Summary:
Ref T10747. When a user drops a ".ics" file or a bunch of ".ics" files into a calendar view, import the events.
(Possibly we should just do this if you drop ".ics" files into any application, but we can look at that later.)
Test Plan: Dropped some .ics files into calendar views, got imports.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10747
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16722
Summary: Ref T11730. Removes the front end crop feature. Will follow up with proper removal, but this seems broken outright.
Test Plan:
Edit a room, don't seen "Crop" feature. Upload new photo, works fine.
- grep for `ConpherencePicCropControl`
- grep for `aphront-crop`
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11730
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16665
Summary: Adds a class for explicitly hiding the sidenav.
Test Plan: Set Config to Enable Filetree. View a diff, see tree. Press `f`, see it go away. Reload page, see persistence.
Reviewers: avivey, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16359
Summary: Ref T10252. This is similar to D16259, but makes KeyboardShortcutManager more relaxed about `altKey` when typing obscure characters.
Test Plan: Pressed Option + Shift + 7 on a German keyboard layout, saw Conphernece sidebar toggle.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10252
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16260
Summary:
Ref T4788. When closing a task as a duplicate of another task, you can only select one task, since it doesn't really make sense to merge one task into several other tasks (this operation is //possible//, but probably not what anyone ever wants to do, I think?).
Make the UI understand this: after you select a task, disable all of the "select" buttons in the UI to make this clear.
Test Plan:
- Used "Close as Duplicate", only allowed to select 1 task.
- Used other editors like "Merge Duplicates In", allowed to select lots of tasks.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16203
Summary:
Ref T11179. Ref T4768. Currently, on `master`, if two users open "Edit Revisions" at the same time, then add revisions A and B, only the last state wins (just "B").
Instead, apply these as "add A" and "add B" so they merge in a natural way.
Test Plan:
- Opened edit dialog in two windows.
- Added "A" in one, "B" in the other.
- Saved both.
- Saw "Added A" and "Added B" transactions, instead of "Added A" and "Removed A, added B".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16164
Summary:
Ref T8510. Sort prefix matches above non-prefix matches, so that "Ape Discovery" does not match "discovery" better than "Discovery".
Sort functions last.
Rename function internal strings so they don't get over-promoted the prefix-match rules.
Add kind of a hack to get "Project X" sorting above all the "Project X (Milestone 1)" results.
Test Plan:
Created "Ape Discovery", "Baboon Discovery", "Chimpanzee Discovery", etc.
Main project now sorts above milestones:
{F1681773}
Prefix matches now sort above other matches:
{F1681774}
Function results (rarely used) are now less prominent:
{F1681775}
Better function results here:
{F1681776}
More function results:
{F1681777}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8510
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16094
Summary:
Fixes T10402.
I tried about 50 variations on the wording and notification layout, this seemed by far the most reasonable.
Didn't implement a way to ignore the warning, which might be required - but figured this is serious and broken enough while being completely invisible 99% of the time that it's worth shouting about.
Test Plan: Messed around with $_SERVER['HTTPS'] on the server side and client_uri on the client side - saw reasonable results in all combinations.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T10402
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16064
Summary:
Ref T4103. This removes these options:
{F1660585}
The jump nav option came from T916, when we had a separate jump nav on the home page. Essentially no one has ever been confused by the behavior of search or disabled this feature. Here are the stats for this install:
| Total Users | 36656 |
| Have Set Any Preference | 3084 |
| Have Disabled Jump | 6
| Are Not "Security Researchers" | 2
| Any Account Activity | 0
The "/" option came in the same change, but the preference came from T989. This keystroke conflicts with a default Firefox keystroke. Almost no one cares about this either, but I count 6 real users who have disabled the behavior. I suspect the number of real users who //use// it may be smaller.
In Safari and Firefox, the "tab" key does the same thing.
In Chrome, the "tab" key does the same thing if {nav Preferences > Web Content > "Pressing Tab highlights..."} is disabled.
Upshot: jump nav is great, bulk of the change in T989 was clearly great, specific preferences that came out of it seem not-so-great and now is a good time to kill them as we head into T4103.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed constants.
- Pressed "/".
- Searched for `T123`.
- Viewed settings.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4103
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15976
Summary:
Ref T3025. Chrome gives us an easily-accessible, much better guess at which timezone the user is in.
Firefox also exposes "Intl" but this doesn't seem to be a reliable method to read the timezone.
Test Plan:
In Chrome, swapped my system date/time between zones, clicked the "reconcile" popup, got the dropdown prefilled accurately.
