Summary:
'cuz we need to be phamous!
V1 feature set
- posts
-- standard thing you'd expect - a title and a remarkup-powered body and...
-- "phame" title - a short string that can be used to reference the story. this gets auto-updated when you mess with the title.
-- configuration - for now, do you want Facebook, Disqus or no comments? this is a per-post thing but feeds from an instance-wide configuration
Please do toss out any must have features or changes.
Test Plan: played around with this bad boy like whoa
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T1111
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2202
Summary: In Safari, Firefox and Chrome, respect cursor position and selection ranges.
Test Plan: Dragged-and-dropped files into the middle of text, end of text, and a selected text range in Safari, Firefox and Chrome. Copy/pasted files into similar cases in Chrome. Got expected, normal behavior in all cases.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1016
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2155
Summary:
The older logic was incorrect:
- It chose `change.left` for `data.on_right` being true.
- 'O' and 'N' mean 'old' and 'new', not 'left' and 'right'. In diff-of-diffs, both sides are 'N'.
So, select the changeset ID correctly (pick the right side one for on_right), and select the new file prefix correctly (N for new, O for old).
Test Plan: Waved my mouse over some inline comments in a diff-of-diffs, got reasonable-looking reticles.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1076
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2138
Summary:
various stripe stuff, including
- external stripe library
- payment form
- test controller to play with payment form, sample business logic
My main questions / discussion topics are...
- is the stripe PHP library too big? (ie should I write something more simple just for phabricator?)
-- if its cool, what is the best way to include the client? (ie should I make it a submodule rather than the flat copy here?)
- is the JS I wrote (too) ridiculous?
-- particularly unhappy with the error message stuff being in JS *but* it seemed the best choice given the most juicy error messages come from the stripe JS such that the overall code complexity is lowest this way.
- how should the stripe JS be included?
-- flat copy like I did here?
-- some sort of external?
-- can we just load it off stripe servers at request time? (I like that from the "if stripe is down, stripe is down" perspective)
- wasn't sure if the date control was too silly and should just be baked into the form?
-- for some reason I feel like its good to be prepared to walk away from Stripe / switch providers here, though I think this is on the wrong side of pragmatic
Test Plan: - played around with sample client form
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2096
Summary: I looooove JS! It makes me giddy with glee!
Test Plan: Picked dates. See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2086
Summary:
Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks.
Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used
this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it.
The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish.
Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when
reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks
against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two
tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some
code to deal with this at some point if necessary.
I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all.
(There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header
counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.)
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt
Maniphest Tasks: T859
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731
Summary:
**Who can delete global rules?**: I discussed this with @jungejason. The current behavior is that the rule author or any administrator can delete a global rule, but this
isn't consistent with who can edit a rule (anyone) and doesn't really make much sense (it's an artifact of the global/personal split). I proposed that anyone can delete a
rule but we don't actually delete them, and log the deletion. However, when it came time to actually write the code for this I backed off a bit and continued actually
deleting the rules -- I think this does a reasonable job of balancing accountability with complexity. So the new impelmentation is:
- Personal rules can be deleted only by their owners.
- Global rules can be deleted by any user.
- All deletes are logged.
- Logs are more detailed.
- All logged actions can be viewed in aggregate.
**Minor Cleanup**
- Merged `HomeController` and `AllController`.
- Moved most queries to Query classes.
- Use AphrontFormSelectControl::renderSelectTag() where appropriate (this is a fairly recent addition).
- Use an AphrontErrorView to render the dry run notice (this didn't exist when I ported).
- Reenable some transaction code (this works again now).
- Removed the ability for admins to change rule authors (this was a little buggy, messy, and doesn't make tons of sense after the personal/global rule split).
- Rules which depend on other rules now display the right options (all global rules, all your personal rules for personal rules).
- Fix a bug in AphrontTableView where the "no data" cell would be rendered too wide if some columns are not visible.
- Allow selectFilter() in AphrontNavFilterView to be called without a 'default' argument.
Test Plan:
- Browsed, created, edited, deleted personal and gules.
- Verified generated logs.
- Did some dry runs.
- Verified transcript list and transcript details.
- Created/edited all/any rules; created/edited once/every time rules.
- Filtered admin views by users.
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2040
Summary:
- When an inline comment preview corresponds to an inline comment on the page, link to it. Just punt in the tough case where the inline is on some other page.
- In "haunted" mode, "z" now toggles through three modes: normal, comment area only, and comment + previews.
Test Plan:
- Viewed visible and not-visible inline comment previews, clicked "View" links.
