Summary:
Ref T13018. See that task and the Discourse thread for discussion.
This doesn't work as-is and we need to `og:description` everything to make it work. I don't want to sink any more time into this so just back all the changes out for now.
(The `<html>` change is unnecessary anyway.)
Test Plan: Strict revert.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13018
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18782
Summary: Ref T13018. This is easy to get working roughly, at least, and seems reasonable.
Test Plan: Viewed page source, saw tags. Custom header logo still worked. Pretty hard to debug against a local install since Disqus / debugger tools can't hit it, but I'll see what it looks like in production and tweak it if I got anything horribly wrong.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13018
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18780
Summary: Fixes T12775. Currently, we do not validate this option and it's possible to configure it in an invalid way.
Test Plan: Tried to misconfigure things, was helpfully pointed toward errors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12775
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18041
Summary: Also fixes insufficiently-escaped regex examples
Test Plan: Made several changes to http://local.phacility.com/config/edit/syntax.filemap/ and observed validation failures on malformed regexes, and success on well-formed regexes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12532
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17684
Summary: Fixes T11437. Provides a normal form for configuring this, instead of weird "look up the PHID and adjust things in the database" stuff.
Test Plan:
{F1753651}
{F1753652}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11437
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16377
Summary:
Ref T10010. Ref T5819. General alignment of the stars:
- There were some hacks in Conduit around stripping `fa-...` off icons when reading and writing that I wanted to get rid of.
- We probably have room for a subtitle in the new heavy nav, and using the icon name is a good starting point (and maybe good enough on its own?)
- The project list was real bad looking with redundant tag/names, now it is very slightly less bad looking with non-redundant types?
- Some installs will want to call Milestones something else, and this gets us a big part of the way there.
- This may slightly help to reinforce "tag" vs "policy" vs "group" stuff?
---
I'm letting installs have enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot (e.g., define 100 icons). It isn't the end of the world if they reuse icons, and is clearly their fault.
I think the cases where 100 icons will break down are:
- Icon selector dialog may get very unwieldy.
- Query UI will be pretty iffy/huge with 100 icons.
We could improve these fairly easily if an install comes up with a reasonable use case for having 100 icons.
---
The UI on the icon itself in the list views is a little iffy -- mostly, it's too saturated/bold.
I'd ideally like to try either:
- rendering a "shade" version (i.e. lighter, less-saturated color); or
- rendering a "shade" tag with just the icon in it.
However, there didn't seem to be a way to do the first one right now (`fa-example sh-blue` doesn't work) and the second one had weird margins/padding, so I left it like this for now. I figure we can clean it up once we build the thick nav, since that will probably also want an identical element.
(I don't want to render a full tag with the icon + name since I think that's confusing -- it looks like a project/object tag, but is not.)
Test Plan:
{F1049905}
{F1049906}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: 20after4, Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T5819, T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14918
Summary: All classes should extend from some other class. See D13275 for some explanation.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13283
Summary: Fixes T7165. Let users specify a file phid in config, and then use that file via an inline style tag. Also, cache the URI so that we don't have to query the file on every page load.
Test Plan: {F319050}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7165
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11886
Summary:
Fixes T4773. For config settings of type `list<string>`, `set`, or `list<regex>`, the "defaults" table and "examples" aren't always in the same format you should actually use when changing the setting.
This is pretty confusing. Instead, always show the settings in the desired format. For example, if the user should enter a newline-separated list, show them a newline separated list.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `list<string>`, `list<regex>`, and `'set'`; verified all the config had the right example format (most already did).
- Viewed config settings of various kinds, including custom settings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4773
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8725
Summary: Fixes T1812. Moves the internal configuration into public space and documents it.
Test Plan:
- Tried to set it to some invalid stuff.
- Set it to various valid things.
- Browsed around, changed statuses, filtered statuses, viewed statuses, merged duplictes, examined transaction record, created tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8585
Summary:
Ref T1703. This sets the stage for (but does not yet implement) custom UI types for config. In particular, a draggable list for custom fields.
I might make all the builtin types go through this at some point too, but don't really want to bother for the moment. It would be very slightly cleaner but woudn't get us much of anything.
Test Plan:
UI now renders via custom code, although that code does nothing (produces an unadorned text field):
{F45693}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6154
