Summary: Ref T8116. Puts a list of packages on the publisher page, and a list of versions on the package page.
Test Plan: Viewed a publisher, saw packages. Viewed a package, saw versions. Looked at list views.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16321
Summary: Ref T8116. Add search-by-name and per-package / per-publisher search to Packages.
Test Plan: Searched publishers, packages, versions by name. Searched packages by publisher. Searched versions by package.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16320
Summary:
Ref T8116. This adds a control for creating publishers (default: administrators) and default publisher/package edit controls.
I've left the edit defaults at "no one" for now to force you to select a policy. This might be something to look at later.
Test Plan: Created publishers, packages. Tried to create publishers with "can create" policy set restrictively.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16319
Summary:
Ref T8116. A version has:
- a package (like "Arcanist") which it belongs to;
- a name (like "v3.1.5").
The name is immutable and unique, like the package key and publisher key.
Policy stuff:
- Versions have the exact same policies as their packages.
- You must be able to edit a package to create new versions of it.
This is still entirely uninteresting.
Test Plan: {F1731703}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16316
Summary:
Ref T8116. A package has:
- a publisher (like "Phacility"), from the previous revision;
- a name (like "Arcanist");
- a package key (like "arcanist").
The package key is immutable, like the publisher key.
This gives a package a full key like "phacility/arcanist".
Policy stuff:
- You must be able to view a publisher to view a package (currently, everyone can always see all publishers).
- You must be able to edit a publisher to create a new package inside it.
- Packages have separate view/edit permissions.
This still does nothing interesting.
Test Plan: {F1731663}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16315
Summary:
Ref T8116. Partially scavenged from D14152. This roughs in a new Packages application for Arcanist extensions and third-party applications, and adds a "Publisher" object.
A "Publisher" represents an individual or entity who is publishing a package, like "Phacility". It's explicitly //not// necessarily the original author -- just the primary entity vouching for the safety of the code.
A publisher just has a name and a unique key for now. For example, Phacility might have "Phacility" and "phacility", respectively.
Unique keys are immutable, e.g., the package "phacility/arcanist" will always be exactly the same package by exactly the same publisher.
Test Plan: {F1731621}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16314
Summary:
Ref T11326. This isn't perfect, but should be a little easier to use and less weird/confusing.
Generally, provide a "Query > Month > Day" crumb on day views, and a "Wed, July 3" header.
Generally, provide a "Query > Month" crumb on month views, and a "July 2019" header.
Also try to fix a bit of padding/spacing on the day view.
Test Plan: {F1739128}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16338
Summary:
Ref T11326. When viewing "February", add a class to dates in January and March to let them be styled a little differently as a UI hint.
For now, I've given them a grey background. (Calendar.app changes the date number color instead.)
Test Plan: {F1738990}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16336
Summary:
Ref T11326. This doesn't go quite as far as the mock in T11326#185932, but gets rid of the easy margins.
Also cleans up some of the border rules so they're simpler and more consistent (no weird ragged edges on the far right).
Test Plan: {F1738951}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16335
Summary:
Ref T11326. Currently, we link Calendar days using hidden DOM nodes.
This is nice because it's simple, and right-clicking a day works properly. However, it's a bit ugly/unintuitive, messy, and unclear. It's especially messy because days are really two different rows, one for events and one for day/week numbers.
Instead, use JS to highlight day cells. You can still right-click by clicking the actual day number, which seems like a reasonable compromise.
Test Plan: {F1738941}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16334
Summary:
Ref T11326. When an event is all-day, hide the time controls for the start/end dates. These aren't used and aren't helpful/useful.
This got a little more complicated than it used to be because EditEngine forms may have only some of these controls present.
Test Plan: Edited an all-day event; edited a normal event; swapped an event between normal and all-day.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16327
Summary: When we have an info view in a column, the css isn't specific enough to override the core info-view css.
Test Plan: Review an importing repository, see info view properly spaced.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16331
Summary: This padding is a little off / custom. Normalizes it to the form on mobile.
Test Plan: Review some settings forms, save form changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16330
Summary: Mobile forms are super tight, this opens them up a little bit.
Test Plan: Review editing a document, task, mobile, tablet.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16329
Summary:
Fixes T11375. Some validation code was mishandling raw epoch timestamps.
For numeric values larger than 29999999 (e.g., 2999-12-25, christmas 2999), assume the value is a timestamp.
Test Plan: Used `maniphest.search` to query for `modifiedStart`, got a better result set and saw the `dateModified` constraint in the query.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11375
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16326
Summary:
Finishes fixing T11365. rP28199bcb48 added the new numeric entry
control and used it for TOTP setup, but missed the case of entering
a factor when TOTP was already set up.