- Tapped "z" a bunch to toggle haunt modes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T517, T214
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2041
Summary: I think these are all the actions which make any sense.
Test Plan:
- Performed and verified each action through the batch editor.
- Performed a large batch edit which applied each action type multiple times and verified the aggregate behavior was correct.
Reviewers: btrahan, cpiro
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1971
Summary:
Depends on D1921. Depends on D1899.
Add the "View Options" dropdown menu to Diffusion, with options like "show standalone", "show raw file", "show all", etc.
Test Plan: Viewed commits in Differential and Diffusion.
Reviewers: davidreuss, nh, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1932
Summary:
Make clicking the link also select the object (this operation is very common). Add an arrow to the left to view the object (this operation is very rare). Increase link target area to the entire cell.
Also simplify some handlers.
Test Plan: Clicked things with wild abandon. Behavior seemed unchanged.
Reviewers: cpiro, btrahan
Reviewed By: cpiro
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1962
Summary:
- We incorrectly count resolution changes and other noise as opens / closes.
- Show one graph: open bugs over time (red line minus green line). This and its derivative are the values you actually care about. It is difficult to see the derivative with both lines, but easy with one line.
Test Plan: Looked at burnup chart. Saw charty things. Verified resolution changes no longer make the line move.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T923, T982
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1945
Summary: This diff is really complicated, only a master programmer like myself could have accomplished it.
Test Plan: derrrrrp
Reviewers: davidreuss, nh, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1936
Summary: Works in Safari, Firefox, Chrome.
Test Plan: Copied some text, threw up a little in my mouth.
Reviewers: aran, tuomaspelkonen, tomo, rstout, btrahan
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran, epriestley, ddfisher
Maniphest Tasks: T145, T995
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D244
Summary:
It is currently not possible to select source code covered by reticle when creating comment.
This diff hides reticle on mouseout from reply area.
Test Plan:
Hover inline comment, verify that reticle is displayed.
Reply, verify that reticle is displayed when mouseover reply, hidden otherwise.
Repeat for create.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1851
Summary:
Resolves T989
- users can now disable the '/' keyboard shortcut which focuses the
search box
- users can now disable the jump nav functionality of the search box
Test Plan:
- verified that the '/' keyboard shortcut works with preference enabled
or unset
- verified that '/' no longer has any effect and disappears from
keyboard shortcuts help overlay with preference disabled
- verified that search boxes have jump nav capabilities with jump nav
functionality preference unset or enabled
- verified that search boxes do not jump with jump nav preference
disabled
- verified that the jump nav still works as a jump nav with jump nav
preference disabled
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: simpkins, aran, epriestley, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T989
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1902
Summary:
I've found it quite confusing that uploading a single image displays the image itself but uploading more images displays My Files.
I've also got a user report about it because most users don't know that they can drop the image directly to the comment textarea and they are interested mainly in the ID of the uploaded file.
Test Plan: Upload a file.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1891
Summary:
- Show a tip in the margin about what coverage colors mean.
- Highlight the line when mousing over coverage.
- Randomly change the colors to different colors.
- Fix a bug with "show more" that I introduced with the other coverage diff (oops!)
Test Plan: Moused over coverage things.
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, btrahan
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T965
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1874
Summary: There are a few things we can improve with tooltips.
Test Plan: Moused over all the stuff on the test page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T965
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1870
Summary:
Currently, we sort all results alphabetically. This isn't ideal. Instead, sort them like this:
- If the viewing user appears in the list, always sort them first. This is common in a lot of contexts and some "Ben Evans" guy is sorting first on secure.phabricator.com and causing me no end of aggravation.
- If the tokens match a "priority" component (e.g., username), sort that before results which do not have a "priority" match.
- Within a group (self, priority, everything else) sort tokens alphabetically.
NOTE: I need to go add setUser() to all the tokenizers to make the "self" rule work, but that's trivial so I figured I'd get this out first.
Test Plan:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/data/4s2a72l5hhyyqqkq4bnd/PHID-FILE-x2r6ubk7s7dz54kxmtwx/Screen_Shot_2012-03-07_at_9.18.03_AM.png
Previously, "aaaaaepriestley" (first alphabetic match) would sort before "epriestley" (the viewing user). Now, "epriestley" sorts first because that is the viewer.
