Summary:
Ref T11326. This doesn't go quite as far as the mock in T11326#185932, but gets rid of the easy margins.
Also cleans up some of the border rules so they're simpler and more consistent (no weird ragged edges on the far right).
Test Plan: {F1738951}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16335
Summary:
Ref T11326. Currently, we link Calendar days using hidden DOM nodes.
This is nice because it's simple, and right-clicking a day works properly. However, it's a bit ugly/unintuitive, messy, and unclear. It's especially messy because days are really two different rows, one for events and one for day/week numbers.
Instead, use JS to highlight day cells. You can still right-click by clicking the actual day number, which seems like a reasonable compromise.
Test Plan: {F1738941}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16334
Summary:
Ref T11326. When an event is all-day, hide the time controls for the start/end dates. These aren't used and aren't helpful/useful.
This got a little more complicated than it used to be because EditEngine forms may have only some of these controls present.
Test Plan: Edited an all-day event; edited a normal event; swapped an event between normal and all-day.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16327
Summary: When we have an info view in a column, the css isn't specific enough to override the core info-view css.
Test Plan: Review an importing repository, see info view properly spaced.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16331
Summary: This padding is a little off / custom. Normalizes it to the form on mobile.
Test Plan: Review some settings forms, save form changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16330
Summary: Mobile forms are super tight, this opens them up a little bit.
Test Plan: Review editing a document, task, mobile, tablet.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16329
Summary:
Fixes T11375. Some validation code was mishandling raw epoch timestamps.
For numeric values larger than 29999999 (e.g., 2999-12-25, christmas 2999), assume the value is a timestamp.
Test Plan: Used `maniphest.search` to query for `modifiedStart`, got a better result set and saw the `dateModified` constraint in the query.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11375
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16326
Summary:
Finishes fixing T11365. rP28199bcb48 added the new numeric entry
control and used it for TOTP setup, but missed the case of entering
a factor when TOTP was already set up.
Test Plan:
Observe behaviour of TOTP setup and subsequent factor entry
in iOS browser, make sure they're consistent.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T11365
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16325
Summary:
Fixes T11365. I tested these variants:
- `<input type="number" />`
- `<input type="text" pattern="\d*" />`
Of these, this one (using `pattern`) appears to have the best behavior: it shows the correct keyboard on iOS mobile and does nothing on desktops.
Using `type="number"` causes unwanted sub-controls to appear in desktop Safari, and a numbers + symbols keyboard to appear on iOS (presumably so users can type "." and "-" and maybe ",").
Test Plan: Tested variants in desktop browsers and iOS simulator, see here and T11365 for discussion.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11365
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16323
Summary:
Fix T11339.
Now, old and new are both simple lists of phids, and the rendering should make sense.
Test Plan: Viewed existing transaction with all 3 states.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11339
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16311
Summary:
See accompanying discussion in T11359.
As far as I can tell we aren't vulnerable, but subprocesses could be (now, or in the future). Reject any request which may have a `Proxy:` header.
This will also do a false-positive reject if `HTTP_PROXY` is defined in the environment, but this is likely a misconfiguration (cURL does not read it). I'll provide guidance on this.
Test Plan:
- Made requests using `curl -H Proxy:...`, got rejected.
- Made normal requests, got normal pages.
Reviewers: chad, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16318
Summary:
`mysql` has the magic feature of ignoring port arguments and using the socket when connecting to localhost.
This flag makes it not do that.
Test Plan: `./bin/storage shell`, execute `status`, see `Connection: localhost via TCP/IP`.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16317
Summary:
Fixes T11358. Entering a too-long title/subtitle currently raises an unfriendly (database-level) error.
Raise a friendlier error.
Test Plan: {F1731533}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11358
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16313
Summary:
Fixes T10750. Files have some outdated cache/key code which prevents recording an edit history on file comments.
Remove this ancient cruft.
(Users must `bin/storage adjust` after upgrading to this patch to reap the benefits.)
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage adjust`.
