Summary:
The highlighting is distracting according to Nick Shrock and others.
Real designer, Lee Byron, helped me with this.
It also gives us unagressive target for jumping to the source line in future.
Another feature I will probably implement is highlighting also the source of copies/moves.
I will use the right side of the left column for it.
Test Plan:
Hover copied notifier.
Hover coverage notifier.
I've also checked that this doesn't break our super-flaky old/new code JavaScript detector.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin, leebyron, schrockn
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2443
Summary:
The older logic was incorrect:
- It chose `change.left` for `data.on_right` being true.
- 'O' and 'N' mean 'old' and 'new', not 'left' and 'right'. In diff-of-diffs, both sides are 'N'.
So, select the changeset ID correctly (pick the right side one for on_right), and select the new file prefix correctly (N for new, O for old).
Test Plan: Waved my mouse over some inline comments in a diff-of-diffs, got reasonable-looking reticles.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1076
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2138
Summary:
It is currently not possible to select source code covered by reticle when creating comment.
This diff hides reticle on mouseout from reply area.
Test Plan:
Hover inline comment, verify that reticle is displayed.
Reply, verify that reticle is displayed when mouseover reply, hidden otherwise.
Repeat for create.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1851
Summary:
The current approach of using a modal overlay dialog to create/edit inline
comments is pretty silly. Use an inline textarea instead.
This element isn't perfect and we have some mild modalness issues, but I think
it's better than the silly thing we've got going on right now. We can keep
poking it as people break it.
Test Plan:
- Created comments; submitted and undid them in empty and nonempty states.
Used undo for nonempty states + cancel.
- Edited comments; saved and canceled them. Used undo for changed state.
- Replied to comments; yada yada as above.
- Deleted comments.
- Did various modal trickery where I clicked "Reply" on something else with a
dialog already up, this very mildly glitches but I think it's not a big issue.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, Makinde, nh
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T431
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1716
Summary:
This code was just all kinds of wrong, but got all the common cases anyone cares
about correct.
- In edit-inline-comments.js, if isOnRight() is true, use data.right, not
data.left (derp).
- Set data.left correctly, not to the same value as data.right (derp derp).
- Set "isNewFile" based on $is_new, not $on_right (derp derp derp).
Test Plan:
- Added JS debugging code to print "OLD" vs "NEW" and "LEFT" vs "RIGHT".
Clicked the left and right sides of diff-vs-base and diff-vs-diff diffs,
verified output was accurate in all cases.
- Added comments to the left-display-side of a diff-of-diffs, saved them, they
showed up where I put them.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1567
Summary:
- Use n/p to jump between comments.
- Use r to reply to the selected comment.
- Use e to edit the selected comment.
Test Plan: Verified n, p, r, e, j, k, J, K, "click edit" and "click reply"
behavior in as many weird cases as I could come up with.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason, nh, cpiro, jl
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T583
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1308
Test Plan:
Go to any diff
Click on a line number with right mouse button
No dialog should be opened
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1150
don't show "Undo"
Summary: When a user hits "Reply" on an inline comment, doesn't type anything,
and then hits "Cancel", we incorrectly store the text of the comment the user is
replying to as the "original" text, and then detect that they've changed it when
they immediately cancel. Instead, store empty string as the original text.
Test Plan:
- Hit "Reply" and then "Cancel" on an inline comment. No undo now.
- Hit "Reply", typed some text, and then hit "Cancel". Got an undo which
restored my text.
Reviewers: tomo, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran, tomo
Differential Revision: 879
Summary:
We use a 'null' row to indicate the element should be appended to the end of the
table (otherwise, it is prepended to the row in question), but also derive the
table from the row. This needs more cleanup in general but fix the immediate
issue at least.
Test Plan:
Added an inline comment to the last line of a file.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 425
Summary:
When a user hits 'cancel' on a 'new', 'edit', or 'reply' operation, add a little
"Changes discarded. __Undo__" insert so they can get their change back. No undo
for delete since there's an explicit prompt. Once this lands we can make
'escape' work again to close dialogs.
This change started feeling really good when I was merging all the duplicate
code and making things more consistent, but by the time I started writing client
rendering it felt gross. I'm not really thrilled with it but I guess it's a step
forward? The feature seems pretty OK in practice. Let me know how much barfing
this causes and I can try to remedy the most acute concerns.
This also fixes a bug where replies always (?) appear on the 'new' side of the
diff (I think?).
Test Plan:
Applied 'new', 'edit', 'delete' and 'reply' operations, pressed 'cancel' and
'okay' in each case, with and without changing text where relevant. All
behaviors seem to conform with expectations, except that canceling out of 'edit'
without changing the text gives you an option to undo when it shouldn't really.
There's no super easy way to get at the original text right now.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: simpkins, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 406
Summary:
Javelin is currently embedded in Phabricator via copy-and-paste of prebuilt
packages. This is not so great.
Pull it in as a submodule instead and make all the Phabriator resources declare
proper dependency trees. Add Javelin linting.
Test Plan:
I tried to run through pretty much all the JS functionality on the site. This is
still a high-risk change, but I did a pretty thorough test
Differential: inline comments, revealing diffs, list tokenizers, comment
preview, editing/deleting comments, add review action.
Maniphest: list tokenizer, comment actions
Herald: rule editing, tokenizers, add/remove rows
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: aran, tomo, mroch, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, tomo, epriestley
Differential Revision: 223
