Summary: title. Ref T2784.
Test Plan: foreach of SVN, Mercurial, and Git, loaded up a repository. Verified that only git had a tags box and it showed up correctly. Went to CALLSIGN/tags and verified that only git had a tags box and it showed up correctly. Went to various commits across vcs and verified it said "none" unless it was a git commit that also was tagged.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5894
Summary: see title. Ref T2784.
Test Plan:
In diffusion, for each of SVN, Mercurial, and Git, I loaded up /diffusion/CALLSIGN/. I verified the README was displayed and things looked good. Next I clicked on "browse" on the top-most commit and verified things looked correct. Also clicked through to a file for a good measure and things looked good.
In owners, for each of SVN, Mercurial, and Git, I played around with the path typeahead / validator. It worked correctly!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5883
Summary: Ref T2784. This is probably pretty good except the fancy lint error saver now issue serial queries via Conduit.
Test Plan: reparsed commits on 3 repos - yay. viewed readme from diffusion UI on 3 repos - yay. viewed file content from diffusion UI on 3 repos - yay.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5824
Summary: ref T2784. This one had a few fun spots where I had to move data around. Also, is there some common object (or should I add it?) that can do this toDictionary newFromConduit stuff? Also, this assumes D5803 is largely correct at the time of this diff.
Test Plan: browsed mercurial and git repository page. saw the branches i expected.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5810
Summary: le title. However, this also "is the first" conversion so sets the precedence for how this will all work. See comments in the code. I think this helps us keep the new code we're writing to a minimum. Wondering if the conduit end point could be more generic, and rather than have a switch statement on VCS type, one can just implement the "handleSubversion" version and have that called? Ref T2784
Test Plan: slapped an "or true" in the conditional protecting this code path. verified it worked on all 3 vcs systems, including typing in garbage and getting a 404
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5803
Summary: Fixes T2698. When applications are installed, their Conduit calls should drop out. This will also let us land Releeph without exposing Conduit calls.
Test Plan:
- Viewed Conduit console; uninstalled some applications and verified their calls dropped out.
- Tried to make an uninstalled call; got an appropriate error.
Reviewers: edward, btrahan
Reviewed By: edward
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2698
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5302
Summary: Mostly applies a new call spacing rule; also a few things that have slipped through via pull requests and such
Test Plan: `find src/ -type f -name '*.php' | xargs -n16 arc lint --output summary --apply-patches`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5002