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/data/rmnxgnafz42f23fsjwui/PHID-FILE-yrnn55jl3ysbntldq3af/Screen_Shot_2012-03-07_at_9.18.09_AM.png
Previously, "aaaagopher" (first alphabetic match) would sort before "banana" (the "priority" match). Now, "banana" sorts first because it priority matches on username.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T946
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1807
Summary: Provide a reasonable JS API for the Aphlict client. Provide an example behavior to invoke it.
Test Plan:
Ran "aphlict_server.js" with:
$ sudo node aphlict_server.js
Loaded /aphlict/. Opened console. Got "hello" from the server every second.
Got reasonable errors with the server not present ("Security exception", but this is because it can't connect to port 843 to access the policy server).
Reviewers: ddfisher, keebuhm, allenjohnashton, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T944
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1800
Summary:
- all search boxes are now jump navs (old functionality retained if none
of the jump nav patterns match)
- added global keyboard shortcut '/' to focus the search box in the upper
right
Test Plan:
- pressed '/' and noticed the search box gains keyboard focus
- triggered jump nav functionality from search box and saw it worked
- did a search which did not match a jump nav pattern and saw it worked
(and searched in the selected context)
NOTE: The search box on the /search/ page is also changed to have jump
nav functionality. Old functionality is not impared. Still, this may not
be desirable.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1794
Summary:
- These are still slow, awkward and hideous -- but slightly better than
before.
- Allow "open" reports to be sorted.
- Add a "burn" chart/table for assessing project volatility.
- Add navigation.
Test Plan: Looked at reports.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1737
Test Plan:
Edit inline comment.
Clear its text.
Hit Cancel.
Try to find Undo link on the usual place with no success.
Repeat for same text.
Repeat for different text, this time with success.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1739
Summary:
The current approach of using a modal overlay dialog to create/edit inline
comments is pretty silly. Use an inline textarea instead.
This element isn't perfect and we have some mild modalness issues, but I think
it's better than the silly thing we've got going on right now. We can keep
poking it as people break it.
Test Plan:
- Created comments; submitted and undid them in empty and nonempty states.
Used undo for nonempty states + cancel.
- Edited comments; saved and canceled them. Used undo for changed state.
- Replied to comments; yada yada as above.
- Deleted comments.
- Did various modal trickery where I clicked "Reply" on something else with a
dialog already up, this very mildly glitches but I think it's not a big issue.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, Makinde, nh
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T431
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1716
Summary: Add comment previews and saved drafts to audits, like Maniphest /
Differential.
Test Plan: Typed stuff into the box. Got a preview. Reloaded page. Stuff was
still there. Submitted comment. Stuff is gone.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1699
Summary:
Allows you to write a commit rule that triggers an audit by a user (personal
rules) or a project (global rules).
Mostly this is trying to make auditing more lightweight and accessible in
environments where setting up Owners packages doesn't make sense.
For instance, Disqus wants a rule like "trigger an audit for everything that
didn't have a Differential revision". While not necessarily scalable, this is a
perfectly reasonable rule for a small company, but a lot of work to implement
with Owners (and you'll get a lot of collateral damage if you don't make every
committer a project owner).
Instead, they can create a project called 'Unreviewed Commits' and write a rule
like:
- When: Differential revision does not exist
- Action: Trigger an Audit for project: "Unreviewed Commits"
Then whoever cares can join that project and they'll see those audits in their
queue, and when they approve/raise on commits their actions will affect the
project audit.
Similarly, if I want to look at all commits that match some other rule (say,
XSS) but only want to do it like once a month, I can just set up an audit rule
and go through the queue when I feel like it.
NOTE: This abuses the 'packagePHID' field to also store user and project PHIDs.
Through the magic of handles, this (apparently) works fine for now; I'll do a
big schema patch soon but have several other edits I want to make at the same
time.
Also:
- Adds an "active" fiew for /audit/, eventually this will be like the
Differential "active" view (stuff that is relevant to you right now).
- On commits, highlight triggered audits you are responsible for.
Test Plan: Added personal and global audit triggers to Herald, reparsed some
commits with --herald, got audits. Browsed all audit interfaces to make sure
nothing exploded. Viewed a commit where I was responsible for only some audits.
Performed audits and made sure the triggers I am supposed to be responsible for
updated properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1690
Test Plan:
Go to revision with lots of comments in Firefox.
Click on one of the last three comments permalink.
Repeat in Chrome.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1702
Summary:
First stab at a batch editor for Maniphest. Basically, you can select a group of
tasks and then import them into the "batch" interface, where you can edit all of
them at once.
High level goal is to make it easier for users in PM/filer/support/QA roles to
deal with large numbers of tasks quickly.