In Safari (no `Intl` API) got the normal flow with no default selected.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3025
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15962
Summary: Ref T3025. This adds a check for different client/server timezone offsets and gives users an option to fix them or ignore them.
Test Plan:
- Fiddled with timezone in Settings and System Preferences.
- Got appropriate prompts and behavior after simulating various trips to and from exotic locales.
In particular, this slightly tricky case seems to work correctly:
- Travel to NY.
- Ignore discrepancy (you're only there for a couple hours for an important meeting, and returning to SF on a later flight).
- Return to SF for a few days.
- Travel back to NY.
- You should be prompted again, since you left the timezone after you ignored the discrepancy.
{F1654528}
{F1654529}
{F1654530}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3025
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15961
Summary: Bumping this up higher since two column views get extra tight fast below 900 px. This felt most correct to me, dialing it back from first attempt at 960. Mostly I don't want to ever accidentally trigger it when I'm on the 12" MacBook. Ref T10926
Test Plan: Durable Column, Workboards, Dashboards, Tasks.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: avivey, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10926
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15960
Summary:
Ref T5187. This definitely feels a bit flimsy and I'm going to hold it until I cut the release since it changes a couple of things about Workflow in general, but it seems to work OK and most of it is fine.
The intent is described in T5187#176236.
In practice, most of that works like I describe, then the `phui-file-upload` behavior gets some weird glue to figure out if the input is part of the form. Not the most elegant system, but I think it'll hold until we come up with many reasons to write a lot more Javascript.
Test Plan:
Used both drag-and-drop and the upload dialog to upload files in Safari, Firefox and Chrome.
{F1653716}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5187
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15953
Summary:
Ref T10923. This makes the "Clone URI" UI a little nicer:
- Show whether each URI is read-only, read-write, or external.
- Clicking the button selects the URI.
- Add a link to manage the appropriate credentials.
Test Plan: {F1308302, size=full}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15891
Summary: Fixes T9295
Test Plan: Create event, open datepicker for start date, choose 1/31/2016, open datepicker again, click right button to scroll month. New suggested date should be 2/29/2016
Reviewers: chad, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9295
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15727
Summary: Fixes T9296
Test Plan: Create an event, change start time to `3PM`, end value should update to `4:00 PM`, not `4:0 PM`
Reviewers: chad, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9296
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15725
Summary:
Ref T4571. Allows users to click the "read-only mode" notification to get more information about why an install is in read-only mode.
Installs can be in this mode for several reasons (explicit administrative action, no masters defined, no masters reachable), and it's useful to be able to tell the difference.
Test Plan: {F1212930}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4571
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15671
Summary:
Ref T4571. There will be a very long path beyond this, but add a basic read-only mode. You can explicitly enable this to put Phabricator in a sort of "maintenance" mode today if you're swapping databases or something.
In the long term, we'll automatically degrade into this mode if the master database is down.
Test Plan:
- Enabled read-only mode.
- Browsed around.
- Didn't immediately see anything that was totally 100% broken.
Most stuff is 80-90% broken right now. For example:
- Stuff like submitting comments doesn't work, and gives you a confusing, unhelpful error.
- None of the UI really knows that it's read-only. EditEngine stuff should all hide itself and say "you can't add new comments while an install is in read-only mode", for example, but currently does not.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4571
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15662
Summary:
This fix further addresses T10229. The problem and solution are the same:
- If the DOM is mutated during a touch, it never registers as a 'click' so the tapped button does not activate.
- This was partially addressed in D15136, which covered taps on code lines in a Differential view.
- Tapping on some buttons, like "Reply" or "Hide Comment" still caused the problem by showing a tooltip.
- There are probably similar buttons elsewhere, other than in Differential, exhibiting the same 'needs multiple taps to work' behaviour.
- The testing in the iOS simulator performed for D15136 did not reveal that the problem with "Hide comment" and such remained because the small device size used for testing triggered the `!= 'desktop'` path for tooltips.
To fix it:
- Don't show tooltips for touch events. You can't 'hover' with a finger (with today's tech) so that UI paradigm doesn't apply.
- Show the tooltips for regular mouse events, even if they are on the same device. Some devices have both touch and a mouse.
- No longer try to rely on a distinction between 'desktop' and 'mobile' devices. Mobile devices like the iPad Pro are essentially desktop like, and as mentioned above, a single device could be both touch and mouse enabled. It's not about the nature of the device, it's about the nature of the interaction.
Test Plan:
- Tapped "Hide Comment", "Reply" on an iPad Pro running iOS 9.2 and got single touch responses with no tooltips.
- Tried the same on an iPhone 6 running iOS 9.2.