Test Plan:
Observe behaviour of TOTP setup and subsequent factor entry
in iOS browser, make sure they're consistent.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T11365
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16325
Summary:
Fixes T11365. I tested these variants:
- `<input type="number" />`
- `<input type="text" pattern="\d*" />`
Of these, this one (using `pattern`) appears to have the best behavior: it shows the correct keyboard on iOS mobile and does nothing on desktops.
Using `type="number"` causes unwanted sub-controls to appear in desktop Safari, and a numbers + symbols keyboard to appear on iOS (presumably so users can type "." and "-" and maybe ",").
Test Plan: Tested variants in desktop browsers and iOS simulator, see here and T11365 for discussion.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11365
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16323
Summary:
Fix T11339.
Now, old and new are both simple lists of phids, and the rendering should make sense.
Test Plan: Viewed existing transaction with all 3 states.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11339
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16311
Summary:
See accompanying discussion in T11359.
As far as I can tell we aren't vulnerable, but subprocesses could be (now, or in the future). Reject any request which may have a `Proxy:` header.
This will also do a false-positive reject if `HTTP_PROXY` is defined in the environment, but this is likely a misconfiguration (cURL does not read it). I'll provide guidance on this.
Test Plan:
- Made requests using `curl -H Proxy:...`, got rejected.
- Made normal requests, got normal pages.
Reviewers: chad, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16318
Summary:
`mysql` has the magic feature of ignoring port arguments and using the socket when connecting to localhost.
This flag makes it not do that.
Test Plan: `./bin/storage shell`, execute `status`, see `Connection: localhost via TCP/IP`.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16317
Summary:
Fixes T11358. Entering a too-long title/subtitle currently raises an unfriendly (database-level) error.
Raise a friendlier error.
Test Plan: {F1731533}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11358
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16313
Summary:
Fixes T10750. Files have some outdated cache/key code which prevents recording an edit history on file comments.
Remove this ancient cruft.
(Users must `bin/storage adjust` after upgrading to this patch to reap the benefits.)
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage adjust`.
- Edited a comment in Files.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16312
Summary: Ref T11326. This makes it a little easier to jump back up to check out your day.
Test Plan: {F1725575}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16309
Summary: Ref T11326. This just cleans things up a little and removes some of the obvious layout/CSS issues.
Test Plan:
- Viewed day view before/after. Also viewed profile panel.
Before:
{F1725547}
After:
{F1725548}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16308
Summary:
Ref T11326. This just inches things forward a little bit:
- Make it easier to see current day.
- Line-through cancelled events.
- Don't colorize the whole event title, just use an Attending/Invited/Custom icon.
- Slightly subtler treatment for all-day events.
Test Plan: See screenshot in T11326.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16306
Summary:
Ref T11326. Normally, events occur at a specific epoch, independent of the viewer. For example, if we're having a meeting in 35 hours, every user who looks at the event will see that it starts 35 hours from now.
But when an event is "All Day", the start time and end time depend on the //viewer//. A day like "Christmas" does not start at the same time for everyone: it starts sooner if you're in a more-eastern timezone. Baiscally, an event on "July 15th" starts whenever "July 15th" starts for whoever is looking at it.
Previously, we stored these events by using the western-most and eastern-most timezones as the start and end times (the earliest possible start and latest possible end).
This worked OK, but we get into a bunch of trouble with EditEngine, mostly because each field can be updated individually now. We can't easily tell if an event is all-day or not when reading or updating the start time and end time, and making that easier would introduce a huge amount of complexity.
Instead, when we update the start or end time, we write //two// times:
- The epoch timestamp of the time the user entered, which is the start time we will use if the event is a normal event.
- The epoch timestamp of 12:00 AM in UTC on the same date as the //local// date the user entered. This is pretty much like just storing the date the user actually typed. This is what w'ell use if the event is an all-day event.
Then, no matter whether the event is later made all-day or not, we have all the information we need to display it correctly.
Test Plan:
- Created and edited all-day events.
- Migrated existing all-day events, which appeared to survive without problems. (Note that events all-day which were created or edited in the last couple of days `master` won't survive this mutation correctly and will need to be fixed.)
- Created and edited normal, recurring, and recurring all-day events.
- Swapped back to `stable`, created an event, specifically migrated it forward, made sure it survived with times intact.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16305
Summary: Ref T11326. Align this stuff with "Host" and "hostPHID".
Test Plan: Searched for events by host.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16303
Summary:
Ref T11326. This gets rid of the old multi-paged form stuff used in the last version of Diffusion.
This incidentally removes a callsite for a date control to make it a little easier to simplify them.
Test Plan: Grepped for all removed classes, no more callsites.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16302
Summary:
Ref T11326. These are last-generation and neither of these have callsites anymore.
(I nuked these since I'm trying to simplify date handling.)
Test Plan: Grepped for callsites.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16301
Summary: Ref T11326. Use modern methods instead of building this stuff separately.