This implementation has a few major limitations:
- The only available actions are "add projects" and "remove projects".
- There is no review / undo / log stuff.
- All the changes are applied in-process, which may not scale terribly well.
However, the immediate need is just around projects and this seemed like a
reasonable place to draw the line for a minimal useful version of the tool.
Test Plan: Used batch editor to add and remove projects from groups of tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan, yairlivne
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, sandra
Maniphest Tasks: T441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1680
Summary:
This is so freaking cool that I will try to implement it also on Facebook.
Idea is from
http://strd6.com/2011/09/html5-javascript-pasting-image-data-in-chrome/.
I don't know how to properly detect support but lying about it is not a big
deal.
Test Plan:
Go to revision comment textarea.
Paste some text data - works as usual.
Paste some image data in Chrome - file is uploaded and a link to it is inserted.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1681
Summary:
- Restore quick methods for getting to common features (upload file, create
task, etc.)
- Provide a flexible cli-like navigation element similar to stuff used at
Facebook (bunny1 / lolbunny).
Test Plan: Used jump nav and nav buttons.
Reviewers: btrahan, fratrik
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1619
Summary:
'this._request' was never set so 'waiting' was always false.
Result was that several requests were sent at once which wastes resources and
leads to weird bugs when responses don't arrive in sending order.
Blame Rev: D258
Test Plan:
Write a comment extremely fast, watch for requests sent.
Add sleep(5) for some inputs to DifferentialCommentPreviewController, verify
correct order.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1612
Summary: It makes perfect sense to add more reviewers while requesting review.
Test Plan:
Request review. Verify that Add Reviewers field shows and works.
Add some reviewer. Verify that comment preview works.
Submit. Verify that reviewers are saved and displayed.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1473
Summary:
This code was just all kinds of wrong, but got all the common cases anyone cares
about correct.
- In edit-inline-comments.js, if isOnRight() is true, use data.right, not
data.left (derp).
- Set data.left correctly, not to the same value as data.right (derp derp).
- Set "isNewFile" based on $is_new, not $on_right (derp derp derp).
Test Plan:
- Added JS debugging code to print "OLD" vs "NEW" and "LEFT" vs "RIGHT".
Clicked the left and right sides of diff-vs-base and diff-vs-diff diffs,
verified output was accurate in all cases.
- Added comments to the left-display-side of a diff-of-diffs, saved them, they
showed up where I put them.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1567
Summary: also fixes a small bug where the page title was always "Create Task".
switch it to the header name which is much more descriptive / correct IMO.
Test Plan:
created a new task and watched the description preview update.
edited an old task and saw the description preview populate with the correct
existing data.
edited an old task and edited the description and saw the description preview
update
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1489
Summary:
It is possible to open a file in editor by registering a custom URI scheme
(pseudo-protocol). Some editors register it by default.
Having links to open the file in external editor is productivity booster
although it is a little bit harder to set up.
There are several other tools using file_link_format configuration directive
(XDebug, Symfony) to bind to this protocol.
I've added the example with editor: protocol which can be used as a proxy to
actual editor (used by Nette Framework:
http://wiki.nette.org/en/howto-editor-link).
Test Plan:
Configure Editor Link in User Preferences.
Register URI scheme in OS.
Open a file in Diffusion. Click on the Edit button.
Open a revision in Differential. Click on the Edit button.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1422
Summary:
Added a typeahead in the edit herald rule page that allows an admin or
owner to change the current owner of a rule. If the typeahead is emptied, the
current owner will remain owner.
Test Plan:
Created a test rule. Changed the owner. Deleted the owner in the
typahead. Verified expected behavior.
Reviewers: jungejason, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley, xela
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1322
Summary: The <a href> attribute is useful because user knows where the link goes
before opening it plus he can copy it to the clipboard plus he can add it to the
bookmarks.
Test Plan:
Display revision.
View Options.
Click.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1436
Test Plan:
Open menu for added file
Open menu for deleted file
Open menu for changed file
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1410
Summary: Clicks all the "Show All" links for you at the touch of a button.
Test Plan:
- Used "reveal entire file" on revealable files.
- Opened on already-visible files, got "entire file shown".
- Used other menu options.
- Used normal "show more" links.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, btrahan
Maniphest Tasks: T497
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1331
Summary:
Provide an easy way to jump to Diffusion from Differential if we have
the data we need to connect them.
