprising/fragile.

Note that `Comment` objects still have an unrelated method with the same name. In that case, the method ties the `Comment` storage object to the related `Transaction` storage object.

Test Plan: Grepped for `getApplicationTransactionObject`, verified that all remaining callsites are related to `Comment` objects.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T11351

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19920
2018-12-20 15:16:19 -08:00
epriestley
6c43d1d52c Remove "willRenderTimeline()" from ApplicationTransactionInterface
Summary:
Depends on D19914. Ref T11351. Some of the Phoilo rabbit holes go very deep.

`PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` currently requires you to implement `willRenderTimeline()`. Almost every object just implements this as `return $timeline`; only Pholio, Diffusion, and Differential specialize it. In all cases, they are specializing it mostly to render inline comments.

The actual implementations are a bit of a weird mess and the way the data is threaded through the call stack is weird and not very modern.

Try to clean this up:

  - Stop requiring `willRenderTimeline()` to be implemented.
  - Stop requiring `getApplicationTransactionViewObject()` to be implemented (only the three above, plus Legalpad, implement this, and Legalpad's implementation is a no-op). These two methods are inherently pretty coupled for almost any reasonable thing you might want to do with the timeline.
  - Simplify the handling of "renderdata" and call it "View Data". This is additional information about the current view of the transaction timeline that is required to render it correctly. This is only used in Differential, to decide if we can link an inline comment to an anchor on the same page or should link it to another page. We could perhaps do this on the client instead, but having this data doesn't seem inherently bad to me.
  - If objects want to customize timeline rendering, they now implement `PhabricatorTimelineInterface` and provide a `TimelineEngine` which gets a nice formal stack.

This leaves a lot of empty `willRenderTimeline()` implementations hanging around. I'll remove these in the next change, it's just going to be deleting a couple dozen copies of an identical empty method implementation.

Test Plan:
  - Viewed audits, revisions, and mocks with inline comments.
  - Used "Show Older" to page a revision back in history (this is relevant for "View Data").
  - Grepped for symbols: willRenderTimeline, getApplicationTransactionViewObject, Legalpad classes.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T11351

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19918
2018-12-20 14:55:07 -08:00
Bob Trahan
6ab3f06b6e Transactions - adding willRenderTimeline to handle tricky cases
Summary: Fixes T6693.

Test Plan:
Made a bunch of comments on a diff with differential, being sure to leave inlines here and there. This reproduced the issue in T6693. With this patch this issue no longer reproduces!

Successfully "showed older changes" in Maniphest too.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T6693

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10931
2014-12-04 13:58:52 -08:00
epriestley
bee1e09fd1 Remove getPHID() from PhabricatorMentionableInterface
Summary: Some versions of PHP aren't very happy about both interfaces and superclasses defining a method. Just remove it from MentionableInterface and leave it as implicit.

Auditors: btrahan
2014-09-10 06:35:25 -07:00
Bob Trahan
c75495e63f Transactions - add infrastructure for "mentions"
Summary: Fixes T4036. Now if you say something on diff X like "This reminds me of Tx and Dy and commitHashFoo and Px." each of those objects gets a little visible transaction that the mention occurred. No feed, email, or notifications.

Test Plan: made a comment like above and verified transactions. also submitted a diff that "Fixes Tx" and Tx did not get the transaction as expected.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T4036

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10451
2014-09-09 14:21:13 -07:00
epriestley
5cbdda413c Paradigms, paradigms, paradigms
Summary: Fixes T4693.

Test Plan: {F146407}

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T4693

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8829
2014-04-21 15:33:59 -07:00
epriestley
49bc32f12d Implement PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface in Differential
Summary:
Ref T4810. Ultimate goal is to let Harbormaster post a "build passed/failed" transaction. To prepare for that, implement `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` in Differential.

To allow Harbormaster to take action on //diffs// but have the transactions apply to //revisions//, I added a new method so that objects can redirect transactions to some other object.

Test Plan:
  - Subscribed/unsubscribed/attached/detached from Differential, saw transactions appear properly.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T4810

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8802
2014-04-17 16:03:24 -07:00
epriestley
0ca7c77c10 Integrate subscriptions with ApplicationTransactions
Summary: Fixes T2214. For objects which support ApplicationTransaction, use ApplicationTransactions to apply subscription action changes. Principally, this makes clicking "Subscribe" / "Unsubscribe" appear correctly in the transaction log.

Test Plan: Clicked "Subscribe" and "Unsubscribe" a on Macros and Mocks.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2214

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4986
2013-02-17 06:37:09 -08:00