- Edited a comment in Files.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16312
Summary: Ref T11326. This makes it a little easier to jump back up to check out your day.
Test Plan: {F1725575}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16309
Summary: Ref T11326. This just cleans things up a little and removes some of the obvious layout/CSS issues.
Test Plan:
- Viewed day view before/after. Also viewed profile panel.
Before:
{F1725547}
After:
{F1725548}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16308
Summary:
Ref T11326. This just inches things forward a little bit:
- Make it easier to see current day.
- Line-through cancelled events.
- Don't colorize the whole event title, just use an Attending/Invited/Custom icon.
- Slightly subtler treatment for all-day events.
Test Plan: See screenshot in T11326.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16306
Summary:
Ref T11326. Normally, events occur at a specific epoch, independent of the viewer. For example, if we're having a meeting in 35 hours, every user who looks at the event will see that it starts 35 hours from now.
But when an event is "All Day", the start time and end time depend on the //viewer//. A day like "Christmas" does not start at the same time for everyone: it starts sooner if you're in a more-eastern timezone. Baiscally, an event on "July 15th" starts whenever "July 15th" starts for whoever is looking at it.
Previously, we stored these events by using the western-most and eastern-most timezones as the start and end times (the earliest possible start and latest possible end).
This worked OK, but we get into a bunch of trouble with EditEngine, mostly because each field can be updated individually now. We can't easily tell if an event is all-day or not when reading or updating the start time and end time, and making that easier would introduce a huge amount of complexity.
Instead, when we update the start or end time, we write //two// times:
- The epoch timestamp of the time the user entered, which is the start time we will use if the event is a normal event.
- The epoch timestamp of 12:00 AM in UTC on the same date as the //local// date the user entered. This is pretty much like just storing the date the user actually typed. This is what w'ell use if the event is an all-day event.
Then, no matter whether the event is later made all-day or not, we have all the information we need to display it correctly.
Test Plan:
- Created and edited all-day events.
- Migrated existing all-day events, which appeared to survive without problems. (Note that events all-day which were created or edited in the last couple of days `master` won't survive this mutation correctly and will need to be fixed.)
- Created and edited normal, recurring, and recurring all-day events.
- Swapped back to `stable`, created an event, specifically migrated it forward, made sure it survived with times intact.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16305
Summary: Ref T11326. Align this stuff with "Host" and "hostPHID".
Test Plan: Searched for events by host.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16303
Summary:
Ref T11326. This gets rid of the old multi-paged form stuff used in the last version of Diffusion.
This incidentally removes a callsite for a date control to make it a little easier to simplify them.
Test Plan: Grepped for all removed classes, no more callsites.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16302
Summary:
Ref T11326. These are last-generation and neither of these have callsites anymore.
(I nuked these since I'm trying to simplify date handling.)
Test Plan: Grepped for callsites.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16301
Summary: Ref T11326. Use modern methods instead of building this stuff separately.
Test Plan: Used `E123`, `{E123}`, saw references render normally.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16300
Summary:
Ref T11326. Try to make this a little more useful:
- Don't show entire attendee list (not useful?)
- Show host (useful?)
- Show your own status prominently (attending vs declined vs invited).
- Show cancelled events prominently.
Test Plan: {F1723550}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16299
Summary:
Ref T11326. Show this information with a subheader instead of in properties.
Also, slightly simplify the list view.
Test Plan: {F1723539}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16298
Summary:
Ref T11326. Currently, events show the icon as a property, like this:
> Icon: Default
This is boring and terrible. Show the icon in the header instead:
{F1723530}
Also minor cleanup on active/cancel states.
Test Plan: Viewed an event, saw icon.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16297
Summary:
Ref T11326. Currently, we render "E (99)" for ghost instances, which is meaningless and inconsistent.
Render these more sensibly and consistently.
Test Plan: Viewed event list, saw reasonable monograms / object names.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16296
Summary:
Ref T4788. One install has some particularly impressive task graphs which are thousands of nodes large.