Test Plan: Tested menu in linked and unlinked diffs. Used menu item.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, btrahan
Maniphest Tasks: T309
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1326
Summary:
When the user loads a page with an anchor on it like #thing, or clicks a link to
#thing, and #thing doesn't exist, keep trying to navigate to #thing for a few
seconds.
This allows anchors to work when the target is in content which is later ajaxed
in. In particular, this affects inline comments in Differential.
Test Plan: Opened inline comment links in a new tab, was in the right place when
I switched tabs.
Reviewers: nh, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T492
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1327
Summary:
There are several open Differential tasks that are basically blocked on not
having reasonable places in the UI to put things. Replace the "View Standalone /
Raw" button with a "View Options" dropdown menu so we can shove things like
"Expand All", "Fold / Unfold File", and "View in Diffusion" in there.
This doesn't change any behavior, just puts the existing options in a menu.
Test Plan:
- Toggled menu open by clicking button.
- Clicked menu items.
- Toggled menu closed by clicking button.
- Toggled menu closed by clicking document.
- Toggled menu closed by opening another menu.
- Toggled menu closed by selecting an item.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan
Maniphest Tasks: T497, T309
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1316
Summary:
- Use n/p to jump between comments.
- Use r to reply to the selected comment.
- Use e to edit the selected comment.
Test Plan: Verified n, p, r, e, j, k, J, K, "click edit" and "click reply"
behavior in as many weird cases as I could come up with.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason, nh, cpiro, jl
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T583
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1308
Summary: Preview of Add Reviewers looks silly without actually showing them
Test Plan:
Go to any diff
Leap into action: Add Reviewers
Add some reviewers
Write some comment
Preview including Added reviewers should be displayed
Change action to Comment
Added reviewers should disappear
Repeat with Add CCs
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, vrana
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1276
Summary: Rate-limit conditions didn't set a new timer. It results in stopping of
periodically updating Preview and also in missing last typed characters in
Preview.
Test Plan:
Go to any diff
Type something really fast in Comment
After finishing typing, whole comment should be displayed in Preview
Insert something without keyboard (e.g. paste with mouse)
Preview should be updated
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1288
Summary:
This is a needlessly confusing/complex feature that I originally wrote sort of
speculativley. I think we can better serve what little need may exist here with
project feeds.
I'm probably going to get rid of or deemphasize "role" too and just add "Join
Project" and "Leave Project" buttons.
Test Plan: Viewed project list, project profile. Edited project profile and
affiliation.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason, zeeg
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan
Maniphest Tasks: T681
Differential Revision: 1228
Test Plan:
Go to any diff
Click on a line number with right mouse button
No dialog should be opened
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1150
Summary: This is sort of silly but maybe useful? The real problem is that there
are like 500k conduit call logs and the real solution to that is better
filtering options, but this seems sort of okay.
Test Plan: Used "[" and "]" to switch between pages on the conduit call log.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason, nh, aran
Reviewed By: nh
CC: aran, nh, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1145
Summary: Provide a dirt-simple working example of client-side templating and
reactive programming.
Test Plan: Load the examples
Reviewers: epriestley, mroch, tomo
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: ide, schrockn, aran, rzadorozny, epriestley
Differential Revision: 908
Summary:
This makes symbol cross-references work in Differential. You need to do a little
legwork but I'll document that once the change has baked for a little while.
Basically:
- Projects are annotated with indexed languages, and "shared library" projects
(for example, symbols in Phabricator should be searched for in Arcanist and
libphutil).
- When we render a changeset, we check if its language is an indexed one. If
it is, we invoke the decorator Javascript.
- The Javascript takes you to a lookup page, which either gives you a list of
matching symbols (if several match) or redirects you instantly to the
definition.
Test Plan: Clicked class and function symbols in a diff, got jumped into
sensible sorts of places in Diffusion.
Reviewers: jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 980
Summary: When the user clicks a crossreference, jump them to symbol lookup
Test Plan: Clicked some crossref symbols
Reviewers: jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: nh
CC: aran, nh, epriestley
Differential Revision: 904
Summary:
the details pages are using preload instead of ondemand for
typeahead, but the most common actions on the pages are commenting which
would not need the preloaded info. To improve the performance of the
pages, turn on ondemand according to the setting in the config file.
Test Plan: verify it is working with both modes, for both pages.
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 995
datasources
Summary:
The open source Phabricator has like 3,500 user accounts now and it takes a
while to pull/render them. Add an option to switch to ondemand for large
installs.
I'll follow up with a patch at some point to address a couple of name things:
- Denormalize last names into a keyed column (although this evidences some
bias toward the western world).
