Summary:
Add a dropdown to display notificaitons. Right now
there is nothing real time about it, but we do update the panel
when the user clicks. This panel is only displayed if the
install has notifications enabled and you have them enabled in
your preferences (not using them by default).
Test Plan: Turn off notifications for user1, left them on for user2. Did things from user1 and from user2 on task both were cc'd on. user2 recieved all notifications, user1 recieved nothing. Made new user, made sure everything was switched off by default.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: keebuhm, ddfisher, aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2703
Summary: Just because I like it more.
Test Plan: View diff with comment from disabled user.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2525
Summary:
This is not so general as `getRequiredHandlePHIDs()`.
It allows bulk loading of user statuses only in revision list.
It also loads data in `render()`. I'm not sure if it's OK.
Maybe we can use the colorful point here.
Or maybe some unicode symbol?
Test Plan: {F11451, size=full}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2484
Summary: A bunch of installs are doing this to varying degrees of success anyway, make it easier and nudge them toward a more consistent approach.
Test Plan: Set a custom logo, viewed normal and admin pages.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T700
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2019
Summary:
We currently allow you to assign code review to disabled users, but
should not.
Test Plan:
- Created revisions with no reviewers and only disabled reviewers, was
appropriately warned.
- Looked at a disabled user handle link, was clearly informed.
- Tried to create a new revision with a disabled reviewer, was rebuffed.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1429
Summary: Not really thrilled about my fix for T684 in D1224. This makes some
design tweaks to solve it without the awkward horizontal scrollbar in the page
content div.
Test Plan: Looked at diffs overflowing the window. Looked at footer on several
pages.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason, Makinde
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan
Maniphest Tasks: T684
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1332
Summary:
If a page generates warnings or errors, you only get a little red dot in
DarkConsole which is hard to see. DarkConsole is also fairly big and there are
plenty of reasons not to leave it open all the time.
Instead, unconditionally show a big message to developers if there are errors or
warnings.
We could make this more sophisticated eventually, but the value is just that you
see it.
Test Plan: Browsed pages with and without warnings, got the right banner state.
Reviewers: nh, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan
Maniphest Tasks: T734
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1307
Summary:
This seems like the least-bad solution to the issues mentioned in T684: when we
need to x-scroll the main page area, scroll that div rather than the surrounding
page chrome.
I played around with a bunch of other possible solutions but they all seem bad
in some way or another. The tricky part here is that I want the real background
to be grey so that the footer color is grey even if the page is very short and
the browser window is very tall.
The only downside here is that the scrollbar appears in a somewhat unusual
place, but I think that's OK?
Actually, it's kind of terrible if people really use the scrollbar to scroll
horizontally rather than two-finger swipe or shift+mousewheel or the arrow keys.
So maybe this isn't good.
If this is no good, I think we need to make design sacrifices (not necessarily a
big deal; I'm not married to how the footer behaves) or someone much better than
I am at CSS needs to tell me how to fix this (@mroch / @tomo)?.
Test Plan:
- In Settings -> Preferences, set font to "72px Impact".
- Observed overflow scroll behavior in Safari / Firefox / Chrome.
Reviewers: Makinde, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: Makinde
CC: mroch, tomo, aran, Makinde
Maniphest Tasks: T684
Differential Revision: 1224
Summary: See T551. We don't apply the default monospacing rules to the example,
so if you don't have a custom font selection you don't see the default
accurately.
Test Plan: Deleted my preference, saw an accurate default. Set my preference to
"14px impact", ensured it was respected in applications.
Reviewers: jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: nh
CC: aran, nh
Differential Revision: 1035
Summary:
We use ObjectHandles as proxy objects which can refer to any other object in the
system. Add the concept of the underlying object's "status" (e.g., open, closed
or busy).
This allows us to render completed tasks and revisions with strikethrough. In
the future, if we implement OOO or something, we could render users with a
"busy" status if they're on vacation, etc.
Test Plan: Viewed a task with closed revisions and dependencies:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/view/PHID-FILE-6183e81286fa3288d33d/
Reviewed By: codeblock
Reviewers: codeblock, hunterbridges, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, codeblock
Differential Revision: 772
Summary:
Not totally sure I'm in love with this but I think it's somewhat non-terrible,
despite the lack of lens flare.
Also made "Cancel" take you back to the task if you got to "Create" from "Create
Another Task".