- Hovered over the same on a regular desktop in Safari and saw tooltips. Clicked and saw regular reactions.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15310
Summary:
Ref T4900. The root problem is that dragging stuff near the bottom of the board can cause jittery, jumpy behaviors.
Internal scrolling has changed the nature of this problem. Previously, the height of the board itself would jump around, but it's now fixed so the height of columns jumps around instead.
We could take the same approach and add a chunk to the bottom of each column when a drag starts, but this is really distracting visually since it's obvious to the user.
Instead, treat columns as infinitely tall (so dragging beneath them still counts as dragging to the bottom position).
Test Plan:
- View a board with a column taller than the screen (has a scrollbar).
- Drag a card to near the bottom position.
- Move the mouse down a little bit at a time, continuing toward the bottom of the page.
- Before patch: at some point, UI flips out and starts rapidly adding, scrolling, and removing the ghost.
- After patch: sensible behavior, ghost is in bottom position for all cursor locations.
Also works for dragging to the top.
(This leaves us with a little less dead space for cancelling drags, but you've still got the left menu, anything offscreen, and the escape key, which seems fine.)
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15227
Summary: This scroll lock thing prevented both X and Y scrolling, but should only prevent Y scrolling. Dragging a card to the edge to scroll left/right is fine.
Test Plan: Scrolled a workboard left/right by dragging a card to the edge.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15213
Summary:
Ref T5240.
- Columns are fixed height.
- Columns scroll internally.
- Drag behaviors generally align with these column behaviors.
Test Plan: {F1099061}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15209
Summary:
Currently, in Safari, if you drag an image onto a board to make it a cover file and then wave it around wildly a lot over differnent cards, it sometimes glitches out a bit and won't drop on them properly.
This appears to be because sequencing and delivery of dragenter/dragleave events isn't always totally ideal.
Instead, just cancel any existing drag when we get a new drag that targets a new drop target.
Test Plan:
- Opened a board with a bunch of cards.
- Dragged a file from my desktop onto the board.
- Waved it around wildly, hovering over many different cards.
- Before patch: sometimes cards under the cursor stopped highlighting properly.
- After patch: behavior seems correct and consistent.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15208
Summary: This was slightly more complex than I believed, but not too terrible.
Test Plan:
{F1096126}
- Also used some normal file uploaders to make sure I didn't break that.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15202
Summary:
Ref T10289. This probably doesn't cover everything but should do a little bit better.
Although we should mabye just exlude milestones from this menu completely?
Test Plan: {F1093937}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10289
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15191
Summary: No UI changes, just some search and replace for UI consistency.
Test Plan: Test person and object hovercards still work. UIExamples too.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15172
Summary:
Ref T5240. This probably has some bugs and doesn't quite work in Firefox (fine on boards, not quite on the task list -- some issue with body or document being special, I think).
I think this is close enough that we can throw it out there and see how users manage to break it, though. It's not worse than what we've got now? I think?
Test Plan:
dragged things near the edge of other things
they seemed to move around OK
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10188
Summary:
Ref T5240.
- Add proper class when dropping cards.
- Add proper class when creating new cards.
- Make X-drag explicit so that it works if there's only one column.
- Stop tootips when dragging, resume them after dropping.
- Move CSS rule for consistency.
- Allow user to hit "Escape" to cancel an in-progress drag.
Test Plan:
- Dropped cards.
- Created new cards.
- X-dragged on a workboard with one column and a dashboard.
- Dragged over a tooltip (no tip), dropped, moused over tooltip (tip).
- Hit escape during a drag.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cspeckmim
Maniphest Tasks: T5240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15163
Summary:
Ref T5240. Currently, when dragging nodes, we leave them where they are in the document and apply "position: relative;" so we can move them around on screen.
- Pros: All the CSS still works.
- Cons: Can't drag them outside the nearest containing element with "overflow: hidden;", many subtle positioning bugs with scrollable containers.
Instead, this diff leaves the thing we're dragging exactly where it is, clones it, and drags the clone instead.
- Pros: You can drag it anywhere. Seems to fix all the scrolling container problems.
- Cons: CSS which depends on a container class no longer works.
The CSS thing is bad, but doesn't seem too unreasonable to fix. Basically, we just need to put some `phui-this-is-a-workboard-card` class on the cards, and use that to style them instead of `phui-workboard-view`, and then do something similar for draggable lists.
Although we no longer need to drag cards to tabs with the current design, I think there's a reasonable chance we'll revisit that later. The current design also calls for scrollable columns, but there would be no way to drag cards outside of their current column with the current approach.