- Force all usernames to lowercase (sorry Girish, Makinde).
Also this patch is so clean it's crazy.
Didn't bother with other object types for now, I'm planning to dedicate a few
days to Projects at some point and I'll flesh out some auxiliary features like
this when I do that.
Test Plan: Switched to ondemand, verified data was queried dynamically. Switched
back, verified data was preloaded.
Reviewers: jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: nh
CC: aran, epriestley, nh
Differential Revision: 923
Summary: See D939. Regardless of what we do there, these will break, and they're
pretty silly anyway (see the giant caveat comments in the second one).
Test Plan: Clicked a direct-jump comment link, did save/cancel for inline
comments.
Reviewers: phil, cpojer, tomo, mroch
Reviewed By: phil
CC: aran, phil
Differential Revision: 940
don't show "Undo"
Summary: When a user hits "Reply" on an inline comment, doesn't type anything,
and then hits "Cancel", we incorrectly store the text of the comment the user is
replying to as the "original" text, and then detect that they've changed it when
they immediately cancel. Instead, store empty string as the original text.
Test Plan:
- Hit "Reply" and then "Cancel" on an inline comment. No undo now.
- Hit "Reply", typed some text, and then hit "Cancel". Got an undo which
restored my text.
Reviewers: tomo, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran, tomo
Differential Revision: 879
Summary:
We don't currently validate CSRF tokens on this workflow. This allows an
attacker to upload arbitrary files on the user's behalf. Although I believe the
tight list of servable mime-types means that's more or less the end of the
attack, this is still a vulnerability.
In the long term, the right solution is probably to pass CSRF tokens on all Ajax
requests in an HTTP header (or just a GET param) or something like that.
However, this endpoint is unique and this is the quickest and most direct way to
close the hole.
Test Plan:
- Drop-uploaded files to Files, Maniphest, Phriction and Differential.
- Modified CSRF vaidator to use __csrf__.'x' and verified uploads and form
submissions don't work.
Reviewers: andrewjcg, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, erling
Commenters: andrewjcg, pedram
CC: aran, epriestley, andrewjcg, pedram
Differential Revision: 758
Summary: -
Test Plan:
This was a pretty straightforward replace. Everything should
be sane.
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: tomo, epriestley, mroch
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 803
Summary: Provide a more coarse keyboard navigation option to jump between files.
Test Plan:
- Used "j" and "k" to jump between changes in files.
- Used "J" and "K" to jump between files.
- Pressed "?" and read help about this.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Commenters: fzamore
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason, fzamore
Differential Revision: 764
Summary:
This gets all the major pieces working. Allows you to drag-and-drop files in
Differential and Phriction, and embed files in remarkup with {Fxxx} references.
See also task.
I'm explicitly not documenting this yet since it's still pretty rough.
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped stuff into Differential and Phriction.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran, tomo
Commenters: tomo
CC: aran, tomo, jungejason
Differential Revision: 674
Summary:
- There's no way you can figure out the ID of a file right now. Expose that
more prominently.
- Put the drag-and-drop uploader on the main page so you don't have to click
through.
- Restore the basic uploader so IE users can theoretically use the suite I
guess? Added author info to basic uploader.
- Show author information in the table.
- Show date information in the table.
- Link file names.
- Rename table for filter views.
- When you upload one file, just jump to it. When you upload multiple files,
jump to your uploads and highlight them.
- Add an "arc download" hint.
Test Plan: Uploaded single files, groups of files, and files via simple
uploader.
Reviewers: codeblock, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Commenters: codeblock
CC: aran, codeblock, epriestley
Differential Revision: 746
Summary:
Currently, you can only edit your own affiliation to projects. Enable users to
be managed in a more reasonable batched way.
I'll lock this down to admins/owners and add a transaction log at some point.
Test Plan: Edited project affiliations. Verified Herald still works.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 677
Summary: When a JX.Request fails, there's no default error handling. Rather than
write some kind of custom stuff, just use JX.Workflow so we get exception
dialogs. We have plans to enhance these anyway (see T302).
Test Plan: Changed the changeset view controller to throw exceptions. Verified I
got un-mysterious exception dialogs when a changeset failed because of an
exception in either initial rendering or after hitting "see more".
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran, tomo
CC: aran, epriestley, tomo
Differential Revision: 679
Summary: Preview Phriction documents as they are edited, similar to how
Differential/Maniphest work.
Test Plan: Mashed my keyboard while editing a Phriction document.
