Summary: For any count fact, allow a chart to be drawn. INCREDIBLY POWERFUL DATA ANALYSIS PLATFORM.
Test Plan: Drew a chart of object counts. Drew the Maniphest burn chart.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1562
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3099
Summary:
...pretty sure the JS is too hack-tastic but it works...! :D
also fixed a small error from assert_instances_of change where a null value is all errors and what have you
Test Plan: played around with tasks in firefox and safari. made cc, owner, and project changes, as well as priority, etc.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2234
Summary:
Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks.
Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used
this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it.
The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish.
Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when
reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks
against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two
tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some
code to deal with this at some point if necessary.
I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all.
(There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header
counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.)
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt
Maniphest Tasks: T859
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731
Summary: I think these are all the actions which make any sense.
Test Plan:
- Performed and verified each action through the batch editor.
- Performed a large batch edit which applied each action type multiple times and verified the aggregate behavior was correct.
Reviewers: btrahan, cpiro
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1971
Summary:
- We incorrectly count resolution changes and other noise as opens / closes.
- Show one graph: open bugs over time (red line minus green line). This and its derivative are the values you actually care about. It is difficult to see the derivative with both lines, but easy with one line.
Test Plan: Looked at burnup chart. Saw charty things. Verified resolution changes no longer make the line move.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T923, T982
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1945
Summary:
- These are still slow, awkward and hideous -- but slightly better than
before.
- Allow "open" reports to be sorted.
- Add a "burn" chart/table for assessing project volatility.
- Add navigation.
Test Plan: Looked at reports.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1737
Summary:
First stab at a batch editor for Maniphest. Basically, you can select a group of
tasks and then import them into the "batch" interface, where you can edit all of
them at once.
High level goal is to make it easier for users in PM/filer/support/QA roles to
deal with large numbers of tasks quickly.
This implementation has a few major limitations:
- The only available actions are "add projects" and "remove projects".
- There is no review / undo / log stuff.
- All the changes are applied in-process, which may not scale terribly well.
However, the immediate need is just around projects and this seemed like a
reasonable place to draw the line for a minimal useful version of the tool.
Test Plan: Used batch editor to add and remove projects from groups of tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan, yairlivne
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, sandra
Maniphest Tasks: T441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1680
Summary: also fixes a small bug where the page title was always "Create Task".
switch it to the header name which is much more descriptive / correct IMO.
Test Plan:
created a new task and watched the description preview update.
edited an old task and saw the description preview populate with the correct
existing data.
edited an old task and edited the description and saw the description preview
update
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1489
Summary:
the details pages are using preload instead of ondemand for
typeahead, but the most common actions on the pages are commenting which
would not need the preloaded info. To improve the performance of the
pages, turn on ondemand according to the setting in the config file.
Test Plan: verify it is working with both modes, for both pages.
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 995
Summary:
Provide a quick workflow for adding a new project. This ended up being sort of
complicated because we don't currently put forms in dialogs. I separated the
actual <form /> tag out of the display/layout of AphrontFormView to enable this
(the dialog is itself a form).
Limitations: if you create a new project and then remove it, it won't appear in
the tokenizer until you reload the page. We need to add the ability for the
datasource to drop its cache to enable this, which is super complicated.
Test Plan:
Used "Create new project" to add a new project when creating a task.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 422
Summary:
Make it discoverable, show uploading progress, show file thumbnails, allow you
to remove files, make it a generic form component.
Test Plan:
Uploaded ducks
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: aran, tomo, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley, tomo
Differential Revision: 334
Summary:
This needs a bunch of UI polish (critically, it's totally undiscoverable) but it
basically works correctly. I'll clean it up in some followups.
Test Plan:
Uploaded some files via drag-and-drop, made comments, etc.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tomo, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: anjali, aran
Differential Revision: 332
Summary:
When a task description is updated, there's currently no way to see the change.
Build an "expanded summary" mode for transactions that shows description change
details. Also include changes in the email.
Test Plan:
Changed task descriptions, clicked "show details", read email.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 320
Summary: When rendering a Maniphest comment preview, also render a preview of the transaction.
Test Plan: tested previews for all transaction types, got reasonable renders
Summary:
Moves shared code from Differential and Maniphest comment previews into
PhabricatorShapedRequest, and then implements Maniphest previews.
This doesn't implement comment drafts, I'll follow up with that but it requires
this and is completely separable.
This also always shows the preview as "commented" rather than previewing the
actual transaction. I'll follow up with that but I think it will require a
little factoring and this is useful even without transaction details.
I need to tweak the styling a bit too.
Test Plan:
Typed text in Maniphest and Differential. Toggled Differential action. Made
comments.
Reviewed By: rm
Reviewers: rm, tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, rm
Differential Revision: 258
Summary:
Javelin is currently embedded in Phabricator via copy-and-paste of prebuilt
packages. This is not so great.
Pull it in as a submodule instead and make all the Phabriator resources declare
proper dependency trees. Add Javelin linting.
Test Plan:
I tried to run through pretty much all the JS functionality on the site. This is
still a high-risk change, but I did a pretty thorough test
Differential: inline comments, revealing diffs, list tokenizers, comment
preview, editing/deleting comments, add review action.
Maniphest: list tokenizer, comment actions
Herald: rule editing, tokenizers, add/remove rows
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: aran, tomo, mroch, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, tomo, epriestley
Differential Revision: 223
