Summary:
adds a Phabricator OAuth server, which has three big commands:
- auth - allows $user to authorize a given client or application. if $user has already authorized, it hands an authoization code back to $redirect_uri
- token - given a valid authorization code, this command returns an authorization token
- whoami - Conduit.whoami, all nice and purdy relative to the oauth server.
Also has a "test" handler, which I used to create some test data. T850 will
delete this as it adds the ability to create this data in the Phabricator
product.
This diff also adds the corresponding client in Phabricator for the Phabricator
OAuth Server. (Note that clients are known as "providers" in the Phabricator
codebase but client makes more sense relative to the server nomenclature)
Also, related to make this work well
- clean up the diagnostics page by variabilizing the provider-specific
information and extending the provider classes as appropriate.
- augment Conduit.whoami for more full-featured OAuth support, at least where
the Phabricator client is concerned
What's missing here... See T844, T848, T849, T850, and T852.
Test Plan:
- created a dummy client via the test handler. setup development.conf to have
have proper variables for this dummy client. went through authorization and
de-authorization flows
- viewed the diagnostics page for all known oauth providers and saw
provider-specific debugging information
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T44, T797
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1595
Summary:
Some browsers will still sniff content types even with "Content-Type" and
"X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff". Encode "<" and ">" to prevent them from
sniffing the content as HTML.
See T865.
Also unified some of the code on this pathway.
Test Plan: Verified Opera no longer sniffs the Conduit response into HTML for
the test case in T865. Unit tests pass.
Reviewers: cbg, btrahan
Reviewed By: cbg
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T139, T865
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1606
Summary:
we use to only add X-Frame-Options for AphrontWebpageResponse.
There some security concern about it. Example of a drag-drop attack:
http://sites.google.com/site/tentacoloviola/. The fix is to add it to
all AphrontResponse.
Test Plan:
View page which disalble this option still works (like the
xhpast tree page); verify that the AphrontAjaxResponse contains the
X-Frame-Options in the header.
Reviewers: epriestley, benmathews
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: nh, aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 926