NOTE: This does not attempt to fix the CSS, so dragging is pretty rough, since the "clone" loses a number of container classes and thus a number of rules. I'll clean up the CSS in the next change.
Test Plan:
- Dragged stuff around on task lists, workboards, and sort lists (e.g., pinned applications) in Safari, Firefox and Chrome.
- Scrolled window and containers (workboards) during drag.
- Dragged stuff out of the workboard.
- Dragged stuff offscreen.
- CSS is funky, but I can no longer find any positioning or layout issues in any browser.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15160
Summary: Ref T5240. This property does nothing.
Test Plan: Search, drag a card around.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15159
Summary:
Ref T5240. Currently, we calculate drag positions assuming the "ghost" element is not present (it isn't, usually), then adjust them while dragging to account for the ghost.
However, this fails after scrolling: we dirty the cache, but the ghost //is// present. We continue adjusting for it, but essentially double-adjust. This leads to scroll positions being about 80-ish px off from where they should be.
Test Plan:
- Begin dragging a task in a long task list.
- While dragging, use mousewheel to scroll to the bottom of the list.
- Drag task downward through the list.
- Before fix: ghost is off by, like, an inch or so.
- After fix: ghost position is accurate to cursor position.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15157
Summary:
Fixes T10229. Broadly:
- When the user hovers over a line number or inline comment, we update the yellow reticle to highlight the relevant lines. Specifically, this is in response to a `mouseover` event.
- On touch devices, touches fire `mouseover` and if you mutate the DOM inside the event, the device aborts the touch.
To remedy this:
- Distingiush between mouse-originated and touch-originated cursor events.
- We do this, roughly, by setting a flag when we see "touchstart", and clearing it when we see the second copy of any unique cursor event.
- This method is complex, but should be robust to any implementation differences between devices (for example, it will work no matter which order the events are fired in).
- This method should also produce the correct results on weird devices that have both mouse-devices and touch-devices available for cursor input.
- When we see a touch-originated `mouseover` or `mouseout`, don't mutate the DOM.
- Put an extra DOM mutation into the `click` event to improve highlighting behavior on touch devices.
Test Plan:
- In iOS Simulator (4s, iOS 9.2), clicked various inline actions ("Reply", "Hide", "Done", "Cancel", line numbers, etc). Got responses after a single touch.
- Verified hover + click behavior on a desktop.
- Logged and examined a bunch of events as a general sanity check.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: aljungberg
Maniphest Tasks: T10229
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15136
Summary: Ref T10229. Fixes T9969. We make a decision about 1up vs 2up pretty early, and sometimes the viewport size reads as larger than the device, so we incorrectly select 2up when the proper setting would be 1up.
Test Plan:
I can reproduce this by, e.g., reloading a lot on an iPhone 4s in iOS Simulator running iOS 9.2. Sometimes it picks 2-up. I added logging to show that the viewport dimension read was the issue.
After this change, it always selects 1-up (`window.screen.availWidth` is defined and sensible on the device).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9969, T10229
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15135
Summary:
Ref T10163.
- If you click a result, we get a blur before your click hits, and deactivate before the click can work. Instead, wait before responding to blur.
- Use the standard sort handler which puts unixnames over human names. Also use the standard filter which deals with disabled users not matching unless they're the only match.
Test Plan:
- Clicked a result, got a replacement.
- Named myself "dog dog", typed "@dog", user "@dog" was now first match despite me being "@admin".
- Used normal typeaheads to make sure I didn't break sort handler.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15031
Summary: Ref T3725. This probably has 900,000 bugs. This will need updates for subprojects/milestones.
Test Plan:
- Tested very gently in Safari, Firefox and Chrome.
- Reasonable inputs appear to work.
- Clicking, escape, tab, return, arrow keys work OK?
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3725
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15029
Summary:
Ref T10010. Ref T5819. General alignment of the stars:
- There were some hacks in Conduit around stripping `fa-...` off icons when reading and writing that I wanted to get rid of.
- We probably have room for a subtitle in the new heavy nav, and using the icon name is a good starting point (and maybe good enough on its own?)
- The project list was real bad looking with redundant tag/names, now it is very slightly less bad looking with non-redundant types?
- Some installs will want to call Milestones something else, and this gets us a big part of the way there.
- This may slightly help to reinforce "tag" vs "policy" vs "group" stuff?
---
I'm letting installs have enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot (e.g., define 100 icons). It isn't the end of the world if they reuse icons, and is clearly their fault.
I think the cases where 100 icons will break down are:
- Icon selector dialog may get very unwieldy.
- Query UI will be pretty iffy/huge with 100 icons.
We could improve these fairly easily if an install comes up with a reasonable use case for having 100 icons.