The current graph is pretty broken in these cases. For now, just render a "too big to show" message. In the future, I'd plan to finesse this (e.g., show parents/children, show links to parents/children, etc).
Test Plan:
- Viewed a normal task.
- Set limit to 3, viewed a task with graph size 6, saw an error message.
- Viewed a revision stack graph (unaffected).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16295
Summary:
Fixes T9224. This adds:
- A "Default Edit Policy" and "Default View Policy" to Calendar, similar to other applications.
- "Event Host" and "Event Invitees" objects policies.
These policies often end up being redundant (the host can always view/edit, the invitees can always view), but they can be more clear than setting "No One", and "Editable By: Event Invitees" is a legitimately useful policy.
Test Plan:
- Created and edited events.
- Fiddled with defaults.
- Tried to remove myself as the event host for an "Editable By: Host" event, got an error ("you wouldn't be able to edit").
- Tried to remove myself as host/invitee for an "Editable By: Invitees" event, got an error.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9224
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16294
Summary: Modular transactions have slightly more modern ways to express values now.
Test Plan: Looked at transaction record of a paste.
Reviewers: chad, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16293
Summary:
Fixes T10909. I think this is a generally reasonable sort of capability to expose, although I've made it edit-only for now (when creating an event, you're always the host).
Also clean up some minor leftovers in the code, and a couple of little bugs with recurrence frequencies.
Test Plan: Created an event, edited the host of an event.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16292
Summary: Ref T10909. Ref T9224. We label this field "Host" in the UI; make the storage format consistent.
Test Plan:
- Viewed month view, day view, detail view of an event.
- Created a new event, saw myself as the host.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9224, T10909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16291
Summary: Fixes T9202.
Test Plan:
- Viewed day in 12-hour, saw "8:00 PM".
- Viewed day in 24-hour, saw "16:00".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9202, T10932
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16290
Summary:
Fixes T8911. This corrects several issues which could crop up if a calendar event query matched more results than the query limit:
- The desired order was not applied by the SearchEngine -- it applies the first builtin order instead. Provide a proper builtin order.
- When we generate ghosts, we can't do limiting in the database because we may select and then immediately discard a large number of parent events which are outside of the query range.
- For now, just don't limit results to get the behavior correct.
- This may need to be refined eventually to improve performance.
- When trimming events, we could trim parents and fail to generate ghosts from them. Separate parent events out first.
- Try to simplify some logic.
Test Plan: An "Upcoming" dashboard panel with limit 10 and the main Calendar "Upcoming Events" UI now show the same results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8911
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16289
Summary: Ref T7944. The search method is a bit bare-bones for now, but these substantially work.
Test Plan: Edited events via API; queried events via API.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7944
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16288
Summary:
Fixes T10633. When generating email about a transaction which adjusts a date, render the offset explicitly (like "UTC-7").
This makes it more clear in cases like this:
- mail is being sent to multiple users, and not necessarily using the viewer's settings;
- you get some mail while travelling and aren't sure which timezone setting it generated under.
Test Plan: Rendered in text mode, saw UTC offset.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10633
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16287
Summary:
Ref T9275. Swaps Calendar over to modular transactions. Theoretically, this has almost no effect on anything.
Ref T10633. I didn't actually do anything here yet, but this gets us ready to put timestamps in email.
Test Plan: Created and edited a bunch of events, nothing seemed catastrophically broken.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275, T10633
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16286
Summary: Ref T9275. I waffled back and forth on these transactions a bit, but put these back here in better working order.
Test Plan: Tried to schedule an event on "taco".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16285
Summary:
Ref T9275. We were rendering too many transactions and/or over-rendering invitees.
Clean this logic up a bit:
- List all before/after invitees.
- Simplify the lists before rendering.
Test Plan: Viewed an event, edited invitees, got sensible human-readable transactions.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16284
Summary:
Ref T9275. This throws away the old EditController and switches fully to EditEngine.
There's still some sketchy behavior (particularly, no JS stuff yet) but I think all the basics work properly.
