Summary:
- Add an option for the queue.
- By default, enable it.
- Dump new users into the queue.
- Send admins an email to approve them.
Test Plan:
- Registered new accounts with queue on and off.
- As an admin, approved accounts and disabled the queue from email.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7576
Summary:
Small step forward which improves existing stuff or lays groudwork for future stuff:
- Currently, to check for email verification, we have to single-query the email address on every page. Instead, denoramlize it into the user object.
- Migrate all the existing users.
- When the user verifies an email, mark them as `isEmailVerified` if the email is their primary email.
- Just make the checks look at the `isEmailVerified` field.
- Add a new check, `isUserActivated()`, to cover email-verified plus disabled. Currently, a non-verified-but-not-disabled user could theoretically use Conduit over SSH, if anyone deployed it. Tighten that up.
- Add an `isApproved` flag, which is always true for now. In a future diff, I want to add a default-on admin approval queue for new accounts, to prevent configuration mistakes. The way it will work is:
- When the queue is enabled, registering users are created with `isApproved = false`.
- Admins are sent an email, "[Phabricator] New User Approval (alincoln)", telling them that a new user is waiting for approval.
- They go to the web UI and approve the user.
- Manually-created accounts are auto-approved.
- The email will have instructions for disabling the queue.
I think this queue will be helpful for new installs and give them peace of mind, and when you go to disable it we have a better opportunity to warn you about exactly what that means.
Generally, I want to improve the default safety of registration, since if you just blindly coast through the path of least resistance right now your install ends up pretty open, and realistically few installs are on VPNs.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration, verified `isEmailVerified` populated correctly.
- Created a new user, checked DB for verified (not verified).
- Verified, checked DB (now verified).
- Used Conduit, People, Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7572
Summary: I'd like to reuse this for other content areas, renaming for now. This might be weird to keep setForm, but I can fix that later if we need.
Test Plan: reload a few forms in maniphest, projects, differential
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7120
Summary:
This attempts some consistency in form layouts. Notably, they all now contain headers and are 16px off the sides and tops of pages. Also updated dialogs to the same look and feel. I think I got 98% of forms with this pass, but it's likely I missed some buried somewhere.
TODO: will take another pass as consolidating these colors and new gradients in another diff.
Test Plan: Played in my sandbox all week. Please play with it too and let me know how they feel.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6806
Summary:
^\s+(['"])dust\1\s*=>\s*true,?\s*$\n
Test Plan: Looked through the diff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6769
Summary: Makes all forms on People app consistent with rest of site.
Test Plan: Click each page
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5865
Summary: We certainly don't go all-caps enough, else we would have noticed them.
Test Plan: Looked at profiles, people edit page before and after with All-Caps
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5450
Summary:
Introduce `PhabricatorUserQuery::attachProfilesForUsers()` for batch attachment of user profiles (for a future diff)
Introduce `PhabricatorUser::loadUserProfile()` to load attached user profiles (or load them on their own, if no one is attached).
USed them in code
Test Plan:
verified that use sites did not break
- Uploaded user profile image for bots
- changed my own profile image and blurb
- looked a lot at my own profile
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5395
Summary:
Depends on D5360; Refs T2770
See https://secure.phabricator.com/chatlog/channel/6/?at=54481 for discussion.
This will be a sad day, when I will repeatedly continue to hit a glass wall trying to get into `/people/` to browse the user list J4F at http://secure.phabricator.com/.
Test Plan:
verified that I could not access People as some passer-by.
Verified I could still access user profiles (at least I think I got the right controller for that).
Reviewers: epriestley, chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2770
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5386
Summary:
I feel pretty disturbed by having the thought of admins,
super-beings among all users, being able to edit my profile picture. So I took away
that capability of theirs.
Test Plan: Tried to edit a sys agent's profile pic, and somebody else's.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad, btrahan, Afaque_Hussain
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5358
Summary: Added an action in Edit option of People application allowing Admins to set profile pictures for System Agents
Test Plan: By trying to set a profile picture for the sytem agents
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5293
Summary: Searched for `AphrontFormView` and then for `appendChild()`.