---
The UI on the icon itself in the list views is a little iffy -- mostly, it's too saturated/bold.
I'd ideally like to try either:
- rendering a "shade" version (i.e. lighter, less-saturated color); or
- rendering a "shade" tag with just the icon in it.
However, there didn't seem to be a way to do the first one right now (`fa-example sh-blue` doesn't work) and the second one had weird margins/padding, so I left it like this for now. I figure we can clean it up once we build the thick nav, since that will probably also want an identical element.
(I don't want to render a full tag with the icon + name since I think that's confusing -- it looks like a project/object tag, but is not.)
Test Plan:
{F1049905}
{F1049906}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: 20after4, Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T5819, T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14918
Summary: Ref T10004. This control doesn't disable visually or behaviorally, e.g. when locked in an EditEngine configuration.
Test Plan:
- Locked field for Projects.
- Reviewed form in EditEngine.
- Created/edited a project.
- Swapped default.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14911
Summary: Ref T10004. This primarily supports moving Phame to EditEngine.
Test Plan: {F1045166}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14887
Summary: Ref T8980. Previously, if you had like `T123T123T123` and waved your mouse over them, we wouldn't move the card. Now, move the card.
Test Plan: Waved mouse. Saw the card move.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8980
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14881
Summary: Ref T8980. This calculation was not quite right and you could sneak one off screen if you tried carefully.
Test Plan: Couldn't sneak one off screen anymore.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8980
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14880
Summary:
Ref T8980. Move away from events to EngineExtensions.
This also simplifies hovercards a bit:
- Removes tasks from revision cards.
- Removes blockers/blocked from task cards.
- Removes "Send Message" from user cards.
These mostly felt cluttery to me. Open to arguments to retain them. I think we can make better use of the space, though (e.g., flags, projects + board columns).
Test Plan:
- Viewed people, task, revision, commit and project hovercards.
{F1043256}
{F1043257}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8980
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14878
Summary:
Ref T3967. This gives us a reasonable baseline for doing remarkup previews inline in all contexts, and works in weird/constrained context including:
- inline comments;
- conpherence; and
- custom fields.
It would be nicer to go beyond this in contexts like Phame posts, but this is a start, at least.
Test Plan:
{F1040877}
{F1040878}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14855
Summary:
Fixes T10039. We add text to textareas in two cases:
- Users clicking assitance buttons in Remarkup text areas.
- Drag-and-drop file uploads.
In case (1), it makes sense to highlight the text (it shows the user what we inserted, and lets them undo the action easily if it isn't what they wanted).
In case (2), it does not. Users almost never want to delete or edit a file reference. It is slightly nice to have the reference as a visual callout, but I don't think this is a big deal.
Change the behavior so that we highlight only for remarkup buttons, not for drag-and-drop files.
Test Plan:
- Clicked an "isnert quote" button on remarkup assist area, got highlighted example text.
- Dragged and dropped a file, got text inserted with no highlight.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14851
Summary: Fixes T9871. Ref T10004. These won't win any awards but it fixes them being incredibly weird and confusing.
Test Plan:
{F1029090}
- Tried to use controls, got reasonable behavior.
- Used normal controls to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9871, T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14814
Summary:
Ref T10004. After a user logs in, we send them to the "next" URI cookie if there is one, but currently don't always do a very good job of selecting a "next" URI, especially if they tried to do something with a dialog before being asked to log in.
In particular, if a logged-out user clicks an action like "Edit Blocking Tasks" on a Maniphest task, the default behavior is to send them to the standalone page for that dialog after they log in. This can be pretty confusing.
See T2691 and D6416 for earlier efforts here. At that time, we added a mechanism to //manually// override the default behavior, and fixed the most common links. This worked, but I'd like to fix the //default// beahvior so we don't need to remember to `setObjectURI()` correctly all over the place.
ApplicationEditor has also introduced new cases which are more difficult to get right. While we could get them right by using the override and being careful about things, this also motivates fixing the default behavior.
Finally, we have better tools for fixing the default behavior now than we did in 2013.
Instead of using manual overrides, have JS include an "X-Phabricator-Via" header in Ajax requests. This is basically like a referrer header, and will contain the page the user's browser is on.
In essentially every case, this should be a very good place (and often the best place) to send them after login. For all pages currently using `setObjectURI()`, it should produce the same behavior by default.
I'll remove the `setObjectURI()` mechanism in the next diff.
Test Plan: Clicked various workflow actions while logged out, saw "next" get set to a reasonable value, was redirected to a sensible, non-confusing page after login (the page with whatever button I clicked on it).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14804