Reviewed By: hsb
Reviewers: hsb, codeblock, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, hsb
Differential Revision: 684
Summary:
We currently cycle CSRF tokens every hour and check for the last two valid ones.
This means that a form could go stale in as little as an hour, and is certainly
stale after two.
When a stale form is submitted, you basically get a terrible heisen-state where
some of your data might persist if you're lucky but more likely it all just
vanishes. The .js file below outlines some more details.
This is a pretty terrible UX and we don't need to be as conservative about CSRF
validation as we're being. Remedy this problem by:
- Accepting the last 6 CSRF tokens instead of the last 1 (i.e., pages are
valid for at least 6 hours, and for as long as 7).
- Using JS to refresh the CSRF token every 55 minutes (i.e., pages connected
to the internet are valid indefinitely).
- Showing the user an explicit message about what went wrong when CSRF
validation fails so the experience is less bewildering.
They should now only be able to submit with a bad CSRF token if:
- They load a page, disconnect from the internet for 7 hours, reconnect, and
submit the form within 55 minutes; or
- They are actually the victim of a CSRF attack.
We could eventually fix the first one by tracking reconnects, which might be
"free" once the notification server gets built. It will probably never be an
issue in practice.
Test Plan:
- Reduced CSRF cycle frequency to 2 seconds, submitted a form after 15
seconds, got the CSRF exception.
- Reduced csrf-refresh cycle frequency to 3 seconds, submitted a form after 15
seconds, got a clean form post.
- Added debugging code the the csrf refresh to make sure it was doing sensible
things (pulling different tokens, finding all the inputs).
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 660
Summary:
See T303. Enable comment panel haunting.
I hid the preview for the sticky panel, which I think is reasonable?
Test Plan:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/view/PHID-FILE-64713fa8a7c2a22e5b93/
Reviewed By: broofa
Reviewers: broofa, jungejason, aran, tomo, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, broofa
Differential Revision: 615
Summary:
We currently have only an "Add reviewers" action, add "Add CCs". This can also
be accomplished less-discoverably with mentions.
Test Plan:
Added reviewers and CCs to revisions. Toggled display between reviewers and CCs.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: tomo, mroch, jsp, jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 521
Summary:
This ended up being pretty hard to see, make it a bit easier.
Test Plan:
Focused things using the keyboard reticle.
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: tomo, moskov, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, tomo
Differential Revision: 483
Summary:
Permit "j" and "k" to cycle through individual changeblocks, similar to how this
feature works in ReviewBoard. This still needs a bunch of refinement but it's
getting closer to being useful.
Also moved reticle underneath the table so you can click links through it (derp
derp).
Test Plan:
Used "j" and "k" to cycle through individual changes.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: moskov, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 426
Summary:
Allow duplicate tasks to be selected and merged in Maniphest.
I didn't create a separate transaction type for this because that implies a
bunch of really complicated rules which I don't want to sort out right now
(e.g., do we need to do cycle detection for merges? If so, what do we do when we
detect a cycle?) since I think it's unnecessary to get right for the initial
implementation (my Tasks merge implementation was similar to this and worked
quite well) and if/when we eventually need the metadata to be available in a
computer-readable form that need should inform the implementation.
Plenty of room for improvement here, of course.
Test Plan:
Merged duplicate tasks, tried to perform invalid merge operations (e.g., merge a
task into itself).
Tested existing attach workflows (task -> revision, revision -> task).
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: anjali, aran
Differential Revision: 459
Summary:
Some day, maybe close the existing dialog too but there's no public method on
JX.Workflow for that right now.
Test Plan:
Hit "??????", then "esc", got back to the page instead of just popping a deep
stack.
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: tomo
CC: aran, tomo
Differential Revision: 450
errors.
Summary:
Make sure reviewers know what they are doing.
Test Plan:
Tested with different diffs that had lint and unit problems.
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: epriestley, jungejason
CC: grglr, aran, epriestley, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 432
Summary:
Provide a quick workflow for adding a new project. This ended up being sort of
complicated because we don't currently put forms in dialogs. I separated the
actual <form /> tag out of the display/layout of AphrontFormView to enable this
(the dialog is itself a form).
Limitations: if you create a new project and then remove it, it won't appear in
the tokenizer until you reload the page. We need to add the ability for the
datasource to drop its cache to enable this, which is super complicated.
Test Plan:
Used "Create new project" to add a new project when creating a task.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 422
Summary:
Addon that allows you to create a live countdown page to
some event.
Here is the ticket that this code is based on
https://secure.phabricator.com/T36
Test Plan:
Tested by manually setting dates in the timer.js file and
checking if they made sense.
