Summary:
Ref T1205. Continuation of D5915.
Currently, `PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail` has //all// the logic for routing mail. In particular:
- New mail receivers in applications must edit it.
- Mail receivers don't drop out when applications are uninstalled.
Applications have some logic in subclasses of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler`, but this class is a bit of a mess. It is also heavily based on the assumption that mail receivers are objects (like revisions), but this is not true in at least two cases today (creating new tasks with `bugs@`, creating a new Conpherence thread) and likely other cases in the future (e.g., revision-by-mail).
Move this logic into a new `PhabricatorMailReceiver` classtree. This is similar to `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` but a bit cleaner and more general. I plan to heavily reduce the responsibilities of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` or possibly eliminate it entirely.
For now, the new classtree doesn't do much of interest. The only behavioral change this diff causes is that Phabricator will now reject mail to an application when that application is uninstalled.
I also moved all the `ReplyHandler` classes into `mail/` directories in their respective applications.
Test Plan: Unit tests, used receive test to route mail to various objects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Afaque_Hussain, edward, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5922
Summary:
Unmuck almost all of the we-sort-of-have-viewers-some-of-the-time mess.
There are a few notable cases here:
- I used Omnipotent users when indexing objects for search. I think this is correct; we do policy filtering when showing results.
- I cheated in a bad way in the Remarkup object rule, but fixing this requires fixing all the PhabricatorRemarkupEngine callsites (there are 85). I'll do that in the next diff.
- I cheated in a few random places, like when sending mail about package edits. These aren't a big deal.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for all PhabricatorObjectHandleData references.
- Gave them viewers.
Reviewers: vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, edward
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5151
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary:
Some e-mail clients display this header and it needs to be constant.
This is somehow involved but I doubt that there is a simpler solution.
Test Plan:
Applied SQL patch.
Commented on revision, commented on commit, changed package.
Verified that the `Thread-Topic` has constant and human readable value.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: ola, aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2745
Summary:
It seems that Outlook and Mail.app mostly ignores the threading headers and thread primarily by subject.
They are also very picky about the Re: part in the header.
I guess that's because users of these clients often hit Reply when they want to create a new message to the sender of an e-mail.
We need both of these applications to work with the same setting because we don't use multiplexing to prevent sending multiple e-mails to people in lists.
I also believe that the default behavior should just work in most setups.
I've tried several different combinations of putting "Re:" and none of them seems to always work in both clients.
This diff at least adds more abstraction to the code which should prevent copy/paste errors (two fixed by this diff!).
Test Plan: Sent several e-mails with varying subject, verified that they look as before in Outlook and Mail.app.
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2709
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
Summary:
For package creation and deletion, send email to all the owners For
package modification, detect important fields such as owners and paths, and then
send out emails to all owners (including deleted owners and current owners)
Also start using transaction for package creation/deletion/modification.
Test Plan:
- tested mail creation and deletion
- tested modification to auditing enabled, primary owners, owners, paths
Reviewers: epriestley, nh, vrana
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: prithvi, aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2470