Test Plan: Used `E123`, `{E123}`, saw references render normally.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16300
Summary:
Ref T11326. Try to make this a little more useful:
- Don't show entire attendee list (not useful?)
- Show host (useful?)
- Show your own status prominently (attending vs declined vs invited).
- Show cancelled events prominently.
Test Plan: {F1723550}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16299
Summary:
Ref T11326. Show this information with a subheader instead of in properties.
Also, slightly simplify the list view.
Test Plan: {F1723539}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16298
Summary:
Ref T11326. Currently, events show the icon as a property, like this:
> Icon: Default
This is boring and terrible. Show the icon in the header instead:
{F1723530}
Also minor cleanup on active/cancel states.
Test Plan: Viewed an event, saw icon.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16297
Summary:
Ref T11326. Currently, we render "E (99)" for ghost instances, which is meaningless and inconsistent.
Render these more sensibly and consistently.
Test Plan: Viewed event list, saw reasonable monograms / object names.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16296
Summary:
Ref T4788. One install has some particularly impressive task graphs which are thousands of nodes large.
The current graph is pretty broken in these cases. For now, just render a "too big to show" message. In the future, I'd plan to finesse this (e.g., show parents/children, show links to parents/children, etc).
Test Plan:
- Viewed a normal task.
- Set limit to 3, viewed a task with graph size 6, saw an error message.
- Viewed a revision stack graph (unaffected).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16295
Summary:
Fixes T9224. This adds:
- A "Default Edit Policy" and "Default View Policy" to Calendar, similar to other applications.
- "Event Host" and "Event Invitees" objects policies.
These policies often end up being redundant (the host can always view/edit, the invitees can always view), but they can be more clear than setting "No One", and "Editable By: Event Invitees" is a legitimately useful policy.
Test Plan:
- Created and edited events.
- Fiddled with defaults.
- Tried to remove myself as the event host for an "Editable By: Host" event, got an error ("you wouldn't be able to edit").
- Tried to remove myself as host/invitee for an "Editable By: Invitees" event, got an error.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9224
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16294
Summary: Modular transactions have slightly more modern ways to express values now.
Test Plan: Looked at transaction record of a paste.
Reviewers: chad, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16293
Summary:
Fixes T10909. I think this is a generally reasonable sort of capability to expose, although I've made it edit-only for now (when creating an event, you're always the host).
Also clean up some minor leftovers in the code, and a couple of little bugs with recurrence frequencies.
Test Plan: Created an event, edited the host of an event.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16292
Summary: Ref T10909. Ref T9224. We label this field "Host" in the UI; make the storage format consistent.
Test Plan:
- Viewed month view, day view, detail view of an event.
- Created a new event, saw myself as the host.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9224, T10909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16291
Summary: Fixes T9202.
Test Plan:
- Viewed day in 12-hour, saw "8:00 PM".
- Viewed day in 24-hour, saw "16:00".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9202, T10932
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16290
Summary:
Fixes T8911. This corrects several issues which could crop up if a calendar event query matched more results than the query limit:
- The desired order was not applied by the SearchEngine -- it applies the first builtin order instead. Provide a proper builtin order.
- When we generate ghosts, we can't do limiting in the database because we may select and then immediately discard a large number of parent events which are outside of the query range.
- For now, just don't limit results to get the behavior correct.
- This may need to be refined eventually to improve performance.
- When trimming events, we could trim parents and fail to generate ghosts from them. Separate parent events out first.
- Try to simplify some logic.
Test Plan: An "Upcoming" dashboard panel with limit 10 and the main Calendar "Upcoming Events" UI now show the same results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8911
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16289
Summary: Ref T7944. The search method is a bit bare-bones for now, but these substantially work.
Test Plan: Edited events via API; queried events via API.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7944
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16288
Summary:
Fixes T10633. When generating email about a transaction which adjusts a date, render the offset explicitly (like "UTC-7").
This makes it more clear in cases like this:
- mail is being sent to multiple users, and not necessarily using the viewer's settings;
- you get some mail while travelling and aren't sure which timezone setting it generated under.
Test Plan: Rendered in text mode, saw UTC offset.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10633
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16287
Summary:
Ref T9275. Swaps Calendar over to modular transactions. Theoretically, this has almost no effect on anything.
Ref T10633. I didn't actually do anything here yet, but this gets us ready to put timestamps in email.
Test Plan: Created and edited a bunch of events, nothing seemed catastrophically broken.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275, T10633
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16286
Summary: Ref T9275. I waffled back and forth on these transactions a bit, but put these back here in better working order.
Test Plan: Tried to schedule an event on "taco".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16285
Summary:
Ref T9275. We were rendering too many transactions and/or over-rendering invitees.
Clean this logic up a bit:
- List all before/after invitees.
- Simplify the lists before rendering.
Test Plan: Viewed an event, edited invitees, got sensible human-readable transactions.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16284