Test Plan:
- Style:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/view/PHID-FILE-ad37d3c1f3b2c7a7a7d1/
- Hit "Cancel" from "Create Another", got sent back to task.
- Hit "Cancel" from normal create, got sent back to list.
- Tried to save an invalid task after making changes to CC/Projects, changes
were preserved.
Reviewed By: codeblock
Reviewers: hunterbridges, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran, codeblock
CC: aran, epriestley, codeblock
Differential Revision: 736
Summary:
This ended up being pretty hard to see, make it a bit easier.
Test Plan:
Focused things using the keyboard reticle.
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: tomo, moskov, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, tomo
Differential Revision: 483
Summary:
For some reason, Webkit parses the completely made-up "background-position-y"
property. Firefox does not. Use a real property instead of a creative one that
doesn't exist.
Test Plan:
Hovered over "Phabricator" logo in Firefox, Safari.
Reviewed By: codeblock
Reviewers: codeblock, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, codeblock
Differential Revision: 484
Summary:
Permit "j" and "k" to cycle through individual changeblocks, similar to how this
feature works in ReviewBoard. This still needs a bunch of refinement but it's
getting closer to being useful.
Also moved reticle underneath the table so you can click links through it (derp
derp).
Test Plan:
Used "j" and "k" to cycle through individual changes.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: moskov, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 426
Summary:
A few tweaks to hsb's Countdown implementation:
- Allow the page to be rendered "chromeless", suitable for display on one of
the dozens of monitors everyone has laying around.
- Show title of countdown in deletion dialog.
- When creating a new countdown default to time(), not Dec 31, 1969.
- Add extra "/" after editing to avoid needless redirect.
- Tweak some page titles.
- Show countdown author in list view.
- Highlight tab in list view.
- Tweak menu copy.
- Link countdown title in list view, separate buttons into different columns
so they pick up padding.
Test Plan:
Created, edited and deleted a timer. Viewed a timer and toggled chrome mode.
Viewed timer list.
Reviewed By: hsb
Reviewers: hsb, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, hsb, epriestley
Differential Revision: 454
Summary:
If you resize your window to be very narrow, the menu bar spazzes out right now.
Prevent it from developing all sorts of weird internal linewrapping.
Test Plan:
Narrowed my browser window, header didn't spaz out.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 428
Summary:
ReviewBoard has a fancier version of this feature that's more granular -- the
keyboard can focus on individual changes. I think that's good and intend to
implement something similar, but this gets us a step closer and gets rid of some
of the bookkeeping stuff like making shortcuts discoverable.
(I have another brnach with Maniphest merging which also uses fatcow icons,
which is why the README seems a little out of context.)
Test Plan:
Used "j" and "k" to jump between changesets. Pressed "?" and got a list of
available shortcuts.
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: moskov, aran, epriestley, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 412
Summary: Implements a simple infrastructure for keyboard shortcuts, see T184, and a "help" shortcut.
There's a lot of room for refinement here but I think it basically works. Each shortcut can also provide a "tooltip" handler which allows it to show help when the alt/option key is held down.
Test Plan: Pressed "?" and got help. Pressed "?" in various contexts where it should not activate (modifier keys, text input focused) and didn't get help.
Reviewers: aran, tuomaspelkonen, jungejason
CC: moskov
Differential Revision: 362
Summary:
- Provide a red version of the logo for the admin view.
- Make selected tabs in the admin view look correct.
- Fix a Chrome styling issue where the username and "settings" would have
weird offsets.
Test Plan:
Loaded Phabricator in chrome and clicked around tabs of an admin interface.
Hovered over logo.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: cadamo, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 371
Summary:
I ran a 99designs contest and this gear-eye thing was actually pretty okay. All
this stuff needs tweaks but at least it won't render with a big square on
windows anymore.
Test Plan:
Looked at menu, it seemed slightly more legitimate and designey than before?
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 363
Summary:
Provide an "isAdmin" flag for users, to designate administrative users.
Restore the account editing interface and allow it to set role flags and reset
passwords.
Provide an "isDisabled" flag for users and shut down all system access for them.
Test Plan:
Created "admin" and "disabled" users. Did administrative things with the admin
user. Tried to do stuff with the disabled user and was rebuffed. Tried to access
administrative interfaces with a normal non-admin user and was denied.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: ccheever, aran
Differential Revision: 278
