Summary:
Ref T13222. See D19829. We're inconsistent about using `getDetail()/setDetail()` to do some ad-hoc reads. Put this stuff in proper accessor methods.
Also a couple of text fixes from D19850.
Test Plan: Set, edited, and removed autoclose branches from a repository. Got sensible persistence and rendering behavior.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19856
Summary:
See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/cannot-accept-commits-in-audit/2166/>.
In D19842, I changed `PhabricatorEditField->shouldGenerateTransactionsFromComment()`.
- Previously, it bailed on `getIsConduitOnly()`.
- After the patch, it bails on a missing `getCommentActionLabel()`.
The old code was actually wrong, and it was previously possible to apply possibly-invalid actions in some cases (or, at least, sneak them through this layer: they would only actually apply if not validated properly).
In practice, it let a different bug through: we sometimes loaded commits without loading their audit authority, so testing whether the viewer could "Accept" the commit or not (or take some other actions like "Raise Concern") would always fail and throw an exception: "Trying to access data not attached to this object..."
Fixing the insufficiently-strict transaction generation code exposed the "authority not attached" bug, which caused some actions to fail to generate transactions.
This appeared in the UI as either an unhelpful error ("You can't post an empty comment") or an action with no effect. The unhelpful error was because we show that error if you aren't taking any //other// actions, and we wouldn't generate an "Accept" action because of the interaction of these bugs, so the code thought you were just posting an empty comment.
Test Plan: Without leaving comments, accepted and rejected commits. No more error messages, and actions took effect.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: stephan.senkbeil, hskiba
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19845
Summary:
Depends on D19831. Ref T13216. See PHI908. Allegedly, a user copied a large repository into itself and then pushed it. Great backup strategy, but it can create headaches for administrators.
Allow a "maximum paths you can touch with one commit" limit to be configured, to make it harder for users to make this push this kind of commit by accident.
If you actually intended to do this, you can work around this by breaking your commit into pieces (or temporarily removing the limit). This isn't a security/policy sort of option, it's just a guard against silly mistakes.
Test Plan: Set limit to 2, tried to push 3 files, got rejected. Raised limit, pushed changes successfully.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13216
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19839
Summary: Depends on D19830. Ref T13216. See PHI908. See PHI750. See PHI885. Allow users to configure a filesize limit, and allow them to adjust the clone/fetch timeout.
Test Plan:
{F6021356}
- Configured a filesize limit and pushed, hit it. Made the limit larger and pushed, change went through.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13216
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19831
Summary:
Ref T13222. See PHI683. Currently, you can "Change subtype..." via Conduit and the bulk editor, but not via the comment action stack or edit forms.
In PHI683 an install is doing this often enough that they'd like it to become a first-class action. I've generally been cautious about pushing this action to become a first-class action (there are some inevitable rough edges and I don't want to add too much complexity if there isn't a use case for it) but since we have evidence that users would find it useful and nothing has exploded yet, I'm comfortable taking another step forward.
Currently, `EditEngine` has this sort of weird `setIsConduitOnly()` method. This actually means more like "this doesn't show up on forms". Make it better align with that. In particular, a "conduit only" field can already show up in the bulk editor, which is goofy. Change this to `setIsFormField()` and convert/simplify existing callsites.
Test Plan:
There are a lot of ways to reach EditEngine so this probably isn't entirely exhaustive, but I think I got pretty much anything which is likely to break:
- Searched for `setIsConduitOnly()` and `getIsConduitOnly()`, converted all callsites to `setIsFormField()`.
- Searched for `setIsLockable()`, `setIsReorderable()` and `setIsDefaultable()` and aligned these calls to intent where applicable.
- Created an Almanac binding.
- Edited an Almanac binding.
- Created an Almanac service.
- Edited an Almanac service.
- Edited a binding property.
- Deleted a binding property.
- Created and edited a badge.
- Awarded and revoked a badge.
- Created and edited an event.
- Made an event recurring.
- Created and edited a Conpherence thread.
- Edited and updated the diff for a revision.
- Created and edited a repository.
- Created and disabled repository URIs.
- Created and edited a blueprint.
- Created and edited tasks.
- Created a paste, edited/archived a paste.
- Created/edited/archived a package.
- Created/edited a project.
- Made comments.
- Moved tasks on workboards via comment action stack.
- Changed task subtype via comment action stack.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19842
Summary: Depends on D19423. Ref T12164. Adds controllers capable of listing and editing `PhabricatorRepositoryIdentity` objects. Starts creating those objects when commits are parsed.