I'm not sure if it works across different timezones though.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC:
Differential Revision: 436
Summary:
We use a 'null' row to indicate the element should be appended to the end of the
table (otherwise, it is prepended to the row in question), but also derive the
table from the row. This needs more cleanup in general but fix the immediate
issue at least.
Test Plan:
Added an inline comment to the last line of a file.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 425
Summary:
ReviewBoard has a fancier version of this feature that's more granular -- the
keyboard can focus on individual changes. I think that's good and intend to
implement something similar, but this gets us a step closer and gets rid of some
of the bookkeeping stuff like making shortcuts discoverable.
(I have another brnach with Maniphest merging which also uses fatcow icons,
which is why the README seems a little out of context.)
Test Plan:
Used "j" and "k" to jump between changesets. Pressed "?" and got a list of
available shortcuts.
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: moskov, aran, epriestley, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 412
Summary:
When a user hits 'cancel' on a 'new', 'edit', or 'reply' operation, add a little
"Changes discarded. __Undo__" insert so they can get their change back. No undo
for delete since there's an explicit prompt. Once this lands we can make
'escape' work again to close dialogs.
This change started feeling really good when I was merging all the duplicate
code and making things more consistent, but by the time I started writing client
rendering it felt gross. I'm not really thrilled with it but I guess it's a step
forward? The feature seems pretty OK in practice. Let me know how much barfing
this causes and I can try to remedy the most acute concerns.
This also fixes a bug where replies always (?) appear on the 'new' side of the
diff (I think?).
Test Plan:
Applied 'new', 'edit', 'delete' and 'reply' operations, pressed 'cancel' and
'okay' in each case, with and without changing text where relevant. All
behaviors seem to conform with expectations, except that canceling out of 'edit'
without changing the text gives you an option to undo when it shouldn't really.
There's no super easy way to get at the original text right now.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: simpkins, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 406
Summary:
This simplifies it a lot and prevents it from spazzing out when some control is
foucsed.
Test Plan:
Hit "?", "`".
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran
Differential Revision: 410
Summary: Implements a simple infrastructure for keyboard shortcuts, see T184, and a "help" shortcut.
There's a lot of room for refinement here but I think it basically works. Each shortcut can also provide a "tooltip" handler which allows it to show help when the alt/option key is held down.
Test Plan: Pressed "?" and got help. Pressed "?" in various contexts where it should not activate (modifier keys, text input focused) and didn't get help.
Reviewers: aran, tuomaspelkonen, jungejason
CC: moskov
Differential Revision: 362
Summary:
Allows you to link to comments with "D123#3" or "T123#3", then adds a pile of JS
to try to make it not terrible. :/
The thing I'm trying to avoid here is when someone says "look at this!
http://blog.com/#comment-239291" and you click and your browser jumps somewhere
random and you have no idea which comment they meant. Since I really hate this,
I've tried to avoid it by making sure the comment is always highlighted.
Test Plan:
Put T1#1 and D1#1 in remarkup and verified they linked properly.
Clicked anchors on individual comments.
Faked all comments hidden in Differential and verified they expanded on anchor
or anchor change.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, tomo, mroch, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 383
Summary:
Make it discoverable, show uploading progress, show file thumbnails, allow you
to remove files, make it a generic form component.
Test Plan:
Uploaded ducks
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: aran, tomo, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley, tomo
Differential Revision: 334
Summary:
It was possible to submit a comment multiple times if the submit
button was pressed more than once quickly. Added javascript code
that disables the button when it is clicked.
Test Plan:
Tried to click the button multiple times very quickly, but the
button was disabled after the first click.
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: epriestley, jungejason
Commenters: aran
CC: aran, epriestley, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 337
Summary:
We hit this very short (1s) timeout when the browser chooses to resolve all the
diff requests before the preview request. In the long term we could start the
preview request only after all the diff requests resolve, but this solves the
issue for now and there's no reason for such a short timeout.
The historical reason to have this timeout at all is that intern was megaflaky
and that's no longer a problem.
Test Plan:
Faked it so it would use a 1ms timeout the first time and then a 20s timeout;
got reasonable behavior.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran
Differential Revision: 329
Summary:
This needs a bunch of UI polish (critically, it's totally undiscoverable) but it
basically works correctly. I'll clean it up in some followups.
Test Plan:
Uploaded some files via drag-and-drop, made comments, etc.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tomo, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: anjali, aran
Differential Revision: 332