Test Plan: /login/
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4855
Summary: Done by searching for `AphrontErrorView` and then `appendChild()`.
Test Plan:
Looked at Commit Detail.
Looked at Revision Detail.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4843
Summary:
Created with spatch:
lang=diff
- phutil_render_tag
+ phutil_tag
(X, Y, '...')
Then searched for `&` and `<` in the output and replaced them.
Test Plan: Loaded homepage.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4503
Summary: This removes all calls to addSpacer and the method. We were applying it inconsistently and it was causing spacing issues with redesigning the sidenav. My feeling is we can recreate the space in CSS if the design dictates, which would apply it consistently.
Test Plan: Go to Applications, click on every application.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4420
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary: the former is self explanatory. the latter is necessary for installations that require email verification. since many system agents are given bogus email address there can become a problem where these accounts can't be verified
Test Plan: created system agent account from scratch. edited user and toggled system agent accountness. created system agent with unverified email address and verified it.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1656
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3401
Summary: Move to application navigation, make it possible to get to /logs/ from the navigation.
Test Plan: Hit all interfaces, verified email.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1569, T631
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3261
Summary:
See title - This simply adds a checkbox to the "Edit User" page in the
admin view, to allow an administrator to re-send the "Welcome to Phabricator"
email.
Test Plan:
Sent myself another welcome email using the checkbox.
Created a new user using the admin panel, to make sure emails still get
sent for new users.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1524
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3081
Summary:
Allow administrators to delete accounts if they jump through enough hoops.
Also remove bogus caption about usernames being uneditable since we let admins edit those too now.
Test Plan: Tried to delete myself. Deleted a non-myself user.
Reviewers: csilvers, vrana
Reviewed By: csilvers
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2767
Summary:
Give them a big essay about how it's dangerous, but allow them to do it formally.
Because the username is part of the password salt, users must change their passwords after a username change.
Make password reset links work for already-logged-in-users since there's no reason not to (if you have a reset link, you can log out and use it) and it's much less confusing if you get this email and are already logged in.
Depends on: D2651
Test Plan: Changed a user's username to all kinds of crazy things. Clicked reset links in email. Tried to make invalid/nonsense name changes.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1303
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2657
Summary:
See T1303, which presents a reasonable case for inclusion of these characters in valid usernames.
Also, unify username validity handling.
Test Plan: Created a new user with a valid name. Tried to create a new user with an invalid name. Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1303
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2651
Summary:
See https://github.com/facebook/phabricator/issues/117
- The $user save can hit a duplicate key exception like the email, but we don't handle it correctly.
- When the $user saves but the $email does not, the $user is left with a (rolled-back, invalid) ID. This makes the UI glitch out a bit. Wipe the ID if we abort the transaction.
- We show the "Required" star marker even if the email is filled in.
The ID issue is sort of a general problem, but I think it's fairly rare: you must be doing inserts on related objects and the caller must catch the transaction failure and attempt to handle it in some way.
I can think of three approaches:
- Manually "roll back" the objects inside the transaction, as here. Seems OK if this really is a rare problem.
- Automatically roll back the 'id' and 'phid' columns (if they exist). Seems reasonable but maybe more complicated than necessary. Won't get every case right. For instance, if we inserted a third object here and that failed, $email would still have the userPHID set.
- Automatically roll back the entire object. We can do this by cloning all the writable fields. Seems like it might be way too magical, but maybe the right solution? Might have weird bugs with nonwritable fields and other random stuff.
We can trigger the rollback by storing objects we updated on the transaction, and either throwing them away or rolling them back on saveTransaction() / killTransaction().
These fancier approaches all seem to have some tradeoffs though, and I don't think we need to pick one yet, since this has only caused problems in one case.
Test Plan: Tried to create a new user (via People -> Create New User) with a duplicate username. Got a proper UI message with no exception and no UI glitchiness.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, hgrimberg, hgrimberg01
Reviewed By: hgrimberg01
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2650
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
2012-06-01 12:32:44 -07:00
Renamed from src/applications/people/controller/edit/PhabricatorPeopleEditController.php (Browse further)