Test Plan: Reparsed some revisions, observed objects getting created in the database. Altered some `Identity` objects using the controllers and observed effects in the database. No attempts made to validate behavior under "challenging" author/committer strings.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T12164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19429
Summary:
Fixes T13031. "Enormous" changes are basically changes which are too large to hold in memory, although the actual definition we use today is "more than 1GB of change text or `git diff` runs for more than 15 minutes".
If an install configures a Herald content rule like "when content matches /XYZ/, do something" and then a user pushes a 30 GB source file, we can't put it into memory to `preg_match()` it. Currently, the way to handle this case is to write a separate Herald rule that rejects enormous changes. However, this isn't obvious and means the default behavior is unsafe.
Make the default behavior safe by rejecting these changes with a message, similar to how we reject "dangerous" changes (which permanently delete or overwrite history) by default.
Also, change a couple of UI strings from "Enormous" to "Very Large" to reduce ambiguity. See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/herald-enormous-check/822>.
Test Plan: Changed the definition of "enormous" from 1GB to 1 byte. Pushed a change; got rejected. Allowed enormous changes, pushed, got rejected by a Herald rule. Disabled the Herald rule, pushed, got a clean push. Prevented enormous changes again. Grepped for "enormous" elsewhere in the UI.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: joshuaspence
Maniphest Tasks: T13031
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18850
Summary:
See PHI234. Several issues here:
- The warning about observing a repository in Read/Write mode checks the raw I/O type, not the effective I/O type. That means we can fail to warn if other URIs are set to "Default", and "Default" is "Read/Write" in practice.
- There's just an actual typo which prevents the "Observe" version of this error from triggering properly.
Additionally, add more forceful warnings that "Observe" and "Mirror" mean that you want to //replace// a repository with another one, not that we somehow merge branches selectively. It isn't necessarily obvious that "Observe" doesn't mean "merge/union", since the reasons it can't in the general case are somewhat subtle (conflicts between refs with the same names, detecting ref deletion).
Test Plan:
Read documentation. Hit the error locally by trying to "Observe" while in Read/Write mode:
{F5302655}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18810
Summary: Noticed a couple of typos in the docs, and then things got out of hand.
Test Plan:
- Stared at the words until my eyes watered and the letters began to swim on the screen.
- Consulted a dictionary.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18693
Summary:
Ref T12298. The PullLocal daemon has had hibernation code for a little while, but it never actually activated because we don't sleep for more than 15 seconds in any case.
Add a maximum sleep instead and use that to control the longest sleep we'll do for hibernation purposes.
Also, when a repository or repository URI is edited, write a NEEDS_UPDATE event into the message table to make sure the daemons de-hibernate.
Test Plan: Used `bin/phd debug pull`, saw the daemon actually hibernate instead of just sleeping for 15 seconds.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12298
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17635
Summary: These were once ordered, but I think we switched to being defined in the Engine and never implemented the sorts there. This adds sort ordering to Tasks, Projects, and Repositories.
Test Plan: Review Favorites Menu in local install, see order is now set per the engine. Click Edit Favorites, and re-order. See order sticks.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17490
Summary: Ref T5867. Instead of hard-coding projects, tasks and repositories, let EditEngines say "I want a quick create item" so third-party code can also hook into the menu without upstream changes.
Test Plan: Saw same default items in menu.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5867
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17215
Summary:
Ref T10978. This prepares for swapping the comment UI to stacked actions.
These are only accessible via the API.
Test Plan: Used the API to accept, raise concern with, and reject commits.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17182
Summary: Ref T10978. Ref T7676. Make auditors work more like reviewers, so they can be freely added or removed.
Test Plan:
- Interacted with auditors via "Edit Commit" and API.
- Comment area is still oldschool and doesn't work yet.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978, T7676
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17181
Summary: Ref T10978. This currently does almost nothing, but gets it in place so I can add stuff to it.
Test Plan: Made a comment on a commit using the API.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17178
Summary: Ref T10978. The current "Edit" flow has some autoclose info. This isn't necessarily the best place to put it in the long run, but preseve it for now since the documentation refers to it.
Test Plan: {F2340658}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17176
Summary:
Ref T10978. After T11114, we have some features (like the old code for the haunted comment panel) which are only used by Diffusion. I want to modernize it so I can nuke them. T10978 also describes many bugs which are only fixable after modernizing.
This adds very basic EditEngine support for commits/audit. You can't create new commits with this workflow, just tag/update existing ones.
Test Plan: {F2340347}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17175
Summary:
Fixes T11936. After editing a repository URI, we were not correctly updating the URI index.
Any other edit to the repository //would// update the index, and this index is only really used by `arc` to figure out which repository a working copy belongs to, so that's how this evaded detection for this long. In particular, creating a repository would usually have an edit after any URI edits, to activate it, which would build the index correctly.
Test Plan:
- Added a new URI to a repository.
