Summary: Ref T4830. Also deletes some very obsolete code.
Test Plan: Looked at Facts as logged out user.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4830
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9177
Summary:
Lots of killed `phutil_escape_html()`.
Done by searching for `AphrontTableView` and then `$rows` (usually) backwards.
Test Plan:
Looked at homepage.
echo id(new AphrontTableView(array(array('<'))))->render();
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4884
Summary: Done by searching for `AphrontErrorView` and then `appendChild()`.
Test Plan:
Looked at Commit Detail.
Looked at Revision Detail.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4843
Summary:
Created with spatch:
lang=diff
- phutil_render_tag
+ phutil_tag
(X, Y, '...')
Then searched for `&` and `<` in the output and replaced them.
Test Plan: Loaded homepage.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4503
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary:
Firefox has a limit of ~500,000 elements which can be passed in literal array.
This amount of data is meaningless anyway because even Retina displays don't have such resolution.
Limit the amount of data to mitigate browser limitations and also reduce the page size.
Ensure that first and last element is passed.
I considered also reducing the granularity to days but I want new repositories to have nice precise graph.
Test Plan: Displayed the chart in Firefox.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3134
Summary: For any count fact, allow a chart to be drawn. INCREDIBLY POWERFUL DATA ANALYSIS PLATFORM.
Test Plan: Drew a chart of object counts. Drew the Maniphest burn chart.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1562
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3099
Summary: Not totally sure about this but I think it's okay?
Test Plan: Loaded /fact/, got a more readable page.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1562
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3090
Summary:
Some facts are aggregations of other facts. For example, we may compute how many times each macro is used in each object as a "raw fact":
Dnnn uses macro "psyduck" 6 times.
But we want to present this data in aggregate form, e.g. "order macros by popularity". We can do this at runtime and it probably won't be too awful a query, but we can also aggregate it cheaply:
Macro "psyduck" is used 3920 times across all objects.
...and then do a query like "select macros ordered by usage".
"Aggregate" facts support facts like this. The aggregate facts I've implemented are:
- Count of all objects.
- Count of objects of type X.
- Last time facts were updated.
These clearly fit the "aggregate" facts template well. I'm not 100% sure macros do. We can use this table to answer a question like "What are the most popular macros, ordered by use?" We can also use it to answer a question like "What are the most popular macros in the last 6 months?", if we build a specific fact for that. But we can't use it to answer a question like "What are the most popular macros between times X and Y?". Maybe that's important; maybe not.
This seems like a good fit for at least some types of facts.
I'll de-magic the keys a bit in the next diff.
Test Plan: Ran the engines and got some aggregated facts about other facts.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1562
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3089
