Summary:
Ref T13249. Ref T13258. In some cases, builds are not idempotent and should not be restarted casually.
If the scary part is at the very end (deploy / provision / whatever), it could be okay to restart them if they previously failed.
Also, make the "reasons why you can't restart" and "explanations of why you can't restart" logic a little more cohesive.
Test Plan:
- Tried to restart builds in various states (failed/not failed, restartable always/if failed/never, already restarted), got appropriate errors or restarts.
- (I'm not sure the "Autoplan" error is normally reachable, since you can't edit autoplans to configure things to let you try to restart them.)
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258, T13249
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20252
Summary:
Ref T13124. See PHI531. When a revision is updated, builds against the older diff tend to stop being relevant. Add an option to abort outstanding older builds automatically.
At least for now, I'm adding this as a build step instead of some kind of special checkbox. An alternate implementation would be some kind of "Edit Options" action on plans with a checkbox like `[X] When this build starts, abort older builds.`
I think adding it as a build step is a bit simpler, and likely to lead to greater consistency and flexibility down the road, make it easier to add options, etc., and since we don't really have any other current use cases for "a bunch of checkboxes". This might change eventually if we add a bunch of checkboxes for some other reason.
The actual step activates //before// the build queues, so it doesn't need to wait in queue before it can actually act. T13088 discusses some plans here if this sticks.
Test Plan:
- Created a "Sleep for 120 seconds" build plan and triggered it with Herald.
- Added an "Abort Older Builds" step.
- Updated a revision several times in a row, saw older builds abort.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13124
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19376
Summary:
Depends on D19279. Ref T13110. This implements the existing publishing logic for buildables, but does so via ModularTransactions instead of a core transaction type.
Since each application is implementing build transactions independently, this removes the core type.
Next, Differential will get a similar treatment.
Test Plan: Used `bin/harbormaster publish` (with some commenting-out-guard-clauses) to publish a commit Buildable; saw unchanged feed behavior.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13110
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19280
Summary:
Depends on D19064. Ref T13054. See that task for additional discussion.
When buildables are created by `arc` and have lint/unit messages, they can currently pass or fail before Herald triggers actual builds. This puts them in a pre-build state where they can't complete until Herald says it's okay.
On its own, this change intentionally strands `arc diff --only` diffs in the "PREPARING" stage forever.
Test Plan:
- Ran a build with `bin/harbormaster`, saw it build normally.
- Ran a build with web UI, saw it build normally.
- Ran a build with `arc diff`, saw it build normally.
- Ran a build with `arc diff --only`, saw it hang in "PREPARING" forever.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19065
Summary: Depends on D19063. Ref T13054. Prepare for the addition of a new `PREPARING` status by getting rid of the "scattered mess of switch statements" pattern of status management.
Test Plan: Searched/browsed buildables. Viewed buildables. Viewed revisions. Grepped for all affected symbols.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19064
Summary:
Ref T13054. Fixes T10746. Fixes T11154. This is really a one-line fix (include `ABORTED` in `BuildEngine->updateBuildable()`) but try to structure the code a little more clearly too and reduce (at least slightly) the number of random lists of status attributes spread throughout the codebase.
Also add a header tag for buildable status.
Test Plan: Aborted a build, saw buildable fail properly.
Subscribers: yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13054, T11154, T10746
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19055
Summary:
Ref PHI261. This moves Harbormaster build status to work more similarly to other modern status types, like Differential revision status, where we try to specify as much behavior on the server as possible so that the client and server can vary independently.
(I don't have any specific plans to make Harbormaster build status configurable on the server side, but it isn't out of the question.)
Test Plan: Ran `harbormaster.querybuilds` (saw same data as before) and `harbormaster.build.search` (saw same data as before, plus new ANSI color data).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18838
Summary:
We're picking three useful groups of build statuses to provide as default queries:
- Stuff not yet building
- Stuff building
- Stuff which has finished building
These are reasonable buckets for builds since (unlike most objects in phabricatorland) users are generally waiting impatiently for the machine to do something for them, rather than being responsible for doing something with the machine.
Test Plan: clicked around the search engine and enjoyed my defaults
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16349
Summary:
Ref T10457. Skipped tests are almost always well-behaved (e.g., `testWindows()`, but the test is running on Linux) and not interesting, and we do not expect well-written, solid systems to necessarily have 0 skips.
Although skips //could// indicate that you have missing dependencies on a build server, and thus be a bit interesting, I think they almost always indicate that a particular test is not expected to run in the current environment.
If we wanted to tackle this problem in granular detail, we could eventually add a "Missing" status or similar which would serve as "a skip you //could// reasonably fix in this environment", but I don't think that's too interesting.
Test Plan:
Here's an example of a build result with skips: B10875
{F1136511}
I think this is clearer as "Passed", as this is the expected production state of the build.
Locally, looked at some builds.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10457
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15369
Summary: Ref T10457. These lack color and iconography and are difficult to parse. Make them easier to read.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F1135396}
After:
{F1135399}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10457
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15362