- Verified it was immediately reflected in the `repository_uriindex` table.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11936
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16972
Summary: Fixes T11839. Both are missing a parameter and one is a copy/paste slop.
Test Plan:
{F1913812}
{F1913813}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11839
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16837
Summary I broke this in D16237: that made the CLI workflow work, but we attach the repository earlier in the web workflow and won't have one when we arrive here.
Test Plan: Created a new repository URI from the web UI.
Auditors: chad
Summary: Fixes T11276. This feels slightly iffy (we `attachRepository()` here, and also when applying the TYPE_REPOSITORY transaction) but simpler than trying to reorder things.
Test Plan: Created a repository URI with transactions in `["uri", "repository"]` order.
Reviewers: chad, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Maniphest Tasks: T11276
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16237
Summary:
Ref T4292. For hosted, clustered repositories we have a good way to increment the internal version of the repository: every time a user pushes something, we increment the version by 1.
We don't have a great way to do this for observed/remote repositories because when we `git fetch` we might get nothing, or we might get some changes, and we can't easily tell //what// changes we got.
For example, if we see that another node is at "version 97", and we do a fetch and see some changes, we don't know if we're in sync with them (i.e., also at "version 97") or ahead of them (at "version 98").
This implements a simple way to version an observed repository:
- Take the head of every branch/tag.
- Look them up.
- Pick the biggest internal ID number.
This will work //except// when branches are deleted, which could cause the version to go backward if the "biggest commit" is the one that was deleted. This should be OK, since it's rare and the effects are minor and the repository will "self-heal" on the next actual push.
Test Plan:
- Created an observed repository.
- Ran `bin/repository update` and observed a sensible version number appear in the version table.
- Pushed to the remote, did another update, saw a sensible update.
- Did an update with no push, saw no effect on version number.
- Toggled repository to hosted, saw the version reset.
- Simulated read traffic to out-of-sync node, saw it do a remote fetch.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15986
Summary:
Ref T10923. Currently, users can disable or enable builtin URIs, but this doesn't actually do anything.
The behavior of "disable" has changed a bit over time and might need some further refinement, but it's currently meaningless for builtin URIs. Prevent adjustment of it. If users want to hide a URI, they should set "Display: Hidden" instead.
Test Plan:
- Disabled/enabled a non-builtin URI.
- Tried to disable a builtin URI, saw greyed out UI and got a helpful error message.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15899
Summary: Ref T10923. Although I'd ideally like to get rid of this eventually, keep it around for now.
Test Plan:
- Edited value for an SVN repository.
- Observed no panel present for a Git repository.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15883
Summary: Ref T10923. Walk users through the "create, configure, activate" workflow a little better and set expectations more clearly.
Test Plan:
- Created a new repository, saw new UI help.
- Activated repository, saw onboarding help disappear.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15875
Summary:
Ref T10923. Fixes T10406. This brings most of the guidance/instructions forward:
- Some remained as instructions.
- Some moved to documentation.
Test Plan: Went through all of the sections and hit the help.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10406, T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15873
Summary: Ref T10923. This provides a little guidance about hosted vs observed, and points at the `diffusion.ssh-*` options.
Test Plan: Poked around in the web UI, saw useful guidance.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15872
Summary:
Ref T10923. Primarily documents the process for creating repositories via the API.
Also fixes a couple of issues with `repositoryPHID` not being set yet when creating URIs via the API.
Test Plan:
- Followed all documented steps to create a new repository.
- Created and edited some new URIs from the web workflow, too.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15870
Summary:
Ref T10923.
- The "Policy" edit form currently goes "Push, View, Edit". Reorder the defaults to "View, Edit, Push".
- Editing Spaces doesn't currently work: the element appears in the UI, but isn't actually processed when handling transactions. Make that work.
Test Plan:
- Edited a repository policies, saw "View, Edit, Push".
- Moved a repository between Spaces.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15866
Summary:
Ref T10748. This needs more extensive testing and is sure to have some rough edges, but seems to basically work so far.
Throwing this up so I can work through it more deliberately and make notes.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Used `bin/repository list` to list existing repositories.
- Used `bin/repository update <repository>` to update various repositories.
- Updated a migrated, hosted Git repository.
- Updated a migrated, observed Git repository.
- Converted an observed repository into a hosted repository by toggling the I/O mode of the URI.
- Conveted a hosted repository into an observed repository by toggling it back.
- Created and activated a new empty hosted Git repository.
- Created and activated an observed Git repository.
- Updated a mirrored repository.
- Cloned and pushed over HTTP.
- Tried to HTTP push a read-only repository.
- Cloned and pushed over SSH.
- Tried to SSH push a read-only repository.
- Updated several Mercurial repositories.