Test Plan: Created and edited events via EditEngine, everything seemed to work alright.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16283
Summary: Ref T9275. This gets things roughly into shape for a cutover to EditEngine, mostly by fixing some problems with "recurrence end date" not being nullable while editing events.
Test Plan: Edited events with EditPro controller, nothing was obviously broken.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16282
Summary:
Ref T9275. This still has a number of rough edges and other minor problems (no JS on the controls, some date handling control bugs) but I'll smooth those over in future changes.
It does make all the editable transaction types available from EditEngine, technically speaking.
Test Plan: Created and edited events with the "pro" controller, which mostly worked.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16281
Summary:
Ref T9275. Now that TYPE_ACCEPT and TYPE_DECLINE have been separated out, we can simplify TYPE_INVITE.
This now just takes a list of invited PHIDs, uninvites ones that were removed and invites ones that were added. This is simpler, lets more logic live in the Editor, and makes EditEngine/API access easier.
Test Plan: Created events, added and removed invitees. Used comment stacked action and "pro" editor to adjust invitees.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16280
Summary:
Ref T9275. Currently, the "Start Date", "End Date", and "Recurrence End Date" transcations take a complex value (AphrontFormDateControlValue) and reduce it to an epoch.
Do this a little earlier, since the API will be much more usable if it just passes in epoch timestamps.
Events also have some logic where they rewrite the from date and to date on the actual object for all day events, then undo the changes later. Specifically, if you have an all-day event on "July 24th", the exact start and end times vary based on who is looking at it. Instead of overwriting the persistent `dateFrom` and `dateTo` properties, add separate `viewer` properties to make it easier to keep this stuff straight.
Since this means all-day events get stored in UTC, we need to query/fetch (and then discard) slightly more events. This is perfectly and much simpler to do.
The one weird "UTC" hack in here will get nuked when this moves to EditEngine properly.
Test Plan: Edited times for normal events and all-day events.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16274
Summary:
Ref T9275. Currently, there's a single "invite" transaction type for managing Calendar invites, and it takes a map of invitees to status.
This isn't great for EditEngine or API access, since it lets you set anyone else to any status and we can't reuse as much code as we can with a simpler API.
Make "Accept" and "Decline" separate actions which affect the actor's invite, so "invite" can be a simpler transaction which just invites or uninvites people.
Test Plan:
- Joined/accepted/declined an event invitation.
- Edited event invitees.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16272
Summary:
Ref T9275. This moves description, icon, and cancel/uncancel to EditEngine.
It removes TYPE_SEQUENCE_INDEX and TYPE_INSTANCE_OF_EVENT. These are currently never generated and I do not expect to genereate them (instead, these changes happen automatically when you edit a stub).
Test Plan: Edited an event with normal and pro edit forms.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16264
Summary:
Ref T9275. When you create a recurring event which recurs forever, we want to avoid writing an infinite number of rows to the database.
Currently, we write a row to the database right before you edit the event. Until then, we refer to it as `E123/999` or whatever ("instance 999 of event 123").
This creates a big mess with trying to make recurring events work with EditEngine, Subscriptions, Projects, Flags, Tokens, etc -- all of this stuff assumes that whatever you're working with has a PHID.
I poked at letting this stuff work without a PHID a little bit, but that looked like a gigantic mess.
Instead, generate an event "stub" a little sooner (when you look at the event detail page). This is basically just an ID/PHID to refer to the instance.
Then, when you edit the stub, "materialize" it into a real event.
This still has some issues, but I think it's more promising than the other approach was.
Also:
- Removes dead user profile calendar controller.
- Replaces comments with EditEngine comments.
Test Plan:
- Commented on a recurring event.
- Awarded tokens to a recurring event.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16248
Summary:
Ref T9275. This builds a Calendar EditEngine which only edits "name".
I'll add more fields, Conduit, etc., and move to modular transactions in future changes.
Test Plan: Used `editpro/` URI manually to edit the name of an event.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16235