- Updated several Subversion repositories.
- Created and edited repositories via the API.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15842
Summary: Ref T10748. This copies existing code in the `CreateController` which will eventually be removed.
Test Plan:
- Created a new repository with the EditPro workflow.
- Saw it come up into the cluster properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15835
Summary:
Ref T10748. This allows an EditEngine form to be broken up into pages.
This is less powerful than `PHUIPagedFormView`, because the pages are not sequential / stateful. Each form saves immediately once it's submitted, and can not take you to a new form or back/forward in a series of forms.
For example, you can't create a workflow where the user fills out 5 pages of information before we create an object, like the current repository workflow does.
However, the only place we've ever wanted to do this is repositories and it's fairly bad there, so I feel reasonably confident we aren't going to miss this in the future.
(We do "choose a type of service/repository/rule -> fill out one page of info" fairly often, but can do this without the full-power paging stuff.)
Test Plan:
- Created a repository usin the new Manage UI, filling out only a handful of fields.
- Edited a repository using the new Manage UI.
- All forms are now EditEngine forms offering paged views of the big huge underlying form:
{F1254371}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15832
Summary:
Ref T10748. Ref T10366. Allows users to set credential for new URIs.
- Ref T7221. Our handling of the "git://" protocol is currently incorrect. This protocol is not authenticated, but is considered an SSH protocol. In the new UI, it is considered an anonymous/unauthenticated protocol instead.
- Ref T10241. This fixes the `PassphraseCredentialControl` so it doesn't silently edit the value if the current value is not visible to you and/or not valid.
Test Plan:
Performed a whole lot of credential edits, removals, and adjustments. I'll give this additional vetting before cutting over to it.
{F1253207}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7221, T10241, T10366, T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15829
Summary:
Ref T10748.
- Allow users to add new URIs by clicking a button instead of knowing a secret URI.
- Validate that URIs are actually valid URIs.
- Add enable/disable action and strings.
Test Plan:
- Created a new URI.
- Tried to create a nonsense URI, created a good URI.
- Enabled/disabled a URI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15825
Summary: Ref T10748. Brings the rest of the transactions to EditEngine, supports creating via API.
Test Plan:
- Created a URI via API.
- Created a URI via web.
- Tried to apply sneaky transactions, got rejected with good error messages. <_< >_>
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15821
Summary:
Ref T10748.
- New View page for repository URIs.
- Make display and I/O behavior (observe, mirror, read, read/write) editable.
- Add a bunch of checks to prevent you from completely screwing up a repository by making it writable from a bunch of differnet sources.
Test Plan:
{F1249866}
{F1249867}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15816
Summary:
Ref T10748. Ref T10366. This adds a new EditEngine, EditController, Editor, Query, and Transaction for RepositoryURIs.
None of these really do anything helpful yet, and these URIs are still unused in the actual application.
Test Plan: {F1249794}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10366, T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15815
Summary:
Ref T10748. Allow the new EditEngine workflow to create repositories by giving the user a modal repository type choice upfront.
(The rest of this flow is still confusing/weird, though.)
Test Plan:
- Created a new repository.
{F1249626}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15813
Summary: Ref T10748. This brings the "Actions" items (publish/notify + autoclose enabled) into the new UI.
Test Plan:
- Edited this stuff via EditEngine and Conduit.
- Viewed via new Manage UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15811
Summary: Ref T10748. Makes a "Branches" panel, enables these transactions in the EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Edited via EditEngine + Conduit.
- Viewed via manage UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15809
Summary: Ref T10748. Port this, add EditEngine support, add some type validation to the transaction.
Test Plan:
- Edited via EditEngine.
- Edited via Conduit.
- Viewed via Management UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15808
Summary: Ref T10748. Brings this forward in the UI and EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Edited via Conduit.
- Viewed via Manage UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15805
Summary: Ref T10748. Ports this UI and exposes it on the EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Edited via EditEngine.
- Viewed new manage UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15804
Summary: Ref T10748. Brings this over and adds EditEngine support for it.
Test Plan: Viewed and edited staging area information.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15801
Summary:
Ref T10748. This supports more transaction types in the modern editor and improves validation so Conduit benefits.
You can technically create repositories via `diffusion.repository.edit` now, although they aren't very useful.
Test Plan:
- Used `diffusion.repository.edit` to create and edit repositories.
- Used `/editpro/` to edit repositories.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15740
Summary: Ref T10748. Ref T10337. This technically implements this stuff, but it does not do anything useful yet. This skips all the hard stuff.
Test Plan:
- Technically used `diffusion.repository.search` to get repository information.
- Technically used `diffusion.repository.edit` to change a repository name.
- Used `editpro/` to edit a repository name.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10337, T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15736
